scholarly journals Induction of labour after 37 weeks of pregnancy using foley’s catheter: traction versus non-traction method

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Jaydeep J. Bhatu ◽  
Disha Patel
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Unfavourable Cervix ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Traction Group

Background: Cervical Foley’s catheter used now a days for induction of labour alone as well as a combined with cerviprim gel. The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of 750 cc traction on Foley catheter with no traction for labour induction in >37 weeks pregnancy.Methods: A randomized controlled trial performed on pregnant women at >37 weeks who were admitted for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix. They were randomly assigned into two groups, Foley’s with 750 cc traction and without traction. The primary outcomes were improvement in Bishop Score, number of favourable cervix following induction and the mode of delivery. The secondary outcomes were neonatal outcome, and maternal infection.Results: A total of 80 pregnant women were randomized into traction group (n=46) and non-traction group (n=34). Traction group had significantly (p=0.0462) higher number of vaginal delivery compared to non-traction group. Participants were comfortable using both methods. There was no difference in neonatal outcomes and risk of maternal infections in both groups.Conclusions: Application of traction did result in more vaginal delivery.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN FOLEY CATHETER AND DINOPROSTONE GEL FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND INDUCTION OF LABOUR IN PATIENTS AT TERM WITH UNFAVOURABLE CERVIX (BISHOP'S SCORE<4)

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Shrikant Warade ◽  
Anshul Pahwa ◽  
Savita Dhongade
Keyword(s):  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Vaginal Deliveries ◽  
Unfavourable Cervix ◽  
Group B ◽  
Singleton Pregnancies

BACKGROUND- Since ancient times, labour inducton is a well established obstetric concept. In the past few decades, rate of labour induction has increased dramatically. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efcacy of transcervical foley catheter with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening and labour induction in term singleton pregnancies with unfavourable cervix. METHODS- Term singleton pregnancies fullling inclusion criteria were randomized by chit box system to receive intracervical dinoprostone or transcervical foley catheter. Progress of labour was monitored with the help of partogram. Labour augmentation was done by oxytocin. RESULTS- 110 patients in each group were enrolled. Group A was induced with transcervical Foley catheter and group B with dinoprostone gel. Baseline characteristics like maternal age, parity, gestational age were comparable in each group. There was a signicant difference in the Bishop's score (<.0.05) at the end of 12 hours, Group B showing a greater improvement than A. A signicant difference was also observed in the requirement of augmentation with Pitocin, 77.27% in foley group and 63.63% in dinoprostone group . Although, there was no signicant difference observed in the mode of delivery (p>0.05) and induction to delivery time interval (p>0.05) , maternal and neonatal morbidity between the groups. CONCLUSION- To conclude, Dinoprostone is associated with rapid cervical ripening . Although, mean induction to delivery interval and number of vaginal deliveries were comparable between the groups. Moreover, cost and safety prole of foley catheter makes it comparable or even superior to dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening and induction of labour, especially in developing countries.

scholarly journals A comparative study of intra-cervical foley’s catheter and PGE2 gel for induction of labour at term

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3689
Author(s):  
Anjali R. Kanada ◽  
Mahima Jain
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Mechanical Methods ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Foley’S Catheter

Background: In cervical ripening, before induction of labour, is needed to increase the success of labour induction, to reduce complications and to diminish the rate of caesarean section and duration of labour. Pharmacological preparations are in widespread use for cervical ripening but are not free from side-effects and complications. Mechanical methods, i.e. the use of Foley’s catheter balloon, though effective have not gained much popularity because of the fear of infection. Therefore, the study has been conducted to prove the efficacy and safety of extra amniotic Foley catheter balloon and to compare it with intra-cervical prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel. The objective of the study was to the success of induction of labor depends on the cervical status at the time of induction. For effective cervical ripening both Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel are used. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intra cervical Foley's catheter and intra cervical PGE2 gel in cervical ripening for the successful induction of labor.Methods: A randomized, comparative study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology, Civil hospital, B.J. Medical College Ahmedabad, during a period of 8 month from September 2018 to April 2019. 100 patients at term with a Bishop's score ≤5 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to group F (intra-cervical Foley’s catheter) and group P (PGE2 gel) with 50 women included in each group.Results: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestation age, indication of induction and initial Bishop's score. Both the groups showed significant change in the Bishop's score, 5.10±1.55 and 5.14±1.60 for Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel, respectively, p <0.001. However there was no significant difference between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the side effects and caesarean section rate in both groups. The induction to delivery interval was 16.01±5.50 hours in group F and 16.85 ± 3.81 hours in group P (p=0.073). Apgar scores, birth weights and NICU admissions showed no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusions: The study shows that both Foley's catheter and PGE2 gel are equally effective in pre induction cervical ripening.

