Designated Neonatal Resuscitation and Transport Team Implementation Improves Neonatal Outcomes in Low Resource Settings

Author(s):  
Caitlin Armstrong ◽  
Yvonne Yui ◽  
Victoria Nakibuuka-Kirabira ◽  
Patrick Bainghana ◽  
Ronald Kyambadde ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S47-S64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen N. Wall ◽  
Anne CC Lee ◽  
Susan Niermeyer ◽  
Mike English ◽  
William J. Keenan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Anne M. White ◽  
Dominic Mutai ◽  
David Cheruiyot ◽  
Amy R. L. Rule ◽  
Joel E. Mortensen ◽  
...  

Preventable neonatal deaths due to prematurity, perinatal events, and infections are the leading causes of under-five mortality. The vast majority of these deaths are in resource-limited areas. Deaths due to infection have been associated with lack of access to clean water, overcrowded nurseries, and improper disinfection (reprocessing) of equipment, including vital resuscitation equipment. Reprocessing has recently come to heightened attention, with the COVID-19 pandemic bringing this issue to the forefront across all economic levels; however, it is particularly challenging in low-resource settings. In 2015, Eslami et al. published a letter to the editor in Resuscitation, highlighting concerns about the disinfection of equipment being used to resuscitate newborns in Kenya. To address the issue of improper disinfection, the global health nongovernment organization PATH gathered a group of experts and, due to lack of best-practice evidence, published guidelines with recommendations for reprocessing of neonatal resuscitation equipment in low-resource areas. The guidelines follow the gold-standard principle of high-level disinfection; however, there is ongoing concern that the complexity of the guideline would make feasibility and sustainability difficult in the settings for which it was designed. Observations from hospitals in Kenya and Malawi reinforce this concern. The purpose of this review is to discuss why proper disinfection of equipment is important, why this is challenging in low-resource settings, and suggestions for solutions to move forward.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Amubuomombe Poli ◽  
Elkanah Omenge Orang’o ◽  
Ann Mwangi ◽  
Felix Ayub Barasa

Background: Cardiac disease is an important life-threatening complication during pregnancy. It is frequently seen in pregnant women living in resource-limited areas and often results in premature death. Aim: The aim of this hospital-based longitudinal study was to identify factors related to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with cardiac disease in low-resource settings. Methods: The study enrolled 91 pregnant women with congenital or acquired cardiac disease over a period of 2 years in Kenya. Results: Maternal and early neonatal deaths occurred in 12.2% and 12.6% of cases, respectively. The risk of adverse outcomes was significantly increased in those with pulmonary oedema (OR 11, 95% CI [2.3–52]; p=0.002) and arrhythmias (OR 16.9, 95% CI [2.5–113]; p=0.004). Limited access to care was significantly associated with adverse maternal outcomes (p≤0.001). Conclusion: Many factors contribute to adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with cardiac disease. Access to comprehensive specialised care may help reduce cardiac-related complications during pregnancy.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Findlay ◽  
Morgan Swanson ◽  
Christian Junker ◽  
Mitchell Kinkor ◽  
Karisa K. Harland ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is an American Academy of Pediatrics neonatal resuscitation program designed to reduce neonatal mortality in low resource settings. The 2017 neonatal mortality rate in Haiti was 28 per 1000 live births and an estimated 85 % of Haitian women deliver at home. Given this, the Community Health Initiative implemented an adapted HBB (aHBB) in Haiti to evaluate neonatal mortality. Methods Community Health Workers taught an aHBB program to laypeople, which didn’t include bag-valve-mask ventilation. Follow-up after delivery assessed for maternal and neonatal mortality and health. Results Analysis included 536 births of which 84.3 % (n=452) were attended by someone trained in aHBB. The odds of neonatal mortality was not significantly different among the two groups (aOR=0.48 [0.16-1.44]). Composite outcome of neonatal health as reported by the mother (subjective morbidity and mortality) was significantly lower in aHBB attended births (aOR=0.31 [0.14-0.70]). Conclusion This analysis of the aHBB program indicates that community training to laypersons in low resource settings may reduce neonatal ill-health but not neonatal mortality. This study is likely underpowered to find a difference in neonatal mortality. Further work is needed to evaluate which components of the aHBB program are instrumental in improving neonatal health.


