scholarly journals Evaluation of the influence of dental bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide in orthodontic bracket shear bond strength

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Vinicius Neiva Nunes do Rego ◽  
Roanselli Marllon Lima dos Santos ◽  
Leanne Matias Portela Leal ◽  
Carlos Gustavo Silva Braga
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Nonparametric Test ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the bond strength of brackets bonded to premolars previously subjected to bleaching with a 35% hydrogen peroxide. METHODS: Twenty one healthy premolars were selected and randomly divided into three groups (n = 7). Group I (G1) included teeth that were not submitted to bleaching. The enamel surfaces of Groups II (G2) and III (G3) were submitted to a bleaching process with 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP Maxx). On Group II (G2), after bleaching, the teeth were stored for 24 hours in distilled water at 98.6 ºF, and then, premolar metallic brackets were bonded using Transbond XT (3M) resin. Group III (G3) was submitted to the same procedure seven days after bleaching. After bonding, all teeth were stored in distilled water at 98.6 ºF for 24 hours. All groups were submitted to a traction test using an EMIC DL2000 universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The bracket resistance to debonding was compared between the groups by the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test (p < 0.05) and it was verified that the bleaching agent significantly reduced bracket adhesion when bonded 24 hours after bleaching. However, seven days after bleaching, there was no significant difference on the resistance to debonding among groups G1 (19,52 kgf) and G3 (18,44 kgf), meaning that it is necessary to wait longer after bleaching to bond brackets.

scholarly journals “Ormocer an innovative technology”: A replacement for conventional cements and veneer? A comparative in vitro analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 058-063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vini Rajeev ◽  
Rajeev Arunachalam ◽  
Sanjna Nayar ◽  
P. R. Arunima ◽  
Sivadas Ganapathy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Sem Analysis ◽  
Innovative Technology ◽  
Group I ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vitro Analysis

ABSTRACT Objective: This in vitro study was designed to assess shear bond strength (SBS) of ormocer flowable (OF) resin as a luting agent, ormocer as an indirect veneer material with portrayal of modes of failures using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Materials and Methods: Sixty maxillary central incisors were divided into Group I, II, and III with 20 samples each based on luting cement used. They were OF, self-adhesive (SA) cement, and total etch (TE) cement. These groups were subdivided into “a” and “b” of ten each based on the type of veneering materials used. Veneer discs were fabricated using Ormocer restorative (O) and pressable ceramic (C). Specimens were thermocycled and loaded under universal testing machine for SBS. The statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey honest significant difference method. Results: A significant difference was observed between the Groups I and II (P < 0.05). The highest mean bond strength when using ormocer veneer was obtained with the Group Ia (19.11 ± 1.92 Mpa) and lowest by Group IIa (8.1 ± 1.04 Mpa), whereas the highest mean bond strength while using ceramic veneer was of similar range for Group Ib (18.04 ± 4.08 Mpa) and Group IIIb (18.07 ± 1.40 Mpa). SEM analysis revealed OF and TE presented mixed type of failure when compared with SA where failure mode was totally adhesive. Conclusion: OF was found equally efficient like TE. Bond strength of ormocer as a veneer was not inferior to ceramic making it one of the promising additions in the field of dentistry.

scholarly journals Shear bond strength of bulk-fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 040-045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Colak ◽  
Ertugrul Ercan ◽  
Mehmet Mustafa Hamidi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Objectives: Bulk-fill composite materials are being developed for preparation depths of up to 4 mm in an effort to simplify and improve the placement of direct composite posterior restorations. The aim of our study was to compare shear-bond strength of bulk-fill and conventional posterior composite resins. Materials and Methods: In this study, 60 caries free extracted human molars were used and sectioned parallel to occlusal surface to expose midcoronal dentin. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups. Total-etch dentine bonding system (Adper Scotchbond 1XT, 3M ESPE) was applied to dentin surface in all the groups to reduce variability in results. Then, dentine surfaces covered by following materials. Group I: SonicFill Bulk-Fill, Group II: Tetric EvoCeram (TBF), Group III: Herculite XRV Ultra, and Group IV: TBF Bulk-Fill, 2 mm × 3 mm cylindrical restorations were prepared by using application apparatus. Shear bond testing was measured by using a universal testing machine. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed to evaluate the data. Results: The highest value was observed in Group III (14.42 ± 4.34) and the lowest value was observed in Group IV (11.16 ± 2.76) and there is a statistically significant difference between these groups (P = 0.046). However, there is no statistically significant difference between the values of other groups. In this study, Group III was showed higher strength values. Conclusion: There is a need for future studies about long-term bond strength and clinical success of these adhesive and bulk-fill systems.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Shear bonding Strength of ION-Z GIC to a Resin Composite Using Different Adhesive Systems: RCT Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Lala ◽  
Thuraya Lazkani
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Shear Bonding Strength

