Impact of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced, mid-range or preserved ejection fraction

ObjectiveTo determine the prognostic value of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved, mid-range or reduced ejection fraction (EF).MethodsPatients hospitalised for acute HF were enrolled in the Korean Acute Heart Failure registry, a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study, between March 2011 and February 2014. HF types were defined as reduced EF (HFrEF, LVEF <40%), mid-range EF (HFmrEF, LVEF 40%–49%) or preserved EF (HFpEF, LVEF ≥50%).ResultsOf 5414 patients enrolled, HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF were seen in 3182 (58.8%), 875 (16.2%) and 1357 (25.1%) patients, respectively. The prevalence of AF significantly increased with increasing EF (HFrEF 28.9%, HFmrEF 39.8%, HFpEF 45.2%; p for trend <0.001). During follow-up (median, 4.03 years; IQR, 1.39–5.58 years), 2806 (51.8%) patients died. The adjusted HR of AF for all-cause death was 1.06 (0.93–1.21) in the HFrEF, 1.10 (0.87–1.39) in the HFmrEF and 1.22 (1.02–1.46) in the HFpEF groups. The HR for the composite of all-cause death or readmission was 0.97 (0.87–1.07), 1.14 (0.93–1.38) and 1.03 (0.88–1.19) in the HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF groups, respectively, and the HR for stroke was 1.53 (1.03–2.29), 1.04 (0.57–1.91) and 1.90 (1.13–3.20), respectively. Similar results were observed after propensity score matching analysis.ConclusionsAF was more common with increasing EF. AF was seen to be associated with increased mortality only in patients with HFpEF and was associated with an increased risk of stroke in patients with HFrEF or HFpEF.Trial registration numberNCT01389843

Download Full-text

Prevalence and prognostic impact of somatic mutations in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0966 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

D.J Vazquez Andres ◽

A Hernandez Vicente ◽

M Diez Diez ◽

M Gomez Molina ◽

A Quintas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Myocardial Dysfunction ◽

Study Endpoint ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Introduction Somatic mutations in hematopoietic cells are associated with age and have been associated with higher mortality in apparently healthy adults, especially due to atherosclerotic disease. In animal models, somatic mutations are associated with atherosclerosis progression and myocardial dysfunction, especially when gene TET2 is affected. Preliminary clinical data, referred to ischemic heart failure (HF), have associate the presence of these acquired mutations with impaired prognosis. Purpose To study the prevalence of somatic mutations in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their impact on long-term prognosis. Methods We studied a cohort of elderly patients (more than 60 years old) hospitalized with HFrEF (LVEF<45%). The presence of somatic mutations was assessed using next generation sequencing (Illumina HiSeq 2500), with a mutated allelic fraction of at least 2% and a panel of 55 genes related with clonal hematopoiesis. Patients were followed-up for a median of three years. The study endpoint was a composite of death or readmission for worsening HF. Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test) and Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed adjusting for age, sex and LVEF. Results A total of 62 patients (46 males (74.2%), age 74±7.5 years) with HFrEF (LVEF 29.7±7.8%) were enrolled in the study. The ischemic etiology was present in 54% of patients. Somatic mutations in Dnmt3a or Tet2 were present in 11 patients (17.7%). No differences existed in baseline characteristics except for a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients with somatic mutations (70% vs. 40%, p=0.007). During the follow-up period, 40 patients (64.5%) died and 38 (61.3%) had HF re-admission. The KM survival analysis for the combined event is shown in Figure 1. Compared with patients without somatic mutations and after adjusting for covariates, there was an increased risk of adverse outcomes when the somatic mutations were present (HR 3.6, 95% CI [1.6, 7.8], p=0.0014). This results remains considering death as a competing risk (Gray's test p=0.0097) and adjusting for covariates (HR = 2.21 95% CI [0.98, 5], p=0.0556). Conclusions Somatic mutation are present in patients with HFrEF and determine a higher risk of adverse events in the follow-up. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical implications of these findings. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Reverse remodelling of the heart after atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Kardiologiia ◽

