scholarly journals TO THE QUESTION OF PROBLEMS OF PROTECTION OF EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY RIGHTS ON MEANS OF INDIVIDUALIZATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
O. M. Voloshchenko
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Exclusive Property

scholarly journals Protection of intellectual property rights on a trademark

2020 ◽  
pp. 19-24
Author(s):  
L.V. Zolota ◽  
G.V. Rusak
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Unique Object ◽  
Trademark Protection ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Trademark Use

In the process of developing their own business, legal entities and individuals are looking for new ways and tools to separate, individualize goods or services from others. The most effective tool to individualize and promote business not only in domestic but also global markets is a trademark. Therefore, it is worth paying attention to the brand from the moment of business formation. After all, the consumer perceives the brand visually, phonetically, semantically, it is a tool that psychologically affects the consumer of a product or service and forces him to make a choice. Relations arising during the acquisition, exercise and protection of trademark rights are provided by the Constitution of Ukraine, the Civil and Commercial Codes of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine "On Protection of Rights to Marks for Goods and Services", as well as relevant ratified international treaties and other regulations acts. Also, the relevance of this topic is due to the fact that the trademark is a special, unique object of intellectual property rights, a means to individualize goods and services, as well as business participants. Problems of trademark use and protection are a significant issue, as a necessary condition for effective economic development, increasing the level of product competitiveness, not only in Ukraine but also abroad, protection against unfair competition is the proper implementation of trademark rights. During the writing of the article to achieve the goal the concept of trademark in Ukraine and its features were revealed, differences of trademark from other marks for goods and services were established, the legislation of Ukraine in the field of trademark protection was analyzed and characterized trademark in Ukraine.

User Rights to Commercial Copies of Copyright Works

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Chapdelaine
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Personal Property ◽  
Exclusive Property

The chapter begins the investigation of the rights users have to copyright works by looking at the scope of the personal property rights users may have in copies of copyright works. These rights have been largely overlooked in copyright law and theory. Applying the ownership spectrum developed by James W. Harris in Property and Justice (1996) this chapter shows how copyright users’ personal property rights are distinct from other forms of personal property and heavily dictated by the exclusive property rights of copyright holders in the copyright work. The personal property rights of copyright users fare poorly on the ownership spectrum and this trend is intensified by commercial practices of copyright holders endorsed by courts, and the struggles of legislatures and courts to deal with the dematerialization of copies of copyright works. This account of the personal property rights of copyright users reveals a weak strain of copyright user rights.

On Certain Questions of Circulation of Exclusive Rights and Material Carrier of Objects of Intellectual Property

10.12737/5495 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Марина Рожкова ◽  
Marina Rozhkova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Authority ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
Named Objects ◽  
Exclusive Property ◽  
The Right ◽  
Exclusive Right

The article draws attention to the main sign of intellectual property, which set them apart from other objects of civil rights, their intangible nature. Given this characteristic, it is emphasized that in civil circulation are introduced themselves the objects of intellectual property and exclusive rights to them and physical media that embodies these objects. In addition, the rules of entering into civil turnover for the named objects of civil rights — exclusive rights and material carriers is different. Physical media are differentiated depending on what is the purpose for their creation. If the purpose of fastening of the object of intellectual activity on the material carrier is to obtain the legal protection of this object, it is a primary material embodiment; if the goal is the introduction of a quantity of material carriers — talking about secondary material embodiment. Exclusive (property) rights can be the object of civil transactions in situations where the right holder provides the legal authority: either alienates belonging to him of the exclusive right to fully or allows another person to one of the rights that make up the exclusive right, the right use of the object of intellectual property rights on conditions of the license.

scholarly journals THE CONCEPT AND CONTENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavlo V. Makushev ◽  
◽  
Andriy V. Khrid�chkin ◽  
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Court Of Justice