Abstract Background:In restorative dentistry we usually use Sandwich Technique for posterior restorations where GIC is placed below and a resin composite is placed over it. The bonding strength between these two materials are low. We are looking for the best adhesive system to put it in between. We think that the self-etching bond will give the best bonding strength between them whereas total etch will give lower bonding strength than self-etching system. Methods:ION-Z GIC was bonded to resin composite by using two different bonding agents. The thirty specimens used were prepared by using acrylic blocks with holes in each hole to retain the ION-Z GIC. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups:Group I: Control group.Group II: Total-etch adhesive was applied and cured over ION-Z GIC.Group III: Self-etch adhesive was applied and cured.The composite resin placed over the ION-Z GIC and cured. The shear bond strength was measured by shearing of the bonded specimens on Universal Testing Machine (Model 114) using speed of 0.1mm / minute. The reading was tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA and Tukey's test.Results:The test showed statistically significant difference between Group III and Group I and between Group III and Group II. Group III had the highest shear bonding strength.Conclusion:Self-etch adhesive agent produces have better shear bond strength to ION-Z than total-etch adhesive and to the group without any bonding agent.

scholarly journals Transverse Strength of Heat Cured Acrylic Resin After Immersed in 0, 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthwash (In Vitro)

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annisa Mayang Rusdi ◽  
Lasminda Syafiar ◽  
Astrid Yudhit
Keyword(s):  
Testing Machine ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group V ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Transverse Strength ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

<p class="AbstractContent"><strong>Objective:</strong> The purpose of this study was to evaluate transverse strength of heat cured acrylic resin after immersed in 0,2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash for 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes.</p><p class="AbstractContent"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was an experimental laboratory study with posttest only group design. The samples were heat cured acrylic resin plate with size 65mm x 10mm x 2,5mm. Polymerization of the heat cured acrylic was done by water bath (74 °C for 2hrs followed by 100 °C for 1hr). Totally 30 samples were prepared and divided into 5 groups (n=6) which are group I as control, and others were immersed in 0, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, group II (15 minutes), group III (30 minutes), group IV (45 minutes) and group V (60 minutes) respectively. The transverse strength was test using Torsee’s Universal Testing machine, Japan with crosshead 1/10 mm/seconds. The data was statistically analyzed using one way ANOVA (p≤0,005).</p><p class="AbstractContent"><strong>Results:</strong> Means and Standard deviation of Transverse strength were 92.382±11.786 N/mm2, 92.186±13.349 N/mm2,92.578±12.492 N/mm2, 92.382±13.939 N/mm2, and 91.989±12.285 N/mm2 for group I, II, III, IV, and V respectively. Statistic analyzed showed no significant difference among groups with p value= 1,000 (p &lt; 0, 05).</p><p class="AbstractContent"><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The immersion in 0, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash at different period does not changed transverse strength of heat cured acrylic resin.</p>

scholarly journals Microshear bond strength evaluation of surface pretreated zirconia ceramics bonded to dentin

2015 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 224-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenbagakuttalam Anand ◽  
Ambrose Vedamanickam Rajesh Ebenezar ◽  
Nirupa Anand ◽  
Kothandaraman Rajkumar ◽  
Sekar Mahalaxmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Zirconia Ceramics ◽  
Group V ◽  
Statistical Significant Difference ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