10.18087/cardio.2671 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 59 (8S) ◽

pp. 37-43

Author(s):

N. Z. Gasimova ◽

E. N. Mikhaylov ◽

V. S. Orshanskaya ◽

A. V. Kamenev ◽

R. B. Tatarsky ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Left Ventricle ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Reverse Remodeling ◽

Left Heart ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Patients With Heart Failure

Aim. To evaluate the effect of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation (CA) on long-term freedom from AF and left heart reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Methods. There were 47 patients (mean age 53.3 ± 10 years, 39 males) enrolled into single-center observational study, with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40 %. Patients underwent CA for AF refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Baseline clinical data and diagnostic tests results were obtained during personal visits and / or via secure telemedical services. Personal contact with evaluation of recurrence of AF and echocardiographic values was performed with 30 (64 %) patients.Results. Paroxysmal AF was present in 12 (40 %) patients, persistent – in 18 (60 %). During mean follow-up of 3 years (0.5–6 years) redo ablation was performed in 9 patients (30 %) with average number of 1.3 procedures per patient. At 6 months 24 (80 %) patients were free from AF, at last follow-up – 16 (53 %). The mean time to first recurrence following CA was 15.6±13.3 months. Follow-up echocardiography revealed significant LVEF improvement (р<0,0001), reduction of left atrium size (р<0,0001), left ventricle end-diastolic volume (р<0,002) and left ventricle endsystolic volume (p<0,0001) and mitral regurgitation (р=0,001).Conclusion. AF CA in patients with HFrEF is associated with improvement in systolic function and left heart reverse remodeling. Durable long-term antiarrhythmic effect often requires repeated procedures.

Download Full-text

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0582 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

O.M Aldaas ◽

F Lupercio ◽

C.L Malladi ◽

P.S Mylavarapu ◽

D Darden ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Catheter Ablation ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽

Patients With Heart Failure ◽

One Year

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR<1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Download Full-text

Abstract 12849: Changes in N-terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Predicts Mortality and Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.132.suppl_3.12849 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Gianluigi Savarese ◽

Camilla Hage ◽

Ulf Dahlström ◽

Pasquale Perrone-Filardi ◽

Lars H Lund

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽

Natriuretic Peptide ◽

Total Mortality ◽

Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Patients With Heart Failure ◽

The Impact

Introduction: Changes in N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been demonstrated to correlate with outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF). However the prognostic value of a change in NT-proBNP in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is unknown. Hypothesis: To assess the impact of changes in NT-proBNP on all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization and their composite in an unselected population of patients with HFPEF. Methods: 643 outpatients (age 72+12 years; 41% females) with HFPEF (ejection fraction ≥40%) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between 2005 and 2012 and reporting NT-proBNP levels assessment at initial registration and at follow-up were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into 2 groups according the median value of NT-proBNP absolute change that was 0 pg/ml. Median follow-up from first measurement was 2.25 years (IQR: 1.43 to 3.81). Adjusted Cox’s regression models were performed using total mortality, HF hospitalization (with censoring at death) and their composite as outcomes. Results: After adjustments for 19 baseline variables including baseline NT-proBNP, as compared with an increase in NT-proBNP levels at 6 months (NT-proBNP change>0 pg/ml), a reduction in NT-proBNP levels (NT-proBNP change<0 pg/ml) was associated with a 45.2% reduction in risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.548; 95% CI: 0.378 to 0.796; p:0.002), a 50.1% reduction in risk of HF hospitalization (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.362 to 0.689; p<0.001) and a 42.6% reduction in risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.574; 95% CI: 0.435 to 0.758; p<0.001)(Figure). Conclusions: Reductions in NT-proBNP levels over time are independently associated with an improved prognosis in HFPEF patients. Changes in NT-proBNP could represent a surrogate outcome in phase 2 HFPEF trials.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Co-existing Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Time to Revisit the Management Guidelines?

Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review ◽

10.15420/aer.2018.17.2 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 91 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Alex Baher ◽

Nassir F Marrouche ◽

◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Catheter Ablation ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Rhythm Control ◽

Pharmacological Interventions ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Patients With Heart Failure ◽

Heart Failure Hospitalisation

AF in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is common and is associated with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure hospitalisation and all-cause mortality. Rhythm control of AF in this population has been traditionally limited to the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Clinical trials assessing superiority of pharmacological rhythm control over rate control have been largely disappointing. Catheter ablation has emerged as a viable alternative to pharmacological rhythm control in symptomatic AF and has enjoyed significant technological advancements over the past decade. Recent clinical trials have suggested that catheter ablation is superior to pharmacological interventions in patients with co-existing AF and HFrEF. In this article, we will review the therapeutic options for AF in patients with HFrEF in the context of the latest clinical trials beyond the current established guidelines.

Download Full-text

Prognostic value of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and different left ventricular ejection fraction: results of the multicenter RIF-CHF register

Russian Journal of Cardiology ◽

10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4200 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 26 (1) ◽

pp. 4200

Author(s):

I. V. Zhirov ◽

N. V. Safronova ◽

Yu. F. Osmolovskaya ◽

S. N. Тereschenko

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Cardiovascular Mortality ◽

Left Ventricular ◽

Left Ventricular Ejection ◽

Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Increased Risk

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are the most common cardiovascular conditions in clinical practice and frequently coexist. The number of patients with HF and AF is increasing every year.Aim. To analyze the effect of clinical course and management of HF and AF on the outcomes.Material and methods. The data of 1,003 patients from the first Russian register of patients with HF and AF (RIF-CHF) were analyzed. The endpoints included hospitalization due to decompensated HF, cardiovascular mortality, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding. Predictors of unfavorable outcomes were analyzed separately for patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (AF+HFpEF), mid-range ejection fraction (AF+HFmrEF), and reduced ejection fraction (AF+HFrEF).Results. Among all patients with HF, 39% had HFpEF, 15% — HFmrEF, and 46% — HFrEF. A total of 57,2% of patients were rehospitalized due to decompensated HF within one year. Hospitalization risk was the highest for HFmrEF patients (66%, p=0,017). Reduced ejection fraction was associated with the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (15,5% vs 5,4% in other groups, p<0,001) but not ischemic stroke (2,4% vs 3%, p=0,776). Patients with HFpEF had lower risk to achieve the composite endpoint (stroke+MI+cardiovascular death) as compared to patients with HFmrEF and HFrEF (12,7% vs 22% and 25,5%, p<0,001). Regression logistic analysis revealed that factors such as demographic characteristics, disease severity, and selected therapy had different effects on the risk of unfavorable outcomes depending on ejection fraction group.Conclusion. Each group of patients with different ejection fractions is characterized by its own pattern of factors associated with unfavorable outcomes. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with mid-range ejection fraction demonstrate that these patients need to be studied as a separate cohort.

Download Full-text

Abstract 16392: The Effect of Dapagliflozin on Anemia in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of DAPA-HF

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.16392 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Kieran Docherty ◽

Silvio E Inzucchi ◽

Lars Kober ◽

Mikhail Kosiborod ◽

Anna Maria Langkilde ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Placebo Treatment ◽

Cardiovascular Death ◽

Treatment Allocation ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Improved Outcomes ◽

