scholarly journals Expression of IGF-II mRNA-binding proteins (IMPs) in gonads and testicular cancer

Reproduction ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels A Hammer ◽  
Thomas v O Hansen ◽  
Anne Grete Byskov ◽  
Eva Rajpert-De Meyts ◽  
Marie Louise Grøndahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Developmental Expression ◽  
Human Testis ◽  
Mrna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Binding

Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding proteins 1, 2 and 3 (IMP1, IMP2 and IMP3) belong to a family of RNA-binding proteins implicated in mRNA localization, turnover and translational control. We examined their expression pattern during development of murine and human testis and ovaries. In the mouse, IMPs were expressed in male and female gonadal cells at embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5). From E16.5, IMP1 and IMP3 became restricted to the developing germ cells, whereas IMP2 expression persisted in the interstitial cells. In mature mouse and human ovaries, IMP1, IMP2 and IMP3 were detected in resting and growing oocytes and in the granulosa cells. In testis, IMP1 and IMP3 were found mainly in the spermatogonia, whereas IMP2 was expressed in the immature Leydig cells. Moreover, all three IMPs were detected in human semen. The developmental expression pattern of IMP1 and IMP3 in the human testis prompted us to examine their possible involvement in testicular neoplasia. IMPs were detected primarily in germ-cell neoplasms, including preinvasive testicular carcinoma in situ, classical and spermatocytic seminoma, and nonseminomas, with particularly high expression in undifferentiated embryonal carcinoma. The relative expression of IMP1, IMP2 and IMP3 varied among tumor types and only IMP1 was detected in all carcinoma in situ cells. Thus IMPs, and in particular IMP1, may be useful auxiliary markers of testicular neoplasia.

scholarly journals The endoplasmic reticulum-associated mRNA-binding proteins ERBP1 and ERBP2 interact in bloodstream-form Trypanosoma brucei

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bajak ◽  
Kevin Leiss ◽  
Christine Clayton ◽  
Esteban Erben
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Bloodstream Form ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Mrna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Binding

AbstractKinetoplastids rely heavily on post-transcriptional mechanisms for control of gene expression, and on RNA-binding proteins that regulate mRNA splicing, translation and decay. Trypanosoma brucei ERBP1 (Tb927.10.14150) and ERBP2 (Tb927.9.9550) were previously identified as mRNA binding proteins that lack canonical RNA-binding domains. We here show that ERBP1 is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum, like ERBP2, and that the two proteins interact in vivo. Loss of ERBP1 from bloodstream-form T. brucei initially resulted in a growth defect but proliferation was restored after more prolonged cultivation. Results from a pull-down of tagged ERBP1 suggest that it preferentially binds to ribosomal protein mRNAs. The ERBP1 sequence resembles that of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bfr1, which also localises to the endoplasmic reticulum and binds to ribosomal protein mRNAs. However, unlike Bfr1, ERBP1 does not bind to mRNAs encoding secreted proteins, and it is also not recruited to stress granules after starvation.

scholarly journals The endoplasmic reticulum-associated mRNA-binding proteins ERBP1 and ERBP2 interact in bloodstream-form Trypanosoma brucei

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e8388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bajak ◽  
Kevin Leiss ◽  
Christine E. Clayton ◽  
Esteban Erben
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Bloodstream Form ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Mrna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Binding

Kinetoplastids rely heavily on post-transcriptional mechanisms for control of gene expression, and on RNA-binding proteins that regulate mRNA splicing, translation and decay. Trypanosoma brucei ERBP1 (Tb927.10.14150) and ERBP2 (Tb927.9.9550) were previously identified as mRNA binding proteins that lack canonical RNA-binding domains. We show here that ERBP1 is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum, like ERBP2, and that the two proteins interact in vivo. Loss of ERBP1 from bloodstream-form T. brucei initially resulted in a growth defect but proliferation was restored after more prolonged cultivation. Pull-down analysis of tagged ERBP1 suggests that it preferentially binds to ribosomal protein mRNAs. The ERBP1 sequence resembles that of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bfr1, which also localises to the endoplasmic reticulum and binds to ribosomal protein mRNAs. However, unlike Bfr1, ERBP1 does not bind to mRNAs encoding secreted proteins, and it is also not recruited to stress granules after starvation.

scholarly journals Roles of Organellar RNA-Binding Proteins in Plant Growth, Development, and Abiotic Stress Responses

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 4548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwanuk Lee ◽  
Hunseung Kang
Keyword(s):  
Abiotic Stress ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Metabolism ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Growth Development

Organellar gene expression (OGE) in chloroplasts and mitochondria is primarily modulated at post-transcriptional levels, including RNA processing, intron splicing, RNA stability, editing, and translational control. Nucleus-encoded Chloroplast or Mitochondrial RNA-Binding Proteins (nCMRBPs) are key regulatory factors that are crucial for the fine-tuned regulation of post-transcriptional RNA metabolism in organelles. Although the functional roles of nCMRBPs have been studied in plants, their cellular and physiological functions remain largely unknown. Nevertheless, existing studies that have characterized the functions of nCMRBP families, such as chloroplast ribosome maturation and splicing domain (CRM) proteins, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins, DEAD-Box RNA helicase (DBRH) proteins, and S1-domain containing proteins (SDPs), have begun to shed light on the role of nCMRBPs in plant growth, development, and stress responses. Here, we review the latest research developments regarding the functional roles of organellar RBPs in RNA metabolism during growth, development, and abiotic stress responses in plants.

