Fast and accurate dynamic raytracing in heterogeneous media

1990 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 1284-1296
Author(s):  
Claude F. Lafond ◽  
Alan R. Levander
Keyword(s):  
Shooting Method ◽  
Heterogeneous Media ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Travel Times ◽  
Complex Velocity ◽  
Geometrical Spreading ◽  
Imaging Condition ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Complex Velocity Model

Abstract We have developed a fast and accurate dynamic raytracing method for 2.5-D heterogeneous media based on the kinematic algorithm proposed by Langan et al. (1985). This algorithm divides the model into cells of constant slowness gradient, and the positions, directions, and travel times of the rays are expressed as polynomials of the travel path length, accurate to the second other in the gradient. This method is efficient because of the use of simple polynomials at each raytracing step. We derived similar polynomial expressions for the dynamic raytracing quantities by integrating the raytracing system and expanding the solutions to the second order in the gradient. This new algorithm efficiently computes the geometrical spreading, amplitude, and wavefront curvature on individual rays. The two-point raytracing problem is solved by the shooting method using the geometrical spreading. Paraxial corrections based on the wavefront curvature improve the accuracy of the travel time and amplitude at a given receiver. The computational results for two simple velocity models are compared with those obtained with the SEIS83 seismic modeling package (Cerveny and Psencik, 1984); this new method is accurate for both travel times and amplitudes while being significantly faster. We present a complex velocity model that shows that the algorithm allows for realistic models and easily computes rays in structures that pose difficulties for conventional methods. The method can be extended to raytracing in 3-D heterogeneous media and can be used as a support for a Gaussian beam algorithm. It is also suitable for computing the Green's function and imaging condition needed for prestack depth migration.

Common‐angle migration: A strategy for imaging complex media

Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1877-1894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng Xu ◽  
Hervé Chauris ◽  
Gilles Lambaré ◽  
Mark Noble
Keyword(s):  
A Priori ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Complex Velocity ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Depth Imaging ◽  
Imaging Condition ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Inversion Operator ◽  
Single Fold ◽  
Lateral Variations

Complex velocity models characterized by strong lateral variations are certainly a great motivation, but also a great challenge, for depth imaging. In this context, some unexpected results can occur when using depth imaging algorithms. In general, after a common shot or common offset migration, the resulting depth images are sorted into common‐image gathers (CIG), for further processing such as migration‐based velocity analysis or amplitude‐variation‐with‐offset analysis. In this paper, we show that CIGs calculated by common‐shot or common‐offset migration can be strongly affected by artifacts, even when a correct velocity model is used for the migration. The CIGs are simply not flat, due to unexpected curved events (kinematic artifacts) and strong lateral variations of the amplitude (dynamic artifacts). Kinematic artifacts do not depend on the migration algorithm provided it can take into account lateral variations of the velocity model. This can be observed when migrating the 2‐D Marmousi dataset either with a wave‐equation migration or with a multivalued Kirchhoff migration/inversion. On the contrary, dynamic artifacts are specific to multi‐arrival ray‐based migration/inversion. This approach, which should provide a quantitative estimation of the reflectivity of the model, provides in this context dramatic results. In this paper, we propose an analysis of these artifacts through the study of the ray‐based migration/inversion operator. The artifacts appear when migrating a single‐fold subdata set with multivalued ray fields. They are due to the ambiguous focusing of individual reflected events at different locations in the image. No information is a priori available in the single‐fold data set for selecting the focusing position, while migration of multifold data would provide this information and remove the artifacts by the stack of the CIGs. Analysis of the migration/inversion operator provides a physical condition, the imaging condition, for insuring artifact free CIGs. The specific cases of common‐shot and common‐offset single‐fold gathers are studied. It appears clearly that the imaging condition generally breaks down in complex velocity models for both these configurations. For artifact free CIGs, we propose a novel strategy: compute CIGs versus the diffracting/reflecting angle. Working in the angle domain seems the natural way for unfolding multivalued ray fields, and it can be demonstrated theoretically and practically that common‐angle imaging satisfies the imaging condition in the great majority of cases. Practically, the sorting into angle gathers can not be done a priori over the data set, but is done in the inner depth migration loop. Depth‐migrated images are obtained for each angle range. A canonical example is used for illustrating the theoretical derivations. Finally, an application to the Marmousi model is presented, demonstrating the relevance of the approach.

