scholarly journals Safety and effectiveness of new embolization microspheres SCBRM for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A feasibility study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Sheng Liu ◽  
Xi-Zhang Lin ◽  
Chiung-Yu Chen ◽  
Yen-Cheng Chiu ◽  
Jui-Wen Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Alanine Aminotransferase ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Clinical Safety ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Recommended Treatment

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the recommended treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, long-term chemoembolization triggers the inflammatory response and may lead to postembolization syndrome (PES). Although several types of degradable microspheres have been developed to reduce drug toxicity and PES incidence, the clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Previously, we have developed a new type of spherical, calibrated, biodegradable, radiopaque microspheres (SCBRM) and demonstrated their safety and efficacy in a pig model. Thus, the goal of this feasibility study was to determine the clinical safety and efficacy of the new SCBRM in intermediate-stage HCC patients. In this study, 12 intermediate-stage HCC patients underwent TACE using SCBRM with a calibrated size of 100–250 μm. The disease control rates at 1 month and 3 months after TACE-SCBRM treatment were 100% and 75.0%, respectively. The objective response rates at 1 month and 3 months after treatment were 66.7% and 58.3%, respectively. Very few adverse events were observed with one patient developing nausea. One day after the treatment, alanine aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin levels were slightly elevated in the patients, but all returned to baseline on day 7. The median and mean overall survival times were 33 months (interquartile range, 12.8–42.0) and 29.2 ± 14.3 months, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 91.7% and 58.3%, respectively. In conclusion, TACE with the new SCBRM microspheres is clinically safe and effective, and it represents a promising approach in the management of intermediate-stage HCC.

scholarly journals Ipilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to prior immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Sum Lung Wong ◽  
Gerry Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Cho Wing Li ◽  
Roland Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Advanced Hcc

BackgroundProgrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nowadays. No strategies to overcome ICI resistance have been described. We aimed to evaluate the use of ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combinations in patients with advanced HCC with progression on prior ICIs.MethodsPatients with advanced HCC with documented tumor progression on prior ICIs and subsequently received ipilimumab with nivolumab/pembrolizumab were analyzed. Objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.ResultsTwenty-five patients were included. The median age was 62 (range: 51–83). About 68% were of Child-Pugh (CP) Grade A and 48% had primary resistance to prior ICI. At median follow-up of 37.7 months, the ORR was 16% with a median DOR of 11.5 months (range: 2.76–30.3). Three patients achieved complete response. The median TTP was 2.96 months (95% CI: 1.61 to 4.31). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 3.99 to 17.8) and the 1 year, 2 year and 3 year survival rates were 42.4%, 32.3% and 21.6%, respectively. The ORR was 16.7% in primary resistance group and 15.4% in acquired resistance group (p=1.00). All responders were of CP A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade 1 or 2. CP and ALBI Grades were significantly associated with OS (p=0.006 and p<0.001, respectively). Overall, 52% of patients experienced TRAEs and 12% experienced Grade 3 or above TRAEs.ConclusionsIpilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab can achieve durable antitumor activity and encouraging survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC who had prior treatment with ICIs.

Neocarzinostatin versus m-AMSA or doxorubicin in hepatocellular carcinoma.

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Falkson ◽  
J M MacIntyre ◽  
A J Schutt ◽  
B Coetzer ◽  
L A Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
South African ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Survival Times

Sixty-one of 76 patients entered on a prospective randomized trial of neocarzinostatin ( NCZ ) versus m-AMSA or doxorubicin were eligible for analysis. Among these 61 patients at least one episode of severe toxicity was documented in 39% of patients on NCZ and 58% on m-AMSA. Fifty-one of the 61 patients were previously untreated with chemotherapy. Among these 51 patients objective response was documented in two of 25 patients treated with NCZ , none of 17 treated with m-AMSA, and one of nine treated with doxorubicin. Among previously untreated North American and European (NA/E) patients the median survival times were: NCZ 11 weeks and m-AMSA 12 weeks. The data on South African (SA) patients with similar entrance criteria entered on earlier Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials were analyzed with that from the randomized trial and show that for SA patients the median survival times were: NCZ , 11 weeks (31 patients); m-AMSA, 13 weeks (33 patients); and doxorubicin, 15 weeks (29 patients).

