Clinical management of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: approved therapies and emerging candidates

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divyanshu Dubey ◽  
Bernd C Kieseier ◽  
Hans Peter Hartung ◽  
Bernhard Hemmer ◽  
William A Miller-Little ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Neuromyelitis Optica ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies

scholarly journals Use of B-Cell–Depleting Therapy in Women of Childbearing Potential With Multiple Sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

2022 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001147
Author(s):  
Alexandra Galati ◽  
Thomas McElrath ◽  
Riley Bove
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Neuromyelitis Optica ◽  
Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Cell Depletion ◽  
B Cell Depletion ◽  
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder ◽  
Childbearing Potential ◽  
Pregnancy And Postpartum

AbstractPurposeof Review: There is considerable heterogeneity in the use of B cell depletion in women of childbearing age, likely driven at least in part by the discrepancy between the product labels and what is known about the physiology of IgG1, including breastmilk and placental transfer.Recent Findings:We provide practical considerations on the use of this medication class in women of childbearing potential. We discuss pre-pregnancy planning including vaccinations, safety of B cell depletion during pregnancy as well as postpartum considerations including breastfeeding.Summary:B cell depleting monoclonal antibodies have shown to be effective for pre-pregnancy and postpartum prevention of inflammatory activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). B cell depleting therapies are large IgG1 monoclonal antibodies which have minimal transfer across the placenta and into breastmilk. Consideration of risks and benefits of these therapies should be considered in counseling women planning pregnancy and postpartum.

Design of Innovative Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies

2017 ◽  
pp. 10-29
Author(s):  
A.V. Karabelskii ◽  
◽  
T.A. Nemankin ◽  
A.B. Ulitin ◽  
A.S. Vaganov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies

Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies in Clinical Practice against Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (16) ◽  
pp. 1895-1907
Author(s):  
Navgeet Kaur ◽  
Anju Goyal ◽  
Rakesh K. Sindhu
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Therapeutic Agent ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Malignant Cells ◽  
Main Target ◽  
Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Cancerous Cells

The importance of monoclonal antibodies in oncology has increased drastically following the discovery of Milstein and Kohler. Since the first approval of the monoclonal antibody, i.e. Rituximab in 1997 by the FDA, there was a decline in further applications but this number has significantly increased over the last three decades for various therapeutic applications due to the lesser side effects in comparison to the traditional chemotherapy methods. Presently, numerous monoclonal antibodies have been approved and many are in queue for approval as a strong therapeutic agent for treating hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. The main target checkpoints for the monoclonal antibodies against cancer cells include EGFR, VEGF, CD and tyrosine kinase which are overexpressed in malignant cells. Other immune checkpoints like CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-1 receptors targeted by the recently developed antibodies increase the capability of the immune system in destroying the cancerous cells. Here, in this review, the mechanism of action, uses and target points of the approved mAbs against cancer have been summarized.

scholarly journals Elucidating distinct clinico-radiologic signatures in the borderland between neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Juryńczyk ◽  
Elżbieta Klimiec-Moskal ◽  
Yazhuo Kong ◽  
Samuel Hurley ◽  
Silvia Messina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Neuromyelitis Optica ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Transverse Myelitis ◽  
Overlap Syndrome ◽  
Brain Lesions ◽  
Central Vein ◽  
Normal Brain ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Background Separating antibody-negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) from multiple sclerosis (MS) in borderline cases is extremely challenging due to lack of biomarkers. Elucidating different pathologies within the likely heterogenous antibody-negative NMOSD/MS overlap syndrome is, therefore, a major unmet need which would help avoid disability from inappropriate treatment. Objective In this study we aimed to identify distinct subgroups within the antibody-negative NMOSD/MS overlap syndrome. Methods Twenty-five relapsing antibody-negative patients with NMOSD features underwent a prospective brain and spinal cord MRI. Subgroups were identified by an unsupervised algorithm based on pre-selected NMOSD/MS discriminators. Results Four subgroups were identified. Patients from Group 1 termed “MS-like” (n = 6) often had central vein sign and cortical lesions (83% and 67%, respectively). All patients from Group 2 (“spinal MS-like”, 8) had short-segment myelitis and no MS-like brain lesions. Group 3 (“classic NMO-like”, 6) had high percentage of bilateral optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM, 80% and 60%, respectively) and normal brain appearance (100%). Group 4 (“NMO-like with brain involvement”, 5) typically had a history of NMOSD-like brain lesions and LETM. When compared with other groups, Group 4 had significantly decreased fractional anisotropy in non-lesioned tracts (0.46 vs. 0.49, p = 0.003) and decreased thalamus volume (0.84 vs. 0.98, p = 0.04). Conclusions NMOSD/MS cohort contains distinct subgroups likely corresponding to different pathologies and requiring tailored treatment. We propose that non-conventional MRI might help optimise diagnosis in these challenging patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document