Novel Intranasal Delivery of Sumatriptan as a Route to Rapid and Sustained Relief in the Acute Treatment of Migraine

US Neurology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Deborah I Friedman ◽  

Migraine remains a common debilitating condition that exerts a high social and economic burden worldwide. Despite the widespread availability of various medications for migraine, many patients are dissatisfied with their treatment. Rapid and effective treatment at an early stage in an attack is vital in migraine to prevent central sensitization leading to attacks that are difficult to treat. Most migraineurs prefer oral medications but this is not always the most rapid or efficient route into the bloodstream. Intranasal administration of migraine treatment provides a rapid, convenient and reliable alternative to oral and other routes. AVP-825 is an intranasal medication delivery system approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in January 2016 as ONZETRA™ Xsail™ (sumatriptan nasal powder [Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Aliso Viejo, CA]) for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. AVP-825 contains low dose sumatriptan powder and takes advantage of some unique aspects of the nasal anatomy to confer rapid pain relief in the acute treatment of migraine. In two Phase III trials, AVP-825 was well tolerated and showed significantly faster migraine pain relief and relief from other symptoms including photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea than placebo or oral sumatriptan. This benefit was achieved with substantially lower drug exposure than oral sumatriptan. Additional analyses of data from the Phase III trials show that significantly more patients with migraine receiving AVP-825 reported clinically meaningful relief, sustained relief, pain freedom, lower migraine-related disability and more consistent relief across multiple attacks than those receiving oral sumatriptan. The rapid and sustained action of AVP-825 and its convenience creates the potential for this unique treatment to reduce the burden of migraine in many patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1083-1083
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Serrurier ◽  
Jimmy Hwang ◽  
Joseph P. McGuire ◽  
Daphne Lichtensztajn ◽  
Ann C. Griffin ◽  
...  

1083 Background: Anthracyclines (A), given in sequence or combination, have been the mainstay of adjuvant CTX for ESBC. Recent molecular studies have questioned the value of A for ESBC. Trials for ESBC, presented primarily in 2005, have demonstrated similar or improved efficacy with non-anthracycline (NA) CTX. We sought to understand changing use of A for ESBC from 2000-2010 as reported in the population-based 9-county Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry (GBACR). Methods: Using the GBACR database, we recorded use of A or NA based CTX regimens in women with ESBC and no prior CTX from 2000-2010, and correlated type of CTX with tumor stage, receptor status, and age. We evaluated the use of A vs. NA (80% taxane-based) CTX from 2000-2005 and 2006-2010. Results: 16,476 patients (pts) met criteria for inclusion; 2,032 (12%) were excluded (missing information, or CTX not given). Pt characteristics were: median age 52 (range 21-94), stage I (25%), II (56%), and III (19%), 69% HR+. From 2000-2010, 83% received A; overall use of A decreased (87% to 57%), and use of NA increased (13% to 43%). The Table compares use of NA CTX during the two time periods by clinical variables. With short follow-up there was no difference in survival based on use of A vs. NACTX. Conclusions: Use of NA CTX significantly increased during 2006-2010; this trend was independent of age or receptor status and was more pronounced in earlier stage disease. The timing of this change correlated with the presentation of two phase III trials, emphasizing the impact of early data from phase III trials on treatment practice, and confirming results from a large claims database (Giordano). Potential outcome differences will be evaluated in NSABP-B49 and with longer follow-up of this cohort. This study was supported by the UCSF Cancer Registry and CPIC. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A DeJulio ◽  
Joshua K Perese ◽  
Nathaniel M Schuster ◽  
Jessica C Oswald

Migraine is a leading cause of morbidity and disability worldwide. Triptans were the first migraine-specific drug class developed and have proven efficacy in treatment of this neurological disease. They are however contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular disease and possibly others, owning to their vasoconstrictive properties. This review will focus on lasmiditan, which has been called the first ‘ditan’ and ‘neurally acting anti-migraine agent’, designed to selectively agonize the serotonin 5-HT1F receptor subtype, providing anti-migraine effects without concomitant vasoconstriction. To date, lasmiditan has proven safe and effective for the acute treatment of migraine in two Phase II and four Phase III trials. Post hoc analysis revealed that the majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were CNS-related, mild-to-moderate in severity and self-limiting. The US FDA label recommends that patients not drive or operate machinery until at least 8 h after taking each dose of lasmiditan.


Ophthalmology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 2013-2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Brown ◽  
Quan Dong Nguyen ◽  
Dennis M. Marcus ◽  
David S. Boyer ◽  
Sunil Patel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document