A randomized phase II trial of a drug eluting bead in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4523-4523 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lencioni ◽  
K. Malagari ◽  
T. Vogl ◽  
F. Pilleul ◽  
A. Denys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Curative Treatment ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
Conventional Tace ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

4523 Background: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to offer a survival benefit for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A widely accepted TACE regimen includes the administration of a doxorubicin-in-oil emulsion followed by gelatine sponge particles. Recently, a drug-eluting bead (DEB) has been developed to enhance drug delivery to the tumor and reduce its systemic availability. Purpose of this randomized trial was to compare conventional TACE with DEB-TACE for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Two hundred and twelve patients (185 males and 27 females; mean age, 67 years) with Child-Pugh A or B liver cirrhosis and large and/or multinodular, unresectable HCC were randomized to receive DEB-TACE (DC Bead; Biocompatibles, UK) uploaded with doxorubicin or conventional TACE with doxorubicin, lipiodol, and gelatin sponge particles. Randomization was stratified according to Child Pugh status (A or B), performance status (ECOG 0 or 1), bilobar disease (yes or no) and prior curative treatment (yes or no). Tumor response at 6 months was the primary study endpoint. An independent, blinded review of magnetic resonance imaging studies was conducted to assess tumor response according to amended RECIST criteria. Results: DEB-TACE with doxorubicin showed a higher rate of complete response, objective response and disease control compared with conventional TACE (27% vs 22%; 52% vs 44%; and 63% vs 52%, respectively; p>0.05). Patients with Child Pugh B, ECOG 1, bilobar disease and recurrence following curative treatment showed a significant increase in objective response (p=0.038) compared to the control. There was a marked reduction in serious liver toxicity in patients treated with DEB-TACE. The rate of doxorubicin related side effects was significantly lower (p=0.0001) in the DEB-TACE group compared with the conventional TACE group. Conclusions: DEB-TACE with doxorubicin is safe and effective in the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC and may offer benefit to patients with more advanced disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and efficacy of docetaxel combined with cisplatin as induction chemotherapy followed by cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective and multicenter phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6064-6064
Author(s):  
Zhi Hui Wang ◽  
Peijian Peng ◽  
Siyang Wang ◽  
Yumeng Liu ◽  
Zhong Lin
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

6064 Background: Radiation therapy is the only curative treatment modality for nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard treatment strategy for NPC in locally advanced stages. However, the results after such treatment are suboptimal. Clearly, novel treatment strategies are needed to further improve patients’ survival rates. This trial aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of a new treatment strategy. Methods: Patients with stage III – IVa-b NPC received TP (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 2-3 cycles) followed by cisplatin chemotherapy concurrently with either 3-dimentional conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy plus gemcitabine (1000mg/m2 every 2 weeks for 2 cycles) as adjuvant chemotherapy. Objective response rates and acute toxicity were assessed based on RECIST (1.1) and CTCAE v.4.0, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival rates. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, number ChiCTR-OIC-17011464. Results: From July 2010 to July 2017, 20 eligible patients with nonmetastatic stage III-IVb NPC were enrolled. The objective response rates were 90% (3 complete responses [CRs] and 15 partial responses [PRs]) after two or three cycles of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and 100% (17 CRs and three PRs) after CCRT plus gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. With a median follow-up time of 41 months, the 3-year overall survival rates were 90% (18/20,95% confidence interval [CI], 76.9%-100%).The 3-year progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and local progression-free survival rates were 80% (16/20,95% CI, 62.5%-97.5%), 85% (17/20,95% CI, 69.4%-100%),95% (19/20,95% CI, 85,4%-100%), respectively. The most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (3/20,15%) and nausea (2/20,10%) after ICT and thrombocytopenia (6/20,30%) and leukopenia (6/20,30%) after CCRT plus gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant TP followed by concurrent chemoradiation plus gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated and produced promising outcomes in patients with LA-NPC in this hypothesis-generating study. The authors concluded that randomized controlled trials are warranted to definitively confirm this aggressive and potentially efficacious strategy. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-OIC-17011464.

The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A nationwide multicenter study in Japan.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 548-548
Author(s):  
Kaoru Tsuchiya ◽  
Masayuki Kurosaki ◽  
Azusa Sakamoto ◽  
Hiroyuki Marusawa ◽  
Chikara Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Modified Recist

