Male and female differences in liver cirrhosis mortality in the United States, 1961-1985.

1990 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
D S Hasin ◽  
B Grant ◽  
T C Harford
1979 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 543-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedric F. Garagliano ◽  
Abraham M. Lilienfeld ◽  
Albert I. Mendeloff

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Walsh ◽  
Jessie L. Krienert

With higher rates than any other form of intrafamilial violence, Hoffman and Edwards (2004) note, sibling violence “constitutes a pandemic form of victimization of children, with the symptoms often going unrecognized and the effect ignored” (p. 187). Approximately 80% of children reside with at least one sibling (Kreider, 2008), and in its most extreme form sibling violence manifests as siblicide. Siblicide is poorly understood with fewer than 20 empirical studies identified in the extant literature since 1980 (see Eriksen & Jensen, 2006). The present work employs 8 years of Supplemental Homicide Report (SHR) data, 2000–2007, with siblicide victims and offenders age 21 years and younger, to construct contemporary victim and offender profiles examining incident characteristics. Findings highlight the sex-based nature of the offense with unique victimization patterns across victims and offenders. Older brothers using a firearm are the most frequent offenders against both male and female siblings. Strain as a theoretical foundation of siblicide is offered as an avenue for future inquiry.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 493-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee D. Goodwin ◽  
Melanie M. Wall ◽  
Tse Choo ◽  
Sandro Galea ◽  
Jonathan Horowitz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 125-136
Author(s):  
Allan Metcalf

For the most part, the gradual expansion of the meaning of “guy” to include everyone, male and female and GLBTQ, has slipped by without particular notice by the general public, and even by linguists. There’s no mystery about Guy Fawkes being the starting point that leads as far from that beginning as groups of women calling each other “you guys,” but neither is there much interest—except in two quarters that object: the feminist movement and the Old South of the United States. Feminists who want the inherently sexist English language to become gender neutral object to the expansion of “guys” to include women as well as men. As a result, some people try to avoid “guys,” though the alternatives aren’t that obvious, at best a plain “you all.” The other objection comes from Southerners, who don’t so much object to “guys” as keep to their well-established older alternative “y’all.” The boundary between “guys” or “you guys” and “y’all” has remained firm for the last century, perhaps getting its strength as one last means of holding the line against the northern states.


1982 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Richard Udry ◽  
Fred R. Deven ◽  
Samuel J. Coleman

SummaryParallel analyses of recent data from the United States, Thailand, Belgium, and Japan all confirm the finding that female age and not male age is the more important contributor to the decline in frequency of marital intercourse during the childbearing ages. The most probable explanation is the decline in female (but not male) androgen levels during the age span examined.


1980 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 434-437
Author(s):  
S.J. Morrissey ◽  
C.L. Burford ◽  
K. Caddel ◽  
M.M. Ayoub

A battery of general anthropometric measures and selected isometric strength measures have been made on a sample of male and female low coal miners in the United States (low coal refers to coal mines in which the coal seam and, thus, tunnel heights are less than 48 inches). In comparison to selected military and civilian anthropometric surveys, both the male and female low coal miners showed significantly greater body circumferences on similar measures. Analysis of the isometric strength data showed both the male and female low coal miners to have significantly lower back strengths than a reference industrial population. Male miners had significantly greater standing leg strengths than the reference population. These differences can be attributed to the occupational and postural demands present in low coal mining.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-245-S-246
Author(s):  
Mohammad Abureesh ◽  
Motasem Alkhayyat ◽  
Rawan Badran ◽  
George Khoudari ◽  
Liliane S. Deeb

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document