scholarly journals Ultrafiltration in Acute Heart Failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Rosa Costanzo

Congestion is the predominant cause of more than 1 million annual heart failure hospitalisations and recurrent fluid overload predicts poor outcomes. Unresolved congestion trumps serum creatinine increases in predicting adverse heart failure outcomes. No pharmacological approach for acute heart failure has reduced these deleterious consequences. Simplified ultrafiltration devices permit fluid removal in lower acuity hospital settings, but results regarding safety and efficacy have been variable. However, adjustment of ultrafiltration rates to patients’ vital signs and renal function has been associated with more effective decongestion and fewer heart failure events. Many aspects of ultrafiltration, including patient selection, fluid removal rates, venous access, prevention of therapy- related complications and costs, require further investigation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marat Fudim ◽  
Jeremy Brooksbank ◽  
Anna Giczewska ◽  
Stephen J. Greene ◽  
Justin L. Grodin ◽  
...  

Background Ultrafiltration is not commonly used because of higher incidence of worsening renal function without improved decongestion. We examined differential outcomes of high versus low fluid removal and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction (EF) in CARRESS‐HF (Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure). Methods and Results Baseline characteristics in the ultrafiltration arm were compared according to 24‐hour ultrafiltration‐based fluid removal above versus below the median. Patients were stratified by EF (≤40% or >40%). We compared clinical parameters of clinical decongestion during the hospitalization based on initial (≤24 hours) response to ultrafiltration. Cox‐proportional hazards models were used to identify associations between fluid removal <24 hours and composite of death, hospitalization, or unscheduled outpatient/emergency department visit during study follow‐up. The intention‐to‐treat analysis included 93 patients. Within 24 hours, median fluid removal was 1.89 L (Q1, Q3: 1.22, 3.16). The high fluid removal group had a greater urine output (9.08 versus 6.23 L, P =0.027) after 96 hours. Creatinine change from baseline to 96 hours was similar in both groups (0.10 mg/dL increase, P =0.610). The EF >40% group demonstrated larger increases of change in creatinine ( P =0.023) and aldosterone ( P =0.038) from baseline to 96 hours. Among patients with EF >40%, those with above median fluid removal (n=17) when compared with below median (n=17) had an increased rate of the combined end point (87.5% versus 47.1%, P =0.014). Conclusions In patients with acute heart failure, higher initial fluid removal with ultrafiltration had no association with worsening renal function. In patients with EF >40%, ultrafiltration was associated with worsening renal function irrespective of fluid removal rate and higher initial fluid removal was associated with higher rates of adverse clinical outcomes, highlighting variable responses to decongestive therapy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 240 ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Morpurgo ◽  
Mario Pasqualini ◽  
Maria Cristiana Brunazzi ◽  
Gabriele Vianello ◽  
Roberto Valle ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 293 (4) ◽  
pp. R1580-R1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando L. Martin ◽  
Thanom Supaporn ◽  
Horng H. Chen ◽  
Sharon M. Sandberg ◽  
Yuzuru Matsuda ◽  
...  

Worsening renal function in the setting of human acute heart failure (AHF) predicts poor outcomes, such as rehospitalization and increased mortality. Understanding potential renoprotective mechanisms is warranted. The guanylate cyclase (GC) enzymes and their second messenger cGMP are the target of two important circulating neurohumoral systems with renoprotective properties. Specifically, natriuretic peptides (NP) released from the heart with AHF target particulate GC in the kidney, while the nitric oxide (NO) system is an activator of renal soluble GC. We hypothesized that both systems are essential to preserve renal excretory and hemodynamic function in AHF but with distinct roles. We investigated these roles in three groups of anesthetized dogs (6 each) with AHF induced by rapid ventricular pacing. After a baseline AHF clearance, each group received intrarenal vehicle (control), NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA), a competitive NO inhibitor (50 μg·kg−1·min−1) or a specific NP receptor antagonist, HS-142-1 (0.5 mg/kg). We observed that intrarenal l-NMMA decreased renal blood flow (RBF) without significant decreases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary sodium excretion (UNaV), or urinary cGMP. In contrast, HS-142-1 resulted in a decrease in UNaV and cGMP excretion together with a reduction in GFR and an increase in distal fractional tubular sodium reabsorption. We conclude that in AHF, the NP system plays a role in maintaining sodium excretion and GFR, while the function of NO is in the maintenance of RBF. These studies have both physiological and therapeutic implications warranting further research into cardiorenal interactions in this syndrome of AHF.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Meng ◽  
Gang Liu ◽  
Jianlong Zhai ◽  
Yuzhi Zhen ◽  
Qingzhen Zhao ◽  
...  

