scholarly journals Reverse remodelling of the heart after atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Kardiologiia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (8S) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
N. Z. Gasimova ◽  
E. N. Mikhaylov ◽  
V. S. Orshanskaya ◽  
A. V. Kamenev ◽  
R. B. Tatarsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Left Heart ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Aim. To evaluate the effect of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) on long-term freedom from AF and left heart reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Methods. There were 47 patients (mean age 53.3 ± 10 years, 39 males) enrolled into single-center observational study, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40 %. Patients underwent CA for AF refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Baseline clinical data and diagnostic tests results were obtained during personal visits and / or via secure telemedical services. Personal contact with evaluation of recurrence of AF and echocardiographic values was performed with 30 (64 %) patients.Results. Paroxysmal AF was present in 12 (40 %) patients, persistent – in 18 (60 %). During mean follow-up of 3 years (0.5–6 years) redo ablation was performed in 9 patients (30 %) with average number of 1.3 procedures per patient. At 6 months 24 (80 %) patients were free from AF, at last follow-up – 16 (53 %). The mean time to first recurrence following CA was 15.6±13.3 months. Follow-up echocardiography revealed significant LVEF improvement (р<0,0001), reduction of left atrium size (р<0,0001), left ventricle end-diastolic volume (р<0,002) and left ventricle endsystolic volume (p<0,0001) and mitral regurgitation (р=0,001).Conclusion. AF CA in patients with HFrEF is associated with improvement in systolic function and left heart reverse remodeling. Durable long-term antiarrhythmic effect often requires repeated procedures.

scholarly journals Impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced, mid-range or preserved ejection fraction

Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (15) ◽  
pp. 1160-1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Kyoung Son ◽  
Jin Joo Park ◽  
Nam-Kyoo Lim ◽  
Won-Ho Kim ◽  
Dong-Ju Choi
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Multicentre Cohort Study ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Registration Number

ObjectiveTo determine the prognostic value of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved, mid-range or reduced ejection fraction (EF).MethodsPatients hospitalised for acute HF were enrolled in the Korean Acute Heart Failure registry, a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study, between March 2011 and February 2014. HF types were defined as reduced EF (HFrEF, LVEF <40%), mid-range EF (HFmrEF, LVEF 40%–49%) or preserved EF (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%).ResultsOf 5414 patients enrolled, HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF were seen in 3182 (58.8%), 875 (16.2%) and 1357 (25.1%) patients, respectively. The prevalence of AF significantly increased with increasing EF (HFrEF 28.9%, HFmrEF 39.8%, HFpEF 45.2%; p for trend <0.001). During follow-up (median, 4.03 years; IQR, 1.39–5.58 years), 2806 (51.8%) patients died. The adjusted HR of AF for all-cause death was 1.06 (0.93–1.21) in the HFrEF, 1.10 (0.87–1.39) in the HFmrEF and 1.22 (1.02–1.46) in the HFpEF groups. The HR for the composite of all-cause death or readmission was 0.97 (0.87–1.07), 1.14 (0.93–1.38) and 1.03 (0.88–1.19) in the HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF groups, respectively, and the HR for stroke was 1.53 (1.03–2.29), 1.04 (0.57–1.91) and 1.90 (1.13–3.20), respectively. Similar results were observed after propensity score matching analysis.ConclusionsAF was more common with increasing EF. AF was seen to be associated with increased mortality only in patients with HFpEF and was associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with HFrEF or HFpEF.Trial registration numberNCT01389843

