scholarly journals Bio-equivalence study of two tilmicosin phosphate formulations (Micotil 300® and Cozina 300®) in broiler chickens

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 523
Author(s):  
Ashraf Elkomy ◽  
Mohamed Aboubakr
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Blood Concentration ◽  
Broiler Chickens ◽  
Broiler Chicken ◽  
Wing Vein ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Disposition Kinetics ◽  
Acceptance Range ◽  
Kinetics Of

Background: The present study was designed to assess the comparative bio-equivalence of Micotil 300® and Cozina 300® in healthy broiler chickens after oral administration of both products in a dose of 15 mg tilmicosin base/kg body wt.Methods: Twenty four broiler chickens were divided equally into two groups (12 chickens for each group). The first group was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of Micotil 300®, while the 2nd group was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of Cozina 300®. Each broiler chicken in both groups was orally administered with 15 mg tilmicosin/kg body wt. Blood samples were obtained from the wing vein and collected immediately before and at 0.08, 0.16, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after a single oral administration.Results: The disposition kinetics of Micotil 300® and Cozina 300® following oral administration of 15 mg tilmicosin/kg body wt revealed that the maximum blood concentration [Cmax] were 1.73 and 1.67 μg/ml and attained at [tmax] of 2.01 and 2.04 hours, respectively.Conclusions: Cozina 300® is bioequivalent to Micotil 300® since the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-24 andAUC0-∞ (T/R) were 0.96, 0.93 and 0.91 respectively. These are within the bio-equivalence acceptance range. Micotil 300® and Cozina 300® are therefore bioequivalent and interchangeable.

scholarly journals Bioequivalence study of two oral lincomycin formulations (lincopharm 800® and lincoyosr®) in broiler chickens

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
Ashraf Elkomy ◽  
Mohamed Aboubakr
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Blood Concentration ◽  
Broiler Chickens ◽  
Broiler Chicken ◽  
Bioequivalence Study ◽  
Wing Vein ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Single Oral Administration ◽  
Acceptance Range ◽  
Kinetics Of

The present study was designed to assess the comparative bio-equivalence of Lincopharm 800® and Lincoyosr® in healthy broiler chicken after oral administration of both products in a dose of 20 mg lincomycin base/kg b.wt. Twenty four broiler chickens were divided into two groups. The first group was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of Lincopharm 800®, while the 2nd group was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of Lincoyosr®. Each broiler chicken in both groups was orally administered with 20 mg lincomycin base/kg b.wt. Blood samples were obtained from the wing vein and collected immediately before and at 0.08, 0.16, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after a single oral administration. The disposition kinetics of Lincopharm 800® and Lincoyosr® following oral administration of 20 mg lincomycin base /kg b.wt, revealed that the maximum blood concentration of lincomycin [Cmax] were 4.81 and 4.62 μg/ml and attained at [tmax] of 1.36 and 1.35 hours, respectively. In conclusion: Lincoyosr® is bioequivalent to Lincopharm 800® since the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-24 and AUC0-∞ (T/R) was 0.96, 0.92 and 0.91 respectively. These are within the bioequivalence acceptance range. Lincoyosr® and Lincopharm 800® are therefore bioequivalent and interchangeable.   

scholarly journals Bio-equivalence study of two oral doxycycline formulations (doxycycline kela 75%® and mebcodox 75%®) in broiler Chickens

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Ashraf El-Komy ◽  
Mohamed Aboubakr
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Blood Concentration ◽  
Broiler Chickens ◽  
Wing Vein ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Disposition Kinetics ◽  
Oral Doxycycline ◽  
Single Oral Administration ◽  
Acceptance Range ◽  
Kinetics Of

