scholarly journals Seismic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings with participating masonry infills

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerson Moacyr Sisniegas Alva ◽  
Alessandro Onofre Rigão ◽  
João Kaminski Junior ◽  
Marco Antônio Silva Pinheiro
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Axial Stiffness ◽  
Masonry Walls ◽  
Seismic Loads ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Frame Building ◽  
Equivalent Strut

ABSTRACT In this paper, seismic analyses are performed of a reinforced concrete frame building with participating masonry walls are carried out. The spectral method of the Brazilian code – ABNT 15421:2006 – was used to obtain the lateral seismic loads. The equivalent diagonal-strut model was employed to simulate the axial stiffness of the masonry walls in the frames, according to different formulations founded in literature. The main purpose is to evaluate the differences implemented by the different formulations for the equivalent strut on the seismic response. This paper also aims at comparing results obtained when the masonry stiffness is not considered under seismic loads. The results obtained are analyzed with the purpose of providing contributions for structural engineers in the design of framed structure buildings with participating masonry walls subjected to seismic loads.

scholarly journals Structural models for analysis of reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infills

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1058-1085
Author(s):  
G. M. S. ALVA ◽  
G. A. MONTANDON
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Finite Elements ◽  
Structural Models ◽  
Axial Stiffness ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Infilled Frame ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Masonry Infills ◽  
Equivalent Strut

Abstract The behavior of single-storey, single-bay reinforced concrete infilled frame with masonry panel subjected to static horizontal load was studied using two structural models: i) equivalent strut model (ESM) and ii) model with two-dimensional finite elements for state stress plane (MEF). In the first model, an equivalent diagonal strut replaces masonry. The axial stiffness of this element is defined by evaluation of the equivalent diagonal width. In the second model, the infilled frame is modeling by two-dimensional finite elements, requiring the simulation of the sliding and separation between the wall surfaces and the reinforced concrete frame. Although equivalent strut models are more attractive for design, the formulas found in the literature to determine equivalent strut width provide very different values. In addition, most of these formulas ignore some parameters that may be important, such as beam flexural stiffness. For this reason, several numerical analysis were be carried out. The models simulated usual geometric and mechanical characteristics observed in reinforced concrete buildings. The results of the two-dimensional finite element modeling (by software ANSYS) were used as reference for the evaluation of the results provided by the equivalent strut model. The comparison of results allowed the assessment of the analytical expressions for evaluation of the equivalent diagonal width. Based on this assessment, a new expression is proposed for buildings with similar characteristics as analyzed in this paper. The results of numerical simulations with MEF models also allowed for an evaluation of stresses and the probable cracking pattern in infill walls.

Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Frames with Masonry Infill Walls to In-Plane Vertical Loading

2016 ◽  
Vol 711 ◽  
pp. 982-988
Author(s):  
Alex Brodsky ◽  
David Z. Yankelevsky
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Progressive Collapse ◽  
Lateral Loading ◽  
Masonry Walls ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Masonry Infill ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Vertical Loading ◽  
Infill Masonry

Numerous studies have been conducted on the in plane behavior of masonry infill walls to lateral loading simulating earthquake action on buildings. The present study is focused on a problem that has almost not been studied regarding the vertical (opposed to lateral) in-plane action on these walls. This may be of concern when a supporting column of a multi-storey reinforced concrete frame with infill masonry walls undergoes a severe damage due to an extreme loading such as a strong earthquake, car impact or military or terror action in proximity to the column. The loss of the supporting column may cause a fully or partly progressive collapse to a bare reinforced concrete frame, without infill masonry walls. The presence of the infill masonry walls may restrain the process and prevent the development of a progressive collapse. The aim of the present study is to test the in-plane composite action of Reinforced Concrete (RC) frames with infill masonry walls under vertical loading through laboratory experiments and evaluate the contributions of infill masonry walls, in an attempt to examine the infill masonry wall added resistance to the bare frame under these circumstances. Preliminary results of laboratory tests that have been conducted on reinforced concrete infilled frames without a support at their end, under monotonic vertical loading along that column axis will be presented. The observed damages and failure modes under vertical loading are clearly different from the already known failure modes observed in the case of lateral loading.

Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (13) ◽  
pp. 1973-1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine A. Goulet ◽  
Curt B. Haselton ◽  
Judith Mitrani-Reiser ◽  
James L. Beck ◽  
Gregory G. Deierlein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Economic Losses ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Frame Building

scholarly journals Shake Table Response of Unreinforced Masonry and Reinforced Concrete Elements of Special Moment Resisting Frame

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Azmat Ali Shah ◽  
Junaid Shah Khan ◽  
Syed Muhammad Ali ◽  
Khan Shahzada ◽  
Waqar Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Masonry Wall ◽  
Masonry Walls ◽  
Shake Table ◽  
Base Excitation ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Frame ◽  
Infill Walls ◽  
Concrete Frame ◽  
Moment Resisting

Half-scaled reinforced concrete frame of two storeys and two bays with unreinforced masonry (URM) infill walls was subjected to base excitation on a shake table for seismic performance evaluation. Considering the high seismic hazard Zone IV of Pakistan, reinforcement detailing in the RC frame is provided according to special moment resisting frames (SMFRs) requirement of Building Code of Pakistan Seismic-Provisions (BCP SP-2007). The reinforced concrete frame was infilled with in-plane solid masonry walls in its interior frame, in-plane masonry walls with door and window openings in the exterior frame, out-of-plane solid masonry wall, and masonry wall with door and window openings in its interior frame. For seismic capacity qualification test, the structure was subjected to three runs of unidirectional base excitation with increasing intensity. For system identification, ambient-free vibration tests were performed at different stages of experiment. Seismic performance of brick masonry infill walls in reinforced concrete frame structures was evaluated. During the shake table test, performance of URM infill walls was satisfactory until design ground acceleration was 0.40g with a global drift of 0.23%. The test was continued till 1.24g of base acceleration. This paper presents key findings from the shake table tests, including the qualitative damage observations and quantitative force-displacement, and hysteretic response of the test specimen at different levels of excitation. Experimental results of this test will serve as a benchmark for validation of numerical and analytical models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document