Interferometric imaging condition for wave-equation migration

Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. S47-S61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Sava ◽  
Oleg Poliannikov
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Wigner Distribution ◽  
Random Noise ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Interferometric Imaging ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Imaging Condition ◽  
Velocity Models

The fidelity of depth seismic imaging depends on the accuracy of the velocity models used for wavefield reconstruction. Models can be decomposed in two components, corresponding to large-scale and small-scale variations. In practice, the large-scale velocity model component can be estimated with high accuracy using repeated migration/tomography cycles, but the small-scale component cannot. When the earth has significant small-scale velocity components, wavefield reconstruction does not completely describe the recorded data, and migrated images are perturbed by artifacts. There are two possible ways to address this problem: (1) improve wavefield reconstruction by estimating more accurate velocity models and image using conventional techniques (e.g., wavefield crosscorrelation) or (2) reconstruct wavefields with conventional methods using the known background velocity model but improve the imaging condition to alleviate the artifacts caused by the imprecise reconstruction. Wedescribe the unknown component of the velocity model as a random function with local spatial correlations. Imaging data perturbed by such random variations is characterized by statistical instability, i.e., various wavefield components image at wrong locations that depend on the actual realization of the random model. Statistical stability can be achieved by preprocessing the reconstructed wavefields prior to the imaging condition. We use Wigner distribution functions to attenuate the random noise present in the reconstructed wavefields, parameterized as a function of image coordinates. Wavefield filtering using Wigner distribution functions and conventional imaging can be lumped together into a new form of imaging condition that we call an interferometric imaging condition because of its similarity to concepts from recent work on interferometry. The interferometric imaging condition can be formulated both for zero-offset and for multioffset data, leading to robust, efficient imaging procedures that effectively attenuate imaging artifacts caused by unknown velocity models.

Kinematic interpretation in the prestack depth‐migrated domain

Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 1226-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Apostoiu‐Marin ◽  
Andreas Ehinger
Keyword(s):  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Time Domain Data ◽  
And Migration ◽  
Point To Point ◽  
Homogeneous Media

Prestack depth migration can be used in the velocity model estimation process if one succeeds in interpreting depth events obtained with erroneous velocity models. The interpretational difficulty arises from the fact that migration with erroneous velocity does not yield the geologically correct reflector geometries and that individual migrated images suffer from poor signal‐to‐noise ratio. Moreover, migrated events may be of considerable complexity and thus hard to identify. In this paper, we examine the influence of wrong velocity models on the output of prestack depth migration in the case of straight reflector and point diffractor data in homogeneous media. To avoid obscuring migration results by artifacts (“smiles”), we use a geometrical technique for modeling and migration yielding a point‐to‐point map from time‐domain data to depth‐domain data. We discover that strong deformation of migrated events may occur even in situations of simple structures and small velocity errors. From a kinematical point of view, we compare the results of common‐shot and common‐offset migration. and we find that common‐offset migration with erroneous velocity models yields less severe image distortion than common‐shot migration. However, for any kind of migration, it is important to use the entire cube of migrated data to consistently interpret in the prestack depth‐migrated domain.

Migration moveout analysis and depth focusing

Geophysics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude F. Lafond ◽  
Alan R. Levander
Keyword(s):  
Heterogeneous Media ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Complex Structure ◽  
Tomographic Reconstruction ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Velocity Analysis ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Velocity Models

Prestack depth migration still suffers from the problems associated with building appropriate velocity models. The two main after‐migration, before‐stack velocity analysis techniques currently used, depth focusing and residual moveout correction, have found good use in many applications but have also shown their limitations in the case of very complex structures. To address this issue, we have extended the residual moveout analysis technique to the general case of heterogeneous velocity fields and steep dips, while keeping the algorithm robust enough to be of practical use on real data. Our method is not based on analytic expressions for the moveouts and requires no a priori knowledge of the model, but instead uses geometrical ray tracing in heterogeneous media, layer‐stripping migration, and local wavefront analysis to compute residual velocity corrections. These corrections are back projected into the velocity model along raypaths in a way that is similar to tomographic reconstruction. While this approach is more general than existing migration velocity analysis implementations, it is also much more computer intensive and is best used locally around a particularly complex structure. We demonstrate the technique using synthetic data from a model with strong velocity gradients and then apply it to a marine data set to improve the positioning of a major fault.

The application of 3-D depth migration to the development of an Alaskan offshore oil field

Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1551-1560 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Whitcombe ◽  
Eugene H. Murray ◽  
Laurie A. St. Aubin ◽  
Randall J. Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Model ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Northwestern Part ◽  
Positioning Error ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Positioning Errors ◽  
Ray Trace ◽  
Offshore Oil ◽  
Lateral Positioning

Inconsistencies in fault positioning between overlapping 3-D seismic surveys over the northwestern part of the Endicott Field highlighted lateral positioning errors of the order of 1000 ft (330 m) in the seismic images. This large uncertainty in fault positioning placed a high and often unacceptable risk on the placement of wells. To quantify and correct for the seismic positioning error, 3-D velocity models were developed for ray‐trace modeling. The lateral positioning error maps produced revealed significant variation in the mispositioning within the Endicott Field that were mainly caused by lateral variations in permafrost thickness. These maps have been used to correct the positions of mapped features and have enabled several wells to be successfully placed close to major faults. Prior to this analysis, these wells were considered too risky to place optimally. The seismic data were 3-D poststack depth migrated with the final velocity model, producing a repositioned image that was consistent with the ray‐trace predictions. Additionally, a general enhancement of data imaging improved the interpretability and enabled the remapping and subsequent successful development of the peripheral Sag Delta North accumulation.

