scholarly journals RBM20 gene variants associated with left atrial dilatation in patients with old myocardial infarction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 4707
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Vakhrushev ◽  
A. A. Kuular ◽  
V. K. Lebedeva ◽  
A. A. Kozyreva ◽  
A. A. Kostareva ◽  
...  

Aim. To study the prevalence of RBM20 gene polymorphisms and their relationship with the structural and functional left atrial (LA) characteristics in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Material and methods. The study included 138 men aged 55,8±6,6 years with prior myocardial infarction ³12 months ago and HFrEF (class II-IV heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (Simpson’s methods), 25,1±7,2%). The control group consisted of 384 healthy donors. Genotyping of two RBM20 polymorphic variants (rs942077 and rs35141404) was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction.Results. The prevalence of RBM20 polymorphisms did not differ in the HFrEF cohort and the control group. The GA rs35141404 genotype was more common among patients with a less pronounced increase in LA volume index (LAVI) (p=0,034). The minor A allele rs35141404 was associated with a protective effect on severe LA remodeling. However, this association did not reach the level of significance.Conclusion. For the rs942077 and rs35141404 polymorphic variants of the RBM20 gene, no significant associations were found with the LA size and atrial fibrillation presence in patients with HFrEF and old myocardial infarction. There was a tendency towards the association of the A allele and the GA rs35141404 genotype with a protective effect on LA remodeling. The data obtained confirm the need for further search for genotype-phenotype relationships of a wider population of patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease.

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 967-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Rusinaru ◽  
David Houpe ◽  
Catherine Szymanski ◽  
Franck Lévy ◽  
Sylvestre Maréchaux ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Budoff ◽  
Sandeep R. Pagali ◽  
Yasmin S. Hamirani ◽  
Andy Chen ◽  
Gordon Cheu ◽  
...  

Atrial volumetric measurement has proven clinical implications. Advances in cardiac imaging, notably the precision enabled by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), herald the need for new criteria of what constitutes normal volumetric measurements. With use of 64-slice MDCT, we compared the atrial volumes in healthy individuals with those in individuals with coronary artery disease. By means of manual segmentation, we measured biatrial volume in 686 participants who underwent retrospective electrocardiographic-gated MDCT angiographic evaluation. The study population included a control group of 203 persons with no cardiac abnormalities, and a study group of 483 patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. All variables were compared between men and women and between the groups. We found a significant difference in left atrial end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes between men and women in the control group (P <0.05); however, right atrial volumes were similar. In comparison with the entire control group, the coronary artery disease group had significantly higher left atrial volume, significantly lower right atrial stroke volume, and significantly lower biatrial ejection fraction, except for left atrial ejection fraction in men. Right atrial volume and left atrial stroke volume were not significantly different. The results imply that a sex-specific reference value is necessary for left atrial volumetric evaluation, and that left atrial volume and biatrial ejection fraction (excluding left atrial ejection fraction in men) might be useful during diagnosis and prognosis in patients who have coronary artery disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-229
Author(s):  
Mihaela Bolog ◽  
Mihaela Dumitrescu ◽  
Florentina Romanoschi ◽  
Elena Pacuraru ◽  
Alina Rapa

Objective – To examine the utility of global longitudinal strain imaging diastolic index (SI-DI) in the assessment of patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods – We performed rest 2D standard echocardiography and strain imaging in 30 healthy subjects and in 148 patients with normal or mildly reduced ejection fraction and indication for coronarography for suspected obstructive CAD. Standard echocardiographic and strain parameters were analysed. Results – Global SI-DI was signifi cantly lower in the selected vs control group (p <0.001). After coronarography patients were divided in three subgroups: 74 patients with more than 50% obstruction in any major artery, 26 patients with previous revascularisation but no significant obstructive lesions at present and 48 patients without obstructive artery disease. Average global SI-DI was significantly lower in the subgroup with obstructive CAD vs the other two subgroups (p<0.05). Global SI-DI lower than 0.5 had a good sensitivity (84%) and a reasonable positive predictive value (52%) for detection of obstructive CAD. Conclusions – Global SI-DI is significantly lower in patients with obstructive CAD and normal or mildly reduced ejection fraction compared with normal subjects. A cut off value lower than 0.5 selects patients with a higher probability of obstructive CAD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haozhang Huang ◽  
Jin Liu ◽  
Min Lei ◽  
Zhou Yang ◽  
Kunming Bao ◽  
...  

Aims: The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics and outcomes of the universal new definition of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) and to identify predictors for HFimpEF among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods: CAD subjects with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (EF ≤ 40%) at baseline were enrolled from the real-world registry of the Cardiorenal ImprovemeNt study from January 2007 to December 2018. The new definition of HFimpEF was defined as left ventricular EF (LVEF) of≤40% at baseline and with improvement of up to 40% and at least a ≥ 10% increase during 1 month to 1 year after discharge.Results: Of the 747 CAD patients with HFrEF (86.7% males, mean age: 61.4 ± 11 years), 267 (35.7%) patients conformed to the new HFimpEF definition. Patients with HFimpEF were younger (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.98 [0.97–0.99]) and had a higher rate of hypertension (aOR:1.43 [1.04–1.98]), lower rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment at the time of detection of HFrEF (aOR: 0.48 [0.34–0.69]), history of PCI (aOR: 0.51 [0.28–0.88]), history of acute myocardial infarction (aOR: 0.40 [0.21–0.70]), and lower left ventricular end diastolic diameter (aOR: 0.92 [0.90–0.95]). During 3.3-year follow-up, patients with HFimpEF demonstrated lower rates of long-term all-cause mortality (13.1% vs. 20.8%, aHR: 0.61[0.41–0.90]).Conclusion: In our study, CAD patients with HFimpEF achieved a better prognosis compared to those with persistent HFrEF. Patients with CAD meeting the criteria for the universal definition of HFimpEF tended to be younger, presented fewer clinical comorbidities, and had lower left ventricular end diastolic diameter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document