Changes Made to Orders Placed by Overnight Admitting Residents on Teaching Rounds the Next Day

Author(s):  
Laura Chiel ◽  
Eli Freiman ◽  
Julia Yarahuan ◽  
Chase Parsons ◽  
Christopher P. Landrigan ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES: Increased focus on health care quality and safety has generally led to additional resident supervision by attending physicians. At our children’s hospital, residents place orders overnight that are not explicitly reviewed by attending physicians until morning rounds. We aimed to categorize the types of orders that are added or discontinued on morning rounds the morning after admission to a resident team and to understand the rationale for these order additions and discontinuations. METHODS: We used our hospital’s data warehouse to generate a report of orders placed by residents overnight that were discontinued the next morning and orders that were added on rounds the morning after admission to a resident team from July 1, 2017 to June 29, 2018. Retrospective chart review was performed on included orders to determine the reason for order changes. RESULTS: Our report identified 5927 orders; 538 were included for analysis after exclusion of duplicate orders, administrative orders, and orders for patients admitted to non-Pediatric Hospital Medicine services. The reason for order discontinuation or addition was medical decision-making (n = 357, 66.4%), change in patient trajectory (n = 151, 28.1%), and medical error (n = 30, 5.6%). Medical errors were most commonly related to medications (n = 24, 80%) and errors of omission (n = 19, 63%). CONCLUSIONS: New or discontinued orders commonly resulted from evolving patient management decisions or changes in patient trajectory; medical errors represented a small subset of identified orders. Medical errors were often errors of omission, suggesting an area to direct future safety initiatives.

Author(s):  
Zahra Rahsepar ◽  
Farzad Faraji-Khiavi ◽  
Mansour Zahiri ◽  
Mohammadhosein Haghighizadeh

Background: Reporting of medical errors is an approach to identify and prevent errors in hospitals. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the barriers to error rError Reporting; Nurse; Hospital; Ahvazeport from the nurses’ viewpoints in Ahvaz Educational hospitals. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was done on 206 nurses working in educational hospitals of Ahvaz selected by stratified random sampling. The measurement tool used in this study was a researcher-made questionnaire, which its validity was confirmed by content validity, and its reliability using Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to be 0.84. Data collection was performed from April to June 2019. Results: The causes of failure to error reporting included educational, attitudinal, process, structural, and managerial factors. The total mean score of the factors causing non-reporting of errors was 3.88 ± 0.53, which was between 3 and 4 (“important”). Also, educational, attitudinal, and process factors were reported as “very important” for nurses. Structural and managerial factors were rated reported “important” by nurses over 90% of nurses rated educational, attitudinal, and process factors as important and very important, and more than 70% of them rated structural and managerial factors as important and very important. Nurses with different levels of education or work experiences had different scores in reasons for not reporting errors. Conclusions: Some educational, attitudinal, process, structural, and managerial factors were critical reasons for not reporting errors. In order to reduce same errors in the future and promoting health care quality, officials need to develop strategies to remove barriers and consider the reasons for not reporting errors in nurses’ educational programs using team-based and forward-looking approaches, adopting an impersonal and systematic approach, and finally, modifying error reporting rules.


Author(s):  
Jayita Poduval

The impact of medical errors on the delivery of health care is massive, and it significantly reduces health care quality. They could be largely attributed to system failures and not human weakness. Therefore improving health care quality and ensuring quality control in health care would mean making systems function in a better manner. In order to achieve this all sections of society as well as industry must be involved. Reporting of medical error needs to be encouraged and this may be ensured if health care professionals as well as administrators and health consumers come forward without fear of being blamed. To get to the root of the problem- literally and metaphorically- a root cause analysis and audit must be carried out whenever feasible. Persons outside the medical care establishment also need to work with medical service providers to set standards of performance, competence and excellence.


