scholarly journals Relevant Problems of Improving the Measures of Criminological Prevention of Extremist Crimes Committed Using Information and Telecommunication Networks

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 776-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Ivantsov ◽  
Sergey Borisov ◽  
Gulfiya Usembaeva ◽  
Tatiana Muzychuk ◽  
Yuri Tishchenko
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
National Policy ◽  
Telecommunication Networks ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Republic Of Bashkortostan ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Internal Affairs ◽  
The Republic

The goal of this study is to identify the problems in the existing system of criminological prevention of extremist crimes committed using information and telecommunication networks, and to work out ideas for its improvement. The authors use general and special research methods, primarily, sociological ones. They have studied 184 criminal cases of extremist crimes committed using information and telecommunication networks tried in courts in the cities of Irkutsk, Moscow, Penza, in Kursk, Moscow, Murmansk, Samara and Chelyabinsk Regions and in the Republic of Bashkortostan in 2010–2017. The have also analyzed the published decisions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and surveyed 158 employees of the internal affairs bodies, 42 judges, 80 employees of the Investigation Committee of the Russian Federation, as well as 46 faculty members from Moscow, Moscow Region and the Republic of Bashkortostan. The authors have analyzed statistical data for 2010–2017 gathered by the Chief Information and Analytics Center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and the Court Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The article takes into account novels of criminal legislation regarding the use of information and telecommunication networks for committing extremist crimes introduced in 2013–2017, the clauses of the Federal Law «On the Basics of the System of Preventing Crimes in the Russian Federation» of 2016. The authors also pay attention to the Strategy of State National Policy of the Russian Federation until 2025, the Counter-Extremism Strategy of the Russian Federation until 2025, the Doctrine of Information Security of 2016, the Strategy of Developing Information Society in the Russian Federation in 2017–2030, and the new Clarifications of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. A complex research of the problems of counteracting extremist crimes committed with the use of information and telecommunication networks allowed the authors to formulate suggestions on improving the system of criminological prevention of these criminal acts.

scholarly journals Novels of the Criminal Code on responsibility for abusesin public procurement: background and problems of qualification

2018 ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
A. Ya. Asnis
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Service Contract ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Contract Managers

The article deals with the criminological grounds and background of the adoption of the Federal law of April 23, 2018 № 99-FZ, which introduced criminal liability for abuse in the procurement of goods, works and services for state or municipal needs (Art. 2004 of Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and for bribery of employees of contract service, contract managers, members of the Commission on the implementation of the procurement of persons engaged in the acceptance of the delivered goods, performed works or rendered services, other authorized persons, representing interests of customer in the scope of the relevant procurement (Art. 2005 of the Criminal Code).The author formulates private rules of qualification of the corresponding crimes and differentiation of their structures from structures of adjacent crimes and administrative offenses. The necessity of changing the position of the legislator regarding generic and direct objects of these crimes, the adoption of a special resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation to explain the practice of applying the relevant innovations.

scholarly journals ON THE QUESTION OF THE LIMITS OF POWERS OF LEGISLATORS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION SUBJECTS IN IMPROVING SOCIAL LEGISLATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 113-116
Author(s):  
D. P. Gevorkyan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Benefits ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Support Measures ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic

The article is devoted to the problems of determining the scope of legislative powers of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the sphere of implementing the principles of the social state and the social rights of citizens. Taking into account the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, introduced in July 2020, which guarantee “targeted social support of citizens and the indexation of social benefits and other social benefits”, it is necessary to monitor current legislation and judicial practice in the social sphere. In the Republic of Daghestan, a fairly active formation of social legislation began in 2004, in recent years, judicial practice has also developed. The article examines a number of legal positions of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Daghestan and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, which must be taken into account in further law-making work on the formation of social legislation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. In particular, the legislators of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of establishing social support measures for certain categories of citizens at the expense of the budget of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation are not entitled to restrict the rights of persons who are established these support measures, in terms of introducing additional conditions for their provision

scholarly journals Improving the effectiveness of treatment of chronic generalized catarrhal gingivitis in cadets of the Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation who are under psychoemotional stress