Telemedicine reduces long term mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Koulaouzidis ◽  
D Charisopoulou
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Aldosterone Antagonists ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Telemonitoring was introduced with the potential to improve the medical care, quality of life and prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). The aim of the study was to assess the effect of home telemedicine (HTM) in long-term mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods This is a retrospective study of 452 consecutive subjects with HFrEF  who were referred to  HTM service. The HTM service was offered to HFrEF patients who: a) have been recently diagnosed with HF, b) have been recently hospitalized due to HF, c) have worsening HF, d) need frequent medication changes, e) are NYHA class II or III. Most patients (n= 352) accepted HTM (HTM-group), but 100 patients refused and received the usual care (UC-group). The HTM group were assessed daily by body weight, blood pressure and heart rate using electronic devices with automatic transfer of data to an online database. A nurse practitioner evaluated the measurements every day using a dedicated clinical user interface. Clinical alerts are dealt with by the HTM nurse calling the patient and then, if necessary, a clinical responder; either a community HF nurse with prescribing qualifications or a cardiologist if long-term changes in therapy are required. Patients in both groups were seen at a specialist HF clinic and the frequency of clinical follow-up was at the discretion of the HF team. The same cardiologists reviewed the patients in both groups. Follow-up period was 60 months. Higher prevalence of male gender was seen in the UC-group (78% vs 67%, p = 0.03). Otherwise there was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics or primary cause of HF between the two groups. Also no differences were seen between the two groups in the treatment with beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists. Results The mean follow-up period for survivors was significantly higher in HTM-group compared with UC-group (50.6 ± 18.2 vs. 37.8 ± 25.2, p &lt; 0.001). After 3 month of follow-up, the all-cause mortality was significantly lower in HTM-group than in UC-group (2.8% vs. 14%; p &lt;0.01). This significantly lower mortality in HTM-group compared to UC-group was further observed in 6 months follow-up ( 4.5% vs. 22%, p &lt; 0.0009); in 12 months follow-up (9% vs. 31.2%,  p &lt; 0.0002); in 18 months follow-up (13.4% vs. 38.2%, p &lt; 0.0001); in 24 months follow-up (15.1% vs. 42%, p &lt; 0.0001); in 36 months follow-up (19% vs. 44.5%, p &lt; 0.0002); in 48 months follow-up (23% vs. 46%, p &lt; 0.001); and finally in 60 months follow-up (25.3% vs. 46%, p &lt; 0.003). Conclusion HTM was associated with improved survival. This was observed from the first months of the study and remained present until the end of the study.The reduced mortality in the HTM patients may reflect the fact that HTM improves patient HF knowledge and self-care behaviors.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation benefits the patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction as well as those with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Yamauchi ◽  
I Morishima ◽  
Y Morita ◽  
K Takagi ◽  
H Nagai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Function ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Functional Class ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Background Although catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has recently been shown to improve the cardiac function and even mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), few studies have examined the outcomes of AF catheter ablation in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Purpose To verify the impact of AF catheter ablation on the cardiac function and HF status in patients with HFpEF. Methods We studied 306 patients with HF who had a history of an HF hospitalization and/or preprocedural serum BNP levels &gt;100pg/ml (age, 68.9±8.2 years old; male, 66.3%; non-paroxysmal AF, 63.1%, left atrial diameter [LAD], 42.5±6.3 mm; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], 60.6±12.0%) out of 596 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation-based catheter ablation of AF. The patients with an LVEF ≥50% were defined as having HFpEF (n=262; age, 69.0±8.2 years old; male, 64.5%; non-paroxysmal AF, 61.8%, LAD, 42.1±5.9 mm; left LVEF, 64.0±8.2%) and the remaining patients with an LVEF &lt;50% were defined as having HFrEF (n=44, age, 67.9±8.7 years old; male, 77.0%; non-paroxysmal AF, 70.5%, LAD, 44.9±8.2 mm; LVEF, 40.1±10.2%). The patients received periodic follow-ups for 12 months after the catheter ablation. The cardiac function parameters including the echocardiographic findings and HF functional status of the patients were compared between baseline and 12 months, stratified by the HF subgroup. Results AF recurred in 60 patients with HFpEF (22.9%) and in 14 with HFrEF (31.8%) during the 12 month follow-up (p=0.27), however, sinus rhythm was maintained at 12 months in most of the patients (253 patients with HFpEF [96.6%] and 42 patients with HFrEF [95.5%]) (p=0.71). Figure 1 compares the changes in the cardiac function parameters and NYHA functional class from baseline to the 12-month follow-up stratified by the HF subgroup. Both the patients with HFpEF and HFrEF had significant improvements in the serum BNP levels, chest thorax ratio, and LVEF determined by echocardiography. LA reverse remodeling as shown by a significant reduction in the LAD was observed in both HF subgroups, however, the E/E', an index of the LV diastolic function, did not significantly change in either of the subgroups. Similar to the patients with HFrEF, an improvement in the NYHA functional class was seen in those with HFpEF. Conclusions Catheter ablation of AF may benefit patients with HFpEF as well as those with HFrEF. Sinus rhythm maintenance achieved by AF catheter ablation in patients with HFpEF may lead to LA reverse remodeling and a better LV systolic function, thereby improving the NYHA functional class. It is unclear whether changes in the LV diastolic function may contribute to this favorable process. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR&lt;1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Prevalence and prognostic impact of somatic mutations in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J Vazquez Andres ◽  
A Hernandez Vicente ◽  
