IGF-I variants which bind poorly to IGF-binding proteins show more potent and prolonged hypoglycaemic action than native IGF-I in pigs and marmoset monkeys

1997 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
FM Tomas ◽  
PE Walton ◽  
FR Dunshea ◽  
FJ Ballard
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Plasma Glucose ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Insulin Receptors ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Igf Binding Proteins ◽  
Glucose Levels ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Rapid Clearance

The relative acute hypoglycaemic potencies of IGF-I and several variants of IGF-I which bind poorly to the IGF-I binding proteins (IGFBPs) have been examined in marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and the pig. In the marmoset study, IGF-I and des(1-3)IGF-I were compared in anaesthetised and conscious animals in a range of bolus doses from 42 to 270 micrograms/kg body weight. In the pig study, IGF-I was compared with four variants, des(1-3)IGF-I long-IGF-I, R3IGF-I and long-R3IGF-I (LR3IGF-I), which show reduced affinity for the IGFBPs as well as with insulin. Doses in the pig were 20 and 50 micrograms/kg body weight for the IGFs and 3 micrograms/kg for insulin. In each study serial blood samples were taken from 30 min before to 4 h after the bolus injection. Plasma glucose levels were decreased in a dose-responsive manner with the pig more sensitive than either the conscious or anaesthetised marmoset (maximum lowering 4.8, 3.7 and 2.5 mmol/l respectively). The IGF variants were consistently 2- to 3-fold more potent than IGF-I in each animal for lowering of plasma glucose to the nadir, with the potency reflecting the relative affinities for binding to the IGFBPs and the IGF-I receptors. Thus, hypoglycaemic potency was in the order IGF-I < long-IGF-I < R3IGF-I approximately LR3IGF-I < des (1-3)IGF-I. Notably the variants suppressed plasma glucose levels over a much longer period than did IGF-I, the cumulative suppression over four hours showing an approximately 4- to 8-fold increase in the extent of hypoglycaemia. The prolonged suppression was not simply proportional to the hypoglycaemic nadir; at doses equipotent for glucose lowering, the cumulative hypoglycaemic effect for the variants in either species was about 2-fold that for IGF-I. The differential effect of the variants in the marmoset could not be accounted for by correlated changes in plasma insulin, IGF-I or IGFBP levels in plasma. Indirect effects via inhibition of glucagon, or direct effects via hepatic insulin receptors are postulated to account for the results. There was a dose-related reduction in plasma amino acids in the pig but, unlike the case for plasma glucose, only one analogue, LR3IGF-I was more potent than IGF-I. The response to LR3IGF-I was accentuated at the high dosage but on the basis of the other variants tested this effect could not be ascribed to either of the incorporated molecular variations. Despite their more rapid clearance from the circulation, variants of IGF-I which show lower affinity for binding to IGFBPs show proportionately superior potency for sustained hypoglycaemic action. Since our data were obtained in animal models of accepted relevance to humans these results point to the possible superior efficacy of the variants, especially des(1-3)IGF-I, over IGF-I for use as an adjunct to insulin treatment of hyperglycaemic conditions.

Superior potency of infused IGF-I analogues which bind poorly to IGF-binding proteins is maintained when administered by injection

1996 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
F M Tomas ◽  
A B Lemmey ◽  
L C Read ◽  
F J Ballard
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Body Weight Gain ◽  
Daily Injection ◽  
Igf Binding Proteins ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Rapid Clearance ◽  
Use Efficiency

