scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy of buccal versus vaginal misoprostol in first trimester induced abortion

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 3368
Author(s):  
Nida Khan ◽  
Anita M. Kant ◽  
Pooja C. Thukral ◽  
Mohammad Saquib
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Vaginal Route ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: To compare the effectiveness, side effects, and patient satisfaction of buccal versus vaginal misoprostol administration in first trimester abortions.Methods: Women opting for first trimester abortion received oral Mifepristone followed 48 hours latermisoprostol. Group A received Misoprostol via buccal route whereas group B received Misoprostol vaginally. A comparative analysis using SPSS was done.Results: Giving 800µg Misoprostol by either buccal or vaginal route after oral Mifepristone have comparable efficacy in terms of complete abortion rate (96% in buccal group versus 98% in vaginal group; p value = 0.495), failure rate being statistically similar (4% versus 2%). Drug abortion interval was comparable in the two groups. (11.16 hour in buccal group and 12.32 hours in vaginal group). Few side effects like nausea and vomiting, shivering, diarrohea was significantly higher with vaginal Misoprostol while abdominal cramps, altered taste were found more with the buccal group.Conclusions: Buccal Misoprostol is comfortable and easier to administer when compared to other routes and it has potential to be developed as a self-administered regimen. Buccal Misoprostol is as efficacious as vaginal Misoprostol with significantly lesser side effects up to 7 weeks of period of gestation.

scholarly journals Comparative study between sequential use of Foley catheter with vaginal misoprostol versus sequential use of oral mifepristone with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4545
Author(s):  
Michelle N. Fonseca ◽  
Vernica Sah
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Sequential Administration ◽  
Group A ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Abortions are one of the most commonly performed procedures in gynaecological departments worldwide. They are still a major problem in developing countries contributing to a significant percentage of maternal morbidity and mortality. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, side effects and acceptability of intracervical Foley and oral Mifepristone both followed with sequential administration of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion.Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial of 36 healthy women opting for termination of pregnancy with ultrasound confirmed intrauterine gestation between 12 to 20 completed weeks. Intracervical Foley catheter with administration of misoprostol (200µg) vaginally was done for Group A. Mifepristone 200mg was administered on day one followed by misoprostol (200µg) vaginally, 48 hours later, to Group B. Both groups received misoprostol (200µg) vaginally at 4 hourly intervals. Completeness of abortion was assessed, and surgical evacuation was performed, if abortion was found to be incomplete.Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, parity and gestational age. 83-89% of the women in both the groups had complete abortion. The mean induction abortion interval was 20.11 hours in Group A and 54.77 hours in Group B, which was statistically significant. Side effect profile was comparable in both groups however the intensity and the duration of persistence of pain was greater among patients from Group A.Conclusions: Authors conclude that medical abortions with both methods were found to be safe, effective, inexpensive and acceptable methods. Whereas a shorter induction abortion interval was observed in the Foley induction group, induction with mifepristone was the preferred regimen in second trimester abortion because of its high efficacy, low incidence of side effects, better tolerance by the patients and due to lower dose of misoprostol required following mifepristone administration.

scholarly journals Randomized comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone priming in termination of second trimester pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3869
Author(s):  
Shrikrushna Vasant Chavan ◽  
Niraj Nilkanth Mahajan ◽  
Arundhati Gundu Tilve
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sublingual Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Sublingual Misoprostol 200 ug 4 hrly is as effective or less effective than vaginal Misoprostol 200ug 4hrly with 200mg oral Mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy.To compare effectiveness, side-effects, and patient satisfaction of sublingual vs vaginal misoprostol administration.Methods: It was prospective randomized open label study. 60 women 13-20 weeks of gestation with a valid legal indication for termination of pregnancy as per MTP act in INDIA were enrolled for study, randomly divided into Group A- Sublingual (n=30) group B-Vaginal (n=30). For group A, 200 mg of Mifepristone was given, 48h later Misoprostol 200 µg was given sublingually 4hrly up to a maximum of 5 doses. If abortion does not occur, the pregnancy was terminated with vaginal misoprostol, in group A. Same procedure repeated in group B. If abortion fails to occur after 5 doses, then second course of vaginal misoprostol was given in group B. Failure of procedure was defined as failed expulsion of foetus at 48 hrs. Results: Mean induction-abortion interval in vaginal group was 12.8±4.38h and 11.47±4.42h in sublingual group was comparable with insignificant p value (p=0.136). All the side effects were comparable in both groups. The overall success rate was 93.3% in the sublingual group while it was 100% in the vaginal group.Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol with oral mifepristone priming in second -trimester medical abortion has a shorter time to pregnancy termination compared with a sublingual regimen. However, both the routes are equally effective for induction of abortion.