M Diez Diez ◽  
M Gomez Molina ◽  
A Quintas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Myocardial Dysfunction ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Introduction Somatic mutations in hematopoietic cells are associated with age and have been associated with higher mortality in apparently healthy adults, especially due to atherosclerotic disease. In animal models, somatic mutations are associated with atherosclerosis progression and myocardial dysfunction, especially when gene TET2 is affected. Preliminary clinical data, referred to ischemic heart failure (HF), have associate the presence of these acquired mutations with impaired prognosis. Purpose To study the prevalence of somatic mutations in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their impact on long-term prognosis. Methods We studied a cohort of elderly patients (more than 60 years old) hospitalized with HFrEF (LVEF&lt;45%). The presence of somatic mutations was assessed using next generation sequencing (Illumina HiSeq 2500), with a mutated allelic fraction of at least 2% and a panel of 55 genes related with clonal hematopoiesis. Patients were followed-up for a median of three years. The study endpoint was a composite of death or readmission for worsening HF. Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test) and Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed adjusting for age, sex and LVEF. Results A total of 62 patients (46 males (74.2%), age 74±7.5 years) with HFrEF (LVEF 29.7±7.8%) were enrolled in the study. The ischemic etiology was present in 54% of patients. Somatic mutations in Dnmt3a or Tet2 were present in 11 patients (17.7%). No differences existed in baseline characteristics except for a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients with somatic mutations (70% vs. 40%, p=0.007). During the follow-up period, 40 patients (64.5%) died and 38 (61.3%) had HF re-admission. The KM survival analysis for the combined event is shown in Figure 1. Compared with patients without somatic mutations and after adjusting for covariates, there was an increased risk of adverse outcomes when the somatic mutations were present (HR 3.6, 95% CI [1.6, 7.8], p=0.0014). This results remains considering death as a competing risk (Gray's test p=0.0097) and adjusting for covariates (HR = 2.21 95% CI [0.98, 5], p=0.0556). Conclusions Somatic mutation are present in patients with HFrEF and determine a higher risk of adverse events in the follow-up. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical implications of these findings. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 12849: Changes in N-terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Predicts Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
Camilla Hage ◽  
Ulf Dahlström ◽  
Pasquale Perrone-Filardi ◽  
Lars H Lund
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Changes in N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been demonstrated to correlate with outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF). However the prognostic value of a change in NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is unknown. Hypothesis: To assess the impact of changes in NT-proBNP on all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization and their composite in an unselected population of patients with HFPEF. Methods: 643 outpatients (age 72+12 years; 41% females) with HFPEF (ejection fraction ≥40%) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2005 and 2012 and reporting NT-proBNP levels assessment at initial registration and at follow-up were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups according the median value of NT-proBNP absolute change that was 0 pg/ml. Median follow-up from first measurement was 2.25 years (IQR: 1.43 to 3.81). Adjusted Cox’s regression models were performed using total mortality, HF hospitalization (with censoring at death) and their composite as outcomes. Results: After adjustments for 19 baseline variables including baseline NT-proBNP, as compared with an increase in NT-proBNP levels at 6 months (NT-proBNP change>0 pg/ml), a reduction in NT-proBNP levels (NT-proBNP change<0 pg/ml) was associated with a 45.2% reduction in risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.548; 95% CI: 0.378 to 0.796; p:0.002), a 50.1% reduction in risk of HF hospitalization (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.362 to 0.689; p<0.001) and a 42.6% reduction in risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.574; 95% CI: 0.435 to 0.758; p<0.001)(Figure). Conclusions: Reductions in NT-proBNP levels over time are independently associated with an improved prognosis in HFPEF patients. Changes in NT-proBNP could represent a surrogate outcome in phase 2 HFPEF trials.

scholarly journals Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 288
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Androulakis ◽  
Catrin Sohrabi ◽  
Alexandros Briasoulis ◽  
Constantinos Bakogiannis ◽  
Bunny Saberwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Control Strategy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Rhythm Control ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been proposed as a means of improving outcomes among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are otherwise receiving appropriate treatment. Unlike HFrEF, treatment options are more limited in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and the data pertaining to the management of AF in these patients are controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of CA on outcomes of patients with AF and HFpEF, such as functional status, post-procedural complications, hospitalization, morbidity and mortality, based on data from observational studies. Methods: We systematically searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for Central Register of Clinical Trials until May 2020. Results: Overall, the pooling of our data showed that sinus rhythm was achieved long-term in 58.0% (95% CI 0.44–0.71). Long-term AF recurrence was noticed in 22.3% of patients. Admission for HF occurred in 6.2% (95% CI 0.04–0.09) whilst all-cause mortality was identified in 6.3% (95% CI 0.02–0.13). Conclusion: This meta-analysis is the first to focus on determining the benefits of a rhythm control strategy for patients with AF and HFpEF using CA, suggesting it may be worthwhile to investigate the effects of a CA rhythm control strategy as the default treatment of AF in HFpEF patients in randomized trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document