548 Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) has been used in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) since Mar 2018 in Japan. We conducted a nationwide multicenter study and especially focused on the efficacy and safety in the patients with intermediate-stage u-HCC. Methods: A total of 240 patients received LEN from March 2018 at 15 sites in Japan was enrolled. Tumour assessments in accordance with modified RECIST were done using dynamic CT or MRI within 4-8 weeks and every 6-8 weeks thereafter. Results: In this study, 88 of 240 (36.7%) patients were BCLC stage B. Among them 76 (86.3%) patients received TACE before LEN and the median number of TACE was 2 (1-10). Only 4 patients were TKI experienced and other 84 (95.5%) patients received LEN as a 1st line therapy. The median pretreatment ALBI score was -2.35 and 75 (85.2%) patients were Child-Pugh A. In this cohort, 73 (83.0%) patients were beyond up-to-seven criteria and the median pretreatment AFP was 38.2 (2-12870) ng/mL. The median observation time was 8.5 months and 16 patients died. The median progression free survival was 8.7 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 48.5% and 80.3%. AFP decrease ( > 20%) after 1 month was observed in 52 (59.0%) patients. Child-Pugh B patients (n = 13) had significantly shorter OS than Child-Pugh A (p = 0.02) and median OS in Child-Pugh B patients was 8.8 months. The patients received > 6 times TACE before LEN had significantly shorter OS than patients received ≤ 6 times TACE (p = 0.02). Additional TACE was performed in 8 patients and The median time of restarting LEN was 19 days. The median ALBI score before additional TACE, Day 1 after TACE and Day 28 after TACE were -2.38, -2.07, and -2.36.There was no severe adverse event associated with additional TACE. The median duration of LEN in patients treated with LEN and additional TACE was 8.5 months. Conclusions: The ORR and DCR of LEN in Child-Pugh A patients with intermediate-stage HCC were 46.6% and 79.3%. The therapeutic strategies for intermediate-stage HCC should be discussed based on the liver function, tumor states, and treatment course about TACE.

scholarly journals Development of a Model to Predict Liver Decompensation prior to Transarterial Chemoembolization Refractoriness in Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Joel Ferreira-Silva ◽  
Pedro Costa-Moreira ◽  
Helder Cardoso ◽  
Rodrigo Liberal ◽  
Pedro Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hepatic Reserve ◽  
Liver Decompensation ◽  
Pugh Class ◽  
First Line Treatment

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For patients without an adequate response, current finding suggests that treatment with molecular target agents, approved for advanced stage, might present benefits. However, this requires a preserved liver function. This study aims to evaluate possible predictors of early deterioration of hepatic reserve, prior to TACE refractoriness, in a cohort of patients treated with TACE. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Retrospective analysis of 99 patients with<b><i></i></b>Child-Pugh class A and intermediate-stage HCC who underwent TACE as the first-line treatment. All patients were submitted to a biochemical and medical evaluation prior to initial TACE and every month afterward. Response to initial TACE was evaluated at 1 month. The time to Child-Pugh class deterioration before TACE refractoriness was assessed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ninety-nine patients were included. Objective response rate (ORR) to initial TACE was assessed as present in 59 (63.4%) and as absent in 34 (36.6%) patients. Liver decompensated before TACE refractoriness in 51 (51.5%) patients, and the median time to liver decompensation was 14 (IQR 8–20) months after first TACE. In multivariate analysis, beyond up-to-7 criteria (HR 2.4, <i>p</i> = 0.031), albumin &#x3c;35 mg/dL (HR 3.5, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and absence of ORR (HR 2.4, <i>p</i> = 0.020) were associated with decreased overall survival free of liver decompensation. Moreover, beyond up-to-7 criteria, albumin &#x3c;35 mg/dL and absence of ORR associated negatively with 6-month survival free of liver decompensation. Our model created using those variables was able to predict liver decompensation at 6 months with an AUROC of 0.701 (<i>p</i> = 0.02). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The absence of ORR after initial TACE, beyond up-to-7 criteria and albumin &#x3c;35 mg/dL, was a predictive factor for early liver decompensation before TACE refractoriness in our population. Such patients might benefit from treatment escalation to systemic therapy, in monotherapy or in combination with TACE.

scholarly journals Lenvatinib as an Initial Treatment in Patients with Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond up-to-seven Criteria and Child-Pugh A Liver Function: A Proof-of-Concept Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Stephan Chan ◽  
Tomohiro Minami ◽  
Hirokazu Chishina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Concept Study

