The International Reference Preparation of Gonadorelin for Bioassay: a comparison with different preparations of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone using physicochemical methods of analysis, different bioassays and immunoassay

1982 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. L. Storring ◽  
P. H. Corran ◽  
Rose E. Gaines Das ◽  
D. H. Calam

The preparation and nature of the International Reference Preparation of Gonadorelin for Bioassay (IRP; coded 77/596) are described. The IRP was studied by four laboratories in four countries and compared, using physicochemical methods of analysis, various bioassay procedures and immunoassay, with preparations of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) produced by different manufacturers. Analyses by thin-layer chromatography and by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) indicated some heterogeneity of the peptide present in most of these preparations of synthetic LH-RH, including that of the IRP; the latter preparation appeared to be 88·3% (w/w) pure, judged by HPLC. The data from the collaborative study suggested that each ampoule of the IRP contains approximately 31 nmol LH-RH. The IRP appeared to be suitable to serve as an international reference preparation for bioassay since its behaviour was similar in different bioassays, so far as this could be examined, to that of the other preparations of LH-RH with which it was compared. Furthermore, the biological activities of different preparations of LH-RH, assessed in terms of the IRP, appeared to correlate with their degrees of purity assessed by physicochemical methods, suggesting that the peptides other than LH-RH present in the IRP did not contribute significantly to the biological activity of the preparation in these assay procedures. The limited data available suggested that the IRP might also be suitable as a reference preparation for immunoassay. The ampouled preparation, coded 77/596, was therefore established by the World Health Organization as the International Reference Preparation of Gonadorelin for Bioassay and assigned a unitage of 31 i.u./ampoule on the basis that the i.u. is represented by 1 nmole of LH-RH.

1982 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. MATTERI ◽  
G. P. MOBERG

During treatment with cortisol or ACTH, dairy heifers were given two doses of LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) spaced 1·5 h apart. Serum concentrations of cortisol and LH were monitored during each treatment. Treatment with both ACTH and cortisol raised plasma cortisol levels above the respective saline controls (P<0·001). Neither treatment affected basal LH concentrations. A slight depression in LH response was seen in the cortisol-treated animals after the first LH-RH injection, as shown by a statistically significant depression at three of the sample times. There was no significant difference between treated and control LH values after the second LH-RH administration. Treatment with ACTH resulted in significantly reduced LH values at all sample times after both injections of LH-RH.


1974 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 754-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Shin ◽  
C. J. Howitt

Several aqueous solvent systems were tested for their efficiency in extracting luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) from rat hypothalamus. Although LH-RH is a water-soluble decapeptide, neutral distilled water extracted only 10% of the LH-RH obtained using acid extraction methods. The efficiency of the acid extraction procedure suggests that in the hypothalamus the releasing hormone is bound to a relatively large molecular weight compound. Using the acidic extraction procedure, we found that hypothalamic LH-RH content is significantly lower in the castrated animal than in the normal rat.


1979 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHUJI SASAMOTO ◽  
SHIGEO HARADA ◽  
KAZUYOSHI TAYA

When 1·0 μg luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) was given i.v. three times at 1 h intervals from 17.00 to 19.00 h on the day of dioestrus (day 0) to regular 4 day cyclic rats, premature ovulation was induced the next morning (day 1) with the number of ova present comparable to normal spontaneous ovulation. The next spontaneous ovulation occurred on the morning of day 5, 4 days after premature ovulation induced by LH-RH. Plasma concentrations of FSH and LH showed transient rises and falls within 1 h of administration of LH-RH; concentrations of FSH in the plasma decreased from 20.00 h on day 0 but markedly increased again from 23.00 h on day 0 to 02.00 h on day 1 and these high levels persisted until 14.00 h on day 1, with only a small increase of plasma LH during this period. The duration of increased FSH release during premature ovulation induced by LH-RH treatment was 6 h longer than the FSH surge occurring after administration of HCG on day 0. Surges of gonadotrophin were absent on the afternoon of day 1 (the expected day of pro-oestrus) and the surges characteristic of pro-oestrus occurred on the afternoon of day 4 and ovulation followed the next morning. The pituitary content of FSH did not decrease despite persisting high plasma levels of FSH during premature ovulation induced by either LH-RH or HCG on day 0. The changes in uterine weight indicated that the pattern of oestrogen secretion from the day of premature ovulation induced by LH-RH to the day of the next spontaneous ovulation was similar to that of the normal 4 day oestrous cycle. When 10 i.u. HCG were given on day 0, an increase in oestrogen secretion occurred on day 2, 1 day earlier than in the group given LH-RH on day 0. This advancement of oestrogen secretion was assumed to be responsible for the gonadotrophin surges on day 3. Similar numbers of fully developed follicles were found by 17.00 h on day 2 after premature ovulation induced by either LH-RH or HCG, suggesting that the shorter surge of FSH during premature ovulation induced by HCG had no serious consequences on the initiation of follicular maturation for the succeeding oestrous cycle in these rats. Administration of LH-RH on day 0 had no direct effect on the FSH surge during premature ovulation. Secretory changes in the ovary during ovulation may be responsible for this prolonged selective release of FSH.


1978 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. YAMASHITA ◽  
M. MIENO ◽  
T. SHIMIZU ◽  
ER. YAMASHITA

The rate of secretion of 17-oxosteroids by the testes of anaesthetized dogs in vivo was used as an index of LH secretion. Intracarotid injection of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH, 1, 5 or 10 μg/kg body wt) resulted in an increase in the testicular 17-oxosteroid secretion which was roughly proportional to the dose administered and which reached a maximum 60 min after the injection. Testicular output of 17-oxosteroids was unaffected by administration of melatonin (10 or 100 μg/kg body wt) into the carotid artery. When LH-RH (5 μg/kg) was injected into the carotid artery 3 h after intracarotid injection of melatonin (10 or 100 μg/kg), the testicular response to LH-RH was considerably diminished. Pretreatment with melatonin (100 μg/kg) did not alter the testicular response to human chorionic gonadotrophin (20 i.u./kg body wt) given i.v. It is concluded that melatonin may act directly on the anterior pituitary gland in dogs to inhibit the LH-RH-induced release of LH.


1978 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 542-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
L A Sternberger

Antisera to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) confer on Araldite sections of occasional rat pituitaries moderate immunocytochemical staining to the large secretory granules of gonadotrophs. Treatment of the sections with LH-RH before anti-LH-RH yields strong staining in all animals, irrespective of presence or absence of staining without pretreatment. This enhancement of staining is specific for LH-RH and is a high affinity, saturable reaction. Staining with or without LH-RH pretreatment is absent when anti-LH-RH absorbed with insolubilized LH-RH is used. Staining is inhibited by carboxyterminally-deficient LH-RH, unaffected by aminoterminally deficient LH-RH.


1975 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. JOHNSON ◽  
R. S. MALLAMPATI

SUMMARY Release of immunoreactive LH and FSH was induced in immature intact female rats by repeated injections of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH). Altering the dose of LH-RH (5, 10, 20, 50 ng) and the frequency of administration (every 10, 20, 30 or 60 min) over a period of 2 h produced a variety of serum LH and FSH concentrations and ratios. When the dose was a constant 20 ng but the frequency of injections was either 20 or 30 min, a steady state in serum gonadotrophin concentrations was reached within 1 h and the level remained the same during the second hour. When given every 10 min, 20 ng LH-RH produced a much higher concentration of both LH and FSH during the second hour of stimulation. Examination of the gonadotrophin levels after each injection of LH-RH showed that the pituitary response was variable in spite of a constant stimulus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document