1970 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 3107-3117
Author(s):  
Gideon Mauti ◽  
Margaret Githae

Background: Patient safety is a fundamental component of health care quality and medical errors continue to occur, placing patients at risk. Medical error reporting systems could help reduce the errors. Purpose: This study assessed “Medical error reporting among Physicians and Nurses in Uganda”. The objectives were; (1) identify the existing medical error reporting systems. (2) Assess the types of medical errors that occurred. (3) Establish factors influencing error reporting. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study in Kisubi and Entebbe hospitals between March to August 2013, with quantitative methods. Results: Medical errors occurred in the two hospitals (53.2%), with overdoses (42.9%) leading. Neither hospital had a medical error reporting system. More than two thirds, 42(64.6%), would not report. Almost half, 29(44.6%) believe reporting a medical error is a medical obligation. Majority, 50(76.9%), believed the law does not protect medical error reporting. Not punishing health workers who report medical errors, (53.8%) and ‘training on error reporting (41.70%) are the greatest measures to improve medical error reporting among nurses and physicians respectively. Conclusion: Medical errors occur in the two hospitals and there are no reporting systems. Health workers who report medical errors should not be punished.Keywords: Medical error reporting, physicians, nurses, Uganda.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1705-1710
Author(s):  
Chase R Parsons ◽  
Jonathan D Hron ◽  
Fabienne C Bourgeois

Abstract Objective This study evaluates and characterizes the use of a confidential clinic note type as part of the implementation of open notes at a free-standing children’s hospital. We describe how this electronic health record feature which disables patient and family access to selected notes in the patient portal is used across our institution, which clinicians are using this feature, and the type of data our clinicians consider confidential. Materials and Methods Through retrospective chart review, we have evaluated the use of a confidential note type over a 1-year period. Results We identified 402 964 clinic notes created during a 1-year period, of which 9346 (2.3%) were flagged as confidential. Use of this confidential note type was associated with female patient sex and increase in patient age. It was used most frequently by a small subset of providers. 922 (83.8%) of 1100 notes manually reviewed contained sensitive information. Reasons for confidential notes varied, but patient’s mental health was most commonly identified. Discussion Our data demonstrate variability in the use of a confidential note type across specialties, patient ages, and types of confidential information. This note type is frequently utilized by a subset of providers who often manage sensitive patient and parent information. As vendors and institutions enable open notes, thoughtful implementation and provider education surrounding the use of this confidential feature is needed. Conclusion A confidential clinic note feature is an integral aspect of pediatric open notes implementation. This feature supports protection of confidential information pertaining to our patients and their caregivers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandria Bear ◽  
Elizabeth Thiel

Background: Medical decision-making has evolved to the modern model of shared decision-making among patients, surrogate decision-makers, and medical providers. As such, informed consent discussions with critically ill patients often should include larger discussions relating to values and goals of care. Documentation of care options and prognosis serves as an important component of electronic communication relating to patient preferences among care providers. Objective: This retrospective chart review study sought to evaluate the prevalence of documentation of critical data, care options, prognosis, and medical plan, within primary team and palliative care consult team documentation. Results: Three hundred two electronic medical records were reviewed. There was a significant difference in documentation between palliative care and primary teams for prognosis (83% vs 32%, P < .001), care options (82% vs 50%, P < .001), and care plan (82% vs 46%, P < .001). Conclusions: Our retrospective chart review study demonstrated a significant difference in documentation between primary and palliative care teams. We acknowledge that review of documentation cannot be extrapolated to the presence or absence of conversations between providers and patients and/or surrogates. Additional studies to evaluate this connection would be advantageous.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tory A. Prynn ◽  
Gretchen Garland ◽  
Lucia Mirea ◽  
Rupali Drewek

Abstract Background: The decision to refer a sick child to a pediatric specialist is important for health care quality, however access to specialty care is worsening. Referrals from primary to specialty care are a critical first step in coordinating specialty care, but there are often shortcomings in the appropriateness, clarity, and completeness of referrals. This study aimed to characterize referrals for asthma-like symptoms to a pediatric pulmonology clinic, evaluate consult interventions, and identify opportunities for improving access. Methods: A retrospective chart review examined patients ages 5-18 years, referred to the pulmonology clinic at Phoenix Children’s Hospital between July 2016 and July 2019. Descriptive statistics summarized demographics, prior asthma diagnosis, ICS use and compliance, reason for referral and intervention during consult. An appropriate referral was defined as prior asthma and ICS Step 3. Results: The total 171 study subjects had mean (standard deviation) age of 9.4 (3.8) years, with 100 (58%) males, and prior asthma diagnosis in 105 (61%). The most common reason for pulmonology referral was asthma in 90 (53%) patients, of which 70 (78% of 90) had prior asthma. Among 105 patients with asthma, 79 (76%) had a history of ICS, with 33 (42% of 79) patients reporting spacer compliance issues. The rate of appropriate referrals was 0.11 (95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.16). During the pulmonology consult, nearly half 10 (53%) of 19 patients appropriately referred received an ICS step up. Among 151 inappropriate referrals, ICS was initiated for 91 (60%) and increased for 45 (30%). Education was provided to all patients during pulmonology consult. Conclusions: Mild-to-moderate asthma can be effectively treated by primary care providers (PCPs) with implementation of ICS, thus prioritizing healthcare resource utilization by enabling the pulmonologist to see higher acuity patients sooner. Further study is warranted to identify strategies and tools for PCPs to optimize asthma management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carmen G. Diaz ◽  
Kimberly Dawson

