scholarly journals Evaluation of laparoscopic appendectomy proficiency in the management of acute appendicitis based on anatomy and pathologies

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 551-559
Author(s):  
Suhel Najjar ◽  
Jawher Aumer ◽  
Paiman Muhamad
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Evaluation Studies ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Pelvic Hematoma ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
Significant Superiority

Background and objective: Laparoscopic appendectomy entered a controversial dilemma for choosing a perfect approach for appendectomy. Evaluation studies may resolve this controversy. This study aimed to evaluate laparoscopic appendectomy proficiency depending on anatomy and pathology. Methods: A total of 148cases managed by laparoscopic appendectomy were studied from 2014 to 2015.These cases were diagnosed clinically and by investigations. Parameters studied were operation duration, conversion rate, complications, associated pathology, rehabilitation, and histopathology. Results: By laparoscopy, the anatomical position of the appendix was easily recognized in 83.78%of cases, while the position of 16.22 %of cases was difficult because of the hidden appendix by adhesions, complications, and technical causes. The operation duration ranged between 34 and 60 minutes. Associated pathologies were demonstrated in 8% of cases. Regarding discharge from the hospital, 30% were on the same day, 50% on the first postoperative day, and 20% on the second postoperative day. Postoperative complications were 3% due to pelvic hematoma, port site infection, and bleeding. Postoperative pain was experienced in 3% of cases. The conversion rate was 4.7%. Rehabilitation was within 8-10 days. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and suitable for various anatomical positions of the inflamed appendix, suspicious, hidden, and in the presence of other pathologies with a properly placed port can play diagnostic and therapeutic roles. Significant superiority of laparoscopic appendectomy was observed in this study for the management of acute appendicitis and its pathological consequences. The conversion rate was 4.7% due to other pathologies. Keywords: Laparoscopic; Appendectomy; Anatomy; Pathology.

scholarly journals Primerjava laparoskopske apendektomije pri enostavnem in zapletenem vnetju slepiča

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matjaž Križaj ◽  
Erik Štrumbelj ◽  
Stanislav Mahne
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Early Postoperative Complications ◽  
Stump Closure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Diagnostic Modalities

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has been gaining ground as a gold standard for the treatment of acute appendicitis. For complex inflammation there is no common opinion. A higher conversion rate, longer operative time, higher incidence of abscess formation and longer hospitalization are being reported. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic modalities, treatment and postoperative complications in uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.Methods: In our institution laparoscopic appendectomy is the method of choice for the treatment of every type of appendicitis. In our retrospective analysis, all patients with acute appendicitis operated on in the years 2013 and 2014 were included. Among 273 patients, 19 were excluded due to primary open procedure and one who underwent revision surgery for other disease and had appendectomy performed. In 253 patients we observed the proportion of the postoperative complications in uncomplicated and complicated cases with respect to patients’ age, period of the year, duration of hospital stay, diagnostic modalities, drainage of the abdominal cavity, conversion rate and stump closure.Results: The analysis showed a steep increase of complicated appendicitis in elderly population, but there were no significant differences regarding period of the year (χ2 test, p = 0.158). The hospital stay was longer in complicated cases (5.94 days v. 3.049 days). When a preoperative CT scan was performed, cases were more often complicated (CT 0.654, no CT 0.229; χ2 test, p < 0.001), as was the proportion of drain insertions during surgery (0.5490 v. 0.065; χ2 test, p < 0.001). The proportion of clips for the stump closure was higher in the uncomplicated group (0.717 v. 0.521; χ2 test, p = 0.005). The rate of early postoperative complications and conversion rate revealed no significant difference.Conclusions: We have found out there is a difference in diagnostic modalities and treatment options in uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, but no significant difference in the conversion rate and early postoperative complications. Our analysis suggests that laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe method in all types of appendicitis.

scholarly journals Unligature method of laparoscopic appendectomy in children

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav G. Svarich ◽  
Evgeniy G. Perevozchikov ◽  
Ilya M. Kagantsov
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Inflammatory Infiltration ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Clinical Hospital ◽  
Digital Assessment

