scholarly journals Patient Safety Programs for Child Maltreatment: Does One Size Fit All?

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e2021051583
Author(s):  
Nancy D. Kellogg ◽  
Natalie N. Kissoon
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 258-263
Author(s):  
Tandi M. Bagian ◽  
Katrina Jacobs ◽  
Robin Hemphill ◽  
Nancy J. Lightner

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-250
Author(s):  
Era Zana Nisa ◽  
Destanul Aulia ◽  
Siti Saidah Nasution

The goal of patient safety is one of the requirements that must be applied to the patient safety program in all hospitals. The implementation of patient safety programs is influenced by behavioral factors, namely the actions of nurses. The implementation of patient safety goals at PTPN IV Kebun Laras Hospital, Simalungun Regency is still not maximally implemented, seen from the actions of nurses, namely there are still incidents that endanger patients (KTD and KNC), and not all nurses behave in accordance with SOPs in implementing patient safety goals. The research used observational analytic method with cross sectional design. The samples were 62 nurses. The results showed that supervision variable had an effect on the actions of implementing nurses in the implementation of patient safety at PTPN IV Kebun Laras Hospital, Simalungun Regency. Keywords: Supervision, Nurses, Patient Safety.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yira Constanza Cortázar C ◽  
José Gilberto Orozco D ◽  
José Julián López G

AbstractPurposedrugs are the common point of pharmacovigilance and patient safety programs. Despite using a common language, the same epidemiological method and legislation that requires the operation of the two programs, there does not seem to be a clear relationship between them.Methodologyobservational descriptive cross sectional study of the reports database from an institutional patient safety program. Medication errors were classified according to the document The Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS) WHO 2009. Adverse Reactions (ADR) were classified according to Uppsala Monitoring Center.Resultsthe omission of drugs or doses was the most frequent error with 42.8% followed by ADRs (20.9%). No harm incidents corresponded to 61.2% and the remaining 38.8% was represented in near missincidents and no harm incidents. There were included 41 ADR and 15 therapeutic failures corresponding to a point-prevalence of 57 ADR/10,000 patients-year and 28.6% (56/196) of reports related to drugs. Phlebitis is the most frequently reported with 23, 7% followed by hypersensitivity reactions with 18.4% and excessive neuromuscular blockade with 13.1%.Conclusionsconsidering time, level of care and number of bed, ADR prevalence seem low. A very important proportion of reports corresponding to near miss incidents or no harm incidents is not taken into account by the security managers, losing a valuable risk management opportunity in the patient safety programs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-17
Author(s):  
Pranavi V. Sreeramoju ◽  
Tara N. Palmore ◽  
Grace M. Lee ◽  
Michael B. Edmond ◽  
Jan E. Patterson ◽  
...  

HEC Forum ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Nelson ◽  
Julia Neily ◽  
Peter Mills ◽  
William B. Weeks

Author(s):  
Felipe Mejia Medina ◽  
Zenaida Cucaita Vergara ◽  
Ruben Dario Castro Acuña ◽  
Jair Tellez

Patient safety is one of the most important challenges facing healthcare organizations in the world. Patient safety programs aim to avoid the events caused to the patient during their care, through strategies aimed at guaranteeing infection control, safe use of medications, equipment, clinical practice and environment. However, errors in health care are often due to weak information systems and their causes can be corrected by identifying the incidents and events presented during the care. Each country must have solid and reliable health information systems (HIS) to generate its own data, in order to monitor the different health programs and thus report on their management. In many countries, SISs are weak, incomplete and fragmented, with problems related to infrastructure, interoperability, connectivity, lack of training and availability to health care personnel. The objective of this study was to conduct a rapid systematic review of the literature about the experiences reported by users or health professionals with the Health Information Systems of Patient Safety Programs (PSP). 98 articles were identified in the Medline database, of which 5 articles with a qualitative approach were included. The results showed problems with the definition of concepts related to patient safety, fear of professionals to report events or incidents, reluctance to use SIS due to interoperability or communication problems. The qualitative studies related to HIS of the PSP are scarce and the publications found have been carried out in countries such as Iran, Taiwan, Austria, Spain and the Netherlands.


Author(s):  
Victoria Kennel ◽  
Julie Fedderson ◽  
Nicole Skinner ◽  
Bethany Lowndes

Patient safety improvement efforts across the country intend to address the threat of medical errors that lead to patient morbidity and mortality. Many hospital-based patient safety programs focus on team tools and skills to support the interdisciplinary nature of healthcare delivery. This institution utilizes two patient safety programs with different groups of professionals and medical trainees. The aim of our research was to identify tool and skill compatibility between the two programs for future integration into interprofessional clinical simulation-based training experiences. Two researchers conducted an independent content analysis of the tools and skills in the two programs to: 1) identify the similarities and differences among tools and skills, and, 2) categorize their potential for integration into clinical simulation-based training. The two programs had six common tools, a majority of which were communication-based. Over half the tools were team-focused. Five common team tools (Brief, SBAR, Check-Back, CUS, and Debrief) were identified for integration in interprofessional clinical simulation-based training experiences.


2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Moffatt-Bruce ◽  
Stephen Clark ◽  
Michael DiMaio ◽  
James Fann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document