scholarly journals A prospective study of foetomaternal outcome in placenta praevia

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 4028
Author(s):  
Somika Kaul ◽  
Bijal Rami
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Neonatal Death ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Placenta Praevia ◽  
Bladder Injury ◽  
Control Group ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: Placenta praevia is one of the serious obstetric problems with far reaching effects and a major cause of antepartum haemorrhage. The aim of the study was to evaluate the foetomaternal outcome of pregnancies with placenta praevia.Methods: The present study was a prospective case control study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lal Ded Hospital, Srinagar from August 2009 to October 2010.Results: Among the 100 cases of placenta praevia studied bleeding per vaginum was the most common presenting symptom. Major placenta praevia was more common (53%) than minor placenta praevia. 43% of the cases of placenta praevia delivered before 37 completed weeks as compared to only 6% in the control group. All cases of placenta praevia delivered by caesarean section. Maternal morbidity in terms of postpartum haemorrhage (32%), intraoperative bowel and bladder injury (2%) and intensive care unit admission (1%) was more in cases of placenta praevia. Foetal complications in terms of neonatal intensive care unit admission (19%), neonatal death (10%) and stillbirth (5%) were more in pregnancies with placenta praevia as compared to controls. 48% of patients with placenta praevia required transfusion of blood and blood products as compared to 4.5% among controls.Conclusions: There is a significant increase in maternal morbidity in pregnancies complicated with placenta praevia. Also, there is a higher incidence of foetal complications and neonatal death. Managing a case of placenta praevia is a challenge in present day obstetrics and it creates a huge burden on the health care system.

scholarly journals Mild thrombocytopenia indicating maternal organ damage in pre‐eclampsia: a cross‐sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michinori Mayama ◽  
Mamoru Morikawa ◽  
Takashi Yamada ◽  
Takeshi Umazume ◽  
Kiwamu Noshiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Preterm Delivery ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Relative Risks

Abstract Background Currently, there is a disagreement between guidelines regarding platelet count cut-off values as a sign of maternal organ damage in pre-eclampsia; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines state a cut-off value of < 100 × 109/L; however, the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy guidelines specify a cut-off of < 150 × 109/L. We evaluated the effect of mild thrombocytopenia: platelet count < 150 × 109/L and ≥ 100 × 109/L on clinical features of pre-eclampsia to examine whether mild thrombocytopenia reflects maternal organ damage in pre-eclampsia. Methods A total of 264 women were enrolled in this study. Participants were divided into three groups based on platelet count levels at delivery: normal, ≥ 150 × 109/L; mild thrombocytopenia, < 150 × 109/L and ≥ 100 × 109/L; and severe thrombocytopenia, < 100 × 109/L. Risk of severe hypertension, utero-placental dysfunction, maternal organ damage, preterm delivery, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were analyzed based on platelet count levels. Estimated relative risk was calculated with a Poisson regression analysis with a robust error. Results Platelet counts indicated normal levels in 189 patients, mild thrombocytopenia in 51 patients, and severe thrombocytopenia in 24 patients. The estimated relative risks of severe thrombocytopenia were 4.46 [95 % confidence interval, 2.59–7.68] for maternal organ damage except for thrombocytopenia, 1.61 [1.06–2.45] for preterm delivery < 34 gestational weeks, and 1.35 [1.06–1.73] for neonatal intensive care unit admission. On the other hand, the estimated relative risks of mild thrombocytopenia were 0.97 [0.41–2.26] for maternal organ damage except for thrombocytopenia, 0.91 [0.62–1.35] for preterm delivery < 34 gestational weeks, and 0.97 [0.76–1.24] for neonatal intensive care unit admission. Conclusions Mild thrombocytopenia was not associated with severe features of pre-eclampsia and would not be suitable as a sign of maternal organ damage.

scholarly journals Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on breastfeeding rates in a neonatal intensive care unit

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asli Okbay Gunes ◽  
Emre Dincer ◽  
Nilgun Karadag ◽  
Sevilay Topcuoglu ◽  
Guner Karatekin
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Breast Milk ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Intake Rate ◽  
Informed Consent Form ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Objectives To find out if the expressed breast milk delivery rate to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for babies who were hospitalized for any reason other than COVID-19, and exclusive breastfeeding (EB) rates between discharge date and 30th day of life of those babies were affected by COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Babies who were hospitalized before the date first coronavirus case was detected in our country were included as control group (CG). The study group was divided into two groups; study group 1 (SG1): the mothers whose babies were hospitalized in the period when mother were asked not to bring breast milk to NICU, study group 2 (SG2): the mothers whose babies were hospitalized after the date we started to use the informed consent form for feeding options. The breast milk delivery rates to NICU during hospitalization and EB rates between discharge and 30th day of life were compared between groups. Results Among 154 mother-baby dyads (CG, n=50; SG1, n=46; SG2, n=58), the percentage of breast milk delivery to NICU was 100%, 79% for CG, SG2, respectively (p<0.001). The EB rate between discharge and 30th day of life did not change between groups (CG:90%, SG1:89%, SG2:75.9; p=0.075). Conclusions If the mothers are informed about the importance of breast milk, the EB rates are not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in short term, even if the mothers are obligatorily separated from their babies. The breast milk intake rate of the babies was lowest while our NICU protocol was uncertain, and after we prepared a protocol this rate increased.