Aim. On the basis of the accumulated clinical material to show the possibility of a ligature-free method of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Materials and methods. From 2000 to 2019, 2044 children with acute appendicitis were treated in the surgical department of the Republican childrens clinical hospital in Syktyvkar. Of these, 651 patients had an open appendectomy with treatment of the stump of the vermiform process by the submersible method, 1363 children had a laparoscopic appendectomy with ligature treatment of the stump of the process, and 32 patients had their first non-ligature laparoscopic appendectomy with the intersection of the vermiform process with the Ligasure device. Results. On average, surgery for ligature-free laparoscopic appendectomy lasted 7 3 minutes less than for laparoscopic appendectomy using the ligature method for treating the stump of the worm-like process. Experimentally, it was found that this method of appendectomy should not be used when the thickness of the worm-like process is more than 1.5 cm, with pronounced inflammatory infiltration of the caecum dome and perforation at the base of the process. With ligature-free appendectomy, the operation time was reduced. In the period from 1 to 6 months, there were no intra-abdominal postoperative complications associated with the new method of surgery. Conclusion. Ligar-free laparoscopic appendectomy in children using modern high-energy platforms with a digital assessment of the degree of tissue coagulation readiness made it possible to avoid intraoperative and postoperative complications, simplify the technique of its implementation, and reduce the time of surgery.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Appendectomy Trends and Outcomes in the United States: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004–2011

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1074-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Masoomi ◽  
Ninh T. Nguyen ◽  
Matthew O. Dolich ◽  
Steven Mills ◽  
Joseph C. Carmichael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is becoming the standard procedure of choice for appendicitis. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and trends of LA for acute appendicitis in the United States and to compare outcomes of LA with open appendectomy (OA). Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we examined patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 2004 to 2011. A total of 2,593,786 patients underwent appendectomy during this period. Overall, the rate of LA was 60.5 per cent (children: 58.1%; adults: 63%; elderly: 48.7%). LA rate significantly increased from 43.3 per cent in 2004 to 75 per cent in 2011. LA use increased 66 per cent in nonperforated appendicitis versus 100 per cent increase in LA use for perforated appendicitis. The LA rate increased in all age groups. The increased LA use was more significant in male patients (84%) compared with female patients (62%). The overall conversion rate of LA to OA was 6.3 per cent. Compared with OA, LA had a significantly lower complication rate, a lower mortality rate, a shorter mean hospital stay, and lower mean total hospital charges in both nonperforated and perforated appendices. LA has become an established procedure for appendectomy in nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in all rates exceeding OA. Conversion rate is relatively low (6.3%).

scholarly journals Irrigation Versus Suction Alone During Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Tae Gyeong Lee ◽  
Soomin Nam ◽  
Hyung Soon Lee ◽  
Jin Ho Lee ◽  
Young Ki Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis

Purpose: To compare the surgical outcomes of peritoneal irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy and to identify the risk factors of surgical site infection in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.Methods: Data from patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis between January 2014 and March 2016 were reviewed. We compared the irrigation and suction alone groups with regard to the following parameters: postoperative complication incidence rate, length of hospital stay, operation time, time to flatus, time to diet commencement, and duration of postoperative antibiotic.Results: A total of 578 patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Twenty-five patients were excluded from the analysis because of need for drain insertion, loss to follow-up, simultaneous surgery for another indication, presence of an appendix tumor, or pregnancy. A total of 207 patients (37.4%) had undergone irrigation, and 346 patients (62.6%) received suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy. The preoperative fever rate was significantly higher in the irrigation group than in the suction alone group. Operative time was also significantly longer in the irrigation group than in the suction alone group (53.8 ± 18.5 minutes vs. 57.8 ± 21.4 minutes, P = 0.027). The postoperative complication rate was higher in the irrigation group than in the suction alone group (4.5% vs. 12.6%, P = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that irrigation and preoperative fever were risk factors for surgical site infection after laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.Conclusion: There is no advantage to irrigating the peritoneal cavity over suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Irrigation may actually prolong the operative time and therefore be detrimental.

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Appendicitis with Peritonitisa

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Mancini ◽  
Matthew L. Mancini ◽  
Henry S. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Abdominal Abscess ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Technical Failures ◽  
Preoperative Factors

