A non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial comparing Unani formulations & PUVAsol in non-segmental vitiligo

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazim Husain ◽  
Qamar Uddin ◽  
Munawwar Husain Kazmi ◽  
Mohd Khalid
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Safety Parameters ◽  
Scoring Index

Abstract Objectives Greco-Arab medicine is an ancient system of medicine with greater treasure on therapeutics of vitiligo. The trial Unani formulations have not been scientifically explored for their safety and efficacy, but have been repeatedly prescribed by the great Unani physicians in the management of Baraṣ (vitiligo). Hence, these interventions were selected for the trial. Methods In this randomized, controlled, open-label clinical trial, 82 participants with non-segmental vitiligo aged 18–40 years were block randomized to either receive Unani interventions or control for 16 weeks. Out of 82 participants, 42 were randomized to the Unani group and 40 were randomized to the control group. The primary outcome measure was change in vitiligo area scoring index (VASI), which was assessed on weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16. The secondary outcome measures included the patient’s global assessment on VAS and investigator’s global assessment based on photographic evaluation at baseline and after the treatment. Safety parameters included hemogram, LFTs, RFTs, CXR, ECG, urine, and stool examinations, which were evaluated at baseline and after the treatment. Results The per-protocol analysis was done on 30 participants in each group and the response in Unani group was not inferior to those receiving control group. The mean ± SD of vitiligo area scoring index (VASI) decreased from 4.09 ± 2.87 and 5.50 ± 5.73 at baseline to 3.13 ± 2.20 and 4.29 ± 4.95 at the end of the trial in both the Unani and control groups respectively. Conclusions The study inferred that both the interventions are equally effective and well-tolerated in patients with non-segmental vitiligo.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Prophylaxis of Vestibular Migraine: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianye Hu ◽  
Hantong Hu ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
Bin Jiang ◽  
Fengfei Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Vestibular Migraine ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Introduction: With a high incidence rate and low diagnosis rate, vestibular migraine (VM) can seriously affect the quality of life of patients, but it remains difficult to manage by current treatment options. Acupuncture may be a potential treatment option for VM prophylaxis, but the currently available evidence is still uncertain. Therefore, this trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for VM prophylaxis.Methods: This is a 28-week parallel, randomized, controlled clinical trial including 4 weeks of baseline, 8 weeks of treatment, and 16 weeks of follow-up. A total of 72 participants will be randomly assigned to two groups. The participants will receive acupuncture in the experimental group, while the participants in the control group will be treated with venlafaxine. The primary outcome measures are change in vertigo/migraine days and vertigo/migraine attacks, vertigo severity, and migraine intensity per 4 weeks from baseline. The secondary outcome measures are change in doses of rescue medication, anxiety level, depression level, and quality of life per 4 weeks from baseline. Adverse events will be recorded for safety evaluation.Discussion: This study will investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for VM prophylaxis. The results will contribute to determining whether acupuncture can serve as an optional treatment strategy for treating VM.Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT0464088.

scholarly journals Baidu Jieduan granule, traditional Chinese medicine, in the treatment of moderate coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Qin Xie ◽  
Xiaoming Xu ◽  
Shuting Sun ◽  
Tian Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: Currently, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is continuously and rapidly circulating, resulting in serious and extensive impact on human health. Due to the absence of antiviral medicine for COVID-19 thus far, it is desperately need to develop the effective medicine. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been widely applied in the treatment of epidemic diseases in China, hoping to produce clinical efficacy and decrease the use of antibiotics and glucocorticoid. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Baidu Jieduan granule in curing COVID-19. Methods/design: This multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial is conducted 300 cases with COVID-19. The patients will be randomly (1:1) divided into treatment group or control group. All cases will receive standard therapy at the same time. The experiment group will receive Baidu Jieduan granule treatment twice a day for 14 days. The outcomes are assessed at baseline and at 3, 5, 7, 14 days after treatment initiation. The primary outcome is the rate of symptom (fever, fatigue, and coughing) recovery. Adverse events (AEs) will be monitored throughout the trial.Discussion: The study will provide a high-quality clinical evidence to support the efficacy and safety of Baidu Jieduan granule in treatment of moderate COVID-19, and also enrich the theory and practice of TCM in treating COVID-19. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000029869. Registered on 15 February 2020

Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine in COVID-2019: A Study Protocol for an Open-Label, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Congcong Zeng ◽  
Zhengzhong Yuan ◽  
Xiaoqiong Pan ◽  
Jizhou Zhang ◽  
Jiahui Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Lung Injury Score ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Introduction: The outbreak of a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and associated COVID-19 disease in late December 2019 has led to a global pandemic. It directly leads to high morbidity and mortality, but also results in a devastating effect on the global economy. Unfortunately, there are no effective therapies or vaccines for it. Hence, we designed a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine for treating patients with COVID-19.Methods and analysis: This is an open-label, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. One hundred and twelve patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 will be randomly assigned to the experimental or the control group in an equal ratio. The patients in control group will accept routine supportive clinically care including the therapies of anti-viral, anti-bacterial and ameliorating the related symptoms, while patients in the experimental group will be asked to take traditional Chinese medicine depending on the different stages of the disease for consecutive 14 days in addition to supportive care. All data will be gathered at baseline and on days 3, 7, 10 and 14. The primary outcome measures will be the time of Reverse Transcription PCR testing of respiratory tract sample turns to be negative. Secondary outcome measures will include Murray lung injury score, MuLBSTA score and TCM ( Traditional Chinese Medicine ) Syndrome Scoring System. A laboratory test will be taken before and after treatment to assess the safety of TCM.Discussion: The study may help to identify the the efficacy and safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine in treating COVID-2019.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000030759.Registered on March 13th 2020-Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/.

An open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial to explore the curative effects between the treatment of capecitabine and andrographolide and the single capecitabine in the patients with pathological and/or histologic diagnosed unresectable, advanced, recurrent, and metastatic colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS819-TPS819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongqian Shu ◽  
Jing Sun ◽  
Peifen Cai ◽  
Weicheng Wang ◽  
Xiao Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Target Therapy ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled

TPS819 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed solid tumors worldwide. Current therapies for the treatment of CRC mainly comprise fluoropyromidine-based chemotherapies that are used individually or in combination with oxaliplatin or/with target therapy. Andrographolide, a natural diterpenoid from Andrographispaniculata, has been reported to exert antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammation and neuroprotectiveactivities. Our previous studies have proved that Andrographolide can inhibit tumor growth in mice at a relatively high dose(about 200 mg/kg).The aim of the study is to make a comparison of PFS, RR, and OS of the elderly CRC between the treatment of xeloda and andrographolide and the signal xeloda.We look forward to these findings highlight the potential possibility of using this natural, safe and relatively inexpensivecompound as potential adjunctive treatments in improving the overall treatment response of patients with CRC in future. Methods: This is an open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients older than or equal to 65, by pathological and/or histologic diagnosed unresectable, advanced, recurrent andmetastatic CRC, will be enrolled. These patients’ tumors must be clearly measured by radiographic technology. All cases of chemotherapy patients randomly divided into two groups, experimental group (xeloda with andrographolide): xeloda: 1250mg/m2 , po bid, d1–14, q3w; andrographolide: 500mg, ivd qd, d1–14, q3w; control group (xeloda): 1250mg/m2, po bid, d1–14, q3w, 21d/cycle. After each 2 cycles, patients will be examined by imageological tests (CT and/or MRI) or tumour biomarkers (CEA and CA199) to estimate the curative effects. Until the tumor progression or after 6 cycles, patients will be removed from this study. PFS is set as the primary endpoint while secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Recruitment has begun in Jan 2014 and about 52 patients has joined this study. Clinical trial information: NCT01993472.