Invasive antenatal procedures and requirement for neonatal intensive care unit admission

1997 ◽  
Vol 156 (7) ◽  
pp. 550-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Greenough ◽  
B. Yuksel ◽  
S. Naik ◽  
P. Cheeseman ◽  
K. H. Nicolaides
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care

scholarly journals Confounders for Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission ın Neonates of Mothers with Preeclampsia

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Cetin Kilicci ◽  
Cigdem Yayla Abide ◽  
Enis Ozkaya ◽  
Evrim Bostancı Ergen ◽  
İlter Yenidede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Admission ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Preterm Neonates ◽  
Apgar Scores ◽  
Gestational Age At Delivery

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of some maternal and neonatal clinical parameters on the neonatal intensive care unit admission rates of neonates born to mothers who had preeclampsia. </p><p><strong>Study Design:</strong> Study included 402 singleton pregnant women with preeclampsia who admitted to Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit of Zeynep Kamil Children and Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital. Pregnancies with uterine rupture, chorioamnionitis and congenital malformations were excluded. Some maternal and neonatal clinical characteristics were assessed to predict neonatal intensive care unit admission.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Among 402 neonates, 140 (35%) of them had an indication for neonatal intensive care unit admission, among 140 neonates, 136 (97%) of them were preterm neonates. Comparison of groups with and without neonatal intensive care unit admission indicated significant differences between groups in terms of gestational age, Apgar scores at 1st and 5th minutes, birth weight, some maternal laboratory parameters (Hemoglobin, hematocrit, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin). In multivariate analysis, among all study population, gestational age at delivery, birth weight and Apgar scores were found to be significantly associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission. On the other hand, in subgroup of term neonates, none of the variables was shown to be associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Gestational age at delivery and the birth weight are the main risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit admission of neonates born to mothers who had preeclampsia.</p>

scholarly journals Perception of Stress and Styles of Coping with It in Parents Giving Kangaroo Mother Care to Their Children during Hospitalization in NICU

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (23) ◽  
pp. 12694
Author(s):  
Barbara Zych ◽  
Witold Błaż ◽  
Ewa Dmoch-Gajzlerska ◽  
Katarzyna Kanadys ◽  
Anna Lewandowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Parental Stress ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Premature Baby ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Skin Contact ◽  
Task Oriented

The experience of hospitalization of a newborn in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) may become distressing both for the baby and parent. The study aimed to assess the degree of parental stress and coping strategies in parents giving KMC to their babies hospitalized in NICU compared to the control group parents not giving KMC. The prospective observational study enrolled a cohort of 337 parents of premature babies hospitalized in NICU in 2016 in Eastern Poland. The Parental Stressor Scale: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations were used. The level of stress in parents giving KMC was defined as low or moderate. Analysis confirmed its greater presence in the group of parents initiating KMC late (2–3 weeks) compared to those starting this initiative in week 1 of a child’s life. An additional predictor of a higher level of stress in parents initiating KMC “late” was the hospital environment of a premature baby. Task oriented coping was the most common coping strategy in the study group. KMC and direct skin-to-skin contact of the parent with the baby was associated with a higher level of parental stress only initially and decreased with time and KMC frequency.

Labor and Delivery Outcomes with the Sequential Use of Misoprostol Followed by Cervical Foley Catheter

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maeve K. Hopkins ◽  
Rebecca F. Hamm ◽  
Sindhu K. Srinivas ◽  
Lisa D. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Nicu Admission ◽  
Time To Delivery

Objective Studies demonstrate shorter time to delivery with concurrent use of misoprostol and cervical Foley catheter. However, concurrent placement may not be feasible. If misoprostol is used to start an induction, little is known regarding the benefit of sequentially using Foley catheter. We examine obstetrical outcomes in women with Foley catheter placed after misoprostol compared with those only requiring misoprostol. Study design Retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies, intact membranes, and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of ≤6 and dilation ≤2 cm) undergoing term induction May 2013 to June 2015. We compared obstetrical outcomes between women receiving misoprostol alone versus those that had a Foley catheter placed after misoprostol. Outcomes are mode of delivery, time to delivery, chorioamnionitis, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and maternal morbidity. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables, Mann–Whitney U-tests compared continuous variables. Results Among 364 women, 281 began induction with misoprostol alone. A total of 135 (48%) subsequently had a Foley catheter placed. Characteristics were similar between the groups, although nulliparity and cervical dilation <1 cm at start of induction were more likely to have subsequent Foley catheter. Women with Foley catheter placement after misoprostol had a longer median time to delivery (15 vs. 11 hours, p < 0.001), twofold higher rate of cesarean (42 vs. 26%, odds ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.26–3.44, p = 0.004), and increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (21 vs. 11%, p = 0.024). There was a nonsignificant increased risk of chorioamnionitis (12 vs. 7%, p = 0.1) and maternal morbidity (15 vs. 8%, p = 0.08) in the misoprostol followed by Foley catheter group. Conclusion In women receiving misoprostol for induction, nulliparas and those with dilation <1 cm are more likely to have subsequent Foley catheter placement. Sequential use of cervical Foley catheter after misoprostol is associated with longer labor, higher cesarean rate, and increased NICU admission. Requirement of Foley catheter after misoprostol confers higher risk and may guide counseling. Key Points

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document