Design Principles of Totally Prefabricated Counterfort Retaining Wall System Compared with Existing Cast-in-Place Concrete Structures

PCI Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maen Farhat ◽  
Mohsen Issa
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Concrete Structures ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Wall System

scholarly journals Possible repair methods of concrete retaining wall

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Nicolas Saliba ◽  
◽  
Ladislav Bartuška
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Simple Form ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Concrete Structures ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Noise Barriers ◽  
Structural Engineer

This document gives instruction and information about remediation of transport retaining walls. Concrete and reinforced concrete retaining walls in terms of proposal and workmanship in comparison with many other structures can be considered less demanding. Unfortunately, this fact does not apply every time and we have to solve compromise proposals for remediation. Calculation of load would also not be problematic even for a less ambitious structural engineer. Also, design principles, and most simple form should not bother anyone. The ways of remediation described in this article can be applied to other concrete structures, whether they are retaining walls and noise barriers along roads or railways.

scholarly journals Load transfer on instrumented prestressed ground anchors in sandy soil

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Micael Dantas de Sousa ◽  
Yuri Daniel Jatobá Costa ◽  
Luiz Augusto da Silva Florêncio ◽  
Carina Maria Lins Costa
Keyword(s):  
Skin Friction ◽  
Sandy Soil ◽  
Load Transfer ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Load Variations ◽  
Bored Pile ◽  
Ground Anchors ◽  
Anchor Testing ◽  
Wall System ◽  
Unbonded Length

abstract: This study evaluates load variations in instrumented prestressed ground anchors installed in a bored pile retaining wall system in sandy soil. Data were collected from instrumentation assembled in the bonded length of three anchors, which were monitored during pullout tests and during different construction phases of the retaining wall system. Instrumentation consisted of electrical resistance strain gauges positioned in five different sections along the bonded length. Skin friction distributions were obtained from the field load measurements. Results showed that the skin friction followed a non-uniform distribution along the anchor bonded length. The mobilized skin friction concentrated more intensely on the bonded length half closest to the unbonded length, while the other half of the bonded length developed very small skin friction. The contribution of the unbonded length skin friction to the overall anchor capacity was significant and this should be accounted for in the interpretation of routine anchor testing results. Displacements applied to the anchor head were sufficient to mobilize the ultimate skin friction on the unbonded length, but not on the bonded length. Performance of loading-unloading stages on the ground anchor intensified the transfer of load from the unbonded length to the bonded length. Long-term monitoring of the anchor after lock-off revealed that the load at the anchor bonded length followed a tendency to reduce with time and was not significantly influenced by the retaining wall construction phases.

Behavior of Tire-Geogrid–Reinforced Retaining Wall System under Dynamic Vehicle Load

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 04020017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihua Li ◽  
Junchao Yang ◽  
Henglin Xiao ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Zhi Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Vehicle Load ◽  
Reinforced Retaining Wall ◽  
Wall System

scholarly journals Embankment seismic fragility assessment: A case study on Xi’an-Baoji expressway (China)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246407
Author(s):  
Fa Che ◽  
Chao Yin ◽  
Xingkui Zhao ◽  
Zhinan Hu ◽  
Lu Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fragility Curves ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Seismic Damage ◽  
Damage Parameter ◽  
Seismic Fragility ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Rc Structures ◽  
Fill Soil ◽  
Soil Foundation ◽  
Wall System

Although embankment seismic damages are very complex, there has been little seismic fragility research yet. Researches on seismic fragility of bridges, dams and reinforced concrete (RC) structures have achieved fruitful results, which can provide references for embankment seismic fragility assessment. Meanwhile, the influencing degrees of retaining structures, such as retaining walls on the embankment seismic performances are still unclear. The K1025+470 embankment of the Xi’an-Baoji expressway was selected as the research object, and the finite difference models of the embankment fill-soil foundation system and embankment fill-soil foundation-retaining wall system were established. The ground-motion records for Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) were selected and the dynamic response analysis were conducted. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis (PSDA) was used to deal with the IDA results and the seismic fragility curves were generated. Based on the assessment results, the influences of the retaining wall on the embankment seismic fragility were further verified. The research results show that regardless of which seismic damage parameter is considered or the presence or absence of the retaining wall, larger PGAs always correspond to higher probabilities of each seismic damage grade. Seismic damages to the embankment fill-soil foundation-retaining wall system are always lower than those of the embankment fill-soil foundation system under the same PGA actions, thus, the retaining wall can decrease the embankment seismic fragility significantly.