Patients With Heart Failure

Background: Anemia is common and associated with worse outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined: 1) whether dapagliflozin corrected anemia in these patients, and 2) the effect of dapagliflozin on outcomes, in patients with or without anemia, in DAPA-HF. Methods: Anemia was defined as baseline hematocrit <39% in men and <36% in women (WHO). Correction of anemia was defined as two consecutive hematocrit measurements above these thresholds at any time during follow-up (follow-up visits: 2 weeks, 2 and 4 months and 4-monthly thereafter). The primary outcome was a composite of worsening HF (hospitalization or urgent visit requiring intravenous therapy) or cardiovascular death. Findings: Of the 4744 patients randomized in DAPA-HF, 4691 had a baseline hematocrit and 1032 were anemic (22.0%). Anemia was corrected in 62% of patients in the dapagliflozin group, compared with 41% of patients in the placebo group (odds ratio 2.37 [95% CI 1.84-3.04]; p<0.001). The effect of dapagliflozin on the primary outcome was consistent in anemic and non-anemic patients (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.52-0.88] versus 0.76 [0.65-0.89]; P-interaction=0.44) [Figure]. A consistent benefit was also observed for the secondary outcomes, irrespective of anemia status t baseline. Patients with resolution of anemia had better outcomes than those with persisting anemia: rate of primary outcome 9.9 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 8.0-12.4) in those with resolution versus 24.1 per 100 patient-years (20.4-28.3) in those without anemia resolution. Interpretation: Anemia was common in patients in DAPA-HF and associated with worse outcomes. Resolution of anemia was associated with better outcomes than persistence of anemia, regardless of treatment allocation. Although dapagliflozin corrected anemia more often than placebo, treatment with dapagliflozin improved outcomes, irrespective of anemia status.

Download Full-text

P2630Incidence and prognostic impact of new-onset left bundle branch block in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0953 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

S L Kristensen ◽

R Roerth ◽

P S Jhund ◽

S Beggs ◽

L Kober ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Failure ◽

Ejection Fraction ◽

Left Bundle Branch Block ◽

Bundle Branch Block ◽

Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽

Patients With Heart Failure ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Qrs Duration ◽

New Onset

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves survival in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, little is known about the incidence of LBBB in HFrEF and the risk factors for developing this. We addressed these questions in the PARADIGM-HF and ATMOSPHERE trials. Methods We identified 7703 patients with a non-paced rhythm on their baseline ECG, a QRS<130 ms, and at least one follow-up ECG (done at annual visits and end of study). Patients were stratified by baseline QRS duration (≤100 ms - reference; 101–115 ms and 116–129 ms) and followed until development of QRS duration ≥130 ms with a LBBB configuration or latest available ECG. The crude LBBB incidence rate per 100 person-years (py) was identified in the three QRS duration subgroups. Additionally, we examined risk of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, in patients with incident LBBB vs. no incident LBBB. Results Overall, 313 of 7703 patients (4%) developed LBBB during a mean follow-up of 2.7 years, yielding an incidence rate of 1.5 per 100 py. The rate ranged from 0.9 in those with QRS ≤100 ms to 4.0 per 100 py in patients with QRS 116–129 ms. Other predictors of incident LBBB included male sex, age, lower LVEF, HF duration and absence of AF. The risk of the primary composite endpoint was higher among those who developed incident LBBB vs no incident LBBB; event rates 13.5 vs 10.0 per 100 py, yielding an adjusted HR of 1.43 (1.05–1.96). For all-cause mortality the corresponding rates were 12.6 vs 7.3 per 100 py; HR 1.55 (1.16–2.07) (Table 1). Table 1. Risk of outcomes according to incident LBBB during follow-up No. events Crude rate per 100py Adjusted* HR (95% CI) HF hospitalization or CV death No incident LBBB 2145 10.0 (9.6–10.4) 1.00 (ref.) Incident LBBB 43 13.5 (10.0–18.2) 1.43 (1.05–1.96) All-cause mortality No incident LBBB 1662 7.3 (6.9–7.6) 1.00 (ref.) Incident LBBB 48 12.6 (9.5–16.7) 1.55 (1.16–2.07) Conclusion Among patients with HFrEF, the annual incidence of new-onset LBBB (and a potential indication for CRT), was around 1.5%, ranging from 1% in those with QRS duration below 100 ms to 4% in those with QRS 116–129 ms. Incident LBBB was associated with a much higher risk of adverse outcomes, highlighting the importance of repeat ECG monitoring in patients with HFrEF. Acknowledgement/Funding Novartis

Download Full-text