scholarly journals European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30: factorial models to Brazilian cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos ◽  
Maria Cláudia Bernardes Spexoto ◽  
Wanderson Roberto da Silva ◽  
Sergio Vicente Serrano ◽  
João Marôco
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Factorial Validity ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the psychometric properties of the seven theoretical models proposed in the literature for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), when applied to a sample of Brazilian cancer patients. Methods Content and construct validity (factorial, convergent, discriminant) were estimated. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed. Convergent validity was analyzed using the average variance extracted. Discriminant validity was analyzed using correlational analysis. Internal consistency and composite reliability were used to assess the reliability of instrument. Results A total of 1,020 cancer patients participated. The mean age was 53.3±13.0 years, and 62% were female. All models showed adequate factorial validity for the study sample. Convergent and discriminant validities and the reliability were compromised in all of the models for all of the single items referring to symptoms, as well as for the “physical function” and “cognitive function” factors. Conclusion All theoretical models assessed in this study presented adequate factorial validity when applied to Brazilian cancer patients. The choice of the best model for use in research and/or clinical protocols should be centered on the purpose and underlying theory of each model.

scholarly journals Quality of Life in POP: Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of the Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) in Spanish Women

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez ◽  
Maria José Yuste-Sánchez ◽  
Beatriz Arranz-Martín ◽  
Beatriz Navarro-Brazález ◽  
Helena Romay-Barrero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽  
Spanish Women ◽  
The Impact

The Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) is a specific questionnaire created to assess the impact of pelvic organ prolapse on women’s quality of life. The aim of the present study was to cross-culturally adapt and assess the psychometric properties of the P-QoL for Spanish women. The cross-cultural adaptation was conducted by a standardized translation/back-translation method. Psychometric analysis was performed by assessing the validity, reliability, responsiveness and feasibility. A total of 200 Spanish women were recruited and assigned to symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. The Spanish P-QoL version demonstrated good content validity. Convergent validity showed high intercorrelations with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form. The discriminant validity showed statistically significant differences between the symptomatic and the asymptomatic groups. The internal consistency was high and of acceptable values. The test-retest reliability was shown to be high in all the cases. Regarding responsiveness, the effect size and standardized response mean demonstrated moderate values. The average time for administration was 10 (3) min. The Spanish P-QoL showed considerable support for the appropriate metric properties of validity, reliability, responsiveness and feasibility to evaluate the symptom severity and its impact on the quality of life in Spanish women with urogenital prolapse.

scholarly journals Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients with Oncoorthopedic Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-166
Author(s):  
E.B. Usmanova ◽  
O.Yu. Schyolkova ◽  
G.L. Isurina ◽  
E.A. Sushentsov ◽  
A.K. Valiev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Bone Tumors ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽  
Russian Version ◽  
Eortc Qlq

European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Bone Metastases (BM22), developed by the Quality of Life Assessment Group, is a specialized module of the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30, assessing the quality of life in patients with bone tumors. The aim of the study is to develop its Russian version. The study included a sample of 139 patients with bone tumors — inpatients of N.N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center. The scale has a good convergent validity and internal consistency (0,871), factor analysis confirmed the structure of the scale and its compliance with the original model. The results revealed significant decrease in quality of life due to patients’ focus on pain and its severity. We conclude by drawing out the main directions of psychological aid to patients with bone tumors.

Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-H&N35

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1008-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Bjordal ◽  
Eva Hammerlid ◽  
Marianne Ahlner-Elmqvist ◽  
Alexander de Graeff ◽  
Morten Boysen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽  
Eortc Qlq

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to define the scales and test the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-H&N35, a questionnaire designed to assess the quality of life of head and neck (H&N) cancer patients in conjunction with the general cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Questionnaires were given to 500 H&N cancer patients from Norway, Sweden, and the Netherlands as part of two prospective studies. The patients completed the questionnaires before, during (Norway and Sweden only), and after treatment, yielding a total of 2070 completed questionnaires. RESULTS: The compliance rate was high, and the questionnaires were well accepted by the patients. Seven scales were constructed (pain, swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, sexuality). Scales and single items were sensitive to differences between patient subgroups with relation to site, stage, or performance status. Most scales and single items were sensitive to changes, with differences of various magnitudes according to the site in question. The internal consistency, as assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient, varied according to assessment point and within subsamples of patients. A low overall alpha value was found for the speech and the senses scales, but values were higher in assessments of patients with laryngeal cancer and in patients with nose, sinus, and salivary gland tumors. Scales and single items in the QLQ-H&N35 seem to be more sensitive to differences between groups and changes over time than do the scales and single items in the core questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, provides a valuable tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical studies of H&N cancer patients before, during, and after treatment with radiotherapy, surgery, or chemotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document