scholarly journals Propensity Score Analysis with Survey Weighted Data

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Ridgeway ◽  
Stephanie Ann Kovalchik ◽  
Beth Ann Griffin ◽  
Mohammed U. Kabeto

AbstractPropensity score analysis (PSA) is a common method for estimating treatment effects, but researchers dealing with data from survey designs are generally not properly accounting for the sampling weights in their analyses. Moreover, recommendations given in the few existing methodological articles on this subject are susceptible to bias. We show in this article through derivation, simulation, and a real data example that using sampling weights in the propensity score estimation stage and the outcome model stage results in an estimator that is robust to a variety of conditions that lead to bias for estimators currently recommended in the statistical literature. We highly recommend researchers use the more robust approach described here. This article provides much needed rigorous statistical guidance for researchers working with survey designs involving sampling weights and using PSAs.

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117863021983697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashis Talukder ◽  
Najiba Akter ◽  
Taslim Sazzad Mallick

In this article, relationship between respondents’ height and occurrence of diabetes has been investigated. This study uses Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2011 data collected from an observational study. Considering height (tall/normal/short) based on percentiles separately for men and women, logistic regression model was fitted to the propensity score (PS)-adjusted weighted data. No significant relationship between respondents’ height and diabetes was observed. We also found that the occurrence of diabetes significantly varies with respect to sex, education level, wealth index, body mass index (BMI), and region/division. As, in general, women are shorter than men by nature, we strongly argue that height categories should be defined separately whenever estimation of the effect of height on some response is of interest.


2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. Smith ◽  
Kate L. Lapane ◽  
Mary L. Fennell ◽  
Edward A. Miller ◽  
Vincent Mor

Author(s):  
Liang Li ◽  
Tom Greene

AbstractPropensity score (PS) matching is widely used for studying treatment effects in observational studies. This article proposes the method of matching weights (MWs) as an analog to one-to-one pair matching without replacement on the PS with a caliper. Compared with pair matching, the proposed method offers more efficient estimation, more accurate variance calculation, better balance, and simpler asymptotic analysis. A statistical test for the misspecification of the PS model is proposed for balance checking purposes. An augmented version of the MW estimator is developed that has the double robust property, that is, the estimator is consistent, if either the outcome model or the PS model is correct. The proposed method is studied in simulations and illustrated through a real data example.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (01) ◽  
pp. E2-E89
Author(s):  
M Giesler ◽  
D Bettinger ◽  
M Rössle ◽  
R Thimme ◽  
M Schultheiss

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document