Application of a stability-indicating HPTLC method for quantitative analysis of amtolmetin guacil in a pharmaceutical dosage form

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Bhusari ◽  
M. V. Mahadik ◽  
S. R. Dhaneshwar
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-261
Author(s):  
Hala E Zaazaa ◽  
Rasha Abdel-Ghany ◽  
M Abdelkawy ◽  
Mahmoud Sayed

Abstract Two robust and selective stability-indicating chromatographic methods were developed and validated for the determination of metolazone in drug substance and pharmaceutical dosage form in the presence of its degradation products. The HPLC method employed a Kromasil C18 (250 × 4.6,5 μm) column and a mobile phase of acetonitrile: 0.2% orthophosphoric acid (32:68 v/v) at a flow rate 2 mL/min and detection at 238 nm. The separation was performed in HPLC isocratic mode. The robustness of the suggested method was assessed using the Plackett–Burman design, parameters affecting system suitability were established and non-significant intervals for the significant parameters were considered. The HPTLC method employed Nano-SIL-20 UV254 HPTLC plates as adsorbent, ethyl acetate: toluene: acetic acid solution (4:4:0.5, v/v/v), as a developing solvent system and densitometric detection at 238 nm. Metolazone was exposed to different stress conditions, including acid and alkaline hydrolysis and oxidative and photolytic degradation. The main degradation products obtained have been characterized and interpreted based on LC-MS. The linearity of the suggested methods was proved in the concentration range of 20–75 μg/mL for the HPLC method and 100–900 ng/spot for the HPTLC method. The suggested methods were validated according to international conference on harmonization guidelines. These methods were successfully dedicated for the estimation of metolazone in drug substance and pharmaceutical dosage form in the presence of its degradation products. The results of the suggested methods were evaluated and compared statistically with results obtained by an official method without finding any significant difference.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asha Byju Thomas ◽  
Shrikrushna Digambar Patil ◽  
Rabindra Kumar Nanda ◽  
Lata Prasad Kothapalli ◽  
Shital Shridhar Bhosle ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document