Objective.To determine the safety and efficacy of prednisone in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) and hyperuricemia.Methods.Prednisone therapy was administered for a short time to 191 symptomatic HF patients with hyperuricemia (serum uric acid > 7 mg/dl).Results.Prednisone significantly reduced serum uric acid by 2.99 mg/dl (p < 0.01) and serum creatinine by 0.17 mg/dl (p < 0.01). These favorable effects were associated with a remarkable increase in urine output, improvement in renal function, and improvement in clinical status.Conclusion.Prednisone can be used safely in symptomatic HF patients with hyperuricemia.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Takeuchi ◽  
Michiaki Nagai ◽  
Keigo Dote ◽  
Masaya Kato ◽  
Noboru Oda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Regardless of patients' baseline renal function, worsening renal function (WRF) during hospitalization is associated with poor outcomes. In individuals with acute heart failure (AHF), one predictor of WRF is an early drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP). Few studies have investigated WRF in elderly AHF patients or the influence of these patients' at-admission heart rate (HR) on the relationship between an early SBP drop SBP and the AHF. Methods: We measured the SBP and HR of 245 elderly AHF inpatients (82.9±6.0 years old, females 50.6%) at admission and another six times over the next 48 hr. We defined 'WRF' as a serum creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL by Day 5 post-admission. We calculated the 'early SBP drop' as the difference between the admission SBP value and the lowest value during the first 48 hr of hospitalization. Results: There were significant differences between the 36 patients with WRF and the 209 patients without WRF: early SBP drop (51.3 vs. 32.5 mmHg, p<0.01) and at-admission HR (79.3 vs. 89.6 bpm, p<0.05), respectively. In the multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for the confounders, early SBP drop (OR: 1.003, 95%CI: 1.003–1.03, p<0.04) and HR at-admission (OR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.96–0.99, p<0.01) were significantly associated with WRF. No significant association was shown for the interaction term of early SBP drop ´ at-admission HR with WRF (p=0.3). Conclusions: In these elderly AHF patients, exaggerated early SBP drop and lower at-admission HR were significant independent predictors of WRF, and these factors were additively associated with WRF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cze-Ci Chan ◽  
Kuang-Tso Lee ◽  
Wan-Jing Ho ◽  
Yi-Hsin Chan ◽  
Pao-Hsien Chu

Abstract Background Acute heart failure is a life-threatening clinical condition. Levosimendan is an effective inotropic agent used to maintain cardiac output, but its usage is limited by the lack of evidence in patients with severely abnormal renal function. Therefore, we analyzed data of patients with acute heart failure with and without abnormal renal function to examine the effects of levosimendan. Methods We performed this retrospective cohort study using data from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD) of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH). Patients admitted for heart failure with LVEF ≤ 40% between January 2013 and December 2018 who received levosimendan or dobutamine in the critical cardiac care units (CCU) were identified. Patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were excluded. Outcomes of interest were mortality at 30, 90, and 180 days after the cohort entry date. Results There were no significant differences in mortality rate at 30, 90, and 180 days after the cohort entry date between the levosimendan and dobutamine groups, or between subgroups of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or on dialysis. The results were consistent before and after propensity score matching. Conclusions Levosimendan did not increase short- or long-term mortality rates in critical patients with acute heart failure and reduced ejection fraction compared to dobutamine, regardless of their renal function. An eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 was not necessarily considered a contraindication for levosimendan in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document