scholarly journals Assessment of Healthcare Providers’ Performance Considering Three Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Review Article

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4-5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Almaspoor Khangah ◽  
Ali Jannati ◽  
Ali Imani
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators

Team-based musculoskeletal assessment and healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 774-781
Author(s):  
Michelle Chan ◽  
Christina Y. Le ◽  
Elizabeth Dennett ◽  
Terry Defreitas ◽  
Jackie L. Whittaker
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators

scholarly journals Hospital accreditation impact on healthcare quality dimensions: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 531-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia A S Araujo ◽  
Marina Martins Siqueira ◽  
Ana Maria Malik
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Patient Centeredness ◽  
Hospital Accreditation ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators ◽  
Quality Dimensions ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose To systematically review the impact of hospital accreditation on healthcare quality indicators, as classified into seven healthcare quality dimensions. Data source We searched eight databases in June 2020: EBSCO, PubMed, Web of Science, Emerald, ProQuest, Science Direct, Scopus and Virtual Health Library. Search terms were conceptualized into three groups: hospitals, accreditation and terms relating to healthcare quality. The eligibility criteria included academic articles that applied quantitative methods to examine the impact of hospital accreditation on healthcare quality indicators. Study selection We applied the PICO framework to select the articles according to the following criteria: Population—all types of hospitals; Intervention—hospital accreditation; Comparison—quantitative method applied to compare accredited vs. nonaccredited hospitals, or hospitals before vs. after accreditation; Outcomes—regarding the seven healthcare quality dimensions. After a critical appraisal of the 943 citations initially retrieved, 36 studies were included in this review. Results of data synthesis Overall results suggest that accreditation may have a positive impact on efficiency, safety, effectiveness, timeliness and patient-centeredness. In turn, only one study analyzes the impact on access, and no study has investigated the impact on equity dimension yet. Conclusion Mainly due to the methodological shortcomings, the positive impact of accreditation on healthcare dimensions should be interpreted with caution. This study provides an up-to-date overview of the main themes examined in the literature, highlighting critical knowledge-gaps and methodological flaws. The findings may provide value to healthcare stakeholders in terms of improving their ability to assess the relevance of accreditation processes.

scholarly journals Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. e20476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rym Boulkedid ◽  
Hendy Abdoul ◽  
Marine Loustau ◽  
Olivier Sibony ◽  
Corinne Alberti
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Delphi Method ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators

scholarly journals Healthcare Quality Indicators of Peripheral Artery Disease Based on Systematic Reviews

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-268
Author(s):  
S. Bellmunt ◽  
M. Roqué ◽  
D. Osorio ◽  
H. Pardo ◽  
J.-R. Escudero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Peripheral Artery Disease ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Peripheral Artery ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators ◽  
Artery Disease

Development of healthcare quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis in Europe: the eumusc.net project

2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 906-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingemar F Petersson ◽  
Britta Strömbeck ◽  
Lene Andersen ◽  
Marco Cimmino ◽  
Rolf Greiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators

Healthcare Quality Indicators for Physiotherapy Management in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Delphi Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 219-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. F. Peter ◽  
E. J. Hurkmans ◽  
P. J. van der Wees ◽  
E. J. M. Hendriks ◽  
L. van Bodegom-Vos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators

scholarly journals Technology of using of healthcare quality indicators in cardiovascular diseases registries

Cardio-IT ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e0203
Author(s):  
Olga M. Posnenkova ◽  
Anton R. Kiselev ◽  
Vladimir I. Gridnev
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators

scholarly journals Development of a longlist of healthcare quality indicators for physical activity of patients during hospital stay: a modified RAND Delphi study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e032208
Author(s):  
Niek Koenders ◽  
Stein van den Heuvel ◽  
Shanna Bloemen ◽  
Philip J van der Wees ◽  
Thomas J Hoogeboom
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Healthcare Quality Indicators

ObjectiveTo develop a longlist of healthcare quality indicators for the care of hospitalised adults of all ages with (or at risk of) low physical activity during the hospital stay.DesignA modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Delphi study.Setting and participantsParticipants were physical therapists, nurses and managers working in Dutch university medical centres.MethodsThe current study consisted of three phases. Phase I was a systematic literature search for quality indicators and relevant domains. Phase II was a survey among healthcare professionals to collect additional data. Phase III consisted of three consensus rounds. In round 1, experts rated the relevance of the potential indicators online (Delphi). The second round was a face-to-face expert panel meeting managed by an experienced moderator. Acceptability, feasibility and validity of the quality indicators were discussed by the panel members. In round 3, the panel members rated the relevance of the potential indicators that were still under discussion.ResultsThe search retrieved 1556 studies of which 53 studies were assessed full text. Data from 17 studies were included in a first draft longlist of indicators. Eighteen nurses and one physical therapist responded to the survey and added data for a second draft of the longlist. Experts constructed the final longlist of 23 indicators in three consensus rounds. Seven domains were identified: ‘Policy’, ‘Attitude and education’, ‘Equipment and support’, ‘Evaluation’, ‘Information’, ‘Patient-tailored physical activity plan’ and ‘Outcome measure’.Conclusion and implicationsThe healthcare quality indicators developed in this study could help to grade, monitor and improve healthcare for hospitalised adults of all ages with (or at risk of) low physical activity during the hospital stay. Future research will focus on the psychometric quality of the indicators and selection of key performance indicators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document