ABSTRACT Objectives: To comparatively assess the micro shear bond strength (MSBS) of dentin bonded surface pre-treated zirconia ceramics. Materials and Methods: Zirconia blocks were sectioned into 50 cubical blocks. The blocks were further categorized into five groups (n = 10 each). Group I: No treatment was performed on zirconia samples; Group II: The zirconia samples were sand-blasted; Group III: Group II + etched with 9.8% of hydrofluoric (HF) acid for 60 s; Group IV: The sandblasted zirconia samples were selectively infiltrated with low fusing porcelain; and Group V: Group IV + etched using 9.8% HF acid gel. The zirconia specimens were then bonded to dentin samples, and the samples were tested for MSBS evaluation using universal testing machine. Results: The MSBS of all the four experimental groups shows greater value than group I. Among the experimental groups, group V and group IV do not show any statistical significant difference, whereas the mean MSBS of groups IV and V were statistically greater than group III and group II. However, groups I, II, and III do not show any statistical significant difference in mean MSBS values between them. Conclusion: Selective infiltration etching of zirconia ceramics provides the highest bond strength with resin cement.

Resistência de união ao cisalhamento entre a resina composta e dentes artificiais de resina acrílica

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (40) ◽  
pp. 33-37
Author(s):  
Joyce de Figueiredo Meira Barbosa ◽  
Lara Pepita de Souza Oliveira ◽  
Marcelo Nascimento Bruce ◽  
Jonas Alves Oliveira ◽  
Ligia Regina Mota Vasconcelos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Artificial Teeth

Acrylic denture teeth may suffer fracture or wear requiring the need for repair. This study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength between acrylic resin artificial teeth restored with composite resin (with two different surface treatments) and acrylic resin (AR), simulating repair with these materials. Thirty artificial incisors were included by the palatal side in a circular microwave-polymerized AR base and polished on their buccal side with 120 and 320 grit sandpaper in a metallographic polisher and, then, divided into three groups: (I) restoration with self-cured AR; (II) conventional restoration with Z-100 composite resin with application of acid etching and Single Bond-3M adhesive; and (III) restoration with Z-100 composite resin with submersion for 30 seconds in acetone and application of Single Bond-3M adhesive. Shear bond strength tests were performed in a Universal Testing Machine (Instron). The results were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey (p<0.05) tests, in which Group I (33.26MPa ±10.76) and Group III (22.24MPa ±13.13) showed no statistically significant difference, but both were superior to Group II (10.31MPa ±5.62), which showed a lower value of shear bond strength. It can be concluded that composite resin restoration with acetone pretreatment can be a viable alternative for repair.

Effect of Bonding Agent on Retention of Different Sealants: An in Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-185
Author(s):  
Moaz H Attar ◽  
Medhat A Abdallah ◽  
Hussein A Alharthy ◽  
Omar A El Meligy
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sealant Retention

Objectives: To investigate the effect of Co-curing versus Staged-curing and No-bonding on retention of different resin-based sealants (RBS). Study design: For shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage tests, 90 extracted premolars were divided equally into 3 groups (I, II, III). Each group was further subdivided equally into 3 subgroups (a, b, c). No-bonding subgroups did not receive a bonding agent, Staged-curing subgroups received a bonding agent that was cured before sealant application, while Co-curing subgroups received a bonding agent that was cured after sealant application. Seal-it was applied for group I, Helioseal-F for group II and Clinpro for group III. SBS buttons were tested using Instron machine, while microleakage specimens were examined using micro-CT. Results: Clinpro showed the highest SBS values in Staged-curing and No-bonding groups (8.72±2.39, 12.51±3.16) respectively. Staged-curing was significantly greater in SBS values than those for other groups (P&lt;0.05). There was a significant difference in microleakage values of Staged-curing among different RBS (P = 0.003), while there was no significant difference in values of No-bonding and Co-curing among different RBS (P = 0.541, P = 0.521). Conclusions: The use of a bonding agent as Staged-curing was more effective in improving sealant retention than No-bonding and Co-curing.

scholarly journals Effects of Potassium Nitrate and Oxalate Desensitizer Agents on Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Brackets

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 1096-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Türkkahraman ◽  
Necdet Adanir
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Potassium Nitrate ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Halogen Light ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths

Abstract Objective: To evaluate the effects of potassium nitrate and oxalate desensitizer agents on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets. Materials and Methods: Forty-five extracted human premolar teeth were randomly assigned to three groups of 15 each. UltraEZ potassium nitrate desensitizer was applied on teeth in the first group, while BisBlock oxalate desensitizer was applied on teeth in the second group. The third group served as a control. Orthodontic brackets were bonded with a light cure composite resin and cured with a halogen light. After bonding, the shear bond strength of the brackets was tested with a universal testing machine. Results: The highest shear bond strengths were measured in Group III. The shear bond strength in Groups I and II was significantly lower than in Group III (P &lt; .001). Significant difference was also found between Group I and Group II (P &lt; .01). Conclusions: Orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel treated with potassium nitrate and oxalate desensitizers showed significantly lower bond strengths than did brackets bonded to untreated enamel.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Shear bonding Strength of ION-Z GIC to a Resin Composite Using Different Adhesive Systems: RCT Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Lala ◽  
Thuraya Lazkani
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Shear Bonding Strength

Abstract Background:In restorative dentistry we usually use Sandwich Technique for posterior restorations where GIC is placed below and a resin composite is placed over it. The bonding strength between these two materials are low. We are looking for the best adhesive system to put it in between. We think that the self-etching bond will give the best bonding strength between them whereas total etch will give lower bonding strength than self-etching system. Methods:ION-Z GIC was bonded to resin composite by using two different bonding agents. The thirty specimens used were prepared by using acrylic blocks with holes in each hole to retain the ION-Z GIC. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups:Group I: Control group.Group II: Total-etch adhesive was applied and cured over ION-Z GIC.Group III: Self-etch adhesive was applied and cured.The composite resin placed over the ION-Z GIC and cured. The shear bond strength was measured by shearing of the bonded specimens on Universal Testing Machine (Model 114) using speed of 0.1mm / minute. The reading was tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA and Tukey's test.Results:The test showed statistically significant difference between Group III and Group I and between Group III and Group II. Group III had the highest shear bonding strength.Conclusion:Self-etch adhesive agent produces have better shear bond strength to ION-Z than total-etch adhesive and to the group without any bonding agent.

scholarly journals Pengaruh bahan desensitasi pasca bleaching ekstrakoronal terhadap kekuatan geser pelekatan restorasi resin komposit

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Ema Mulyawati
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Universal Testing Machine ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

The Effect of desensitizing agent in post-extracoronal bleaching on shear bond strength of composite resin. The dentinal hypersensitivity is a common condition among patients after extracoronal bleaching treatment that usually needs the application of desensitizing agent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the composite resin restoration shear bond strength with and without desensitizing application after extracoronal bleaching using 40% of H2O2. Twenty one extracted permanent human incisor teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 7 each. Group I was with the application of 40% H2O2 without any desensitizing agent. Group II was with the application of 40% of H2O2 with desensitizing agent and group III served as the control. The teeth were immersed in artificial saliva and stored in 37 °C incubator for 7 days. The teeth were restored using composite resin. After restoring the shear bond strength of composite resin was tested using a universal testing machine. Result and conclusion. there is no significant difference between bleaching group with and without desensitizing agent. The application of desensitizing agent after extracoronal bleaching did not impact the composite resin shear bond strength.ABSTRAKDentin hipersensitif merupakan kondisi yang biasa dialami pasien setelah perawatan bleaching ekstrakoronal yang biasanya memerlukan aplikasi bahan desensitasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh bahan desensitasi pasca bleaching ekstrakoronal menggunakan H2O2 40% terhadap kekutan geser pelekatan restorasi resin komposit. Dua puluh satu gigi permanen insisivus yang telah dicabut dibagi dalam tiga kelompok masing-masing 7 gigi. Kelompok I dilakukan bleaching ekstrakoronal dengan H2O2 tanpa bahan desensitasi. Kelompok II dilakukan bleaching setelah itu diaplikasikan bahan desensitasi dan kelompok III sebagai kelompok kontrol. Semua gigi-gigi tersebut di rendam dalam saliva buatan dan dimasukkan inkubator selama 7 hari pada suhu 37 °C. Selanjutnya seluruh gigi dilakukan restorasi resin komposit menggunakan light cure halogen. Setelah itu dilakukan pengujian kekuatan geser pelekatan menggunakan universal testing machine. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Kruskal - Wallis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan kekuatan geser pelekatan pada semua kelompok perlakuan (p > 0,05). Dari penelitian ini disimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat pengaruh aplikasi bahan desensitasi pasca bleaching ekstrakoronal terhadap kekuatan geser pelekatan restorasi resin komposit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document