Use of combined elastic modulus in depth-sensing indentation with a conical indenter

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1043-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Fischer-Cripps

Conventional methods of analysis for depth-sensing indentation test data use the slope of the elastic unloading portion of the load–displacement response in conjunction with the elastic equations of contact for a rigid cone. It is common practice to incorporate the combined modulus of the indenter and specimen in these equations although the validity of this practice never appears to have been verified. This work demonstrates the validity of using the combined elastic modulus in depth-sensing indentation testing in conjunction with the elastic equations of contact for a conical indenter.

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1660-1667 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Riester ◽  
T. J. Bell ◽  
A. C. Fischer-Cripps

The present work shows how data obtained in a depth-sensing indentation test using a Knoop indenter may be analyzed to provide elastic modulus and hardness of the specimen material. The method takes into account the elastic recovery along the direction of the short axis of the residual impression as the indenter is removed. If elastic recovery is not accounted for, the elastic modulus and hardness are overestimated by an amount that depends on the ratio of E/H of the specimen material. The new method of analysis expresses the elastic recovery of the short diagonal of the residual impression into an equivalent face angle for one side of the Knoop indenter. Conventional methods of analysis using this corrected angle provide results for modulus and hardness that are consistent with those obtained with other types of indenters.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 2149-2157 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Fischer-Cripps

The present work is concerned with the methods of simulation of data obtained from depth-sensing submicron indentation testing. Details of analysis methods for both spherical and Berkovich indenters using multiple or single unload points are presented followed by a detailed treatment of a method for simulating an experimental load–displacement response where the material properties such as elastic modulus and hardness are given as inputs. A comparison between simulated and experimental data is given.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1579-1584 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Fischer-Cripps

The underlying theory behind the extraction of elastic modulus and hardness from the unloading load–displacement data obtained with a spherical indenter was explored in detail. A formal treatment of the effect of indenter elasticity was given, and the validity of the use of the reduced or combined modulus in analytical treatments was verified. The “Oliver and Pharr” method and the “Field and Swain” methods of analyses were compared in detail and shown to be equivalent.


2002 ◽  
Vol 750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Fischer-Cripps

ABSTRACTThe present work is concerned with the analysis of elastic unloading data in conventional methods of analysis of nanoindentation test data. Experimental and finite element results are used to show that the reloading of a residual impression with and without the presence of residual stress is an elastic event, and further shows that the estimation of modulus and hardness computed using established techniques is in error due to the assumption the sides of the residual impression are straight. This work calls into question the validity of commonly used methods of test and analysis of instrumented indentation test data that use the elastic unloading data as the basis for the calculation of modulus and hardness of the specimen material.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 3050-3052 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. C. Fischer-Cripps

It is shown that the substitution of reduced modulus for specimen modulus in the analysis equations for nanoindentation test data is valid. The methods of analysis use the slope of the unloading force–depth response which is assumed to be elastic. Because of this utilization of the slope or unloading stiffness, it makes no difference whether or not the deflection of the indenter is accommodated explicitly or transferred to that occurring within the specimen by artificially reducing the specimen modulus from its true value to lower value, the reduced modulus.


1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gubicza ◽  
A. Juh�sz ◽  
P. Arat� ◽  
P. Szommer ◽  
P. Tasn�di ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 44-47 ◽  
pp. 2587-2591
Author(s):  
Xiu Fang Wang ◽  
Yi Wang Bao ◽  
Kun Ming Li ◽  
Yan Qiu ◽  
Xiao Gen Liu

The energy consumption of crushing is directly affected by the mechanical properties of cement materials. The elastic modulus, energy dissipation, recovery resistance and other mechanical properties of cement materials are evaluated based on the depth-sensing indentation method in this work. It is significant and efficient for engineering application. In results, the calculated elastic modulus is close to that measured by dynamic method, being used to verify the correctness of the calculated data. And the calculated energy dissipation of clinker is higher than that of limestone and granite, which can partially be used to explain why the grinding of clinker consumes a lot of energy in cement industry. The recovery resistance of clinker is almost identical to that of granite, more than that of limestone. It is found that the clinker, in contrast to granite and limestone, exhibits better plasticity and greater energy absorption capacity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document