scholarly journals Baidu Jieduan granules, traditional Chinese medicine, in the treatment of moderate coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): study protocol for an open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Qin Xie ◽  
Xiaoming Xu ◽  
Shuting Sun ◽  
Tian Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Chinese Medicine ◽  
Traditional Chinese Medicine ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background Currently, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is continuously and rapidly circulating, resulting in serious and extensive effects on human health. Due to the absence of antiviral medicine for COVID-19 thus far, there is a desperate need to develop effective medicine. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been widely applied in the treatment of epidemic diseases in China, with the aim of achieving clinical efficacy and decreasing the use of antibiotics and glucocorticoids. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Baidu Jieduan granules in treating COVID-19. Methods/design This multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial will be conducted in 300 patients with COVID-19. The patients will be randomly (1:1) divided into a treatment group and a control group. All patients will receive standard therapy at the same time. Patients in the experimental group will receive Baidu Jieduan granule treatment twice a day for 14 days. The outcomes will be assessed at baseline and at 3, 5, 7 and 14 days after treatment initiation. The primary outcome will be the rate of symptom (fever, fatigue and coughing) recovery. Adverse events (AEs) will be monitored throughout the trial. Discussion The study will provide high-quality clinical evidence to support the efficacy and safety of Baidu Jieduan granules in the treatment of moderate COVID-19, and enrich the theory and practice of TCM in treating COVID-19. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000029869. Registered on 15 February 2020

scholarly journals Baidu Jieduan Granule in the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19): Study Protocol for an Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Qin Xie ◽  
Xiaoming Xu ◽  
Shuting Sun ◽  
Tian Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Epidemic Diseases

Abstract Background: Currently, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is continuously and rapidly circulating, resulting in serious and extensive impact on human health. Due to the absence of antiviral medicine for COVID-19 thus far, it is desperately need to develop the effective medicine. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been widely applied in the treatment of epidemic diseases in China, hoping to produce clinical efficacy and decrease the use of antibiotics and glucocorticoid. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Baidu Jieduan Granule in curing COVID-19. Methods/design: This multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial is conducted 300 cases with COVID-19. The patients will be randomly (1:1) divided into treatment group or control group. All cases will receive standard therapy at the same time. The experiment group will receive Baidu Jieduan Granule treatment twice a day for 14 days. The outcomes are assessed at baseline and at 3, 5, 7, 14 days after treatment initiation. The primary outcome is the rate of symptom (fever, fatigue, and coughing) recovery. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the trial.Discussion: The study will provide a high-quality clinical evidence to support the efficacy and safety of Baidu Jieduan Granule in treatment of severe COVID-19, and also enrich the theory and practice of TCM in treating COVID-19. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000029869. Registered on 15 February 2020

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Guhong injection for treating the Coronary microvascular disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieqin Zhuang ◽  
Shuling Liu ◽  
Hairong Cai ◽  
Xingzhen Dai ◽  
Yanhong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Microvascular Disease ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: Coronary microvascular disease (CMVD) refers to cardiovascular diseases with normal coronary angiography but evidence of myocardial ischemia or microcirculation lesions, often presenting as angina pectoris attack. Coronary artery of microtubules dysfunction is one of the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease,but the occurrence and development and the current of CMVD intervention therapy remains to be further researched.Chinese traditional medicine (TCM)has advantages in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, therefore, this article describes an ongoing randomized controlled clinical trial, based on the theory of TCM, for the purpose of evaluating the efficacy and safety of Guhong injection ,a Chinese patent medicine,compared with placebo in patients suffering from CMVD. Methods/design: This is a multicenter, randomized, parallel arm, open-label, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 260 eligible patients will be allocated and randomly assigned, in a ratio of 1:1, to either the experimental group or the control group. The treatment course is 10 consecutive days, with a 8-week follow-up. The primary outcome is the frequency of angina attacks, Secondary outcomes include myocardial metabolites, ecg changes, quantitative score of TCM syndromes, inflammatory response and endothelial function indicators. Discussion: This trial is strictly designed in accordance with principles and regulations issued by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA). The results will provide high quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of Guhong injection in the treatment of CMVD. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR1900022902. Registered on 27 April 2019.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and Safety of Niclosamaide as Add-on Therapy to the Standard of Care Measures in COVID-19 Management: Randomized controlled clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed S. Abdulamir ◽  
Faiq I. Gorial ◽  
Sattar J Saaedi ◽  
Mohammed Fauzi Maulood ◽  
Hashim Ali Hashim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antiviral Effect ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Experimental Group