scholarly journals Comparative study between intravaginal misoprostol and extra-amniotic instillation of ethacridine lactacte for second trimester abortion

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2575
Author(s):  
Suryaprakash Jagdevappa Karande ◽  
Meena Shantanu Gunjotikar
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Ethacridine Lactate ◽  
Second Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Second Trimester Abortion ◽  
Group B

Background: The methods of terminating pregnancy in the first trimester are simple, safe and effective. Factors like lack of knowledge about availability of MTP services, ignorance, denial of pregnancy, fear of society may account for decrease in number of first trimester abortions. The aims of the present study were to compare the efficacy, induction abortion interval and side effects of intravaginal misoprostol with extra amniotic installation of ethacridine lactate for second trimester abortion.Methods: 60 women coming to MTP clinics requesting second trimester pregnancy termination between 12 to 20 weeks were selected. Detail history and examination was carried out in each patient. They divided into two groups, Group A (30) intravaginal misoprostol 400 initially followed by 400 micrograns every 6 hourly if required. Group B (30) extra-amniotic 0.1% ethacridine lactate 150 cc.Results: In Group A success rate was 100% while in Group B it was 76.66%, which is highly statistically significant (P< 0.01). Mean I – A interval in Group A was 14.58+5.25 hours was highly significantly less than in Group B, it was 33.91 + 3.97 hours (p<0.0001). In Group A complete abortion has occurred in 28 cases (93.33%) and in Group B in 12 cases (52.17%).Conclusions: We conclude that, as compared to extra-amniotic instillation of ethacridinelactate intravaginal misoprostol is the preferred regimen in second trimester abortion because of its high efficacy, shorter induction abortion interval, high incidence of completeness of abortion, low incidence of side effects and better tolerance by the patient. 

scholarly journals MISSED ABORTION

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 295-299
Author(s):  
IKRAMULLAH KHAN ◽  
IK TIAR ◽  
NOREEN SHEZADI
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Cervical Dilatation ◽  
Systemic Effects ◽  
Lower Abdomen ◽  
Cervical Priming ◽  
Group A ◽  
Systemic Side Effects ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of extra-amniotic cervical catheter and vaginal misoprostol as a cervical priming agent prior to surgical evacuation in first trimester missed abortions. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: At lady Willingdon hospital gynecology unit 1 from 1st March 2008 to 28th February 2009. Methods: 100 patients with diagnosis of missed abortions of up to 12 weeks + 6 days were studied. The primigravida were included. They were divided in two groups. In group. A (50) patients 400 microgram (2 tablet ) misoprostol were placed high up in posterior vaginal fornix while in group B (50) patients extra-amniotic. Foleys catheter was placed aseptically 6 hour before surgical intervention as priming agent. Exclusion criteria: All multigravida, patients sensitive to prostaglandin, and with disturbed coagulation were excluded. Main Outcome Measures: The main out comes are 1, cervical dilatation and effacement 2,complications like fever, pain lower abdomen, headache and vomiting 3, amount of bleeding in ml after application of agent. Results: Cervical catheter proved to be good cervical priming agent comparable to misoprostol. Cervical dilatation was significantly better in misoprostol (> 10 mm 44%, > 8mm 30%, > 5mm 20%) as compared to Foleys group (>10 mm 24%, > 8mm 38%, > 5mm 20%) while in 3 (6%) dose of misoprostol was repeated and in 10 (20%) patient in Foleys group has no effect. The side effects occurred in both groups but systemic effects were more in misoprostol, pain lower abdomen 42% VS 46%, backache 18% VS 26%, fever 10% VS nil, headache 16% VS nil and no side effect 14% VS28%) as compared to Foleys catheter. Systemic effects were absent in Foleys catheter due to inert nature. Bleeding occurred in all patientswith misoprostol while it was absent in 48% cases in Foleys group (>60ml 42% VS 8%, <40ml 32% VS 14% < 20ml 26% VS 30%). 48% cases had no bleeding in Foleys group. Conclusion: Cervical catheter proved to be good priming agent due to lesser systemic side effects as compared to misoprostol.