2020 ◽  
pp. 157-196
Author(s):  
Rachel Collis ◽  
Rebecca Jones ◽  
Sarah O’Neill

In low-resource settings, obstetrics and gynaecology frequently forms a large part of the anaesthetist’s workload. The chapter serves both as an aide-memoire for those who are not regular practitioners in obstetric anaesthesia and as a guide to adapting your practice in low-resource settings. It contains practical advice on analgesia in labour and anaesthesia for Caesarean section, including spinal, general anaesthesia, and local anaesthesia techniques. It contains advice on drug alternatives in the absence of commonly used obstetric drugs, e.g. spinal bupivacaine. There are also sections on management of pre-eclampsia and obstetric haemorrhage, both of which are commonly encountered in low-resource settings. Neonatal resuscitation and non-obstetric surgery in the pregnant patient are also covered.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori A. Spies ◽  
Cheryl Riley ◽  
Rakhi Nair ◽  
Naveed Hussain ◽  
M. Padmanabh Reddy

Resuscitation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elena Cavicchiolo ◽  
Francesco Cavallin ◽  
Alex Staffler ◽  
Damiano Pizzol ◽  
Eduardo Matediana ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2018-316319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorien M D Versantvoort ◽  
Mirjam Y Kleinhout ◽  
Henrietta D L Ockhuijsen ◽  
Kitty Bloemenkamp ◽  
Willem B de Vries ◽  
...  

BackgroundAn important factor in worldwide neonatal mortality is the deficiency in neonatal resuscitation skills among trained professionals. ‘Helping Babies Breathe’ (HBB) is a simulation-based training course designed to train healthcare professionals in the initial steps of neonatal resuscitation in low-resource areas. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the available evidence regarding intrapartum-related stillbirths and neonatal mortality related to the HBB training and resuscitation method.Data sourcesCochrane, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Scopus.Study eligibility criteriaConducted in low-resource settings focusing on the effects of HBB on intrapartum-related stillbirths and neonatal mortality.Study appraisalIncluded studies were reviewed independently by two researchers in terms of methodological quality.Data extractionData were extracted by two independent reviewers and crosschecked by one additional reviewer.ResultsSeven studies were included in this systematic review; the selected studies included a total of 230.797 neonates. Significant decreases were found after the implementation of HBB in one of two studies describing perinatal mortality (n=25 108, rate ratio (RR) 0.75; p<0.001), four out of six studies related to intrapartum-related stillbirths (n=125.720, RR 0.31–0.76), in four out of five studies focusing on 1 day neonatal mortality (n=111.289, RR 0.37–0.67), and one out of three studies regarding 7 day neonatal mortality (n=4.390, RR 0.32). No changes were seen in late neonatal mortality after HBB training and resuscitation method.LimitationsIncluded studies in were predominantly of moderate quality, therefore no strong recommendations can be made.Conclusions and implications of key findingsDue to the heterogeneous quality of the studies, this systematic review showed moderate evidence for a decrease in intrapartum-related stillbirth and 1-day neonatal mortality rate after implementing the ‘Helping Babies Breathe’ training and resuscitation method. Further research is required to address the effects of simulation-based team training on morbidity and mortality beyond the initial neonatal period.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018081141.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e001092
Author(s):  
Daniel Helldén ◽  
Susanna Myrnerts Höök ◽  
Nicolas J Pejovic ◽  
Dan Mclellan ◽  
Clare Lubulwa ◽  
...  

BackgroundNeonatal mortality, often due to birth asphyxia, remains stubbornly high in sub-Saharan Africa. Guidelines for neonatal resuscitation, where achieving adequate positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is key, have been implemented in low-resource settings. However, the actual clinical practices of neonatal resuscitation have rarely been examined in these settings. The primary aim of this prospective observational study was to detail the cumulative proportion of time with ventilation during the first minute on the resuscitation table of neonates needing PPV at the Mulago National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda.MethodsFrom November 2015 to January 2016, resuscitations of non-breathing neonates by birth attendants were video-recorded using motion sensor cameras. The resuscitation practices were analysed using the application NeoTapAS and compared between those taking place in the labour ward and those in theatre through Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.ResultsFrom 141 recorded resuscitations, 99 were included for analysis. The time to initiation of PPV was 66 (42–102) s overall, and there was minimal PPV during the first minute in both groups with 0 (0–10) s and 0 (0–12) s of PPV, respectively. After initiating PPV the overall duration of interruptions during the first minute was 28 (18–37) s. Majority of interruptions were caused by stimulation (28%), unknown reasons (25%) and suction (22%).ConclusionsOur findings show a low adherence to standard resuscitation practices in 2015–2016. This emphasises the need for continuous educational efforts and investments in staff and adequate resources to increase the quality of clinical neonatal resuscitation practices in low-resource settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document