The article considers the features of public administration in the field of intellectual property and the conceptual basis for the formation of its procedures in the European Union. The conceptual bases of formation and development of procedures of public administration in the field of intellectual property in the countries of the European Union are opened. The pluralism of approaches to the definition of public administration procedures in the field of intellectual property in the countries of the European Union is analyzed. The normative-legal base of procedures of public administration in the field of intellectual property in the countries of the European Union is given. The acts of the Court of Justice of the European Communities on public administration in the field of intellectual property are analyzed. It is proved that the formation of European private law is due to the purpose of creating and functioning of a common market. It is established that in the national legal systems of European countries the regulation of public relations in the field of intellectual property is given considerable attention. The process of improving the procedures of public administration in the field of intellectual property in the European Union is analyzed and the legal framework of this process is given. A feature of European Union law is to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights through two main mechanisms: harmonization of legislation of member states of the European Union and the introduction of European Union protection documents for various intellectual property. Thus, other partner countries of the European Union, in addition to measures to approximate legislation, may decide on the signing of agreements on entry into the regional European system of protection of certain intellectual property. The member states of the European Union pursue a coherent policy in the field of legal protection and use of intellectual property. Guided by the principle of free movement of goods and services, they focus their efforts primarily on the unification and harmonization of legislation in the field of intellectual property and prevention of the use of intellectual property rights in unfair competition. Within the European Union, a system of direct regulation of the processes of unification and harmonization of legislation in the field of intellectual property, which is especially characteristic of the field of copyright and related rights. The Court of Justice of the European Communities plays a significant role in the unification and harmonization of the legal regulation of relations in the field of intellectual property. In the absence of appropriate harmonization of national legislation in the field of intellectual property with the principles of free movement of goods and services, as well as freedom of competition, proclaimed by the European Union, the importance of the case law of the European Court of Justice is difficult to overestimate. The beginning of unification and harmonization activities in the field of intellectual property protection is preceded by a stage of case law enforcement practice, which allows to identify existing gaps in legal regulation and solve relevant problems. At present, it is a question of the existence of a special system of intellectual property rights of the European Union, formed in its general features, built on principles different from the traditional national ones, with a special subject of regulation. At the same time, this system is a new legal phenomenon that is developing quite dynamically and rapidly along with national and international legal systems. The legal regulation of intellectual property relations in the European Union aims to ensure a high level of protection of these rights, as they are the legal basis for the protection of the results of creative activity. The conclusion about the urgency of research of problems of public administration in the field of intellectual property in the countries of the European Union is made.

scholarly journals Objects of intellectual property rights: general terms of protection

2021 ◽  
pp. 98-106
Author(s):  
Olena Bakhareva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Brand Names ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
General Terms ◽  
Commercial Code ◽  
Utility Models

Keywords: wine go and brown models, promises, sort of roslin that breed of twarin,trade marks (marks for goods), commerce (form) naymenuvannya, geographic significance,komertsiyna tamnytsya, computer programs Intellectual property is the result of human creativity: works of art and science, inventionsand utility models in all fields of human activity, industrial designs, trademarks(marks for goods and services), commercial (brand) names, information products,selection achievements, etc. Intellectual property is created as a result of purposefulmental work of human intellect, the result of which is something new, characterized byuniqueness, originality, uniqueness.According to the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine, an intellectual property rightis a person’s right to the result of intellectual, creative activity or another object of intellectualproperty right, defined by this Code and another law. Intellectual property rightsare personal non-property intellectual property rights and (or) property intellectual propertyrights, the content of which in relation to certain objects of intellectual propertyrights is determined by this Code and other law. Intellectual property rights are inviolable.No one may be deprived of intellectual property rights or restricted in their exercise,except in cases provided by law.The Commercial Code of Ukraine provides a list of intellectual property, leaving itopen and states that the general conditions for the protection of intellectual propertyrights to objects are determined by the Civil Code of Ukraine. In the Civil Code ofUkraine, the fourth Book «Intellectual Property Law» is devoted to the issue of intellectualproperty. The Civil Code of Ukraine provides a more extensive list of objects of intellectualproperty rights, defines their concepts.According to Article 420 of the Civil Code of Ukraine, the objects of intellectual propertyrights, in particular, include: literary and artistic works; computer programs; datacompilation (database); implementation; phonograms, videograms, broadcasts (programs)of broadcasting organizations; scientific discoveries; inventions, utility models,industrial designs; arrangement of semiconductor products; innovation proposals; plantvarieties, animal breeds; commercial (brand) names, trademarks (signs for goods andservices), geographical indications; trade secrets.The purpose of my article is to summarize information about the objects of intellectualproperty rights, disclosure of their concepts with reference to relevant regulatorysources. Therefore, to simplify the reader's perception and search for concepts in differentsources, it was decided to group them in one text. I hope that the information providedwill be useful.