Abstract The relative potency of IGF-I and the analogue LR3IGF-I to either promote growth or reverse catabolism in rats when administered by injection rather than by continuous infusion has been examined. LR3IGF-I has very low affinity for the IGF-binding proteins in the rat and hence is cleared from the circulation more quickly than is IGF-I. Experiments were performed in normal growing rats (150 g body weight) and in rats made catabolic by dexamethasone infusion (20 μg/day). IGFs or vehicle were delivered subcutaneously for 7 days either by continuous infusion via osmotic pumps or by injection once or twice daily at 320 and 400 μg/day in normal and catabolic rats respectively. As expected, continuous infusion of IGFs showed greater efficacy than either of the injection modes especially in its anti-catabolic actions. When infused continuously LR3 IGF-I was generally 1·5- to 2-fold more potent than IGF-I for changes in body weight gain, visceral organ weights and feed use efficiency. Notably, LR3 IGF-I remained more potent than IGF-I in several of these effects even when the peptides were given by once-daily injection. In addition, Nτ-methylhistidine excretion by dexamethasone-treated rats was reduced to a threefold greater extent by injected LR3 IGF-I than by injected IGF-I. Notwithstanding these effects, LR3IGF-I was barely equipotent with IGF-I for reversal of carcass muscle loss in dexamethasone-treated rats. Despite its more rapid clearance from the circulation, injected LR3IGF-I retains superior potency to injected IGF-I for several actions, albeit the potency is much reduced compared with continuous infusion. Thus our data indicate that use of IGF analogues which have low affinity for binding proteins may have advantages in potency and/or tissue specificity where IGFs are necessarily administered by injection. Journal of Endocrinology (1996) 150, 77–84

IGF binding proteins-4, -5 and -6 may play specialized roles during L6 myoblast proliferation and differentiation

1995 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Z Ewton ◽  
J R Florini
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Muscle Growth ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Conditioned Media ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Regulation Of Expression ◽  
Igf Binding Proteins ◽  
Proliferation And Differentiation ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igf Binding

Abstract It is well known that IGFs-I and -II stimulate both the proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts, but the role of the IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) during these processes has not been established. In this study we show that IGF-I analogs with greatly reduced affinity for IGFBPs exhibited about a 10-fold increase in potency in stimulating proliferation (as in other cell types), but up to a 100-fold greater potency than native IGF-I in stimulating L6A1c differentiation. Analysis of conditioned media revealed that L6 cells secrete significant levels of IGFBPs that react with antisera to IGFBP-4, -5 and -6. Steady-state levels of IGFBP-4 mRNA were highest in proliferating myoblasts, while IGFBP-5 mRNA could not be detected in myoblasts although its levels were dramatically increased during IGF- or insulin-stimulated differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes. Elevated IGFBP-6 mRNA levels were found in quiescent cells in serum-free medium. IGF-I and IGF-II treatment elevated IGFBP-5 in conditioned media, but longR3IGF-I and insulin, which do not bind to IGFBPs, had smaller effects. This complex regulation of expression of different IGFBPs not only during different stages of muscle growth and differentiation, but also upon stimulation by IGFs or insulin, suggests that the IGFBPs play a specific and significant role in modulating the actions of the IGFs during myogenesis. Journal of Endocrinology (1995) 144, 539–553

scholarly journals Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and especially IGF-I variants are anabolic in dexamethasone-treated rats

1992 ◽  
Vol 282 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
F M Tomas ◽  
S E Knowles ◽  
P C Owens ◽  
C S Chandler ◽  
G L Francis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Muscle Protein ◽  
Protein Breakdown ◽  
Igf Binding Proteins ◽  
Factor I ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igf Binding

The administration of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) via subcutaneously implanted osmotic pumps partially reversed a catabolic state produced by the co-administration of 20 micrograms of dexamethasone/day to 150 g male rats. Marked dose-dependent effects on body weight and nitrogen retention were produced, with the highest IGF-I dose, 695 micrograms/day, giving a 6 g increase in body weight over 7 days, compared with a 19 g loss in the dexamethasone-only group and an 18 g gain in pair-fed controls. Two IGF-I analogues that bind poorly to IGF-binding proteins, the truncated form, des(1-3)IGF-I, and a variant with an N-terminal extension as well as arginine at residue 3, LR3IGF-I, were approx. 2.5-fold more potent than IGF-I. The response with LR3IGF-I was particularly striking because this peptide binds 3-fold less well than IGF-I to the type 1 IGF receptor. The increased potencies of the IGF-I variants may relate to the substantially increased plasma levels of IGF-binding proteins, particularly IGFBP-3, produced by the combined treatment of dexamethasone with IGF-I or the variants. These binding proteins would be expected to decrease the transfer of IGF-I, but not that of the variants, from blood to tissue sites of action. Measurements of muscle protein synthesis at the end of the treatment period and muscle protein breakdown by 3-methylhistidine (3MH) excretion throughout the experiment indicated coordinate anabolic effects of the IGF peptides on both processes. Thus 3MH excretion was decreased at the highest IGF-I dose from 83.5 +/- 4.2 (S.E.M.) mumol/kg per 7 days to 65.1 +/- 2.2, compared with 54.9 +/- 1.2 in the pair-fed controls. Part of this response in 3MH excretion may have reflected a decrease in gut protein breakdown, because IGF-I and especially the IGF analogues increased the gut weight by up to 45%. Notwithstanding the effects on protein synthesis and breakdown, the fractional carcass weights remained low in the IGF-treated groups, although the increase in total carcass weight reflected nitrogen rather than fat gain. The dexamethasone-induced changes in liver, spleen and heart weight were restored towards normal by the IGF treatment. The experiment demonstrates the potential of IGF-I treatment of catabolic states and especially the value of modified forms of growth factors that bind weakly to IGF-binding proteins.

