COMPARISON OF PLASMA LEVELS OF LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE IN MEN AFTER INTRAVENOUS OR INTRANASAL ADMINISTRATION

1974 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. FINK ◽  
G. GENNSER ◽  
P. LIEDHOLM ◽  
J. THORELL ◽  
J. MULDER
Keyword(s):  
Luteinizing Hormone ◽  
Intranasal Administration ◽  
Intravenous Route ◽  
Metabolic Clearance ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Disappearance Curve ◽  
Lh Rh ◽  
Dose Dependent Increase ◽  
Dose Dependent

SUMMARY The concentrations of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) were determined by radioimmunoassay in blood samples taken at intervals after the administration of different doses of synthetic LH-RH administered either intravenously or intranasally in healthy fertile men. Intranasal administration of LH-RH caused a dose-dependent increase of plasma LH with the peak occurring later than that after intravenous injection. The intravenous route was approximately 100 times more effective than the intranasal route in terms of the dose of LH-RH necessary to achieve an LH response of similar magnitude, but the route through the nasal mucosa seems a safe and convenient way for LH-RH administration. The characteristics of the disappearance curve, metabolic clearance rate and volumes of distribution of LH-RH in man are compared with those found by others.

LUTEINIZING HORMONE RESPONSIVENESS TO LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE IN THE ADULT GUINEA-PIG: DIRECT OVARIAN INVOLVEMENT

1978 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. TER HAAR
Keyword(s):  
Luteinizing Hormone ◽  
Guinea Pig ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Maximum Increment ◽  
Lh Rh ◽  
Dose Dependent ◽  
Ovarian Involvement ◽  
Stimulation Of

SUMMARY The effects of intravenous injection of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) on the release of LH and FSH have been studied in the adult guinea-pig. In all the experiments the secretion of FSH was apparently unaffected by administration of LH-RH. The release of LH was log dose-dependent over the range 0·5–50 μg LH-RH. During the female cycle, the maximum increment in the concentration of LH after a single i.v. injection of 0·5 μg LH-RH decreased progressively from day 1 to day 13. Double or triple injections of 1 μg LH-RH at 1 h intervals produced no potentiation on day 3 but progressively greater LH responses occurred on days 7, 10 or 13 of the oestrous cycle. Ovariectomy immediately before the first injection of LH-RH on day 7 blocked the potentiated response to subsequent injections, whereas ovariectomy immediately before the second injection still permitted this potentiation. These results suggest that there is direct ovarian involvement in the potentiated response to LH-RH observed during the later part of the guinea-pig oestrous cycle. Infusion of LH-RH (1 μg over 200 min) produced a potentiated release of LH in female guinea-pigs on day 7 (but not on day 3) of the oestrous cycle after a delay of 1·5 h. It is proposed that there are two 'pools' of LH in the pituitary gland of the female guinea-pig and that the second pool is 'activated' consequent upon previous hypophysial stimulation of secretion from an ovary containing adequately developed follicles.

BLOOD AND URINE CLEARANCE OF LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE IN MAN MEASURED BY RADIOIMMUNOASSAY

1974 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. JEFFCOATE ◽  
R. H. GREENWOOD ◽  
D. T. HOLLAND
Keyword(s):  
Luteinizing Hormone ◽  
Clearance Rate ◽  
Volume Of Distribution ◽  
Metabolic Clearance ◽  
Production Rates ◽  
Metabolic Clearance Rate ◽  
Daily Production ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Rh

SUMMARY The clearance of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) after intravenous injection has been investigated in man. Thirteen tests were performed in ten subjects, four of whom were normal, the other six had proven disease of the hypothalamo-pituitary region. The rate of disappearance of LH-RH from the circulation could be represented as a double exponential with half-times of the two components of 5·3 and 27·4 min respectively. The initial volume of distribution was 11·1 ± 1·6 (s.d.) 1 and the metabolic clearance rate 1480 ± 170 (s.d.) 1/day. There was no difference in any of these parameters between normal and abnormal subjects. Between 0·75 and 2·8% of the injected dose was excreted in the urine within 8 h, of which 48% was excreted in the first hour. The daily production rates of LH-RH were calculated from the urinary excretion rates; these gave higher results than production rates calculated from the blood metabolic clearance rate. Possible reasons for this are discussed.