scholarly journals Efficacy of combination of tablet mifepristone and misoprostol for first trimester pregnancy termination at different gestational age

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Poonam Bhojwani ◽  
Pragati Meena ◽  
Gajendra Singh Verma
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Trimester Pregnancy ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Background: Medical method of abortion is a safe, effective and affordable method for first trimester termination. However, nausea, vomiting, diarhoea, excess bleeding and incomplete abortion are known side effects. The aim of study was to compare the success rate of abortions in both groups, to compare the induction-abortion interval in both groups and to study the side effects of the drugs.Methods: This study was conducted in department of obstetrics and gynecology, NIMS Medical College, Jaipur, India during June 2017-August 2017. Total hundred cases were taken and divided into two groups. Group A was gestational age upto 49 days, Group B was gestational age 50-63 days. Both groups were given tab. mifepristone 200mg. followed by 48 hrs. by 4 tablets of tab misoprostol.Results: The results of the given regimen were highly successful and complete abortion was achieved in 96% and 94% in group A and group B respectively. The difference between two groups was statistically not significant (p value =0.64). Failure rates were seen in only 4% of group A and 6% of group B. Pain abdomen was seen in 16% of group A and 38% of group B patients. The difference between both groups was statistically significant (p value=0.02). Nausea was seen in 10% of group A and 30% of group B patients. The difference between both groups is statistically significant(p value=0.018).Conclusions: First trimester pregnancy can be successfully terminated with combination of mifepristone and misoprostol upto 63 days (9 weeks) of pregnancy.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SUBLINGUAL AND VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL TABLET IN MISSED ABORTION

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (06) ◽  
pp. 623-629
Author(s):  
Raxita Patel ◽  
◽  
Ami Patel ◽  
Debshree a ◽  
Vaishali Panchal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
P Value ◽  
Missed Abortion ◽  
Significant Incidence ◽  
Sublingual Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B ◽  
Abortion Case

Introduction: Management of missed abortion is matter of concern for obstetrician in terms of its methods and complications. Objectives: To compare efficacy, side effects and complications of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol tablet in missed abortion case of less than 20 weeks of gestation. Methods: Total 300 cases were taken, and out of those 300 cases, group A (150cases) included cases who were given sublingual misoprostol tablet, and group B (150 cases) included cases who were given vaginally misoprostol tablet. Observation: Mean gestational age is 7.9 and 8 weeks in Group A and Group B respectively. P value is 0.94. (Not significant). Mean induction abortion interval is 11.6 hours and 12.9 hours in Group A and Group B respectively i.e., the induction abortion interval is slightly short in the Group A. P value is 0.9, means the difference is not statistically significant. Mean dose of misoprostol was 1004.6 microgm and 1080 microgm for group A and group B respectively. P value is 0.029 is significant. Incidence of side effects (nausea, vomiting, unpleasant taste) was higher in group A than group B. P value is <0.05 is significant. Success rate was 86% in group A and 80% in group B. Conclusion: Sublingual and vaginal misoprostol tablet are both equally effective for medical management of missed abortion. Mean dose required for abortion is more in vaginal misoprostol but side-effects are more associated with sublingual misoprostol tablets.