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 02025
Author(s):  
Olesya Sitdikova ◽  
Milyausha Kabirova ◽  
Larisa Gerasimova ◽  
Lida Sitdikova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Stress Factors ◽  
Additional Tool ◽  
Psychoemotional Stress ◽  
Dental Office ◽  
Republic Of Bashkortostan ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Internal Affairs ◽  
The Republic

The purpose of the study was to determine the influence of the psychoemotional stress level on the development of chronic generalized catarrhal gingivitis, to suggest a treatment regimen using a complex of glycine and burnet (Sanguisorba) phytocomposition. Materials and methods. In a clinical study based on the dental office of the medical unit No. 1 of the medical and sanitary unit of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation in the Republic of Bashkortostan (city of Ufa) involved 77 patients aged from 18 to 25 years with chronic generalized catarrhal gingivitis. Results. The use of the proposed complex of glycine and burnet phytocomposition in gel form is convenient to use, since it allows to increase the exposure time on the oral mucosa and provides an optimal concentration of drugs to achieve the fastest therapeutic effect. Conclusion. The study proved the role of stress factors in the genesis of periodontal injuries. The immunosuppressive effect of stress stimulations directly affects the hygienic status of the oral cavity. This medicinal composition of glycine and burnet phytocomposition has demonstrated effectiveness and ease of use. It requires further introduction as an additional tool in the treatment of chronic generalized catarrhal gingivitis against the background of psychoemotional stress.

Certain issues of the formation of the administrative and legal status of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
ELENA A. LESNYKH ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Effective Work ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Full Independence ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this article is the administrative and legal status of the Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. A critical analysis of some provisions of the Federal law ‘On the Judicial Department’, which are not quite successful, in the author’s opinion, reveals a trend in the development of the legal status of the Department, which does not go beyond the narrowly utilitarian implementation of the functions of financial, material, technical and personnel support for real access to justice. Based on the analysis of scientific and practical literature, normative material, the author reveals a contradiction between the recognized in the literature some uncertainty of legal status, on the one hand, and adequate and effective work that corresponds to the tasks facing the Department, on the other. There are obvious contradictions and gaps in the legal regulation of the Department’s activities that require correction. Thus, the definition of the Department ‘under’ the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation puts it formally and legally, in terms of literal interpretation of the law, in direct administrative subordination. To ensure full independence of the Judicial Department as ‘non-systemic’ beyond the branches of government, public authority proposed to withdraw it from the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in personnel matters with the appointment of the Head of Department by the decree of the President of Russia on representation of the Council of judges.

On some Issues of the Practice of Dispute Resolution in the Field of Insurance Bank Deposits

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Svetlana S. Tropskaya ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Deposit Insurance ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Bank Deposits ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article analyzes the practice of applying the federal law «On Deposit Insurance in Banks of the Russian Federation», defines the categories of cases in the field of deposit insurance, highlights the circumstances and facts that the court pays special attention to when considering certain categories of cases. As a result, it is concluded that the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation should issue an act summarizing the practice of considering disputes in the field of mandatory deposit insurance.

ON THE CONCEPT OF RECONCILIATION PROCEDURES AND THEIR VALUE ORIENTATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-28
Author(s):  
T.V. SAKHNOVA
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Value Orientations ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Difference

Conciliation procedures are one of the obvious and most iconic trends of the modern civilizational process. In Russia, a new round of their development was given by the Federal Law of 28 November 2018 No. 451-FZ (as amended by the Federal Law of 26 July 2019 No. 197-FZ). The Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 31 October 2019 No. 41 approved the Rules of Judicial Conciliation. However, after two years, accompanied by active scientific discussions, no unity of views on the existing – or desirable – concept of conciliation procedures in general and their individual types has been developed. One of the reasons is the difference in values and understanding of conciliation – as a factual goal or as a way of achieving a legal goal. According to the author of the article, such “opposition” is artificial and removable by legal means. We argue the thesis that the legislative concept of conciliation procedures, judicial, non-procedural and non-judicial, and its realization must correlate with the type of process and historically developed methodology of civil procedure. The author formulates and analyzes the problems of hermeneutics of “conciliation”, the understanding and purpose of the reconciliation procedures provided by law, judicial conciliation as an emerging delegated conciliation procedure, legal qualification of the results of non-judicial conciliation procedure. It is argued that the universum of procedure as a legal tool has an inexhaustible potential in the horizontal harmonization of civil procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document