Neuroendocrine regulation of growth hormone

1995 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Bertherat ◽  
Marie Thérèse Bluet-Pajot ◽  
Jacques Epelbaum

Bertherat J, Bluet-Pajot MT, Epelbaum J. Neuroendocrine regulation of growth hormone. Eur J Endocrinol 1995;132:12–24. ISSN 0804–4643 This short review is focused on the neuroendocrine regulation of growth hormone (GH) pulsatile secretory pattern and GH gene expression. The neuronal network involved in the central control of GH includes extrahypothalamic neurons such as the noradrenergic and cholinergic systems, which regulate the two antagonistic neurohormonal systems: somatostatin (SRIH) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). Intrahypothalamic Proopiomelanocortin- and Galanin-containing interneurons also participate in the regulation of SRIH and GHRH neuronal activity, which also is dependent on sex steroids and GH and/or insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) feedback. cAMP (controlled mainly by GHRH and SRIH), thyroid and glucocorticoid hormones, IGF-I and activin are among the factors that regulate GH gene expression at the transcriptional level and may play a role in somatotroph differentiation and proliferation during ontogeny as well as physiological and pathological states such as acromegaly. J Epelbaum, U159 INSERM, Centre Paul Broca, 2 ter rue d'Alésia, 75014 Paris, France

1990 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 745-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Pagesy ◽  
Jacques Y. Li ◽  
Françoise Rentier-Delrue ◽  
Olivier Delalande ◽  
Yves Le Bouc ◽  
...  

Abstract. Some patients with active acromegaly have elevated plasma IGF-I concentrations with only minimal elevation of plasma GH. We compared adenomatous GH and SRIH expression in 3 such patients (patients No. 1, 2 and 3; basal plasma GH level < 4 μg/l) and in 3 acromegalic patients with high basal plasma GH level (patients No. 4, 5 and 6; 51.7 ± 16.1 μg/l, mean ± sem). By immunocytochemistry, all the tumours proved to be somatotropic adenomas. At the ultrastructural level, signs of low secretory activity were observed in adenomas from patients No. 2 and 3. Perifused adenoma cells of patients No. 1, 2 and 3 released very little GH compared with those of patients No. 4, 5 and 6 (1± 0.37 vs 51.5± 34.1 μg · (10−6 cells) · min−1, p< 0.001). Adenoma SRIH content was 65.7 and 30.6 pg/mg proteins in patients No. 1 and 2, whereas it was undetectable in the others (patients No. 4, 5 and 6). Northern blot analysis showed that the GH gene was poorly expressed in the adenomas from patients No. 1, 2 and 3 compared with the adenomas from patients No. 4, 5 and 6. SRIH mRNA was detected in all 6 adenomas. However, the signal was more intense in the adenomas from patients No. 1, 2 and 3 than in those from patients No. 4, 5 and 6. In conclusion, because of the variability of the biosynthetic and secretory potential of the somatotropic adenomas, patients harbouring this type of pituitary tumours can exhibit a wide range of plasma GH levels. In acromegaly with minimal elevation of plasma GH, the synthesis of SRIH by the adenoma cells themselves could play a role in the inhibition of GH expression.


2004 ◽  
Vol 181 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Wook Kim ◽  
RP Rhoads ◽  
SS Block ◽  
TR Overton ◽  
SJ Frank ◽  
...  

At parturition, dairy cows experience a 70% reduction in plasma IGF-I. This reduction coincides with decreased abundance of GHR1A, the liver-specific transcript of the growth hormone receptor (GHR) gene, suggesting impaired growth hormone-dependent synthesis of IGF-I. It is not immediately obvious that the periparturient reduction in GHR1A is sufficient to reduce hepatic GHR abundance. This is because approximately 50% of total GHR mRNA abundance in prepartum liver is accounted for by ubiquitously expressed transcripts which remain collectively unchanged at parturition. In addition, the possibility that parturition alters GHR expression in other growth hormone target tissue has not been examined. To address these questions, we measured GHR gene expression and GHR protein in liver and skeletal muscle of four dairy cows on days -35,+3 and+56 (relative to parturition on day 0). Hepatic GHR abundance and GHR1A transcripts were lower on day+3 than on day -35 and returned to late pregnancy value by day+56. Additional studies in two other groups of cows indicated that the hepatic levels of the GHR protein recovered substantially within 10 days after parturition. These changes occurred without variation in the abundance of HNF4, a liver-enriched transcription factor activating the promoter responsible for GHR1A synthesis. In contrast to liver, levels of GHR gene expression and GHR protein were identical on days -35,+3 and+56 in skeletal muscle. These data suggest a role for the GHR in regulating tissue-specific changes in growth hormone responsiveness in periparturient dairy cows.


