scholarly journals Push-Out Bond Strength of Quartz Fiber Posts Luted with Self-Adhesive and Conventional Resin Cements

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Luiz Cardoso DDS, MSD, PhD ◽  
Élito Araújo DDS, MSD, PhD ◽  
Juan Ramírez DDS, MSD, PhD
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Quartz Fiber ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
Crown Roots ◽  
Push Out

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the resin cement on push-out bond strength of quartz fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Fifty-six single-rooted human teeth were selected. After removing the crown, roots were endodontically treated and the dowel spaces were prepared with # 2 post drills of DT Ligth® SL Post System (VDW®). The specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 14). Group 1: RelyX™ Unicem (3M ESPE), Group 2: Clearfil ™ SA Cement (Kuraray), Group 3: Bifix SE (Voco), and G4 RelyX™ ARC (3M ESPE). After 24 h, 12 specimens of each group were sectioned in 6 slices with 1 mm of thickness, two of each radicular third. The push-out test was conducted in an Instron machine at 0.5 mm/min. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Bonferroni test. Fractured specimens were observed at 25X to evaluate the types of failures. Two specimens of each group were processed for SEM evaluation. The Mean values (MPa) for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were respectively: 11.06, 8.85, 8.37 and 13.36. All experimental groups showed higher values of resistance in the cervical third, while the lowest were in the apical third. Adhesive failures between cement and dentin (46.87 %) prevailed, followed by mixed failures (45.15 %). SEM photomicrographs illustrating the interface formed between the self-adhesive resin cements and dentin showed an interface without the formation of a hybrid layer. G4 showed the formation of a thick and homogeneous hybrid layer with resin tags. The conventional resin cement associated with a three-step adhesive system displayed the higher bond strength to intraradicular dentin, when compared to the different self-adhesive resin cements.

scholarly journals Push-Out Bond Strength of Quartz Fiber Posts Luted with Self-Adhesive and Conventional Resin Cements

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Luiz Cardoso DDS, MSD, PhD ◽  
Élito Araújo DDS, MSD, PhD ◽  
Juan Ramírez DDS, MSD, PhD
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Quartz Fiber ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Bonferroni Test ◽  
Crown Roots ◽  
Push Out

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the resin cement on push-out bond strength of quartz fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Fifty-six single-rooted human teeth were selected. After removing the crown, roots were endodontically treated and the dowel spaces were prepared with # 2 post drills of DT Ligth® SL Post System (VDW®). The specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n = 14). Group 1: RelyX™ Unicem (3M ESPE), Group 2: Clearfil ™ SA Cement (Kuraray), Group 3: Bifix SE (Voco), and G4 RelyX™ ARC (3M ESPE). After 24 h, 12 specimens of each group were sectioned in 6 slices with 1 mm of thickness, two of each radicular third. The push-out test was conducted in an Instron machine at 0.5 mm/min. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Bonferroni test. Fractured specimens were observed at 25X to evaluate the types of failures. Two specimens of each group were processed for SEM evaluation. The Mean values (MPa) for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were respectively: 11.06, 8.85, 8.37 and 13.36. All experimental groups showed higher values of resistance in the cervical third, while the lowest were in the apical third. Adhesive failures between cement and dentin (46.87 %) prevailed, followed by mixed failures (45.15 %). SEM photomicrographs illustrating the interface formed between the self-adhesive resin cements and dentin showed an interface without the formation of a hybrid layer. G4 showed the formation of a thick and homogeneous hybrid layer with resin tags. The conventional resin cement associated with a three-step adhesive system displayed the higher bond strength to intraradicular dentin, when compared to the different self-adhesive resin cements.

scholarly journals Influence of Relining Post on the Bond Strength of Resin Cements

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 559-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus Coelho Bandéca ◽  
Adriano Augusto Melo de Mendonça ◽  
Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho ◽  
Fausto da Silva Bramante ◽  
Darlon Martins Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
The Self ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Adhesive Cement ◽  
Push Out

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the influence of relining fiber posts on the bond strength (BS) of resin cements in the root canal. Forty bovine teeth were divided in four groups (n = 10)G1 (ARC)—fiber post cemented with resin cement RelyX ARC; G2 (ARC+Z350)—relined fiber post cemented with RelyX ARC; G3 (U200)—fiber post cemented with self-adhesive cement RelyX U200; G4 (U200+Z350)—relined fiber post cemented with RelyX U200. The roots were sectioned in six 1.2-mm slices and the push-out test was performed. Data were analyzed by three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). For the conventional resin cement, there was no significant difference between groups G1-ARC (15.5 ± 3.8) and G2-ARC+Z350 (16.1 ± 4.5). For the self-adhesive cement, the results revealed higher BS values for relined posts G4-U200 + Z350 (19.9 ± 7.9) as compared to non-relined posts G3-U200 (14.4 ± 4.5). For both cements, in groups of relined posts, the apical and the cervical thirds presented similar BS. Relining enhances the performance of the self-adhesive resin cement, and the interaction between relining and root third influences the BS to the conventional resin cement. How to cite this article Conde DM, Rodrigues VP, de Fátima Carvalho Souza S, Bauer JRO, da Silva Bramante F, Lima SNL, Filho EMM, Bandeca MC, de Mendonça AAM, Lima DM. Influence of Relining Post on the Bond Strength of Resin Cements. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(7):559-564.