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has ignited the urge for repurposing old drugs as candidate antiviral medicines to treat novel challenges of viral infections. Niclosamide (NCS) is an anti-parasitic drug of known antiviral potential. Therefore, this study attempts to investigate the antiviral effect and safety of NCS on SARS-CoV-2 caused COVID-19 patients. Methods: Randomized controlled open label clinical trial encompassed 75 COVID-19 patients treated with standard of care plus NCS were included as experimental group and 75 COVID-19 patients treated with only standard of care therapy as control group. Each group was composed of 25 mild, 25 moderate and 25 severe patients. Survival rate, time to recovery, and side effects were the main endpoints for the assessment of the therapeutic effect and safety of NCS. Results: NCS did not enhance survival rate as three of severe COVID-19 patients in NCS and in control groups died (P>0.05). However, NCS, compared to control group, reduced the time to recovery in moderate and severe COVID-19 patients about 5 and 3 days, respectively but not in mild patients (P≤0.05). Most interestingly, NCS lowered time to recovery up to five days in patients with co-morbidities (P≤0.05) whereas only one day lowered in patients without co-morbidities (P>0.05). Conclusion: It is concluded that NCS accelerates time to recovery about 3 to 5 days in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients especially those with co-morbidities; hence, NCS is of clinical benefit for freeing hospital beds for more patients in pandemic crisis.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of oral hydroxyurea in transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia: a protocol for randomised double-blind controlled clinical trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e041958
Author(s):  
Nirmani Yasara ◽  
Nethmi Wickramarathne ◽  
Chamila Mettananda ◽  
Aresha Manamperi ◽  
Anuja Premawardhena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Fetal Haemoglobin

IntroductionDespite being one of the first diseases to be genetically characterised, β-thalassaemia remains a disorder without a cure in a majority of patients. Most patients with β-thalassaemia receive only supportive treatment and therefore have a poor quality of life and shorter life spans. Hydroxyurea, which has shown to induce fetal haemoglobin synthesis in human erythroid cells, is currently recommended for the treatment of sickle cell disease. However, its clinical usefulness in transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia is unclear. Here, we present a protocol for a randomised double-blind controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral hydroxyurea in transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia.Methods and analysisThis single-centre randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial is conducted at the Thalassaemia Centre of Colombo North Teaching Hospital, Ragama, Sri Lanka. Adult and adolescent patients with haematologically and genetically confirmed transfusion-dependent β-thalassaemia are enrolled and randomised into the intervention or control group. The intervention group receives oral hydroxyurea 10–20 mg/kg daily for 6 months, while the control group receives a placebo which is identical in size, shape and colour to hydroxyurea without its active ingredient. Transfused blood volume, pretransfusion haemoglobin level, fetal haemoglobin percentage and adverse effects of treatment are monitored during treatment and 6 months post-treatment. Cessation or reduction of blood transfusions during the treatment period will be the primary outcome measure. The statistical analysis will be based on intention to treat.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee of Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya (P/116/05/2018) and the trial is approved by the National Medicinal Regulatory Authority of Sri Lanka. Results of the trial will be disseminated in scientific publications in reputed journals.Trial registration numberSLCTR/2018/024; Pre-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document