2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Harvey ◽  
M Kakebeeke ◽  
A E Murphy ◽  
E J Sanders

Growth hormone (GH) is primarily produced in the pituitary gland, although GH gene expression also occurs in the central and autonomic nervous systems. GH-immunoreactive proteins are abundant in the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves. The appearance of GH in these tissues occurs prior to the ontogenic differentiation of the pituitary gland and prior to the presence of GH in systemic circulation. Neural GH is also present in neonates, juveniles, and adults and is independent of changes in pituitary GH secretion. Neural GH is therefore likely to have local roles in neural development or neural function, especially as GH receptors (GHRs) are widespread in the nervous system. In recent studies, GH mRNA and GH immunoreactive proteins have been identified in the neural retina of embryonic chicks. GH immunoreactivity is present in the optic cup of chick embryos at embryonic day (ED) 3 of the 21-d incubation period. It is widespread in the neural retina by ED 7 but also present in the nonpigmented retina, choroid, sclera, and cornea. This immunoreactivity is associated with proteins in the neural retina comparable in size with those in the adult pituitary gland, although it is primarily associated with 15–16 kDa moieties rather than with the full-length molecule of approximately 22 kDa. These small GH moieties may reflect proteolytic fragments of "monomer" GH and (or) the presence of different GH gene transcripts, since full-length and truncated GH cDNAs are present in retinal tissue extracts. The GH immunoreactivity in the retina persists throughout embryonic development but is not present in juvenile birds (after 6 weeks of age). This immunoreactivity is also associated with the presence of GH receptor (GHR) immunoreactivity and GHR mRNA in ocular tissues of chick embryos. The retina is thus an extrapituitary site of GH gene expression during early development and is probably an autocrine or paracrine site of GH action. The marked ontogenic pattern of GH immunoreactivity in the retina suggests hitherto unsuspected roles for GH in neurogenesis or ocular development.Key words: growth hormone, growth hormone receptor, nervous system, retina, autocrine, paracrine.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 166
Author(s):  
V.-H. Dang ◽  
E.-B. Jeung

The term endocrine disruptor (ED) has been used widely to characterize natural and synthetic environmental compounds that may interfere with the endocrine system(s) of humans and wildlife. In previous studies, we demonstrated that in vitro single exposure to EDs induces CaBP-9k expression, a useful biomarker for detecting the estrogenic activities of EDs in rat pituitary GH3 cells. Here we employ the identical model to examine the effects of EDs in the regulation of growth hormone (GH) gene expression, an important hormone in growth, development, and body composition. We measured levels of GH mRNA transcription and GH release using semi-quantitative RT-PCR and EIA kit, respectively. GH3 cells were treated with alkyphenols (APs), i.e., octyl-phenol (OP), nonyl-phenol (NP), and bisphenol A (BPA), in a dose-dependent manner (10–5, 10–6, and 10–7 M) and harvested following 24 h of treatment. Cells were also exposed to a high concentration (10–5 M) of OP, NP, or BPA and harvested at various time points (1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h). An anti-estrogen, ICI 182780 (10–7 M) was used to examine the potential involvement of estrogen receptor (ER) in the induction of GH by EDs through an ER-mediated pathway. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's multiple comparison. OP, NP, and BPA induced a significant increase in GH gene expression at high (10–5 M) and medium (10–6 M) doses at 24 h. ED-exposure induced a marked increase in GH gene transcription as early as 6 h and peaked at 12 h. Co-treatment with ICI 182780 significantly attenuated ED-induced GH expression in GH3 cells. Interestingly, the level of in vitro GH release was increased significantly at 24 h in response to OP, NP, or BPA, whereas co-treatment with ICI 182780 significantly diminished ED-induced GH secretion in GH3 cells, indicating that ER may play a part in both GH gene transcription and GH release in these cells. Here we demonstrate for the first time that single in vitro exposure to OP, NP, or BPA results in an increase in GH expression at 24 h in GH3 rat pituitary cells. These results may provide new insight into the mode of ED action in GH gene regulation as well as the biological pathway underlying these molecular events. Furthermore, data showing GH responsiveness evoked by EDs supports the aim to develop an assay for use in predicting adverse health effects of EDs in humans and wildlife.


2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 559-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damir Alzhanov ◽  
Aditi Mukherjee ◽  
Peter Rotwein

Growth hormone (GH) plays a central role in regulating somatic growth and in controlling multiple physiological processes in humans and other vertebrates. A key agent in many GH actions is the secreted peptide, IGF-I. As established previously, GH stimulates IGF-I gene expression via the Stat5b transcription factor, leading to production of IGF-I mRNAs and proteins. However, the precise mechanisms by which GH-activated Stat5b promotes IGF-I gene transcription have not been defined. Unlike other GH-regulated genes, there are no Stat5b sites near either of the two IGF-I gene promoters. Although dispersed GH-activated Stat5b binding elements have been mapped in rodent Igf1 gene chromatin, it is unknown how these distal sites might function as potential transcriptional enhancers. Here we have addressed mechanisms of regulation of IGF-I gene transcription by GH by generating cell lines in which the rat Igf1 chromosomal locus has been incorporated into the mouse genome. Using these cells we find that physiological levels of GH rapidly and potently activate Igf1 gene transcription while stimulating physical interactions in chromatin between inducible Stat5b-binding elements and the Igf1 promoters. We have thus developed a robust experimental platform for elucidating how dispersed transcriptional enhancers control Igf1 gene expression under different biological conditions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 36-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Srinivasa ◽  
Caroline Suresh ◽  
Jay Mottla ◽  
Sulaiman R. Hamarneh ◽  
Javier E. Irazoqui ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document