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is safe and effective in cases of peritonitis, perforation, and abscess. We investigated our conversion rate and clinical outcomes in this patient population, as well as preoperative factors that predict operative conversion. A retrospective nonrandomized cohort of 92 patients underwent LA for acute appendicitis with peritonitis, perforation, or abscess at our institution between 1997 and 2002. Thirty-six of the 92 were converted to open appendectomy (OA), yielding a conversion rate of 39 per cent. The presence of phlegmon (42%), nonvisualized appendix (44%), technical failures (8%), and bleeding (6%) were reasons for conversion. Preoperative data had no predictive value for conversion. CT scan findings of free fluid, phlegmon, and abscess did not correlate with findings at the time of surgery. Total complication rates were 8.9 per cent in the LA group as compared to 50 per cent in the converted cohort. Postoperative data showed LA patients stayed 3.2 days versus 6.9 days for converted patients ( P = 0.01). LA patients had less pneumonia ( P = 0.02), intra-abdominal abscess ( P = 0.01), ileus ( P = 0.01), and readmissions ( P = 0.01). LA is safe and effective in patients with appendicitis with peritonitis, perforation, and abscess, resulting in shorter hospital stays and less complication.

scholarly journals Frequency of port-site infection in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
Muhammad Javed Khan ◽  
Jehangir Khan ◽  
Amjid Ali Shah ◽  
Muhammad Uzair
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽  
The World ◽  
Safe Technique

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy is being practiced throughout the world for the treatment of acute appendicitis in children and adults. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of port sites infection in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy at our institution. Methods: The study was conducted at the Pediatric Surgery Unit of Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar from January 2014 to Jan 2015. All the patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis underwent a three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Port-site infection was noted postoperatively. Results: Total number of patients in this study was 207 including 138 males (66.70%) and 69 (33.3%) females (M:F 2:1). The age ranged from 6 to 14 years, with mean age of 11 years ±2.096. The overall complications occurred in 39 (18.84%) patients. The port-site infection occurred in 33 (16%) patients. Port-site infection involved only the umbilical port sites and was superficial. Port-site infection was managed conservatively without any sequelae. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe technique in children with port-site infection rate of 16%. There is no morbidity as all the port-site infections occurred at umbilical port-site were superficial thus managed conservatively.

scholarly journals Impact of single-port laparoscopic approach on postoperative pain and cosmesis for acute appendicitis: a comparison with multi-port laparoscopic approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong Eui Kim ◽  
In Soo Cho ◽  
Sung Uk Bae ◽  
Woon Kyung Jeong ◽  
Hyung Jin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Abdominal Emergency ◽  
Scar Assessment ◽  
Cosmetic Outcomes

Abstract Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical abdominal emergency. Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) has been suggested potential advantages including less postoperative pain and better cosmesis. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative pain and cosmetic outcomes between SPLA and multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy (MPLA) for acute appendicitis.Materials and methods: The study included 47 patients who underwent SPLA and 51 patients who underwent MPLA for acute appendicitis between August 2014 and November 2017. The patient scar assessment questionnaire (PSAQ) was used to assess cosmetic outcomes. Results: MPLA involved a longer median operative time than MPLA (60 vs. 47.5 minutes, p=0.02). There were no apparent differences in the time before diet tolerance, length of hospital stay, inflammatory laboratory findings including C-reactive protein and white blood cell count, and postoperative complication rate. SPLA patients had a smaller total incision length (2.0 vs. 2.5 cm, p<0.001) and the total number of analgesics used on postoperative day 0 in the SPLA group was significantly lower than that of the MPLA group (1 vs. 1, p=0.011). The PSAQ scores showed that the SPLA group had a better overall outcome than the MPLA group with respect to total score (48 vs. 55; p = 0.026), appearance (15 vs. 18; p = 0.002) and consciousness (8 vs. 10; p = 0.005), but not in the satisfaction with appearance and symptoms subscales.Conclusion: SPLA is safe and feasible and provides better cosmetic outcomes and less analgesic requirements on the day of surgery compared to MPLA.

scholarly journals Impact of Single-port Laparoscopic Approach on Postoperative Pain and Cosmesis for Acute Appendicitis: A Comparison with Multi-port Laparoscopic Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong Eui Kim ◽  
In Soo Cho ◽  
Sung Uk Bae ◽  
Woon Kyung Jeong ◽  
Hyung Jin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Abdominal Emergency ◽  
Scar Assessment ◽  
Cosmetic Outcomes