Background: Although transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is the standard of care for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), this is a largely heterogeneous disease that includes a subgroup of patients who do not benefit from TACE. The treatment strategy for this subgroup of patients currently remains an unmet need in clinical practice. Here, we performed a proof-of-concept study that lenvatinib may be more favourable treatment option over TACE as an initial treatment in intermediate-stage HCC patients with large or multinodular tumours exceeding the up-to-seven criteria. Methods: This proof-of-concept study included 642 consecutive patients with HCC initially treated with lenvatinib or conventional TACE (cTACE) between January 2006 and December 2018. Of these patients, 176 who received lenvatinib or cTACE as an initial treatment and met the eligibility criteria [unresectable, beyond the up-to-seven criteria, no prior TACE/systemic therapy, no vascular invasion, no extrahepatic spread and Child-Pugh A liver function] were selected for the study. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for patient demographics. Results: After propensity-score matching, outcome of 30 patients prospectively treated with lenvatinib (14 in clinical trials, 1 in early access program and 15 in real world setting) and 60 patients treated with cTACE as the initial treatment was compared. The change of ALBI score from baseline to the end of treatment were -2.61 to -2.61 for 30 patients in lenvatinib group (p = 0.254) and -2.66 to -2.09 in cTACE group (p &lt; 0.01), respectively. The lenvatinib group showed a significantly higher objective response rate (73.3% vs. 33.3%; p &lt; 0.001) and significantly longer median progression-free survival than the cTACE group (16.0 vs. 3.0 months; p &lt; 0.001). Overall survival was significantly longer in the lenvatinib group than in the cTACE group (37.9 vs. 21.3 months; hazard ratio: 0.48, p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: In patients with large or multinodular intermediate-stage HCC exceeding the up-to-seven criteria with Child-Pugh A liver function, who usually do not benefit from TACE, lenvatinib provides more favorable outcome than TACE.

Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Nonviral Infection Who Were Unlikely to Respond to Immunotherapy: A Retrospective, Comparative Study

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Takeshi Hatanaka ◽  
Satoru Kakizaki ◽  
Tamon Nagashima ◽  
Masashi Namikawa ◽  
Takashi Ueno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Viral Infection ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Infection Group ◽  
Significant Difference

<b><i>Aim:</i></b> Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo + bev) shows a good overall survival (OS) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the OS of patients with nonviral infection is quite worse than that in those with viral infection. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with nonviral infection, who were unlikely to obtain benefit from atezo + bev. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a multicenter retrospective study that included 139 advanced HCC patients treated with lenvatinib between March 2018 and September 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median age was 72 years, and 116 patients (83.5%) were male. Based on the etiology of liver disease, 84 (60.4%) and 55 patients (39.6%) were assigned to the viral infection and nonviral infection groups, respectively. The significant extents in patient characteristics were not observed in both groups. The objective response rate per mRECIST and progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ significantly between the viral infection and nonviral infection groups (36.0 vs. 33.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.85; and 7.6 vs. 7.5 months, <i>p</i> = 0.94, respectively). The 1-year survival rates were 68.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.7–79.7%) in the viral infection group and 59.5% (95% CI 45.2–73.8%) in the nonviral infection group. The viral infection group was not a significant factor associated with the PFS or OS in a multivariate analysis. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Lenvatinib shows no significant difference in response between patients with and without viral infection. Treatment strategies based on the etiology of liver disease may lead to good clinical outcome.

Subclassification of BCLC B Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Treatment Strategies: Proposal of Modified Bolondi's Subclassification (Kinki Criteria)

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 751-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Tadaaki Arizumi ◽  
Kazuomi Ueshima ◽  
Toshiharu Sakurai ◽  
Masayuki Kitano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Heterogeneous Population ◽  
Recommended Treatment ◽  
Tumor Number ◽  
Weak Points ◽  
Bclc Staging ◽  
Heterogeneous Tumor

Intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a very heterogeneous tumor in terms of tumor size (>3 cm ∼ over 10 cm), tumor number (4 ∼ over 20) and liver function (Child-Pugh score 5-9). However, transarterial chemoembolization is the only recommended treatment option according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging. Bolondi's subclassification of BCLC B stage is feasible; however, there are several weak points. Therefore, by modifying Bolondi's subclassification, we have proposed a more simplified subclassification, Kinki criteria. The Kinki criteria consist of 2 factors: liver function (Child-Pugh score 5-7 or 8, 9) and tumor status (Beyond Milan and within up-to-7 criteria; IN and OUT). The Kinki criteria classifies BCLC B stage from B1 (Child-Pugh score 5-7 and within up-to-7), B2 (Child-Pugh score 5-7 and beyond up-to-7) and B3 (Child-Pugh score 8, 9 and any tumor status). These criteria are simple and easy to apply to clinical practice. Therefore, these criteria will stratify the heterogeneous population of BCLC B group patient well and give the treatment indication according to each substage. These criteria should be further validated both retrospectively and prospectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document