scholarly journals Law, Politics, and The Neutrality

Author(s):  
Maqfira Izzata Nafsiah
Keyword(s):  

Neutrality ASN (Aparatur Sipil Negara) is one of the most important part in the politics of this. But in fact during these many ASN that is not neutral because of weak laws that can ensnare ASN and because Bawaslu (Badan Pengawas Pemilu) and Panwaslu (Panitia Pengawas Pemilu) cannot reach the whole activity of the ASN leads to neutrality. To that end, the necessary optimal synergy between law enforcers in order to enforce the law firmly of the ASN that is not neutral in order to achieve a healthy democratic party and based on the principle of luberjurdil (langsung, bebas, rahasia, jujur, dan adil) which have mandated in the legislation.

Author(s):  
Sandra F. Sperino ◽  
Suja A. Thomas

Politics might be a reason for the current state of discrimination law. Republicans may want to protect employers’ interests. Democrats may want to protect workers’ interests. Thus, federal judges appointed by Republican Presidents may skew discrimination law in favor of employers, and federal judges appointed by Presidents from the Democratic Party may decide the law to favor workers. This chapter shows how some judges have acted in this partisan way to limit discrimination law. This chapter also shows that the simple dichotomy often fails to explain what is happening in actual cases. Some judges do not discretely fall into categories for or against the discrimination laws. Some employers also do not.


2017 ◽  
pp. 35-38
Author(s):  
Alex Ovsienko

The discussions on the ban on burka in Germany started on November the 15 th. 2015 as the party convention of the CSU (a Bavarian part of the ruling CDU) demanded on its party convention to pass the law which would ban the wearing on facial veils in Germany. In the next months the discussion intensified in Germany as more and more politicians got involved in the debate , like the prominent German member of the Free Democratic Party Alexander Graf Lamsdorf or Wolfgang Kubicki, the vice chairman of the FDP which were both in favor of the ban, on the other side there are German politicians like the President of Germany Joachim Gauck or the German minister of justice Heiko Maas who were opposed to ban the wearing of facial veils in Germany.


2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (01) ◽  
pp. 93-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandler Davidson

The issue before the U.S. Supreme Court in theCrawfordcase (Crawford v. Marion County Election Bd. 2008) was whether a law (Indiana Senate Enrolled Act No. 483) passed by the Indiana legislature requiring most voters to show a photo ID in order to cast a ballot violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiffs argued that it works an unfair hardship on many people who do not have the government-issued documents that count as a legitimate ID (Indiana Democratic Party et al., 12–16). They argued that the law, in effect, constitutes a poll tax, inasmuch as there are costs to obtain the right kind of photo ID, costs that unduly burden many eligible citizens wanting to exercise their right to vote.


2018 ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Ismail Marzuki

This article tries to explore how the influence of Islamic law politics in drafting Law No. 44 of 2008 on Pornography. A qualitative approach was employed in this study. The treatise of Indonesia’s Pornography Law was collected as the primary data. The findings expose that there was the effect of Islamic law politics in drafting Law No. 44 of 2008 on Pornography. It can be noticed from the active involvement of Islamic political parties in parliament and the House of Representatives (DPR) members from the nationalist parties possessing an Islamic background in promoting the law enactment. Likewise, the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and Islamic mass organizations also actively encouraged the issuance of this law. Another result highlights that there was a strong debate between political fractions in the DPR, including the Gerindra Party (PG), the United Development Party (PPP), the Democratic Party (PD), the National Mandate Party (PAN), the National Awakening Party (PKB), the Democratic Vanguard Star (BPD), the Star Reform Party (PBR), the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS), and the mass organizations that proposed the ratification of the Pornography Law draft, and other fractions, namely: the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP), the Prosperous Peace Party (PDS), and the mass organizations that supported the refusal of the law draft ratification


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Leslie ◽  
Mary Casper

“My patient refuses thickened liquids, should I discharge them from my caseload?” A version of this question appears at least weekly on the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Community pages. People talk of respecting the patient's right to be non-compliant with speech-language pathology recommendations. We challenge use of the word “respect” and calling a patient “non-compliant” in the same sentence: does use of the latter term preclude the former? In this article we will share our reflections on why we are interested in these so called “ethical challenges” from a personal case level to what our professional duty requires of us. Our proposal is that the problems that we encounter are less to do with ethical or moral puzzles and usually due to inadequate communication. We will outline resources that clinicians may use to support their work from what seems to be a straightforward case to those that are mired in complexity. And we will tackle fears and facts regarding litigation and the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document