Subcellular localization and RNP formation of IGF2BPs (IGF2 mRNA-binding proteins) is modulated by distinct RNA-binding domains

2013 ◽  
Vol 394 (8) ◽  
pp. 1077-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Wächter ◽  
Marcel Köhn ◽  
Nadine Stöhr ◽  
Stefan Hüttelmaier
Keyword(s):  
Subcellular Localization ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
Structural Constraints ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
Mrna Binding

Abstract The IGF2 mRNA-binding protein family (IGF2BPs) directs the cytoplasmic fate of various target mRNAs and controls essential cellular functions. The three IGF2BP paralogues expressed in mammals comprise two RNA-recognition motifs (RRM) as well as four KH domains. How these domains direct IGF2BP paralogue-dependent protein function remains largely elusive. In this study, we analyze the role of KH domains in IGF2BPs by the mutational GXXG-GEEG conversion of single KH domain loops in the context of full-length polypeptides. These analyses reveal that all four KH domains of IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP2 are essentially involved in RNA-binding in vitro and the cellular association with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Moreover the KH domains prevent the nuclear accumulation of these two paralogues and facilitate their recruitment to stress granules. The role of KH domains appears less pronounced in IGF2BP3, because GxxG-GEEG conversion in all four KH domains only modestly affects RNA-binding, subcellular localization and RNA-dependent protein association of this paralogue. These findings indicate paralogue-dependent RNA-binding properties of IGF2BPs which likely direct distinct cellular functions. Our findings suggest that IGF2BPs contact target RNAs via all four KH domains. This implies significant structural constraints, which presumably allow the formation of exceedingly stable protein-RNA complexes.

scholarly journals An Interaction between Two RNA Binding Proteins, Nab2 and Pub1, Links mRNA Processing/Export and mRNA Stability

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 6569-6579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano H. Apponi ◽  
Seth M. Kelly ◽  
Michelle T. Harreman ◽  
Alexander N. Lehner ◽  
Anita H. Corbett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mrna Stability ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tail Length ◽  
Functional Link ◽  
Mrna Binding Protein ◽  
Mrna Binding

ABSTRACT mRNA stability is modulated by elements in the mRNA transcript and their cognate RNA binding proteins. Poly(U) binding protein 1 (Pub1) is a cytoplasmic Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA binding protein that stabilizes transcripts containing AU-rich elements (AREs) or stabilizer elements (STEs). In a yeast two-hybrid screen, we identified nuclear poly(A) binding protein 2 (Nab2) as being a Pub1-interacting protein. Nab2 is an essential nucleocytoplasmic shuttling mRNA binding protein that regulates poly(A) tail length and mRNA export. The interaction between Pub1 and Nab2 was confirmed by copurification and in vitro binding assays. The interaction is mediated by the Nab2 zinc finger domain. Analysis of the functional link between these proteins reveals that Nab2, like Pub1, can modulate the stability of specific mRNA transcripts. The half-life of the RPS16B transcript, an ARE-like sequence-containing Pub1 target, is decreased in both nab2-1 and nab2-67 mutants. In contrast, GCN4, an STE-containing Pub1 target, is not affected. Similar results were obtained for other ARE- and STE-containing Pub1 target transcripts. Further analysis reveals that the ARE-like sequence is necessary for Nab2-mediated transcript stabilization. These results suggest that Nab2 functions together with Pub1 to modulate mRNA stability and strengthen a model where nuclear events are coupled to the control of mRNA turnover in the cytoplasm.

scholarly journals Translational Control of Cytochrome c by RNA-Binding Proteins TIA-1 and HuR

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 3295-3307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Kawai ◽  
Ashish Lal ◽  
Xiaoling Yang ◽  
Stefanie Galban ◽  
Krystyna Mazan-Mamczarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Er Stress ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Coding Region ◽  
Translation Rate ◽  
Translational Repressor

