Trust and Reciprocity

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-207
Author(s):  
Gary Charness ◽  
Valentin Shmidov
Keyword(s):  
Trust And Reciprocity

Theorizing a Sustainable-Holistic-Interconnected-Partnership Development Model with Feminist, Activist Lenses: Best Practices from a Community-University Service-Learning Partnership in Asian American Studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 64-84
Author(s):  
Jennifer Yee ◽  
Ashley Cheri
Keyword(s):  
Service Learning ◽  
Asian American ◽  
American Studies ◽  
Relationship Building ◽  
Development Model ◽  
Asian American Studies ◽  
University Partnerships ◽  
Partnership Development ◽  
Asian And Pacific Islander ◽  
Trust And Reciprocity

Mindfully engaging with one another on collaborative projects and relationship building is critical for sustaining partnerships of trust and reciprocity between community-based organizations (CBOs) and institutions of higher education. This resource paper presents the Sustainable-Holistic-Interconnected-Partnership (SHIP) Development Model based on a study theorizing the organizational evolution of the ten- year community-university service-learning partnership between the Youth Education Program of the Orange County Asian and Pacific Islander Community Alliance and the Asian American Studies Program at California State University, Fullerton. The authors conducted a self- study intersecting their lenses as feminist activists of color and their use of qualitative methods. They found that they sustained their partnership by intentionally grounding their norms and practice in the values of democracy, equity, social justice, and liberation. The SHIP model has diverse implications for community-university partnerships and the fields of Asian American studies (AAS) and service learning.

Transparency and Iterative Negotiations with Trust and Reciprocity

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiridaran (Giri) Kanagaretnam ◽  
Stuart Mestelman ◽  
Khalid Nainar ◽  
Mohamed Shehata
Keyword(s):  
Trust And Reciprocity

Disclosure Is a Gift That Encourages Trust and Reciprocity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Taguchi ◽  
Yoshio Kamijo
Keyword(s):  
Trust And Reciprocity

Homogeneity, Trust, and Reciprocity: Three Keys to the Sustainable Hospitality Exchange of Couchsurfing

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaping Liu ◽  
Linlin Nie ◽  
Li Li
Keyword(s):  
Trust And Reciprocity

Social Division, Trust, and Reciprocity among Chinese Inmates

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han Liu ◽  
Lucy F. Ackert ◽  
Fang Chang ◽  
Li Qi ◽  
Yaojiang Shi
Keyword(s):  
Social Division ◽  
Trust And Reciprocity

Are Trust and Reciprocity Related within Individuals?

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 249-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamas Kovacs ◽  
Marc Willinger
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Positive Relation ◽  
Strategy Method ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Investment Game ◽  
Trust And Reciprocity ◽  
Within Subjects ◽  
New Evidence

AbstractWe provide new evidence about a positive correlation between the own amount sent and the own amount returned in the investment game. Our analysis relies on the experimental data collected under the strategy method. While the percentage returned is independent of the amount received for most of our subjects, it is strongly correlated to their amount sent as a trustor. Our analysis is based on a two-way classification of subjects: according to their trusting type and according to their reciprocal type. We show the existence of a strong positive relation between trusting types and reciprocal types within subjects.

Post-Disaster Recovery and Social Capital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Vallance ◽  
Ashley Rudkevitch
Keyword(s):  
Social Capital ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Disaster Risk ◽  
Considerable Debate ◽  
Trust And Reciprocity ◽  
Complex Picture ◽  
Bridging Capital ◽  
Bonding Capital ◽  
Health And Well Being ◽  
Post Disaster

Disaster scholarship has resurrected interest in social capital, and it has become well established that strong social ties—bonding capital—can also help individuals and communities to survive in times of crisis, as well as provide substantial and wide-ranging benefits on the long road to recovery. The theoretical tripartite of bonding capital generated in “close ties,” bridging capital developed through “associations,” and linking capital from possibly cool but nonetheless “civil” encounters is also reasonably well established. So too are the currencies of trust and reciprocity. Social capital is noted to be a potent resource capable of facilitating many benefits in terms of health and well-being, and it is considered fundamental to post-disaster attempts to Build Back Better in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. Indeed, the idea of social capital has become almost synonymous with resilience. Nonetheless, it is also acknowledged that there may be disadvantages associated with social capital, such as tribalism, neoptism, and marginalization. Scholarship therefore paints a rather complex picture, and there is still considerable debate about what social capital is: what it does, where it comes from and where it goes, and for what purpose. Without denying the value of a celebratory approach that focuses on the benefits, it is concluded that there is a need for more attention to be given to the broader ideological contexts that may shape the generative and distributional effects of social capital, particularly as these underscore health and well-being outcomes post-disaster.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document