The power of food scale (PFS)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Rose Didie
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Cappelleri ◽  
A. G. Bushmakin ◽  
R. A. Gerber ◽  
N. K. Leidy ◽  
C. C. Sexton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Appetite ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 291 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.M. Forman ◽  
K.L. Hoffman ◽  
K.B. Mcgrath ◽  
J.D. Herbert ◽  
L.L. Brandsma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243530
Author(s):  
Kathryn M. Ross ◽  
Abraham Eastman ◽  
Umelo A. Ugwoaba ◽  
Kathryn E. Demos ◽  
Jason Lillis ◽  
...  

Background Greater sensitivity to food rewards and higher levels of impulsivity (and an interaction between these variables, termed “reinforcement pathology”) have been associated with obesity in cross-sectional studies. Less is known regarding how these constructs may impact attempts at weight loss or longer-term weight loss maintenance. Methods We provided 75 adults (69%Female, 84%White, age = 50.8y, BMI = 31.2kg/m2) with a 3-month Internet-based weight loss program and assessed weight, food reward sensitivity (via the Power of Food Scale [PFS]), and impulsivity (via Go No-Go [GNG] and Delay Discounting [DD] computer tasks) at baseline and at Months 3, 6, 9, and 12. No additional intervention was provided Months 3–12. Multi-level mixed-effect models were used to examine changes in PFS, GNG, and DD over time and associations between these measures and weight loss/regain. Results Participants lost 6.0±1.1kg Months 0–3 and regained 2.4±1.1kg Months 3–12. Across time points, higher PFS scores were associated with higher weight, p = .007; however, there were no significant associations between GNG or DD and weight nor between the interactions of PFS and GNG or DD and weight, ps>.05. There were significant decreases from Months 0–3 in PFS, GNG, and DD, ps < .05; however, neither baseline values nor changes were significantly associated with weight change and there were no significant associations between the interactions of PFS and GNG or DD and weight change, ps>.05. Conclusion Results demonstrated an association between food reward sensitivity and weight. Further, decreases in both food reward sensitivity and impulsivity were observed during an initial weight loss program, but neither baseline levels nor improvements were associated with weight change. Taken together, results suggest that the constructs of food reward sensitivity, impulsivity, and reinforcement pathology may have limited clinical utility within behavioral weight management interventions. Future intervention studies should examine whether food-related impulsivity tasks lead to a similar pattern of results.


Appetite ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 104549
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Stone ◽  
Brittany E. Matheson ◽  
Adam M. Leventhal ◽  
Kerri N. Boutelle

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fereshteh Aliasghari ◽  
Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi ◽  
Neda Lotfi Yaghin ◽  
Reza Mahdavi

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. A165 ◽  
Author(s):  
JC Cappelleri ◽  
AG Bushmakin ◽  
RA Gerber ◽  
NK Leidy ◽  
C Sexton ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Lipsky ◽  
Kyle Stanley Burger ◽  
Myles Faith ◽  
Anna Maria Siega-Riz ◽  
Aiyi Liu ◽  
...  

Background: Eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) measures intake of highly palatable, highly processed foods when sated, and may reflect food reward sensitivity. However, it is unknown whether EAH occurs in the presence of low-processed, nutrient-dense foods, and the relationship of self-reported food reward sensitivity with EAH during pregnancy has not been examined.Objective: This study tested whether EAH differs for highly-processed (HP) versus low-processed (LP) foods in pregnant women and examined relationships of EAH with self-reported food reward sensitivity and impulsivity.Design: Women in their 2nd trimester (n=46) enrolled in a counterbalanced crossover study in which they completed two EAH conditions following a standardized meal. Participants completed the Power of Food Scale (PFS), the modified Yale Food Addiction Scale (m-YFAS), and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS). EAH energy intake (EAH-kcal) and proportion consumed (EAH-%) was measured overall and separately for sweet and savory test foods. Results: EAH-% was similar across conditions (16.3% ± 1.1% HP versus 17.9% ± 1.2% LP, P = 0.74), resulting in 347.7 ± 49.0 kcal greater energy intake in the HP versus LP condition (P &lt; 0.001). PFS was not significantly associated with EAH; m-YFAS was positively associated with EAH-kcal and EAH-% of savory foods, and BIS was positively associated with EAH-kcal and EAH-% overall, and with EAH-% of sweet foods (p &lt; 0.05). There was little evidence of an interaction of BIS with PFS or m-YFAS.Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that EAH in pregnant women correlates with self-reported food reward sensitivity and occurs for both highly processed and low-processed foods. Self-control did not modify the positive association of food reward sensitivity with eating beyond satiation in this sample.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Gülsüm Şahin-Bodur ◽  
Alev Keser ◽  
Mehtap Akçil-Ok ◽  
Emine Nüket Ünsal ◽  
Onur Akın

Abstract Objective: In this study, the aim of the present study was to validate the Turkish version of the C-PFS after translation of the original version. Design: The data were collected via face-to-face interviews using the Turkish version of C-PFS (C-PFS-T) and a sociodemographic information form. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing body weight by the square of the height. After the adaptation of the scale to Turkish language, validity and reliability analysis were conducted for the C-PFS-T. Setting: Gülhane Training and Research Hospital Department of Child Health and Diseases Nutrition and Diet Unit in Ankara Participants: This research was conducted with volunteer children and adolescents between the ages of 9 and 16 (n 268) Results: It was concluded that the 15-item C-PFS-T was collected under 3 factors as in the original version of the child version. Cronbach α coefficient was found to be 0.878 for the scale. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed the acceptability and applicability of adapting the version of the C-PFS-T in terms of χ2/df(=3.816), AGFI(=0.931), RMSEA(=0.082) and GFI(=0.852) fit indices. C-PFS-T total score’s median value of obese group wasn’t substantially different from normal weight group. Conclusions: It was concluded that the Turkish version of the C-PFS, which provides an assessment of the hedonic hunger status of children and adolescents with 15 items and 3 subdimensions, has sufficient reliability and validity to be applied to these subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document