Developing the prediction model of at-risk freshmen students and analyzing characteristics of cluster based on learning analytics

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 425-454
Author(s):  
Jongho Shin ◽  
Jaewon Choi
2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 987-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Chen ◽  
Qinghua Zheng ◽  
Shuguang Ji ◽  
Feng Tian ◽  
Haiping Zhu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredys Simanca ◽  
Rubén González Crespo ◽  
Luis Rodríguez-Baena ◽  
Daniel Burgos

Learning analytics (LA) has become a key area of study in educology, where it could assist in customising teaching and learning. Accordingly, it is precisely this data analysis technique that is used in a sensor—AnalyTIC—designed to identify students who are at risk of failing a course, and to prompt subsequent tutoring. This instrument provides the teacher and the student with the necessary information to evaluate academic performance by using a risk assessment matrix; the teacher can then customise any tutoring for a student having problems, as well as adapt the course contents. The sensor was validated in a study involving 39 students in the first term of the Environmental Engineering program at the Cooperative University of Colombia. Participants were all enrolled in an Algorithms course. Our findings led us to assert that it is vital to identify struggling students so that teachers can take corrective measures. The sensor was initially created based on the theoretical structure of the processes and/or phases of LA. A virtual classroom was built after these phases were identified, and the tool for applying the phases was then developed. After the tool was validated, it was established that students’ educational experiences are more dynamic when teachers have sufficient information for decision-making, and that tutoring and content adaptation boost the students’ academic performance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e003451
Author(s):  
Arjun Chandna ◽  
Rainer Tan ◽  
Michael Carter ◽  
Ann Van Den Bruel ◽  
Jan Verbakel ◽  
...  

IntroductionEarly identification of children at risk of severe febrile illness can optimise referral, admission and treatment decisions, particularly in resource-limited settings. We aimed to identify prognostic clinical and laboratory factors that predict progression to severe disease in febrile children presenting from the community.MethodsWe systematically reviewed publications retrieved from MEDLINE, Web of Science and Embase between 31 May 1999 and 30 April 2020, supplemented by hand search of reference lists and consultation with an expert Technical Advisory Panel. Studies evaluating prognostic factors or clinical prediction models in children presenting from the community with febrile illnesses were eligible. The primary outcome was any objective measure of disease severity ascertained within 30 days of enrolment. We calculated unadjusted likelihood ratios (LRs) for comparison of prognostic factors, and compared clinical prediction models using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). Risk of bias and applicability of studies were assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool.ResultsOf 5949 articles identified, 18 studies evaluating 200 prognostic factors and 25 clinical prediction models in 24 530 children were included. Heterogeneity between studies precluded formal meta-analysis. Malnutrition (positive LR range 1.56–11.13), hypoxia (2.10–8.11), altered consciousness (1.24–14.02), and markers of acidosis (1.36–7.71) and poor peripheral perfusion (1.78–17.38) were the most common predictors of severe disease. Clinical prediction model performance varied widely (AUROC range 0.49–0.97). Concerns regarding applicability were identified and most studies were at high risk of bias.ConclusionsFew studies address this important public health question. We identified prognostic factors from a wide range of geographic contexts that can help clinicians assess febrile children at risk of progressing to severe disease. Multicentre studies that include outpatients are required to explore generalisability and develop data-driven tools to support patient prioritisation and triage at the community level.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019140542.


Author(s):  
Rik J.B. Loymans ◽  
Persijn J. Honkoop ◽  
Evelien H. Termeer ◽  
Helen K. Reddel ◽  
Jiska B. Snoeck-Stroband ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 815-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teus H. Kappen ◽  
Jonathan P. Wanderer ◽  
Linda M. Peelen ◽  
Karel G. M. Moons ◽  
Jesse M. Ehrenfeld

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-257
Author(s):  
Paul Joseph-Richard ◽  
James Uhomoibhi ◽  
Andrew Jaffrey

PurposeThe aims of this study are to examine affective responses of university students when viewing their own predictive learning analytics (PLA) dashboards, and to analyse how those responses are perceived to affect their self-regulated learning behaviour.Design/methodology/approachA total of 42 Northern Irish students were shown their own predicted status of academic achievement on a dashboard. A list of emotions along with definitions was provided and the respondents were instructed to verbalise them during the experience. Post-hoc walk-through conversations with participants further clarified their responses. Content analysis methods were used to categorise response patterns.FindingsThere is a significant variation in ways students respond to the predictions: they were curious and motivated, comforted and sceptical, confused and fearful and not interested and doubting the accuracy of predictions. The authors show that not all PLA-triggered affective states motivate students to act in desirable and productive ways.Research limitations/implicationsThis small-scale exploratory study was conducted in one higher education institution with a relatively small sample of students in one discipline. In addition to the many different categories of students included in the study, specific efforts were made to include “at-risk” students. However, none responded. A larger sample from a multi-disciplinary background that includes those who are categorised as “at-risk” could further enhance the understanding.Practical implicationsThe authors provide mixed evidence for students' openness to learn from predictive learning analytics scores. The implications of our study are not straightforward, except to proceed with caution, valuing benefits while ensuring that students' emotional well-being is protected through a mindful implementation of PLA systems.Social implicationsUnderstanding students' affect responses contributes to the quality of student support in higher education institutions. In the current era on online learning and increasing adaptation to living and learning online, the findings allow for the development of appropriate strategies for implementing affect-aware predictive learning analytics (PLA) systems.Originality/valueThe current study is unique in its research context, and in its examination of immediate affective states experienced by students who viewed their predicted scores, based on their own dynamic learning data, in their home institution. It brings out the complexities involved in implementing student-facing PLA dashboards in higher education institutions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Holmes ◽  
J. Owen Robinson ◽  
Sebastian Van Hal ◽  
Wendy Munckhof ◽  
Eugene Athan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 103890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Eun Russell ◽  
Anna Smith ◽  
Russell Larsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document