scholarly journals The Law of the Russian Federation on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Evolution of Legal Properties

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 43-54
Author(s):  
N. E. Taeva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Law Making ◽  
Legal Force

The paper, on the basis of the analysis of legislation, the RF Constitutional Court jurisprudence, as well as practice of law-making on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, describes the process of evolution of legal properties of the law under consideration. The paper investigates such legal properties of the Law of the Russian Federation on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation as legal force, the subject of the legal regulation, the procedure for adoption and entry into force. The author believes that any change of these legal properties has an impact on the legal properties of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and primarily on its stability. The paper draws special attention to the Law of the Russian Federation on Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation as of MArch 14, 2020, No. 1-FKZ “On improvement of regulation of certain issues of organization and functioning of public power.” According to the author, there was another transformation of the legal properties of the Law on Amendment. This transformation concerns the order of its entry into force. Provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on Amendment to the Constitution adopted in 2020 contain both norms that amend the constitutional text and norms not intended for inclusion in the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation that are technical and transitional in nature. In this regard, the author deals with the question whether the Law on Amendement itself may establish additional conditions for its entry into force other than those provided for by the federal legislation.

scholarly journals CHOICE OF THE TYPE OF PERMITTED USE OF A LAND PLOT BY ITS RIGHT OWNER: PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-256
Author(s):  
G.L. Zemlyakova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Land Plot ◽  
The Russian Federation

The reason for writing this article was the Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of October 16, 2020 No. 42-P, the adoption of which is due to the lack of proper legal regulation of the choice of the type of permitted use of a land plot by its rightholder. Federal legislation does not directly provide for the obligation of the rightholder of a land plot to choose the type of its permitted use, and there is no procedure for its implementation. Therefore, the coercion of the rightholder to conduct cadastral registration of a land plot in connection with the choice or change of its permitted use, and even more so bringing to responsibility for the use of the land plot not in accordance with its permitted use due to failure to fulfill such an obligation cannot be recognized as legal and justified. In this regard, the author made proposals for improving the legislation.

scholarly journals Local Self-Government in the Public Government System: A New Constitutional Dimension

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Oleg A. Kozhevnikov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Public ◽  
System A ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law

The article analyzes certain provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ “On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public power” in terms of regulatory regulation of local self-government. According to the analysis the author comes to the conclusion that with the entry into effect of the mentioned legal act the content of individual elements of the constitutional-legal bases of local self-government will change, but the nature and scope of modifications in many respects will depend on the provisions of the rules of sectoral legislation aimed at implementing the relevant provisions of the Constitution. In this regard, the Federal legislator has a huge responsibility to create an “updated” legal framework for the implementation of the constitutional foundations of local self-government, taking into account the already established law enforcement practice, the positions of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation, as well as the state's international obligations under the European Charter on local self-government.

scholarly journals The subject of judicial control in consideration of complaints: controversial issues of legal regulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-109
Author(s):  
El'vira Mirgorodskaya
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The purpose of this study was an attempt to theoretically understand the subject of judicial consideration of complaints against decisions, actions (inaction) of officials carrying out criminal prosecution. The research was carried out on the basis of comparative legal, formal logical, empirical, statistical methods. Judicial statistics for the year 2020 have been provided, and legislation has been studied from a historical and contemporary perspective, taking into account the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The problem is that, in practice, for about 20 years the courts have had difficulties in determining the subject of complaints, since neither in theory nor in practice a consensus has been developed on this issue. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation also does not contain a definition of the concept of «subject matter». The situation is aggravated by the presence of evaluative concepts in the text of the law, leading to a varied understanding of the subject of appeal by the courts, which leads to a violation of the constitutional rights of citizens at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings. In the article, taking into account the analysis of the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, legislation and the opinion of scientists, a recommendation was made to amend the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to specify the subject of consideration of complaints in accordance with Art. 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in order to eliminate existing contradictions in practice and increase the level of protection of individual rights in pre-trial proceedings.