Closed-loop communication (CLC) promotes a shared understanding of information. The authors hypothesized that simulation-based CLC training would improve staff perceptions of CLC ability and decrease medical errors. Participants experienced 2 hands-on CLC simulations one month apart. A retrospective chart review of Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 1 patients was conducted 4 months pre and post CLC simulation-based training. Seventy simulations were held over 13 weeks. Staff perceptions of CLC ability improved and were sustained after one month. Nine ESI 1 patients were seen pre CLC, and 9 post; 8/9 pre-CLC ESI 1 patients had medical errors, with 19 total errors noted; 5/9 post-CLC ESI 1 patients had medical errors, with 5 total errors noted (rate ratio [99% CI] = 3.8 [1.4, 10.2]; P = .008). This simulation-based CLC training curriculum improved staff perceptions of their CLC ability and was associated with a significant decrease in the number of medical errors in ESI 1 patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. E2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott L. Zuckerman ◽  
Cain S. Green ◽  
Kevin R. Carr ◽  
Michael C. Dewan ◽  
Peter J. Morone ◽  
...  

Morbidity due to avoidable medical errors is a crippling reality intrinsic to health care. In particular, iatrogenic surgical errors lead to significant morbidity, decreased quality of life, and attendant costs. In recent decades there has been an increased focus on health care quality improvement, with a concomitant focus on mitigating avoidable medical errors. The most notable tool developed to this end is the surgical checklist. Checklists have been implemented in various operating rooms internationally, with overwhelmingly positive results. Comparatively, the field of neurosurgery has only minimally addressed the utility of checklists as a health care improvement measure. Literature on the use of checklists in this field has been sparse. Considering the widespread efficacy of this tool in other fields, the authors seek to raise neurosurgical awareness regarding checklists by reviewing the current literature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. E435-E441
Author(s):  
Erin Williams ◽  
Raj Selvam ◽  
Wilma Hopman ◽  
Sulaiman Nanji

Background: Research on informed consent (IC) has traditionally focused on the documentation of the discussion with patients of potential complications. We sought to examine the completeness of documentation for all elements of IC for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC): potential complications, alternatives to LC and details of the procedure. Differences in the documentation of IC for elective and emergent LC were examined. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing LC at our institution between 2015 and 2017 was performed. Completeness of documentation was defined as documentation of all 3 elements of IC in the clinic note, the operating room note or the consent form itself. Data were analyzed descriptively. We compared documention for emergent and elective cases as well as documentation by residents and attending physicians using t tests. Results: A total of 270 patients were included in the analysis. Only 5 (2%) had complete documentation of all elements of IC. Documentation of potential complications was noted in 232 cases (86%), of which 58 (25%) were elective and 174 (75%) were emergent. Details were noted in 28 (10%) cases, of which 21 (75%) were elective and 7 (25%) were emergent. Alternatives were documented the least frequently: they were documented in 23 cases (9%), of which 20 (87%) were elective and 3 (13%) were emergent. Residents performed better than attending physicians in documenting IC discussions in clinic notes and on consent forms, but not in operating room notes. Conclusion: Documentation of the elements of IC for LC was poor. Potential complications were the most frequently documented element of IC; alternatives and details were often omitted. Future studies comparing audiotaped IC conversations with the documentation of IC are warranted. The use of procedure-specific consent forms for LC may facilitate documentation.


2017 ◽  
pp. 975-994
Author(s):  
Jayita Poduval

The impact of medical errors on the delivery of health care is massive, and it significantly reduces health care quality. They could be largely attributed to system failures and not human weakness. Therefore improving health care quality and ensuring quality control in health care would mean making systems function in a better manner. In order to achieve this all sections of society as well as industry must be involved. Reporting of medical error needs to be encouraged and this may be ensured if health care professionals as well as administrators and health consumers come forward without fear of being blamed. To get to the root of the problem- literally and metaphorically- a root cause analysis and audit must be carried out whenever feasible. Persons outside the medical care establishment also need to work with medical service providers to set standards of performance, competence and excellence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document