scholarly journals Appraisal of property rights of intellectual property

2019 ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
K. Ivanova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Special Mechanism ◽  
Exclusive Property ◽  
The Law

Problem setting. The urgency of the problem is caused by the fact that active innovation processes occurring around the world, informatization of society and transformation of knowledge into a source of progress indicate that the profitability of entrepreneurial activity in a market economy to some extent depends on the ability to dispose of the results of human intellectual activity, hence the importance of intellectual property, their value is constantly increasing, which requires the implementation of a special mechanism for determining their value (appraisal). Analysis of recent researches and publications. In the scientific literature the scientists such as V.S. Drobyazko, P.M. Tsybulov, O.O. Horodov, I.M. Bieltiukova, O.M. Vinnyk, A.O. Kodynets, O.R. Kibenko, O.O. Tverezenko, V.S. Shcherbyna, I.YE. Yakubivskyy have made a significant contribution to the development of the issues on valuation of property rights of intellectual property. Target of research. To analyze the mechanism for assessing the value of such group of intangible assets as property rights of intellectual property and identify the features of this mechanism. Article’s main body. Appraisal activity is a complex institution. Appraisal of intellectual property requires the integration of the economic concept of value and the legal concept of property. But the intangible character (ideal nature) of intellectual property objects distinguishes them from other civil rights objects and becomes a certain obstacle when it comes to determining their value. When it comes to appraisal of objects of the intellectual property rights, such actions are subjected not to intangible (ideal) objects, but to exclusive property rights to them. However, the Law “On Appraisal of Property, Property Rights and Professional Appraisal Activity” considered of objects of the intellectual property rights as intangible assets that, in turn, along with things, securities, units form a broader category “property”. If the legislator had given the object of valuation the exclusive property rights and classified them as “property rights that could be valued”, it would be more in keeping with their nature. The Law “On Appraisal of Property, Property Rights and Professional Appraisal Activity” distinguishes between the market value of property and non-market types of property values (ie other types of value that are different from market value). As a general rule, the market value of objects is determined. Thus the value of property rights of intellectual property is determined by the approximate price of market demand for them. Appraisal activity is carried out in cases established by the legislation of Ukraine, international agreements, on the basis of the agreement, as well as at the request of one of the parties to the contract with the consent of the parties. The legislation defines cases when appraisal shall be mandatory. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The commercialization of intellectual property objects requires the implementation of a special mechanism for determining their value (appraisal), and the improvement of current legislation in appraisal activity field. Property rights of intellectual property belong to those, which have a monetary valuation, and must be carried out under the legislation. Valuation of property rights of intellectual property may take place, in particular, in the following cases: 1) defining the valuation of the exclusive rights transferred under the contract in intellectual property field, in particular the license contract, and defining the license fee base; 2) contribution the property rights of intellectual property to the authorized (composite) capital of certain types of companies; 3) using property rights of intellectual property in joint activities without the creation of a legal entity (including in the form of a common partnership); 4) the pledge of the property rights of intellectual property.

scholarly journals Legal Responses to IPR Infringement in Internet Sphere

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-32
Author(s):  
Mahbubl Islam
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Digital Revolution ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Legal Responses ◽  
Online Business ◽  
Ip Law