SPECIFICS OF COMBATING CORRUPTION IN THE CIVIL SERVICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION WITH THE USE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW MECHANISMS

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-113
Author(s):  
Гончарук ◽  
Natalya Goncharuk
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Service ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Law Making

The article provides analytical information on anti-corruption in the system of the civil service of the Russian Federation. The article presents the rationale for further elaboration of decisions on combating corruption at the level of administrative law-making and enforcement of administrative law, because the existing legal provisions should find their content in all kinds of legal liability. It is in the field of administrative legal regulation the concrete mechanisms of combating corruption should be enhanced, gaps should be eliminated, creating opportunities for corruption, the formed schemes of corrupt interaction should be destroyed. A similar situation exists in the scientific coverage of the problems of combating corruption. The existing monographic publications and sources on the subject widely present the strategic and tactical aspects, however, questions on the use of administrative procedures and anti-corruption mechanisms need to be further developed.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT LEGAL POSITION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON EXTREMIST CASES

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 188-194
Author(s):  
N. F. Bodrov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Financial Support ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Causes Of Failure ◽  
Expert Practice

Extremist cases are characterized by a set of features: a wide range of various criminal actions, their proof circumstances complexity, an ambiguous standard and legal regulation and other difficulties. This is a reason of diverse judicial and investigative practice formation. After analysis of judicial and investigative practice author reveals a num- ber of regularities which peculiar for affairs of this category. On the basis of all materials considered by the Constitutional court of the Russian Federation (46 cases on complaints consideration for the period from 1993 to 2017) the author analyses features of complaints and statutes which are the subject at appeal. Practice synthesis of the Constitutional court of the Russian Federation on cases of anti-extremism legislation and description of legal position of the Constitutional court is a result of done analysis. The author reveals and describes substantial aspects of complaints which have been rejected by the Constitutional court. Recommendations about complaints preparation and submission are stated. Special attention is paid to those circumstances which are the basis of the Constitutional court practice and are standard causes of failure in complaint consideration. According to analysis practice results of the Constitutional court of the Russian Federation the following provisions are proved: 1) practice of complaint consideration by the Constitutional court on cases of extremist offenses was already created and on certain questions is constantly reproduced in decisions, 2) law-linguistic uncertainty of anti-extremism legislation isn't an obstacle to its application, 3) results of judicial and expert researches are crucial for circumstances state and existence in expert practice of numerous collisions on similar affairs isn't a subject for the appeal in the Constitutional court. The research is done with financial support of RHSF on the agreement No. 16-33-01150.

scholarly journals The balance between centralization and decentralization of anti-corruption legal regulation with regards to public officials

2021 ◽  
pp. 69-90
Author(s):  
Igor Sergeevich Andreechev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Legal Enforcement ◽  
Uniform State ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Centralization And Decentralization ◽  
Legal Force

The subject of this research is the anti-corruption legal regulation with regards to public officials from the perspective of balance between centralization and decentralization of such regulation. The goal lies in critical analysis of the established normative framework in the area of prevention of corruption for assessing the effectiveness of the applied mechanism of legal regulation. Anti-corruption legal regulation is characterized with multiplicity of normative acts, distribution or duplication of the normative legal content of acts of superior legal force in the acts of inferior legal force. Special attention is given to the examples of decentralization of anti-corruption regulation and methods of ensuring its coherence. The author provides the examples of centralization of anti-corruption regulation, which stemmed from the development of anti-corruption instruments. The conducted research allowed making recommendations on systematization of anti-corruption legislation with centralization and comprehensive anti-corruption regulation with regards to public officials. The key decrees of the President of the Russian Federation in the sphere of anti-corruption regulation with regards to public officials have been adopted over the period from 2009 to 201, and require refinement, taking into consideration the accumulated experience of their legal enforcement. The author also suggest legislating the content of the principle of uniform state policy in the sphere of prevention of corruption.

scholarly journals Main Trends in the Development of Russian Law on Non-Profit Organizations

