UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE ON OKMEYDANI ABOUT TEZKİRE-İ RUMAT BY KATİP ABDULLAH EFENDİ WHEN THE PERİOD OF MEHMET THE FOURTH

2018 ◽  
Vol 0 (19) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Şükrü Seçkin ANIK
Keyword(s):  
Unlawful Interference

scholarly journals Methodology of the Auditing Measures to Civil Airport Security and Protection

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (20) ◽  
pp. 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ján Kolesár ◽  
Lucia Melníková ◽  
Daniela Heralová ◽  
Petr Daňko
Keyword(s):  
Airport Security ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Security Audit ◽  
National Programme ◽  
International Standardization Organization ◽  
Unlawful Interference ◽  
International Standardization ◽  
Independent Auditing ◽  
Certification Requirements ◽  
Standardization Organization

Airports similarly to other companies are certified in compliance with the International Standardization Organization (ISO) standards of products and services (series of ISO 9000 Standards regarding quality management), to coordinate the technical side of standardizatioon and normalization at an international scale. In order for the airports to meet the norms and the certification requirements as by the ISO they are liable to undergo strict audits of quality, as a rule, conducted by an independent auditing organization. Focus of the audits is primarily on airport operation economics and security. The article is an analysis into the methodology of the airport security audit processes and activities. Within the framework of planning, the sequence of steps is described in line with the principles and procedures of the Security Management System (SMS) and starndards established by the International Standardization Organization (ISO). The methodology of conducting airport security audit is developed in compliance with the national programme and international legislation standards (Annex 17) applicable to protection of civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference.

Pengkajian Pengamanan Bandara Frans Kaisepo-Biak

WARTA ARDHIA ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-66
Author(s):  
Rosidin Syamsudin
Keyword(s):  
Air Transportation ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Flight Safety ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
International Civil Aviation Organization ◽  
Transportation Services ◽  
Management Capacity ◽  
Operational Management ◽  
Unlawful Interference ◽  
Main Factor

Air transportation services, security and flight safety is the main factor. Various efforts made to continually improve the level of security and safety of the flight, the good with the upgrade facilities, repair and operational management capacity building resources, human beings. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Annex 17 Of the Security-Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference requires that each number country is obliged to create a procedure and an action brought to prevent weapons or dangerous materials in civil aircraft.As explain standard of the above, then set the various systems and procedures of implementation in every airport and every company in the air transportation. The security of the flight center of gravity is related to passenger and goods that will leave / and transported aircraft.

scholarly journals Civil unmanned aircraft systems and security: The European approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 83-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikko Huttunen
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Unmanned Aircraft ◽  
Unmanned Aircraft Systems ◽  
Security Threats ◽  
Aircraft Systems ◽  
European Approach ◽  
Unlawful Interference ◽  
Security Gap ◽  
The Eu

Abstract Civil unmanned aircraft systems, commonly known as drones, have many useful applications but can also be used to intentionally cause harm. Additionally, drones themselves can be subject to unlawful interference. In this article, I analyze how European Union’s new rules on drones affect such security threats. I argue that the rules on protecting drones from unlawful interference are promising, although the required security features can also be abused by rogue operators. The intentional misuse of drones, however, is not much deterred by the rules that seek to protect persons and property from such misuse. Rules concerning the operator and the pilot assume compliance, the mandatory technical safeguards can be circumvented, and oversight is difficult because drones are mostly operated from outside airports in a distributed manner. One way to fill the security gap is to employ anti-drone technology that detects drones and prevents them from entering sensitive airspace without permission. Although many airports have already adopted such technology, the EU should consider making it mandatory for the busiest airports. Regardless of rules enacted by the Union, though, reliable and safe means of stopping unlawful drone operations should be employed at critical locations. This applies also to areas like prisons and power plants, the protection of which falls within the ambit of national security.

Malice and Unlawful Interference

1898 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernst Freund
Keyword(s):  
Unlawful Interference

TINJAUAN ISOLATED PARKING AREA TERHADAP PELAYANAN LALU LINTAS UDARA DI BANDAR UDARA INTERNASIONAL I GUSTI NGURAH RAI BALI

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59
Author(s):  
Muh Nur ◽  
Lia Yulia Tristin ◽  
Muh Filky Rilwanul Ayub
Keyword(s):  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Unlawful Interference

Bandar Udara Internasional I Gusti Ngurah Rai Bali merupakan salah satu Bandar Udara Internasional yang melayani rute domestic dan rute internasional dengan jumlah pergerakan pesawat yang semakin padat. Pemberian pelayanan pemanduan lalu lintas udara yang maksimal, selain ditentukan oleh sumber daya manusianya terkait pula factor peralatan, prosedur, serta fasilitas Bandar Udara yang mendukung.Letak Isolated Parking Area yang berada di taxiway N7P memberikan efek yang kurang efektif terhadap kelancaran pelayanan lalu lintas udara di Bandar Udara Internasional I Gusti ngurahRai Bali. Disebutkan dalam Document 8973 tentang Security Manual for Safe guarding Civil Aviation Against Acts of Unlawful Interference Volume III, bahwa jika terjadi ancaman pembajakan pesawat, maka pesawat harus diarahkan ke isolated parking area. Apabila area tersebut dilalui oleh taxiway atau runway, maka taxiway dan runway tersebut harus ditutup. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk meninjau letak isolated parking area terhadap pelayanan lalu lintas udaradi Bandar Udara Internasional I Gusti Ngurah Rai Bali