The emergence of the Internet has changed the ways in which we create, distribute, access, and use information. The Internet provides manifold opportunities for users, operators, businesses, and the public at large for speedy, cheap, and global dissemination of information, knowledge, research, and entertainment. At the same time, it also poses complex conceptual and empirical challenges for intellectual property and related rights. Works of intellectual property can be digitized and transferred over the Internet. Many trademarks have been placed on it by the companies for advertising and marketing goods and services. In the field of copyright, a number of works of literature, film and art, and notably computer programs, have been transferred over the Internet. The patent system has also migrated onto the Internet. It is now popular for companies to patent their online business methods. In the Internet Sphere, the infringer can easily misdirect consumers to its website by using another’s trademark as a meta-tag, and it is also easy to copy and distribute other’s copyright materials unlawfully. Due to global nature of the Internet, an Internet IP infringement usually happens not only within one country but also across borders. All of these have raised many difficulties for the protection of IPRs in Internet sphere. Therefore everyone has been dubious of what the actual laws concerning Intellectual Property rights are in relation to Internet sphere. Today the Internet explosion has made the question of how to enforce IP law on a global scale as an imperative issue. In this Article, the author tries to accentuate the existing as well as changing IPR challenges brought about by the Internet and project what issues a national legislature should consider to meet the demands of the digital revolution. The core object of this study is to scrutinize the compelling factors behind the Intellectual Property Rights Infringements through the Internet and investigate the existing Legal Responses in International, Regional and Local levels. However, the findings demonstrate that mass-awareness, consensus and mutual co-operation among the developed and developing countries, proper enforcement of the existing laws as well as bringing amendments to some areas of Law can be cited as a potential solution.  

scholarly journals Cost Accounting and Analysis for the Creation of an Enterprise Website

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 9876-9882
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Intangible Asset ◽  
Analysis Algorithm ◽  
Reasonable Cost ◽  
Exclusive Property ◽  
The Cost ◽  
A Company

The article discusses the theoretical and methodological bases of accounting and analysis of costs for creating an enterprise website and provides recommendations for accounting and analysis of costs for creating an enterprise website. The study of the essence of the website as a separate accounting object from a technical, legal and accounting point of view has determined that the costs of creating a company website are capitalized in the form of an intangible asset and are subject to depreciation only if they are used for their own needs and when there is a likelihood that it will create future economic benefits. That is, the cost of implementing an enterprise website is displayed according to how it is used. The article contains the rationale for the development, as well as the recommendations themselves: a) the cost of creating an enterprise site with the involvement of a contractor and the cost of developing a website independently using its own resources for information placement is offered; b) the Agreement on the transfer of exclusive property rights to the content of the site was developed; c) a comprehensive cost analysis algorithm is proposed for the enterprise web site, which will provide a well-reasoned and reasonable cost estimate.

scholarly journals Legal regulation of the license agreement

2021 ◽  
pp. 15-19
Author(s):  
Alona Tkachuk
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
License Agreement ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
License Agreements ◽  
Scientific Analysis ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
Exclusive Property

The legal regulation of the license agreement is considered. Its contractual construction is investigated. The norms of the Civil Code of Ukraine and other normative legal acts on determining the essential terms of the license agreement are analyzed and it is clarified, which conditions must be agreed by the parties in order for the license agreement to be considered concluded. The scientific analysis of the legal nature of the license agreement in the system of civil law agreements is carried out. The objective essential conditions and features of concluding a license agreement are revealed. The subject and terms of the contract are considered. The rights and responsibilities of the licensor and the licensee are analyzed. The advantages of each party of the contract are determined. The civil law aspects of regulation of contractual license relations are investigated. The legal nature of the license is determined. The classification of license agreements has been carried out. The analysis of the current legislation in the field of granting property rights to the results of intellectual activity is carried out. The essential conditions of the agreement on creation on the order and use of the object of intellectual property rights and the agreement on transfer of exclusive property rights of intellectual property are investigated. The relationship between the license and the license agreement has been clarified. Recommendations on the structure of license agreements and advice on their content and method of presentation are provided. Conclusions and proposals, aimed at improving civil legislation in the field of legal regulation of license agreements, are formulated. It is concluded, that the license agreement is a fair mechanism for obtaining remuneration for the creation or acquisition of intellectual property

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document