Pandemic influenza vaccine development: time is of the essence

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J Cox ◽  
Karl A Brokstad ◽  
Lars R Haaheim
2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (9) ◽  
pp. 4587-4596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Solórzano ◽  
Jianqiang Ye ◽  
Daniel R. Pérez

ABSTRACT Human influenza is a seasonal disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Influenza vaccination is the most effective means for disease prevention. We have previously shown that mutations in the PB1 and PB2 genes of the live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) from the cold-adapted (ca) influenza virus A/Ann Arbor/6/60 (H2N2) could be transferred to avian influenza viruses and produce partially attenuated viruses. We also demonstrated that avian influenza viruses carrying the PB1 and PB2 mutations could be further attenuated by stably introducing a hemagglutinin (HA) epitope tag in the PB1 gene. In this work, we wanted to determine whether these modifications would also result in attenuation of a so-called triple reassortant (TR) swine influenza virus (SIV). Thus, the TR influenza A/swine/Wisconsin/14094/99 (H3N2) virus was generated by reverse genetics and subsequently mutated in the PB1 and PB2 genes. Here we show that a combination of mutations in this TR backbone results in an attenuated virus in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we show the potential of our TR backbone as a vaccine that provides protection against the 2009 swine-origin pandemic influenza H1N1 virus (S-OIV) when carrying the surface of a classical swine strain. We propose that the availability of alternative backbones to the conventional ca A/Ann Arbor/6/60 LAIV strain could also be useful in epidemic and pandemic influenza and should be considered for influenza vaccine development. In addition, our data provide evidence that the use of these alternative backbones could potentially circumvent the effects of original antigenic sin (OAS) in certain circumstances.


2021 ◽  
pp. 0961463X2110322
Author(s):  
Mia Harrison ◽  
Kari Lancaster ◽  
Tim Rhodes

This article investigates how evidence of the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines is enacted in news media via a focus on the temporality of vaccine development. We argue that time constitutes a crucial object of and mechanism for knowledge production in such media and investigate how time comes to matter in vaccine evidence-making communication practices. In science communication on vaccine development, the vaccine object (along with the practices through which it is produced) undergoes a material-discursive shift from an imagined “rushed” product to being many years in the making and uninhibited by unnecessarily lengthy processes. In both these enactments of vaccine development, time itself is constituted as evidence of vaccine efficacy and safety. This article traces how time (performed as both calendar time and as a series of relational events) is materialized as an affective and epistemic object of evidence within public science communication by analyzing the material-discursive techniques through which temporality is enacted within news media focused on the timeline of COVID-19 vaccine development. We contend that time (as evidence) is remade through these techniques as an ontopolitical concern within the COVID-19 vaccine assemblage. We furthermore argue that science communication itself is an important actor in the hinterland of public health practices with performative effects and vital evidence-making capacities.


Vaccine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian A. Crowe ◽  
Peter Brühl ◽  
Marijan Gerencer ◽  
Michael G. Schwendinger ◽  
Andreas Pilz ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 888-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Ikematsu ◽  
Hideaki Nagai ◽  
Masahiro Kawashima ◽  
Yasunobu Kawakami ◽  
Kazuyoshi Tenjinbaru ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document