Aplicación del foro del Artículo 5.3 del reglamento 44/2001 en casos de víctimas indirectas. Comentario a la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea, 21 diciembre 2016, Concurrence, C-618/15 = Rule of jurisdiction of Article 5.3 Regulation 44/2001 in cases of indirect victims. Commentary of Judgment of the Court, 21 december 2016, Concurrence, C-618/15

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 620
Author(s):  
Juliana Rodríguez Rodrigo
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Selective Distribution ◽  
Unlawful Interference ◽  
On Line ◽  
Harmful Event

Resumen: En esta sentencia, el Tribunal de Justicia responde a una cuestión prejudicial planteada por la Cour de Cassation francesa, en relación con un litigio surgido de un contrato de distribución selectiva entre Samsung y la empresa francesa distribuidora Concurrence. En virtud de este contrato, Concurrence sólo podía revender los productos ELITE de Samsung a través de su tienda física, no mediante su página web. La empresa distribuidora infringe esta cláusula y comercializa los productos vía on line. Ante este incumplimiento contractual, Samsung rescinde el contrato y Concurrence demanda a la empresa proveedora porque, según dice, Amazon también vende esos productos de Samsung en su página web, con su consentimiento. También solicita que Amazon cese en su comportamiento por el perjuicio que le ocasionan sus ventas on line. La cuestión prejudicial se plantea entorno a esta última acción de cesación planteada por Concurrence contra Amazon Reino Unido, Amazon Alemania, Amazon España y Amazon Italia. El Tribunal de Justicia considera que los tribunales franceses deben ser competentes por el artículo 5.3 del Reglamento 44/2001 –actual artículo 7.2 del Reglamento 12125/2012–, si en Francia la empresa Concurrence ha sufrido daño debido a las reventas realizadas por Amazon a través de esas páginas web ubicadas fuera de Francia. En este caso, siendo el demandado Amazon Reino Unido, Amazon Alemania, Amazon España y Amazon Italia, ni por el domicilio del mismo ni por el lugar del hecho ilícito, los jueces franceses podrían ser competentes, sólo podrían serlo por el lugar del daño.Nosotros entendemos que Concurrence es una víctima indirecta del comportamiento de Amazon y que, por lo tanto, no se puede aplicar el foro del artículo 5.3 del Reglamento 44/2001 –actual artículo 7.2 del Reglamento 1215/2012– en este caso.Palabras clave: contrato de distribución selectiva, prohibición de reventa on line, foro especial en materia delictual, víctima indirecta.Abstract: In this judgment, the Court answers to a prejudicial question held by French Cour of Cassation, regarding to a litigation on a selective distribution agreement between Samsung and Concurrence. This contract disposes that Concurrence only can resell the Samsung ELITE products through the products on line. For this reason, Samsung ends their relationship and Concurrence bringsan action against it because it says that Amazon also sells these products of Samsung on its webpage. In addition, Concurrence sues Amazon to withdraw the sales of these products because of the damage suffered for them. The prejudicial question is regarding this action for an injunction prohibiting unlawful interference, between Concurrence and Amazon United Kingdom, Amazon Germany, Amazon Spain and Amazon Italy. The Court considers the French jurisdiction has to apply the rule of article 5.3 Regulation 44/2001 –article 7.2 Regulation 1215/2012–, in case of there are damages suffered by Concurrence in France due to sales of Amazon on these webpages situated out of France. Following the Court, in this situation, as the defendant would be Amazon United Kingdom, Amazon Germany, Amazon Spain and Amazon Italy, the French jurisdiction couldn`t be competent by domicile of defendant neither by place where harmful event occurred. It only could be competent by the place of occurred damage. We consider that Concurrence is a indirect victim and, so that, couldn`t apply the article 5.3 Regulation 44/2001 –article 7.2 Regulation 1215/2012– in this case.Keywords: Selective distribution agreement, Prohibition on online resale, Tort, delict or quasidelict rule of jurisdiction, indirect victim.

scholarly journals Tax Inspection – Unlawful Interference

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-98
Author(s):  
Damian Czudek
Keyword(s):  
Czech Republic ◽  
Tax Administration ◽  
Correct Identification ◽  
The Czech Republic ◽  
Unlawful Interference ◽  
Scope Of Application

This article focuses on the issue of options, respectively the scope of application of the tax authorities’ discretion in the use of available instruments to ensure the objective of tax administration, i.e. the correct identification and determination of the tax and its payment. The article is based on a case study of the decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document