Effect of Body Type on Renal Injury: Major Renal Trauma Following an Insignificant Common-in-Everyday-Life Incident

Author(s):  
Antonios Katsimantas ◽  
Vasileios Tzelepis ◽  
Christos Antonopoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Petsas ◽  
Dimitrios Tsavdaris ◽  
...  
1992 ◽  
Vol 59 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 113-115
Author(s):  
F. Cappellano ◽  
F. Catanzaro ◽  
E. Della Morte ◽  
M. Baruffi ◽  
F. Torelli ◽  
...  

The investigation and management of renal trauma have evolved during the last 15 years. The majority of patients with renal trauma can be treated conservatively with minimal radiological investigations, since the outcome is excellent in most cases. A CT scan is the radiological investigation of choice in most cases of renal trauma when the patient is hemodynamically stable and there is suspicion that he has suffered a major renal injury. Long term follow-up of renal trauma patients treated conservatively is needed to examine possible complications. We report our experience on 87 patients presenting a complication in a penetrating injury.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Chiron ◽  
E. Hornez ◽  
G. Boddaert ◽  
M. Dusaud ◽  
Y. Bayoud ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 295-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomer Erlich ◽  
Noam D. Kitrey

The kidneys are the most vulnerable genitourinary organ in trauma, as they are involved in up to 3.25% of trauma patients. The most common mechanism for renal injury is blunt trauma (predominantly by motor vehicle accidents and falls), while penetrating trauma (mainly caused by firearms and stab wound) comprise the rest. High-velocity weapons impose specifically problematic damage because of the high energy and collateral effect. The mainstay of renal trauma diagnosis is based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), which is indicated in all stable patients with gross hematuria and in patients presenting with microscopic hematuria and hypotension. Additionally, CT should be performed when the mechanism of injury or physical examination findings are suggestive of renal injury (e.g. rapid deceleration, rib fractures, flank ecchymosis, and every penetrating injury of the abdomen, flank or lower chest). Renal trauma management has evolved during the last decades, with a distinct evolution toward a nonoperative approach. The lion’s share of renal trauma patients are managed nonoperatively with careful monitoring, reimaging when there is any deterioration, and the use of minimally invasive procedures. These procedures include angioembolization in cases of active bleeding and endourological stenting in cases of urine extravasation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (5) ◽  
pp. 994-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Ballon-Landa ◽  
Omer A. Raheem ◽  
Thomas W. Fuller ◽  
Leslie Kobayashi ◽  
Jill C. Buckley

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-39
Author(s):  
KABM Taiful Alam ◽  
Sumon Rahmon ◽  
Nazmul Hossain ◽  
Digonto Ckakma

The kidney is the most commonly injured genitourinary organ. Most injuries can be managed conservatively but nephrectomy may be needed in case of shuttered or avulsed kidney. Here we present a case of haematuria with blunt trauma to the abdomen. The patient was haemodynamically unstable and his abdomen was distended and rigid. FAST revealed intraabdominal and retroperitoneal haematoma with left renal injury. After rapid primary management emergency nephrectomy had done as there were multiple lecerations and avulsion in the left kidney. Post operative recovery and subsequent follow up was uneventful. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2019) Vol. 23 (1) : 37-39


Trauma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Robert Torrance ◽  
Abigail Kwok ◽  
David Mathews ◽  
Matthew Elliot ◽  
Andrew Baird ◽  
...  

Introduction This study reviews the type, severity, management and follow-up of renal trauma presenting to a major trauma centre in the northwest of England in the four years following inception of the major trauma centre. Given the recent introduction of major trauma centres nationally, research is needed within every specialty to ensure that the centralisation of services benefits all patients affected by these changes. Methods Patients presenting to Aintree University Hospital with renal trauma between June 2012 and June 2016 were identified using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database. The data gathered retrospectively for each patient included mechanism of injury, injury severity score, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading, management of injury, and follow-up. Results Out of a total of 2595 trauma patients, 33 renal injuries were identified. The 31 patients who received imaging were classified according to AAST grading, with 8 Grade I (25.8%), 4 Grade II (12.9%), 8 Grade III (25.8%), 4 Grade IV (12.9%), and 7 Grade V (22.6%) injuries. Twenty-five out of the 30 surviving patients received conservative treatment, three patients received angioembolisation (AE), one patient received a laparotomy with renal suturing, and one patient required a nephrectomy. Of these 30 surviving patients, seven received urology follow-up in clinic (23%). Conclusion The findings appear to support the growing trend towards the conservative management of high-grade renal injuries, and provide further evidence for the value of AE in renal trauma. The success of AE in this study appears to support the centralisation of services in renal trauma; however, the low nephrectomy rate could be interpreted as suggestive of the opposite. The study revealed that improvements to follow-up are needed, and that further research should seek to inform the optimal radiological follow-up of high-grade renal injury.