scholarly journals Adhesive Durability Inside the Root Canal Using Self-adhesive Resin Cements for Luting Fiber Posts

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. E167-E176 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Bitter ◽  
A Maletic ◽  
K Neumann ◽  
L Breschi ◽  
G Sterzenbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Silver Deposits ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
One Year ◽  
Push Out

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of various self-adhesive resin cements on the push-out bond strengths and nanoleakage expression at the luting interfaces of fiber posts immediately and after one year of aging. Methods and Materials: One hundred forty-four extracted human anterior teeth were endodontically treated. After post space preparation, fiber posts were luted using five commercially available self-adhesive resin (SAR) cements and a core build-up material applied with a self-etch adhesive (BF: Bifix SE/Rebilda Post, VOCO; CSA: Clearfil SA Cement/Rely X Fiber Post, 3M ESPE; RX: RelyX Unicem 2/Rely X Fiber Post, 3M ESPE; SPC: Speed Cem/FRC Postec, Ivoclar Vivadent; SMC: Smart Cem/X Post, Dentsply; RB: Rebilda DC-Futurabond/Rebilda Post; n=22). For each group, half of the specimens were subjected to thermocycling (TC) (5°C-55°C, 10,000 cycles) and stored humid for one year at 37°C. Push-out bond strength data of six slices (thickness 1 mm) per root and nanoleakage expression of representative specimens were evaluated after 24 hours (baseline) and after TC and storage for one year (aging), respectively. Results: Bond strength differed significantly among resin cements (p<0.0005) and the location inside the root canal (p<0.0005), but not by aging (p=0.390; repeated-measures analysis of variance). SMC (14.6±5.8 MPa) and RX (14.1±6.8 MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strength compared to BF (10.6±5.4 MPa) and RB (10.0±4.6 MPa) but differed not significantly from SPC (12.8±4.8) MPa; CSA (6.1±4.6 MPa) revealed significantly lower bond strength compared to all other investigated materials (p<0.05; Tukey Honestly Significantly Different). Qualitative nanoleakage analysis revealed more silver deposits at the interface in all groups after aging. For CSA, a large amount of silver deposits inside the cement was also observed at baseline and after aging. Conclusions: Fiber post luting using SAR cements demonstrated reliable bond strengths. Product-specific differences and initial degradation effects could be demonstrated.

scholarly journals Relining effects on the push-out shear bond strength of glass fiber posts

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-233
Author(s):  
Adriana Rosado Valente ANDRIOLI ◽  
Margareth COUTINHO ◽  
Andréa Araújo de VASCONCELLOS ◽  
Milton Edson MIRANDA
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Push Out

Abstract Introduction The correct use of glass fiber posts in endodontically treated teeth is essential for the clinical success of restorative treatment. Objective This study evaluated the push-out shear bond strength of relined (R) or non-relined (NR) glass fiber posts, cemented with self-adhesive resin cement [RelyXTM U100 (U100)] and conventional resin cement [RelyXTM ARC (ARC)]. Material and method Sixty human single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated and divided into ARC-NR; U100-NR; ARC-R; U100-R groups. The teeth were sectioned into cervical, middle and apical thirds, and subjected to the push-out test. Bond strength was analyzed by the Friedman test; cement and post types were compared by the Mann Whitney test. The pattern of failures was evaluated with digital camera through images at 200x magnification, and was classified as adhesive (at the cement/dentin or cement/post interface), cohesive (cement or post), and mixed failures. Result In ARC-NR, bond strength values were higher in the cervical third; in U100-NR and ARC-R they were similar between the thirds. In U100-R, in the cervical and middle thirds the bond strength values were similar, and there was lower value in the apical third. For non-relined glass fiber posts, the highest mean bond strength values were observed with self-adhesive resin cement. Whereas, relined posts cemented with conventional resin cement had stronger cement layer in comparison with non-relined fiber posts. Conclusion The post relining technique was efficient in ARC-R. ARC-NR and U100-R showed improved bond strength in the cervical region of canal walls. The main failures were adhesive at the cement-post interface.