Postprandial changes in plasma growth hormone, insulin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, and IGF-binding proteins in coho salmon fasted for varying periods

2009 ◽  
Vol 297 (2) ◽  
pp. R352-R361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munetaka Shimizu ◽  
Kathleen A. Cooper ◽  
Walton W. Dickhoff ◽  
Brian R. Beckman
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Food Intake ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Coho Salmon ◽  
Fasting Period ◽  
Igf Binding Proteins ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Single Meal

We examined postprandial changes in circulating growth hormone (GH), insulin, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) in yearling coho salmon under different feeding regimes. Fish were initially fasted for 1 day, 1 wk, or 3 wk. Fasted fish were then fed, and blood was collected at 4-h intervals over 26 h. After the various periods of fasting, basal levels of insulin were relatively constant, whereas those of IGF-I, IGFBPs and GH changed in proportion to the duration of the fast. A single meal caused a rapid, large increase in the circulating insulin levels, but the degree of the increase was influenced by the fasting period. IGF-I showed a moderate increase 2 h after the meal but only in the regularly fed fish. Plasma levels of 41-kDa IGFBP were increased in all groups within 6 h after the single meal. The fasting period did not influence the response of 41-kDa IGFBP to the meal. IGFBP-1 and GH decreased after the meal to the same extent among groups regardless of the fasting period. The present study shows that insulin and IGF-I respond differently to long (weeks)- and short (hours)-term nutritional changes in salmon; insulin maintains its basal level but changes acutely in response to food intake, whereas IGF-I adjusts its basal levels to the long-term nutritional status and is less responsive to acute nutritional input. IGFBPs maintain their sensitivity to food intake, even after prolonged fasting, suggesting their critical role in the nutritional regulation of salmon growth.

scholarly journals GH/IGF e neoplasia: o que há de novo nesta associação

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela M. Spinola e Castro ◽  
Gil Guerra-Júnior
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factors ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Igf Binding Proteins ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Ciclo Celular ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factors

Estudos in vitro e em animais sugerem que os membros do sistema insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), incluindo IGF-I, IGF-II, receptores de IGF-I e IGF-II (IGF-IR e IGF-IIR), e as IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) podem ter um importante envolvimento no desenvolvimento e na progressão de neoplasias. Mais especificamente, as IGFs promovem a progressão do ciclo celular e inibem a apoptose tanto por ação direta com outros fatores de crescimento como por ação indireta interagindo com outros sistemas moleculares intracelulares envolvidos na promoção e/ou progressão do câncer. Além disso, inúmeros estudos epidemiológicos têm sugerido que concentrações elevadas das IGFs, independente das alterações nas IGFBPs, podem estar associadas a um aumento no risco de desenvolver determinadas neoplasias. Esta revisão tem como objetivo apresentar o envolvimento do sistema IGF na regulação tumoral, os principais estudos epidemiológicos realizados e o risco de desenvolvimento de neoplasia em pacientes (com ou sem história pessoal de neoplasia prévia) que receberam hormônio de crescimento (rhGH). É importante salientar que o uso clínico de rhGH, nas indicações aprovadas internacionalmente, é seguro e não existem evidências, até o momento, da associação com o desenvolvimento de neoplasias.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document