Author(s):  
Kenan Karavdić

Background: Kidney is the most common site of genitourinary trauma. 50% of all urinary injuries is kidney.Kidney is also affected in 8-12% of all blunt and penetrating trauma to abdomen. 80-90% of renal injury is caused by blunt injury GY. Children,  compared to adults, have  at a higher risk of renal injury from blunt trauma due to a variety of anatomic factors including decreased perirenal fat, weaker abdominal muscles, and a less ossified thoracic cage. While there are strong trends toward non-operative management of blunt renal trauma, there are no explicit guidelines for high grade injuries. Organ preservation in children is always a primary goal with solid organ injury. Aim of the work: The aim of the retrospective study is to show the specificity of kidney injury in children as well as the specificity of surgical treatment. Material and Methods: All 19 patients under the age of 18 who were admitted to Clinic for Pediatic surgery in Sarajevo with a diagnosis of renal trauma were retrospectively reviewed .The Echo an CT were used to identify patients with a renal injury. The time period examined was between January 1, 1999- 2019. Inclusion criteria were either a diagnosis of renal trauma or a diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma and hematuria. Exclusion criterion was death due to an additional traumatic injury. The mechanism of injury (fall, car accident , assault) injury grade (I-V), the presence of hematuria, and demographic data to include age, weight, and sex, were recorded and reviewed.  In addition, amount of blood product required, hematocrit nadir prior to transfusion to assist in ascertaining whether transfusion was necessary, surgical interventions performed, and hospital length of stay were also retrospectively analyzed. Due to the low sample size we used descriptive as opposed to inferential statistics in our analysis. Result: Demographics include male to female ratio of 13:6 and the average age of patients was 11.9 + 4.6 years. Of the nineteen patients who underwent review, eleven (57,89%) children presented with a grade III renal injury, five  with a grade IV injury and three with  grade V injury. Six patients presented with gross hematuria and 3 with microscopic hematuria. Only four patients (22%) required blood transfusions, with the average hematocrit nadir being 31 + 5.3% (24.8-37.8). One of the two patients transfused had a concomitant grade IV splenic laceration with a hematocrit nadir of 24.8% and clinical symptoms consistent with shock. Conclusions:The specificity of the child's anatomy is an aggravating prognostic factor (the kidney is larger in relation to the body cavity than in adults, less protected against the ribs, the muscles of the body and the lower abdomen, the less developed peritoneal and retroperitoneal fatty tissue).It is recommended to initiate conservative treatment (leaching, infusion solution, monitoring) and possibly delayed surgical treatment.Indications for early surgicaly treatment are reserved only for patients with bleeding (absolute) and extravasation (relative).If it is necessary surgical treatment sould be  maximally preserve kidney tissue.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Kumar Govindarajan ◽  
Mallikarjun Utagi ◽  
Bikash Kumar Naredi ◽  
Bibekanand Jindal ◽  
Kumaravel Sambandan ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the presentation and management of major grade renal trauma in children. Method: A retrospective study was performed including data collected from the patients who were admitted in Pediatric surgery with major grade renal injury (grade 3 and more) from January 2015 to August 2018. Demography, clinical parameters, management, duration of hospital stay and final outcome were noted. Results: Out of 13 children (9 males and 4 females), with age range 2-12 years (mean of 8 years), reported self-fall was the commonest mode of injury followed by road traffic accident. The majority (10/13, 75%) had a right renal injury. Eight children had a grade IV injury, one had a grade V injury, and four children had grade III injury. Duration of hospital stay varied from 3 to 28 (mean of 11.7) days. Three children required blood transfusion. One child required image guided aspiration twice and two required pigtail insertion for perinephric collection. All the 13 children improved without readmission or need for any other surgical intervention. Conclusion: Children with major grade renal trauma due to blunt injury can be successfully managed without surgical intervention and minimal intervention may only be needed in select situations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
M McPhee ◽  
N Arumainayagam ◽  
M Clark ◽  
N Burfitt ◽  
R DasGupta

Introduction The aim of this study was to analyse the treatment and management of renal injury patients presenting to our major trauma unit to determine the likelihood of patients needing immediate nephrectomy. Methods The Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database was used to review trauma cases presenting to our department between February 2009 and September 2013. Demographic data, mechanism and severity of injury, grade of renal trauma, management and 30-day outcome were determined from TARN data, electronic patient records and imaging. Results There were a total of 1,856 trauma cases, of which 36 patients (1.9%) had a renal injury. In this group, the median age was 28 years (range: 16–92 years), with 28 patients (78%) having blunt renal trauma and 8 (22%) penetrating renal trauma. The most common cause for blunt renal trauma was road traffic accidents. Renal trauma cases were stratified into American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grades (grade I: 19%, grade II: 22%, grade III: 28%, grade IV: 28%, grade V: 0%). All patients with grade I and II injuries were treated conservatively. There were three patients (1 with grade III and 2 with grade IV renal injuries) who underwent radiological embolisation. One of these patients went on to have a delayed nephrectomy owing to unsuccessful embolisation. Conclusions Trauma patients rarely require emergency nephrectomy. Radiological selective embolisation provides a good interventional option in cases of active bleeding from renal injury in haemodynamically stable patients. This has implications for trauma care and how surgical cover is provided for the rare event of nephrectomy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1677
Author(s):  
Soumish Sengupta ◽  
Supriyo Basu ◽  
Kadambari Ghosh ◽  
Subhrajyoti Sengupta

Introduction: The kidney is the most commonly injured genitourinary organ following trauma. It can be a result of both blunt and penetrating trauma to the abdomen. Both conservative and surgical managements are employed as per the clinical profile of the patient.Methods: This prospective observational study included all the patients with renal trauma who presented at the ER. Computed tomography (CT) was done for grading of renal trauma.Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. Eighty percent (n=48) patients were managed conservatively. Twenty percent (n=12) patients underwent some form of surgical management. The mean (SD) hospital stay as 11.38 (6.94) days. Twenty-eight patients (46.67%) had right renal injury. Thirty-two patients (53.33%) had left renal involvement. There were no patients with bilateral renal injury. According to American association for the surgery of trauma (AAST), 11.66% patients (n=7) were categorised in grade I, 20% patients (n=12) to grade II, 33.33% patients (n=20) to grade III, 25% patients (n=15) to grade IV and 10% patients (n=6) to grade V. The most common associated injuries were rib fracture and visceral injury.Conclusion: Much has changed since historical times with regards to renal trauma management. Data from various studies point towards a paradigm shift from surgical to conservative management as the standard of care irrespective of the grade and mode of renal trauma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document