IMPROVEMENT OF THE METHOD OF CALCULATING THE STRESS-STATE AND STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES OF HYDRAULIC CORNER RETAINING WALLS WITH INTER-BLOCK JOINTS TAKING

2021 ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
S. E. LISICHKIN ◽  
◽  
O.D. RUBIN ◽  
F. A. PASHCHENKO ◽  
N. S. KHARKOV
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Concrete Structures ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Transverse Reinforcement ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Structures ◽  
Wall Structures ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
Inclined Cracks

Corner retaining walls are one of the most common structures of waterworks. Most of them were designed and built several decades ago and have been in operation for a long time. In some cases, there is a deviation from the design prerequisites and the strengthening of reinforced concrete structures of retaining walls is required. The main reason for these deviations is incomplete consideration of the characteristic features of retaining wall structures (including horizontal inter-block joints and secondary inclined cracks), as well as the nature of the loads acting on them. As a result, design horizontal transverse reinforcement is practically not installed in retaining walls that is not required by calculation based on traditional calculation methods.Traditional reinforcement schemes for retaining walls do not provide for the presence of horizontal inter-block joints and horizontal transverse reinforcement. As a result of the research carried out,the method for calculating the stress-strain state and strength of reinforced concrete structures of corner retaining walls with inter-block joints has been improved taking into account secondary stresses. Reinforcement schemes for retaining walls have also been improved.

scholarly journals Experimental and Numerical Study of At-Rest Lateral Earth Pressure of Overconsolidated Sand

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdi El-Emam
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Model ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Earth Pressure ◽  
System A ◽  
Lateral Earth Pressure ◽  
Backfill Soil ◽  
Load Cells ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Wall System

The paper presents a one-meter-height rigid facing panel, supported rigidly at the top and bottom to simulate nonyielding retaining wall system. A set of load cells is used to measure the horizontal force at the top and bottom of the facing panel, which is converted to equivalent horizontal earth pressure acting at the back of the wall. Another set of load cells is used to measure the vertical load at the bottom of the wall facing, both at the toe and the heel. Uniformly graded sand was used as backfill soil. The measured wall responses were used to calibrate a numerical model that used to predict additional wall parameters. Results indicated that the measured horizontal earth force is about three times the value calculated by classical at-rest earth pressure theory. In addition, the location of the resultant earth force is located closer to 0.4 H, which is higher compared to the theoretical value of H/3. The numerical model developed was able to predict the earth pressure distribution over the wall height. Test set up, instrumentation, soil properties, different measured responses, and numerical model procedures and results are presented together with the implication of the current results to the practical work.

scholarly journals Evaluating the potential stormwater retention of a living retaining wall system

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
M Ostendorf ◽  
◽  
Susan Morgan ◽  
Serdar Celik ◽  
William Retzlaff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urban Areas ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Storm Events ◽  
Plant Materials ◽  
Best Management ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Stormwater Retention ◽  
Wall System

Redesigning standard revetment or retaining walls to capture stormwater could increase the use of living walls and, thus, expand their beneficial impacts, including greening underutilized space. This study evaluated the potential stormwater retention and percent plant coverage of an experimental wall surface for six treatments (five vegetated Sedum treatments and an unplanted ‘control’ wall) on 18 circular living retaining wall systems designed from a standard retaining wall system. Percent stormwater retention, which compared effective precipitation volumes with stormwater runoff volumes, was quantified for 81 storm events from July 2010 to September 2011. Living retaining wall systems planted with S. (Phedimus) takesimensis retained stormwater more effectively than the unplanted wall and other planted treatments, including walls planted with S. spurium, mixed Sedum species, and S. kamtschaticum. Plant surface coverage of the living retaining wall system was the greatest when planted with mixed Sedum species, S. spurium, and S. kamtschaticum. Overall this study demonstrates that properly designed living retaining wall systems may be able to be used as a best management practice for stormwater retention in urban areas. Further study could determine the performance of living retaining walls with a more conventional design (i.e., single aspect vs. four aspects against a slope), over a longer time period, walls planted with other vegetated treatments, and walls featuring different fill and plant materials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document