The present study was designed to assess the comparative bio-equivalence of Doxycycline Kela 75%® and Mebcodox 75%® in healthy broiler chickens after oral administration of both products in a dose of 20 mg doxycycline base/kg.b.wt. Twenty four broiler chickens were divided into two groups. The first group was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of Doxycycline Kela 75%®, while the 2nd group was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of Mebcodox 75%®. Each broiler chickens in both groups were orally administered with 20 mg doxycycline base/kg.b.wt. Blood samples were obtained from the wing vein and collected immediately before and at 0.08, 0.16, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after a single oral administration The disposition kinetics of Doxycycline Kela 75%® and Mebcodox 75%® following oral administration of 20 mg doxycycline base/kg.b.wt. revealed that the maximum blood concentration [Cmax] were 3.35 and 3.28 μg/ml and attained at [tmax] of 0.97 and 0.99 hours, respectively.In conclusion: Mebcodox 75%® is bioequivalent to Doxycycline Kela 75%® since the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-24 and AUC0-∞ (T/R) was 0.97, 0.95 and 0.94 respectively. These are within the bioequivalence acceptance range. Mebcodox 75%® and Doxycycline Kela 75%® are therefore bioequivalent and interchangeable.   

scholarly journals Bioequivalence study of two oral amoxicillin formulations (Biocillin® and Atcomox 87%®) in broiler chickens

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1042
Author(s):  
Mohamed Aboubakr ◽  
Mohamed Elbadawy
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Broiler Chickens ◽  
Broiler Chicken ◽  
Bioequivalence Study ◽  
Wing Vein ◽  
Model Following ◽  
Systemic Bioavailability ◽  
Acceptance Range ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Kinetics Of

Background: The present study was designed to assess the comparative bioequivalence of Biocillin® and Atcomox87%® in healthy broiler chickens after oral administration of both products in a dose of 20 mg amoxicillin base/kg.b.wt.Methods: Twenty-four broiler chickens were divided into two groups. The first group was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of Biocillin®, while the 2nd group was designed to study the pharmacokinetics of Atcomox87%®. Each broiler chicken in both groups was injected intravenously with 20 mg amoxicillin pure standard/kg.b.wt. After 15 days both groups taken orally Biocillin® and Atcomox87%®, respectively. Blood samples were obtained from the wing vein and collected immediately before and at 0.08, 0.16, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours after a single intravenous or oral administration.Results: Amoxicillin in both products obeyed a two compartments open model following I.V. injection. The disposition kinetics of Biocillin® and Atcomox87%® following oral administration of 20 mg amoxicillin base/kg.b.wt. revealed that the maximum blood concentration [Cmax] were 10.79 and 10.30 μg/ml and attained at [tmax] of 0.90 and 0.86 hours, respectively. The mean systemic bioavailability of amoxicillin in Biocillin® and Atcomox 87%® after oral administration in healthy chickens was 64.15 and 65.54%, respectively.Conclusions: Atcomox 87%® is bioequivalent to Biocillin® since the ratios of Cmax, AUC0-24 and AUC0-∞ (T/R) were 0.95, 0.91 and 0.90 respectively. These are within the bioequivalence acceptance range. Biocillin® and Atcomox87%® are therefore bioequivalent and interchangeable.

scholarly journals Disposition kinetics, in vitro plasma protein binding and tissue residues of tilmicosin in healthy and experimentally (CRD) infected broiler chickens

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 2201
Author(s):  
Taha Attia ◽  
Amera Abd El Latif ◽  
Saber El-Hanbally ◽  
Hanem El-Gendy
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Protein Binding ◽  
Broiler Chickens ◽  
Assay Method ◽  
Wing Vein ◽  
Maximum Serum ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Disposition Kinetics ◽  
The Right

Background: Several studies assayed the pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin in broilers at a dosage of (25mg/kg.b.wt.). The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and tissue residues of tilmicosin following single and repeated oral administrations (25mg/kg.b.wt.) once daily for 5 consecutive days in healthy and experimentally Mycoplasma gallisepticum and E. coli infected broilers.Methods: After oral administrations of tilmicosin (25 mg/kg.b.wt.) one ml blood was collected from the right wing vein and tissues samples for determination of tilmicosin concentrations and the disposition kinetics of it by the microbiological assay method using Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633) as a test organism.Results: In this study, the plasma concentration time graph was characteristic of a two-compartments open model. Following a single oral administration, tilmicosin was rapidly absorbed in both healthy and experimentally infected broilers with an absorption half-life of (t0.5(ab)) 0.45 and 0.52h, maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was 1.06 and 0.69μg/ml at (tmax) about 2.56 and 2.81h, (t0.5(el)) was 21.86 and 22.91h and (MRT) was 32.15 and 33.71h, respectively; indicating the slow elimination of tilmicosin in chickens. The in-vitro protein binding was 9.72±0.83%. Serum concentrations of tilmicosin following repeated oral administration once daily for five consecutive days, almost peaked 2h after each dose with lower significant values recorded in experimentally infected broiler chickens than in healthy ones.Conclusions: This study showed that tilmicosin was cleared rapidly from tissues. The highest residue values were recorded in the lung followed by liver and kidneys while the lowest values were recorded in spleen, fat and thigh muscles. Five days for withdrawal period of tilmicosin suggested in broilers.