Abstract Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical abdominal emergency. Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) has been suggested potential advantages including less postoperative pain and better cosmesis. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative pain and cosmetic outcomes between SPLA and multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy (MPLA) for acute appendicitis.Materials and methods: The study included 47 patients who underwent SPLA and 51 patients who underwent MPLA for acute appendicitis between August 2014 and November 2017. The patient scar assessment questionnaire (PSAQ) was used to assess cosmetic outcomes. Results: MPLA involved a longer median operative time than MPLA (60 vs. 47.5 minutes, p=0.02). There were no apparent differences in the time before diet tolerance, length of hospital stay, inflammatory laboratory findings including C-reactive protein and white blood cell count, and postoperative complication rate. SPLA patients had a smaller total incision length (2.0 vs. 2.5 cm, p<0.001) and the total number of analgesics used on postoperative day 0 in the SPLA group was significantly lower than that of the MPLA group (1 vs. 1, p=0.011). The PSAQ scores showed that the SPLA group had a better overall outcome than the MPLA group with respect to total score (48 vs. 55; p = 0.026), appearance (15 vs. 18; p = 0.002) and consciousness (8 vs. 10; p = 0.005), but not in the satisfaction with appearance and symptoms subscales.Conclusion: SPLA is safe and feasible and provides better cosmetic outcomes and less analgesic requirements on the day of surgery compared to MPLA.

scholarly journals A comparative study on surgical site infection in cases of open and laparoscopic appendicectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3309
Author(s):  
Priyansh Pandey ◽  
Manish M. Swarnkar ◽  
S. C. Jain
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
White Blood Cell ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendicectomy ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Site Infection

Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mostly based on clinical features pointing towards appendicitis. Several biochemical parameters, such as the white blood cell (WBC) count, and neutrophil percentage, are currently used to aid clinical diagnosis.  Without immediate surgery, appendicitis may progress to perforation of the appendix. This study was carried out to determine rate of SSI in open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendicitis and to identify independent risk factors for SSI.Methods: Appendicitis is a common cause of pain in right iliac fossa worldwide. The present study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi, Wardha, from August 2015 to July 2017. This study was conducted after the due clearance from Institutional Ethical committee. Total 132 patients admitted to the surgery ward with acute lower abdominal pain with clinical features of acute appendicitis on clinical examination, were studied prospectively.Results: In the present study, maximum patients were seen in less than 20 years of age and next commonest age group of presentation was 21-30 years. The male to female sex ratio was 1:1.3 in the laparoscopic appendectomy group while in the open appendectomy group was 1.81:1. The incidence of complicated intra-operative findings and mean white blood cell count was more in the open appendectomy group. The mean operative time, days for use of analgesics, time taken to return to soft diet and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy group was less than the open appendectomy group. There were more cases of surgical site infection in the patients operated by open approach than laparoscopic approach.Conclusions: Wound class II versus III and NNIS index were found to be significantly associated with surgical site infection.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Surgical Site Infection between Laparoscopic Appendectomy and Open Appendectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11
Author(s):  
Md Salim ◽  
Jashim Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Nur Hossain Bhuyian ◽  
Mahmudur Rahman ◽  
Monirul Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Wound Infection Rate ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
College Hospital

Surgical site infection (SSI) is defined as infection at surgical site within 01 month after surgery (or within a year in case of implant). Surgical-site infection requires microbial contamination of the surgical wound to occur. LA provides considerable benefits over OA, including a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain, earlier postoperative recovery, and a lower complication rate. This was a prospective observational study conducted inpatient department of Chittagong Medical College Hospital and private hospitals and clinics in Chittagong city. The patients were interviewed face to face by the researcher for the purpose of collection of data and were examined by the researcher for certain signs recorded in the fixed protocol. Collected data was classified, edited, coded and entered into the computer for statistical analysis by using SPSS-22. Out of 200 cases mean age was found 33.76 ± 23.35 years in OA group and 32.21 ± 16.51 years in LA group. Male was found 58% in OA group and 53% in LA group. Female was found 42% and 47% in OA and LA group respectively. Mean operative time was found 41.2±8.5 minutes in OA group and 49.3±8.9 minutes in LA group. Alternate pathology were more frequently detected in LA due to wide area of vision. Superficial incisional SSI was found 10% in OA group and 5% in LA group. Deep incisional SSI was found 2% in OA group and 2% in LA group. Organ/space SSI was 2% and 3% in OA group and LA group respectively. Staphylococcus aureus is the commonest organism isolated form the surgical wounds from 41.34% followed by Pseudomonas 21.26%, no growth 11.1%, E.coli 9.6%, others 9.4%, Klebsiella 7.0%. Laparoscopic appendectomy was better than open appendectomy with respect to wound infection rate, postoperative pain, postoperative hospital stay and return to normal activities.Medicine Today 2017 Vol.29(1): 6-11

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document