scholarly journals Comparable Efficacy of Terbinafine and Itraconazole in the Treatment of Tinea Pedis

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
Md Abdul Wahab ◽  
Mohammad Jamal Uddin ◽  
Biswas Shahen Hassan ◽  
Md Zafrul Islam ◽  
Ishrat Bhuiyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fungal Infection ◽  
Tinea Pedis ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Mycological Cure ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Tinea pedis (athlet’s foot) is the most common fungal infection. Relapse is common in tinea pedis and may be result of recurrence following inadequate treatment or reinfection. Objective: To evaluate the comparable efficacy of terbinafine and itraconazole in the treatment of tinea pedis. Methods: 120 patients of tinea pedis confirmed by KOH microscopy were included in the study. The study was carried out in three different Hospitals and Private Chambers for a period of 3 years from July 2006 to June 2009. Mean age of the patients was 40.28±10.23. The patients were devided into 2 equal group:A & B. Group- A was given terbinafine 250 mg/day and group-B was given intraconazole 200 mg/day for 2 weeks. Results: Follow up 2 weeks after cessation of therapy revealed clinical and mycological cure of 93.3% in terbinafine group and 86.6% in itraconazole group. Conclusion: Efficacy analysis revealed that terbinafine is superior than itraconazole in the treatment of tinea pedis (P value 0.224). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjmed.v21i2.13615 Bangladesh J Medicine 2010; 21: 74-79

scholarly journals Comparative effectiveness of simultaneous administration of mifepristone and misoprostol versus interval regimen of mifepristone followed by misoprostol 12 hours apart in second trimester medical abortion

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2449
Author(s):  
Arunima Saini ◽  
Preet Kamal Bedi ◽  
Nisha Bhagat
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Simultaneous Administration ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Group A ◽  
Second Trimester Abortion ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: In second trimester abortion, medical methods are preferred. Prostaglandins are the most widely used. Amongst them, misoprostol is the most commonly used. Thus, the study was conducted to delineate the effectiveness of simultaneous administration of mifepristone and misoprostol versus interval regimen mifepristone followed by misoprostol 12 hours apart in second trimester medical abortion.Methods: It was a prospective, single centered, comparative study conducted on 50 patients in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GMC, Amritsar coming for second trimester abortion, either elective or emergency, with gestational age between 12-20 weeks. Initially, 53 patients were enrolled in the study, 3 patients dropped out at different stages of study. Finally, 50 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups of 25 patients each by 1:1 randomization. In Group-A, mifepristone 200 mg orally along with misoprostol 600µg vaginally were given simultaneously, followed by 400 µg vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours for a maximum of five doses in 24 hours. Group-B initially received mifepristone 200 mg per oral followed by 12 hours later misoprostol 400µg vaginally and then 400µg vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours for a maximum of five doses in 24 hours. Primary outcome measure was effectiveness of regimen in complete abortion, which was confirmed on pelvic ultrasound 1-week after the last dose. Secondary outcome measure was to compare the induction abortion interval (IAI), dose of misoprostol required and adverse drug reaction (ADR) among both the regimens. P-value <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.Results: Mean age in Group-A was 25.68±3.79 years while in Group-B was 23.40±2.73 years. Both the regimens had success rate of 76% for complete abortion. However, IAI in Group-A was 5.9±4.47 hours whereas in Group-B was 9.6±5.07 hours, which was statistically significant (p= 0.009). A statistically significant difference was also observed in the mean dose of misoprostol between two groups that is, 1000±200µg and 1425±437.41µg respectively (p=0.01). Gestational age was related to IAI from 13 to 17.6 weeks in both groups (p=0.01) while no significant relation was seen between them in more than 17.6 weeks of gestation (p=0.63).Conclusions: Simultaneous administration of mifepristone and misoprostol showed better results than interval regimen in term of significant lesser induction abortion interval, lower dosages of misoprostol required with comparable success rates.