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 81-103
Author(s):  
A. Avtonomov ◽  
V. Grib
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

The article is a comparative study of legal regulation on non-profits in the Russian Federation by federal law, including the Constitution, federal statutes, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, resolutions of the Government and Constitutional Court rulings in connection with certain international legal acts dealing with the right to association, and by the law of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The main stages of the development of the law on non-profits both at the federal level and at the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as the main trends in the development of non-profit law in modern Russia, are explored.

scholarly journals House Arrest of the Accused (Suspect): Full Isolation and the Right to Walk

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-46
Author(s):  
Valentina N. Gaponova ◽  
◽  
Varsenik A. Vinogradova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
House Arrest ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The article analyzes the changes in the legal regulation of the house arrest and the practice of its imposition. Particular attention is given to the controversial issue of the right of the accused under house arrest to leave the premises for a walk. The authors note that the Normative Transformation of House Arrest, which brought it closer to detention, set the law enforcement task to overcome the established stereotypes in the interpretation of specific provisions related to the essence of this preventive measure. First, it concerns the “regime” of isolation, specifically, the possibility of the accused to take walks. Today, when the house arrest implies ultimate isolation of the accused with the right to live in their home, the court’s permission for the accused to leave the place of residence is not based on the law. The authors conclude that the positive decision of the court is permissible only because of applying the law by analogy. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the responsibility of the state to take care of the health of persons whose possibilities in this part are limited due to the election of preventive measures with isolation from society.

scholarly journals LAWMAKING ACTIVITY OF TERRITORIAL ENTITIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99
Author(s):  
О. Рыбаков ◽  
O. Rybakov ◽  
О. Рыбакова ◽  
O. Rybakova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Problems And Solutions ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Legal Expertise ◽  
Law Making

<p>The article features an analysis of lawmaking activity of territorial entities of the Russian Federation, while focusing on some problems of regional normative legal acts. The authors define the role of legal expertise as one of the key elements of the regional law-making activity providing unity and integrity of the law over the whole territory of the Russian Federation. The analysis of the concept of “legal expertise” due to the regional regulations is given in the article, as well as its types and its essence. The authors examine different trends and approaches to the nature of the normative legal act due to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation practice, as well as in legal doctrine and legal law enforcement practice.</p>

scholarly journals Competence of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the sphere of tourism: the state of legal regulation and prospects for development in light of the new Strategy

2020 ◽  
pp. 22-36
Author(s):  
Irina Aleksandrovna Chebotareva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Authority ◽  
Federal Legislation ◽  
Special Importance ◽  
New Strategy ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

The subject of this research is the federal legislation establishing competence of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the sphere of tourism. With passing of the Strategy for the Development of Tourism until 2035 by the government of the Russian Federation, and the corresponded change in the paradigm of the national tourism policy, the question on the nature and the extent of participation of the branches of public authority of various levels in its realization gains special importance. Its solution is exacerbated by the fact that tourism as a phenomenon affects different spheres public life. Therefore, it objectively serves as the subject of legal regulation of the acts of various branches of legislation, thus in one way or another, relates to majority of the subject of jurisdiction of all levels of public authority. This article is dedicated to the analysis of the state and forecast of the key trends of development of federal legislation establishing authority of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the sphere of tourism due to the coming enactment of the new Strategy for the development of tourism. The conducted research allowed the author to substantiate the inadequacy of the regulation of the authority of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the sphere of tourism by the Federal Law &ldquo;On the Fundamentals of Tourism Activity in the Russian Federation&rdquo;, as well as indicate the gaps therein; outline other legislative sources of competence of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the sphere of tourism; determine the factors of differentiation of the legal regulation of tourism as a subject of shared jurisdiction of the Federation and its constituents; signify the problems of legal formalization of the competence of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and formulate proposals for their solution. Additionally, this article is first to subject the Strategy for the Development of Tourism until 2035 to legal assessment from the positions of competence of the Russian Federation constituents, underlining narrow avenues of its implementation from the perspective of current legislation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document