Development and implementation of guided, self-directed learning modules in graduate medical education

INTRODUCTION The American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) defines 18 “key procedures” as requirements in emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. The post-graduate year-1 (PGY-1) curriculum provides an early foundation for EM trainees to gain procedural experience, but traditional PGY-1 rotations may not provide robust procedural opportunities. Our objective was to replace a traditional orthopedic rotation with a 4-week rotation that emphasized EM procedure acquisition and comprehension. Although all residents met ACGME procedural requirements before the curricular modification, the purpose of this month was to increase overall procedure numbers. The block contained dedicated procedure shifts in the emergency department as well as an asynchronous, self-directed learning course. We sought to compare the number of procedures performed by PGY-1 residents during their orthopedic rotation (the year before implementation), to the number of procedures performed during their procedure rotation (the year after implementation). METHODS The total number of procedures performed and logged by PGY-1 residents during the traditional orthopedic rotation (during the year prior to implementation of the new procedure rotation) were compared to the total number of procedures by the first class to undergo the new procedure rotation the following year. Thirty resident logs were reviewed (15 per class). Data were analyzed using SAS NPAR1WAY; Z < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS When compared to the orthopedic rotation, the procedure rotation had statistically significant higher numbers of procedures per resident (22, standard deviation [SD] 12, vs 11.4, SD 7.6; Z = 0.0177). A wide variety of nonorthopedic procedures accounted for the increased numbers, (13.6, SD 10.3, vs 0.9, SD 0.9; Z < 0.001). While the average number of orthopedic procedures was slightly less on the procedure rotation, there was no statistical difference (orthopedic rotation 10.13, procedure rotation 8.26; Z = 0.4605). Notably, fewer procedures were performed when 2 residents were on the procedure rotation at the same time (21 vs 10.1). CONCLUSION This analysis demonstrated a larger number and a wider variety of procedures performed by PGY-1 residents during a dedicated procedure rotation compared to a traditional orthopedic rotation. Furthermore, exposure to orthopedic procedures did not decline significantly. Limitations of the study include a modest number of subjects. Data may be limited by the consistency of procedure logging by individual residents. Further studies may assess procedural competency after PGY-1 year of training.

Download Full-text

The Future of the Lecture in Neurology Education

Seminars in Neurology ◽

10.1055/s-0038-1667042 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 38 (04) ◽

pp. 418-427 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Sara Schaefer ◽

Moises Dominguez ◽

Jeremy Moeller

Keyword(s):

Medical Education ◽

Flipped Classroom ◽

Current Knowledge ◽

Self Directed Learning ◽

Learning Modules ◽

Computer Based Learning ◽

Traditional Lectures ◽

Modern Learning ◽

Directed Learning ◽

Teaching Problem

AbstractThe lecture has been a core pedagogical method since the early days of formal medical education. Although approaches to formal lectures have evolved over the years, there has been ongoing debate about the role that lectures should play in modern medical education. Arguably, traditional lectures do not align well with modern learning theory, and do not take full advantage of our current knowledge of how people learn. In many modern medical curricula, lectures have been replaced by self-study activities, including video-based lectures, computer-based learning modules, and other self-directed learning. We argue that scheduled “together time” is still important, particularly in neurology education, where there is a strong emphasis on clinical reasoning. We outline alternative teaching methods that effectively use this time, including the flipped classroom, just-in-time teaching, problem-based learning, and team-based learning. We discuss ways in which these approaches may be particularly conducive to components of neurology education.

Download Full-text

Myth or Reality: Self-Assessment Is Central to Effective Curriculum in Anatomical Pathology Graduate Medical Education

Academic Pathology ◽

10.1177/23742895211013528 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

pp. 237428952110135

Author(s):

Fang-I Lu ◽

Susan Glover Takahashi ◽

Carolyn Kerr

Keyword(s):

Medical Education ◽

Graduate Medical Education ◽

Research Literature ◽

Self Directed Learning ◽

Self Assessment ◽

Learner Engagement ◽

Graduate Medical ◽

External Data ◽

Quality Feedback ◽

Anatomical Pathology

Self-assessment, a personal evaluation of one’s professional attributes and abilities against a perceived norm, has frequently been cited as a necessary component of self-directed learning and the maintenance of competency within regulated health professions, including the medical professions. However, education research literature has consistently shown uninformed personal global assessment of performance to be inaccurate in a variety of contexts, and have limited value in a workplace-based curriculum. Incorporating known standards of performance with internal and external data on the performance improves a learner’s ability to accurately self-assess. Selecting content suitable for self-assessment, providing explicit assessment standards, encouraging feedback-seeking behaviors, supporting a growth mindset, and providing quality feedback in a supportive context are all strategies that can support learner self-assessment, learner engagement in reflection, and action on feedback in Anatomical Pathology graduate medical education.

Download Full-text