scholarly journals Oral and vaginal route of misoprostol for induction of labour: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1956
Author(s):  
Deepti D. Sharma ◽  
Kavita A. Chandnani
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Vaginal Route ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive

Background: Induction of labour can be defined as “Artificial initiation of uterine contractions before the onset of spontaneous labour, after the period of viability, by any methods, for purpose of vaginal delivery.” The key factor for a successful induction is the status of cervix, its form, consistency and dilatation which is determined by the Bishop score. In case of unfavourable cervix or in the pregnancies remote from the term; prostaglandins are more effective than any other method of induction. Introduction of misoprostol, PGE1 analogue, for the induction of labour in 1993 and its approval for clinical use by ACOG (American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology) in 1999 has been the most significant advancement. It is the latest drug for induction of labour which is cheap and stable at room temperature and is being used worldwide in different doses and by various routes. We compared the most commonly preferred two routes; vaginal and oral in terms of success of induction and noted the adverse events and side effects in both routes.Methods: This was a prospective comparative study carried out at SBKSMIRC (Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre), Dhiraj general hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, 200 patients who required induction of labour were recruited after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly divided in two groups- Group A meant to receive 50µg oral misoprostol, Group B - meant to receive 25µg vaginal misoprostol repeated 4 hourly up to maximum of five doses. Progress of labour was charted on the partograph. The mean induction delivery interval, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes and complications were observed.Results: The mean induction to delivery interval was significantly less in vaginal group than oral (23.3±12.4 hours in oral vs. 17.3±10 hours in vaginal). Vaginal delivery and cesarean section rates were comparable in both groups (76% in Group A vs. 72% in Group B for vaginal delivery, 18% vs. 20% for Cesarean section, respectively). 58% patients in Group A required more than two doses as compared to 39% in group B, though the difference was statistically not significant. Significant number of patients required added oxytocin administration in Group A (72%). No major complications or adverse events were observed. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia was seen more in Group A.Conclusions: Both Oral misoprostol in a dose of 50μg and vaginal misoprostol 25 μg every four hours, to a maximum of five doses, have the potential to induce labour safely and effectively. The vaginal route however is beneficial in effecting delivery in lesser time with few numbers of doses as compared to oral route.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Tamsulosin and Alfuzosin in Management of Distal Ureteral Stones

Med Phoenix ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-13
Author(s):  
Bimochan Piya ◽  
Abhishek Bhattarai
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Diclofenac Sodium ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Ureteral Stones ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Expulsion Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Urinary tract calculi are the most frequent condition in urology clinics worldwide. The overall prevalence is about 5 % and lower urinary tract stones account for 70% among them. Medical expulsive therapy has been used to treat distal ureteric stone as it reduces symptoms and facilitates stone expulsion. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of tamsulosin and alfuzosin as medical therapy in ureteric stones. Materials and Methods: A total of 87 patients with distal ureteral stones of size ≤10 mm were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group A patients (n-30) received 0.4 mg of tamsulosin daily, group B patients (n-29) received 10 mg of alfuzosin daily and group C patients (n-28) received 75 mg of diclofenac sodium. Patients in all groups received diclofenac sodium for one week and then as required. Follow-up was done on a weekly basis for 4 weeks. The stone expulsion rate, time for stone expulsion, and side-effects were recorded in each group. Results: The mean stone size (5.66, 5.79, 5.67) mm and age (29.1, 30.31, 29.4) were comparable in each group. The stone expulsion rate was 83.3%, 79.3%, and 50% in groups A, B, and C respectively.  It showed that both the study groups (Group A and Group B) were effective than the control group (p-value 0.006 and 0.02 respectively) but there was no difference between tamsulosin and alfuzosin (p-value 0.69). The duration of stone expulsion was 11.5 days, 11.8 days, and 17.3 days for Group A, B, and C respectively. The drugs related side effects reported by patients were mild and transient. Conclusion:  The use of tamsulosin and alfuzosin for the medical treatment of ureteric stones proved to be safe and effective and neither did have any significant benefits over the other.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document