PS Energy Imaging Condition for Microseismic Data - Part 1: Theory and Applications in 3D Isotropic Media

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-79
Author(s):  
Can Oren ◽  
Jeffrey Shragge
Keyword(s):  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Model Building ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Microseismic Monitoring ◽  
Elastic Model ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Imaging Condition ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Monitoring Programs ◽  
Imaging Conditions

Accurately estimating event locations is of significant importance in microseismic investigations because this information greatly contributes to the overall success of hydraulic fracturing monitoring programs. Full-wavefield time-reverse imaging (TRI) using one or more wave-equation imaging conditions offers an effective methodology for locating surface-recorded microseismic events. To be most beneficial in microseismic monitoring programs, though, the TRI procedure requires using accurate subsurface models that account for elastic media effects. We develop a novel microseismic (extended) PS energy imaging condition that explicitly incorporates the stiffness tensor and exhibits heightened sensitivity to isotropic elastic model perturbations compared to existing imaging conditions. Numerical experiments demonstrate the sensitivity of microseismic TRI results to perturbations in P- and S-wave velocity models. Zero-lag and extended microseismic source images computed at selected subsurface locations yields useful information about 3D P- and S-wave velocity model accuracy. Thus, we assert that these image volumes potentially can serve as the input into microseismic elastic velocity model building algorithms.

Incorporating geologic information into reflection tomography

Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 533-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Clapp ◽  
Biondo L. Biondi ◽  
Jon F. Claerbout
Keyword(s):  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Null Space ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Prestack Depth Migration ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Interval Velocity ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Regularized Inversion ◽  
Symmetric Operators ◽  
Reflection Tomography

In areas of complex geology, prestack depth migration is often necessary if we are to produce an accurate image of the subsurface. Prestack depth migration requires an accurate interval velocity model. With few exceptions, the subsurface velocities are not known beforehand and should be estimated. When the velocity structure is complex, with significant lateral variations, reflection‐tomography methods are often an effective tool for improving the velocity estimate. Unfortunately, reflection tomography often converges slowly, to a model that is geologically unreasonable, or it does not converge at all. The large null space of reflection‐tomography problems often forces us to add a sparse parameterization of the model and/or regularization criteria to the estimation. Standard tomography schemes tend to create isotropic features in velocity models that are inconsistent with geology. These isotropic features result, in large part, from using symmetric regularization operators or from choosing a poor model parameterization. If we replace the symmetric operators with nonstationary operators that tend to spread information along structural dips, the tomography will produce velocity models that are geologically more reasonable. In addition, by forming the operators in helical 1D space and performing polynomial division, we apply the inverse of these space‐varying anisotropic operators. The inverse operators can be used as a preconditioner to a standard tomography problem, thereby significantly improving the speed of convergence compared with the typical regularized inversion problem. Results from 2D synthetic and 2D field data are shown. In each case, the velocity obtained improves the focusing of the migrated image.

Practical aspects and applications of 2D stereotomography

Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 1008-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Billette ◽  
Soazig Le Bégat ◽  
Pascal Podvin ◽  
Gilles Lambaré
Keyword(s):  
Estimation Method ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Velocity Model ◽  
Velocity Estimation ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Depth Migration ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Automatic Picking ◽  
Iterative Inversion

Stereotomography is a new velocity estimation method. This tomographic approach aims at retrieving subsurface velocities from prestack seismic data. In addition to traveltimes, the slope of locally coherent events are picked simultaneously in common offset, common source, common receiver, and common midpoint gathers. As the picking is realized on locally coherent events, they do not need to be interpreted in terms of reflection on given interfaces, but may represent diffractions or reflections from anywhere in the image. In the high‐frequency approximation, each one of these events corresponds to a ray trajectory in the subsurface. Stereotomography consists of picking and analyzing these events to update both the associated ray paths and velocity model. In this paper, we describe the implementation of two critical features needed to put stereotomography into practice: an automatic picking tool and a robust multiscale iterative inversion technique. Applications to 2D reflection seismic are presented on synthetic data and on a 2D line extracted from a 3D towed streamer survey shot in West Africa for TotalFinaElf. The examples demonstrate that the method requires only minor human intervention and rapidly converges to a geologically plausible velocity model in these two very different and complex velocity regimes. The quality of the velocity models is verified by prestack depth migration results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document