The Role of Resin Cement on Bond Strength of Glass-fiber Posts Luted Into Root Canals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. E31-E44 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Sarkis-Onofre ◽  
JA Skupien ◽  
MS Cenci ◽  
RR Moraes ◽  
T Pereira-Cenci
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts

SUMMARY Because there are several ways to cement glass-fiber posts (GFPs) into root canals, there is no consensus on the best strategy to achieve high bond strengths. A systematic review was conducted to determine if there is difference in bond strength to dentin between regular and self-adhesive resin cements and to verify the influence of several variables on the retention of GFPs. This report followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. In vitro studies that investigated the bond strength of GFPs luted with self-adhesive and regular resin cements were selected. Searches were carried out in the PubMed and Scopus databases. No publication year or language limit was used, and the last search was done in October 2012. A global comparison was performed between self-adhesive and regular resin cements. Two subgroup analyses were performed: 1) Self-adhesive × Regular resin cement + Etch-and-rinse adhesive and 2) Self-adhesive × Regular resin cement + Self-etch adhesive. The analyses were carried out using fixed-effect and random-effects models. The results showed heterogeneity in all comparisons, and higher bond strength to dentin was identified for self-adhesive cements. Although the articles included in this meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity and high risk of bias, the in vitro literature seems to suggest that use of self-adhesive resin cement could improve the retention of GFPs into root canals.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF PUSH-OUT BOND STRENGTH AND FAILURE MODES OF FIBER POST CEMENTED WITH DIFFERENT ADHESIVE RESIN CEMENTS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Sonali Bansod ◽  
Ashwini Gaikwad ◽  
Abhijit Jadhav
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Push Out

Aim: To compare the push-out bond strength and modes of failure of fiber post cemented with different adhesive resin cements. Materials and Method: Forty five single rooted teeth were randomly divided into three groups as, group 1- Fluorocore 2+, group 2- Rely-X U200 and group 3-G-Cem, according to the adhesive resin cement used. The roots were subjected to chemo-mechanical preparation and cemented with adhesive resin cement. The teeth were sectioned into slices of the different root thirds and tested for bond strength (push out). Results were analysed using Chi square, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis test was used to find the significance of study parameters between three or more groups, with p = 0.05 for statistical significance. Result: Push out bond strength of Fluorocore 2+ is significantly higher at coronal level than apical level. No significant difference observed between coronal, middle and apical levels in group 2 and in group 3. Conclusion: Fluorocore 2+ adhesive resin cement is best to use for luting the fibre post. Fluorocore 2+ forms better bonding with post as well as dentin proving its better efficiency clinically.

Push-out bond strength of fiber posts luted using different adhesive resin cements

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suat Özcan ◽  
Darendeliler Yaman ◽  
Serkan Aktuna ◽  
Oya Bala ◽  
Yelda Nayir
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Push Out

Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Resin Relined Fiber Posts Cemented With Self-adhesive Resin Cement on Push-out and Microtensile Bond Strength Tests

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. E185-E195
Author(s):  
RV Machry ◽  
PE Fontana ◽  
TC Bohrer ◽  
LF Valandro ◽  
OB Kaizer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Push Out

Clinical Relevance When luting relined fiber posts with self-adhesive cement, the surface treatment of the posts influences the adhesion of the fiber posts to root dentin. SUMMARY This study evaluated the effect of surface treatment and silanization of resin composite on the bond strength of relined fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Push-out and microtensile bond strength (MTBS) tests were performed in this study. The endodontic treatment of 80 single-rooted bovine teeth was first performed in the push- out test segment, followed by weakening the intracanal walls by diamond bur. Then, the glass fiber posts were adapted with resin composite to fill the root canals, followed by photoactivation and resin surface conditioning according to four different experimental conditions: no conditioning as control, 10% hydrofluoric acid, 35% hydrogen peroxide, or air abrasion with alumina particle (all groups were subdivided into “with silanization” or “without silanization,” thus totaling eight experimental groups). Self-adhesive resin cement was used for the post cementation. Four slices per tooth were obtained for the push-out tests. Next, 160 blocks of resin composite were first produced for the MTBS tests; their bonding surfaces were conditioned (as mentioned, ie, eight treatments), and they were cemented to each other. The 80 sets (n=10/treatment) were then cut into microbars (16/set): eight were immediately tested, while the other eight were thermocycled (12,000×) and stored (120 days) before MTBS. Failure modes and topographic analyses were performed after treatments. There was no statistically significant difference for the push-out results. In MTBS, surface treatment and silanization had a significant effect (p<0.001). Aging decreased bond strength for all groups. Considering the aged groups, air abrasion promoted the highest values and silanization improved bond strength for all treatments except air abrasion. The alumina particle air abrasion of the relining resin composite promoted the highest bond strengths when luting with self-adhesive resin cement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document