Kinetics of UV Light-induced Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers in Human Skin In Vivo: An Immunohistochemical Analysis of both Epidermis and Dermis

2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 788-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosh K. Katiyar ◽  
Mary S. Matsui ◽  
Hasan Mukhtar
2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Tewari ◽  
Robert P. Sarkany ◽  
Antony R. Young

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Lu ◽  
Natalia Eugenia Gutierrez-Bayona ◽  
John-Stephen Taylor

Abstract Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) are the major products of DNA produced by direct absorption of UV light, and result in C to T mutations linked to human skin cancers. Most recently a new pathway to CPDs in melanocytes has been discovered that has been proposed to arise from a chemisensitized pathway involving a triplet sensitizer that increases mutagenesis by increasing the percentage of C-containing CPDs. To investigate how triplet sensitization may differ from direct UV irradiation, CPD formation was quantified in a 129-mer DNA designed to contain all 64 possible NYYN sequences. CPD formation with UVB light varied about 2-fold between dipyrimidines and 12-fold with flanking sequence and was most frequent at YYYR and least frequent for GYYN sites in accord with a charge transfer quenching mechanism. In contrast, photosensitized CPD formation greatly favored TT over C-containing sites, more so for norfloxacin (NFX) than acetone, in accord with their differing triplet energies. While the sequence dependence for photosensitized TT CPD formation was similar to UVB light, there were significant differences, especially between NFX and acetone that could be largely explained by the ability of NFX to intercalate into DNA.


2006 ◽  
Vol 103 (37) ◽  
pp. 13765-13770 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mouret ◽  
C. Baudouin ◽  
M. Charveron ◽  
A. Favier ◽  
J. Cadet ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 105601
Author(s):  
Qingyu Lin ◽  
Ekaterina N Lazareva ◽  
Vyacheslav I Kochubey ◽  
Yixiang Duan ◽  
Valery V Tuchin

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3456-3463 ◽  
Author(s):  
T O'Brien ◽  
J T Lis

Heat shock rapidly activates expression of some genes and represses others. The kinetics of changes in RNA polymerase distribution on heat shock-modulated genes provides a framework for evaluating the mechanisms of activation and repression of transcription. Here, using two methods, we examined the changes in RNA polymerase II association on a set of Drosophila genes at 30-s intervals following an instantaneous heat shock. In the first method, Drosophila Schneider line 2 cells were quickly frozen to halt transcription, and polymerase distribution was analyzed by a nuclear run-on assay. RNA polymerase transcription at the 5' end of the hsp70 gene could be detected within 30 to 60 s of induction, and by 120 s the first wave of polymerase could already be detected near the 3' end of the gene. A similar rapid induction was found for the small heat shock genes (hsp22, hsp23, hsp26, and hsp27). In contrast to this rapid activation, transcription of the histone H1 gene was found to be rapidly repressed, with transcription reduced by approximately 90% within 300 s of heat shock. Similar results were obtained by an in vivo UV cross-linking assay. In this second method, cell samples removed at 30-s intervals were irradiated with 40-microseconds bursts of UV light from a Xenon flash lamp, and the distribution of polymerase was examined by precipitating UV cross-linked protein-DNA complexes with an antibody to RNA polymerase II. Both approaches also showed the in vivo rate of movement of the first wave of RNA polymerase through the hsp70 gene to be approximately 1.2 kb/min.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document