EFFECT OF CORTISOL OR ADRENOCORTICOTROPHIN ON RELEASE OF LUTEINIZING HORMONE INDUCED BY LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE IN THE DAIRY HEIFER

1982 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. MATTERI ◽  
G. P. MOBERG
Keyword(s):  
Luteinizing Hormone ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Dairy Heifers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Significant Depression ◽  
Lh Rh ◽  
Lh Releasing Hormone ◽  
And Control ◽  
Slight Depression

During treatment with cortisol or ACTH, dairy heifers were given two doses of LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) spaced 1·5 h apart. Serum concentrations of cortisol and LH were monitored during each treatment. Treatment with both ACTH and cortisol raised plasma cortisol levels above the respective saline controls (P<0·001). Neither treatment affected basal LH concentrations. A slight depression in LH response was seen in the cortisol-treated animals after the first LH-RH injection, as shown by a statistically significant depression at three of the sample times. There was no significant difference between treated and control LH values after the second LH-RH administration. Treatment with ACTH resulted in significantly reduced LH values at all sample times after both injections of LH-RH.

Acidic Aqueous Extraction of Hypothalamic Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone to Study Biological Effects

1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 754-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Shin ◽  
C. J. Howitt
Keyword(s):  
Luteinizing Hormone ◽  
Biological Effects ◽  
Extraction Procedure ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Acid Extraction ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Aqueous Solvent ◽  
Lh Rh

Several aqueous solvent systems were tested for their efficiency in extracting luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) from rat hypothalamus. Although LH-RH is a water-soluble decapeptide, neutral distilled water extracted only 10% of the LH-RH obtained using acid extraction methods. The efficiency of the acid extraction procedure suggests that in the hypothalamus the releasing hormone is bound to a relatively large molecular weight compound. Using the acidic extraction procedure, we found that hypothalamic LH-RH content is significantly lower in the castrated animal than in the normal rat.

PROLONGED RELEASE BY DIOESTROUS RATS OF FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE DURING THE PERIOD OF OVULATION INDUCED BY LUTEINIZING HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE

1979 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHUJI SASAMOTO ◽  
SHIGEO HARADA ◽  
KAZUYOSHI TAYA
Keyword(s):  
Luteinizing Hormone ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
High Plasma ◽  
Oestrous Cycle ◽  
Prolonged Release ◽  
Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Follicular Maturation ◽  
Lh Rh ◽  
Premature Ovulation

When 1·0 μg luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) was given i.v. three times at 1 h intervals from 17.00 to 19.00 h on the day of dioestrus (day 0) to regular 4 day cyclic rats, premature ovulation was induced the next morning (day 1) with the number of ova present comparable to normal spontaneous ovulation. The next spontaneous ovulation occurred on the morning of day 5, 4 days after premature ovulation induced by LH-RH. Plasma concentrations of FSH and LH showed transient rises and falls within 1 h of administration of LH-RH; concentrations of FSH in the plasma decreased from 20.00 h on day 0 but markedly increased again from 23.00 h on day 0 to 02.00 h on day 1 and these high levels persisted until 14.00 h on day 1, with only a small increase of plasma LH during this period. The duration of increased FSH release during premature ovulation induced by LH-RH treatment was 6 h longer than the FSH surge occurring after administration of HCG on day 0. Surges of gonadotrophin were absent on the afternoon of day 1 (the expected day of pro-oestrus) and the surges characteristic of pro-oestrus occurred on the afternoon of day 4 and ovulation followed the next morning. The pituitary content of FSH did not decrease despite persisting high plasma levels of FSH during premature ovulation induced by either LH-RH or HCG on day 0. The changes in uterine weight indicated that the pattern of oestrogen secretion from the day of premature ovulation induced by LH-RH to the day of the next spontaneous ovulation was similar to that of the normal 4 day oestrous cycle. When 10 i.u. HCG were given on day 0, an increase in oestrogen secretion occurred on day 2, 1 day earlier than in the group given LH-RH on day 0. This advancement of oestrogen secretion was assumed to be responsible for the gonadotrophin surges on day 3. Similar numbers of fully developed follicles were found by 17.00 h on day 2 after premature ovulation induced by either LH-RH or HCG, suggesting that the shorter surge of FSH during premature ovulation induced by HCG had no serious consequences on the initiation of follicular maturation for the succeeding oestrous cycle in these rats. Administration of LH-RH on day 0 had no direct effect on the FSH surge during premature ovulation. Secretory changes in the ovary during ovulation may be responsible for this prolonged selective release of FSH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document