ABSTRACT Stresses affecting the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) globally modulate gene expression patterns by altering posttranscriptional processes such as translation. Here, we use tunicamycin (Tn) to investigate ER stress-triggered changes in the translation of cytochrome c, a pivotal regulator of apoptosis. We identified two RNA-binding proteins that associate with its ∼900-bp-long, adenine- and uridine-rich 3′ untranslated region (UTR): HuR, which displayed affinity for several regions of the cytochrome c 3′UTR, and T-cell-restricted intracellular antigen 1 (TIA-1), which preferentially bound the segment proximal to the coding region. HuR did not appear to influence the cytochrome c mRNA levels but instead promoted cytochrome c translation, as HuR silencing greatly diminished the levels of nascent cytochrome c protein. By contrast, TIA-1 functioned as a translational repressor of cytochrome c, with interventions to silence TIA-1 dramatically increasing cytochrome c translation. Following treatment with Tn, HuR binding to cytochrome c mRNA decreased, and both the presence of cytochrome c mRNA within actively translating polysomes and the rate of cytochrome c translation declined. Taken together, our data suggest that the translation rate of cytochrome c is determined by the opposing influences of HuR and TIA-1 upon the cytochrome c mRNA. Under unstressed conditions, cytochrome c mRNA is actively translated, but in response to ER stress agents, both HuR and TIA-1 contribute to lowering its biosynthesis rate. We propose that HuR and TIA-1 function coordinately to maintain precise levels of cytochrome c production under unstimulated conditions and to modify cytochrome c translation when damaged cells are faced with molecular decisions to follow a prosurvival or a prodeath path.

scholarly journals Abstract P-22: Enhanced Crosslinking and Immunoprecipitation (Eclip) Data Reveal Interactions of RNA Binding Proteins with the Human Ribosome

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S21-S21
Author(s):  
Andrey Buyan ◽  
Ivan Kulakovskiy ◽  
Sergey Dmitriev
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Structural Data

Background: The ribosome is a protein-synthesizing molecular machine composed of four ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and dozens of ribosomal proteins. In mammals, the ribosome has a complicated structure with an additional outer layer of rRNA, including large tentacle-like extensions. A number of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) interact with this layer to assist ribosome biogenesis, nuclear export and decay, or to modulate translation. Plenty of methods have been developed in the last decade in order to study such protein-RNA interactions, including RNA pulldown and crosslinking-immunoprecipitation (CLIP) assays. Methods: In the current study, using publicly available data of the enhanced CLIP (eCLIP) experiments for 223 proteins studied in the ENCODE project, we found a number of RBPs that bind rRNAs in human cells. To locate their binding sites in rRNAs, we used a newly developed computational protocol for mapping and evaluation of the eCLIP data with the respect to the repetitive sequences. Results: For two proteins with known ribosomal localization, uS3/RPS3 and uS17/RPS11, the identified sites were in good agreement with structural data, thus validating our approach. Then, we identified rRNA contacts of overall 22 RBPs involved in rRNA processing and ribosome maturation (DDX21, DDX51, DDX52, NIP7, SBDS, UTP18, UTP3, WDR3, and WDR43), translational control during stress (SERBP1, G3BP1, SND1), IRES activity (PCBP1/hnRNPE1), and other translation-related functions. In many cases, the identified proteins interact with the rRNA expansion segments (ES) of the human ribosome pointing to their important role in protein synthesis. Conclusion: Our study identifies a number of RBPs as interacting partners of the human ribosome and sheds light on the role of rRNA expansion segments in translation.

scholarly journals RNA binding protein RBM3 augments kissing loop formation with lncRNAs to enhance translational control

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afreen Asif Ali Sayed ◽  
Sonali Choudhury ◽  
Dharmalingam Subramaniam ◽  
Sumedha Gunewardena ◽  
Sivapriya Ponnurangam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Tumor Xenograft ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Loop Formation ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Kissing Loop

Background and Aims: Translational regulation involve the coordinated actions of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) and non-coding RNAs. For efficient translation, the mRNA needs to be circularized. While RNA binding proteins and translation factors have been shown to regulate the circularization, the role of lncRNAs in the process is not yet defined. Methods: We first performed RNA-seq and RNA-immunoprecipitation coupled-Seq (RIP-Seq) to identify differentially expressed lncRNA and mRNA in RBM3 overexpressing cell lines. We manipulated lncRNA expression in the cells and determined effects on gene expression and cell viability and motility. The studies were confirmed in vivo in intestine specific RBM3 transgenic and RBM3 knockout mouse models. Results: In comparing the RNA-Seq and RIP-Seq datasets, we identified increased expression of lncRNA LSAMP-3 and Flii-1 that bind to RBM3. In addition, there was an increase in expression of epithelial mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis markers following RBM3 overexpression. Moreover, modeling studies suggest that these lncRNAs formed kissing-loop interactions on target mRNAs including transcripts that encode epithelial mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis. While RBM3 transgenic mice showed increased LSAMP-3 and Flii-1, this was reduced in the RBM3 knockout mice. Also, RBM3 overexpression increased tumor xenograft growth, which was suppressed by knockdown of the lncRNAs. Also, knockdown of endogenous RBM3 specifically in the intestine suppressed azoxymethane-dextran sodium sulfate driven colitis-associated cancers, with a corresponding reduction in the expression of lncRNAs and transcripts that encode epithelial mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis. Conclusion: We propose that RBPs such as RBM3 mediate their function through regulatory lncRNAs that enable circularization to control translation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document