scholarly journals Effect of three anticoccidials on pharmacokinetics of tilmicosin in broiler chickens

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Mohamed El-Hewaity
Keyword(s):  
Oral Administration ◽  
Broiler Chickens ◽  
Broiler Chicken ◽  
Test Organism ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Profile ◽  
Maximum Serum ◽  
Elimination Half ◽  
Bacillus Subtilis Atcc ◽  
Maximum Serum Concentration ◽  
Compartment Open Model

The disposition kinetic of tilmicosin (25mg/kg) was studied following oral administration alone, pretreated with amprolium (240 ppm), pretreated with diclazuril (2.5 ppm) and pretreated with toltrazuril (25 ppm) in broiler chickens. The serum tilmicosin concentrations were determined by microbiological assay technique using Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633) as the test organism. Following oral administration of tilmicosin, the disposition curve was best described by two-compartment open model. The maximum serum concentration (Cmax) was 1.90 ± 0.11, 1.27 ± 0.13, 1.50 ± 0.14 and 1.41 ± 0.11µg/ml for tilmicosin alone and in the presence of amprolium, diclazuril and toltrazuril, respectively. The elimination half-life (T0.5 (el)) was significantly decreased (5.28 ± 0.30, 5.88 ± 0.33, 6.03 ± 0.25 h, respectively) in amprolium, diclazuril and toltrazuril pretreated broiler chicken compared to tilmicosin alone (7.30 ± 0.41 h). The outcomes illustrated a significant decrease in the interval between doses in amprolium, diclazuril and toltrazuril pretreated broiler chicken compared to tilmicosin alone. Amprolium diclazuril and toltrazuril, resulted in a significance decrease in AUC (12.02 ± 1.14, 15.50 ± 1.26 and 14.56 ± 1.46 µg.h.ml-1, respectively) compared to tilmicosin alone (21.98±1.83 µg.h.ml-1). It is concluded that the administration of amprolium, diclazuril and toltrazuril before tilmicosin would altered its pharmacokinetic profile in broiler chicken.

Comparison of Two Methods for Determining the Toxicokinetics of Fluazifop-butyl after Intravenous Dosing in Rats

1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Rawlings ◽  
W. McLean Provan ◽  
Martin F. Wilks ◽  
Peter L. Batten
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Blood Concentration ◽  
Kinetic Data ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Sampling Techniques ◽  
Concentration Profiles ◽  
Elimination Kinetics ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Tail Vein ◽  
Kinetics Of

1 We have described and compared the use of two blood sampling techniques to measure the kinetics of fluazifop-butyl, a selective herbicide. Following intravenous administration of radiolabelled compound, blood samples were collected from female rats either by tail vein puncture or from chronically implanted catheters inserted in tethered rats. Urine samples were also collected from tethered animals. 2 Both techniques indicate that fluazifop-butyl is rapidly eliminated from blood into urine (t½3-4.5 h) and the overall blood concentration profiles were comparable between the two methods. However, by using cannulated rats, kinetic data were obtained from individual animals, providing. evidence of inter-animal variation and allowing compartmental and statistical analysis. 3 The tethered rat technique is relatively simple and reliable. Compared to tail vein bleeding, results obtained from cannulated animals are more informative, providing comprehensive data from a small number of rats. It is therefore the preferred method for our kinetic based research studies using compounds known to exhibit multicompartmental elimination kinetics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document