scholarly journals Sequential Foley Catheter and Misoprostol Versus Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor in Postdated Pregnancy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Baburam Dixit Thapa ◽  
Tara Manandhar ◽  
Sarita Sitaula ◽  
Tulasa Basnet
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Induction Of Labor ◽  
Normal Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Pharmacological Agents ◽  
Sequential Group ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Time To Delivery

Introduction: Induction of labor is done with the aim of normal vaginal delivery. There are different methods; mechanical like intra-cervical Foley’s or pharmacological agents like misoprostol ordinoprostone. Objectives: To compare sequential use of Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol in comparison with vaginal misoprostol only. Methods: Patients with period of gestation more than or equal to 41 weeks without any complications were assigned randomly according to computer generated randomization into sequential use ofintracervical Foley followed by vaginal misoprostol after 24 hours (sequential group) or vaginalmisoprostol only. Primary outcome was rate of normal vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes were induction to delivery interval, maternal and fetal morbidity. Results: Rate of normal vaginal delivery in sequential group (n= 353) and misoprostol alone group(n= 356) was 71.6% and 53.3% (p < 0.001) but the time to delivery from induction is statistically more in sequential group (30.3 vs. 11.2 hours, p< 0.001). Maternal outcomes like postpartum hemorrhage, hyper-stimulation syndrome, chorioamnitis and neonatal outcomes like low Apgar score, meconium stained baby and stillbirth are similar in both the groups. Conclusions: The priming of cervix using intracervical Foley catheter before giving vaginalmisoprostol was beneficial in increasing the rate of normal vaginal delivery but it increased the induction to delivery interval.

scholarly journals Evaluation of pre induction scoring by clinical examination vs transvaginal sonography

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Sonali Kaur Sharma ◽  
Madhu Nagpal ◽  
CL Thukral
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Cervical Length ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Transvaginal Sonography ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Unfavourable Cervix ◽  
Successful Induction ◽  
Singleton Pregnancies

Background: The aim of the study was to find out pre-induction cervical length by TV Sonography, determine Bishops score and to co-relate the obstetric outcome with these two variables.Methods: A study was done on 100 women with singleton pregnancies at 37-42 weeks of gestation, admitted for induction of labour in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at SGRDIMSR, Vallah, Amritsar, Punjab, India. All women underwent cervical assessment by both transvaginal ultrasound and Bishop Score and the outcome of labour induction was determined.Results: Of the 100 women, 53 women had vaginal delivery and 47 landed into LSCS. Bishop score < 6 and cervical length > 3 cm are cut off values of cervical unfavourablity. Successful induction was achieved among 87.5% and 78% women with favorable cervix according to Bishop Score and Cervical length respectively .Among the 92 and 50 women with unfavourable cervix according to Bishop score and cervical length, 48 (52.17%) and 14 (28%) had vaginal delivery respectively.Conclusions: Hence, cervical length by transvaginal ultrasound is a better predictor for the success of induction of labour as compared with assessment by Bishop Score alone.

scholarly journals A comparative study of intracervical foley’s catheter with oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 3660
Author(s):  
Priyanka . ◽  
Shashi Bala Arya ◽  
Mirdu Sinha ◽  
J. K. Goel
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Misoprostol Group ◽  
Successful Induction ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Group B

Background: Induction of labour implies stimulation of uterine contraction before spontaneous onset of labour with or without ruptured membranes. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intracervical Foley’s catheter with oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term.Methods: A total 100 term pregnant women were chosen with bishop score <6 and divided into two groups: Foley’s catheter with oxytocin (Group A) and vaginal misoprostol (Group B). In Group A, a 16 F Foley’s catheter introduced beyond internal os and traction applied every 4 hourly to check for expulsion with simultaneous oxytocin infusion (2 mU/min up to 32 mU/min). In Group B, 25 mcg misoprostol administered every 4 hourly (maximum 6 doses or 150 mcg). Data analysed using SPSS software 20.0. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: No statistical difference found between demographic variables between two groups. Both primigravida and multigravida had poor pre-induction bishop score in both groups. Foley’s catheter (80%) and misoprostol group (96%) had successful induction and was statistically significant (p<0.05). Foley’s catheter took more time from induction-delivery both in primigravida and post-dated pregnant women. The rate of cesarean in Foley’s catheter group was high (62.5%) including 33% cases with failed induction. Foley’s catheter had less maternal and neonatal complications, less NICU admission as compared to misoprostol (p>0.05).Conclusions: Misoprostol was found better for successful induction, decreases induction-to-delivery interval and increases vaginal delivery as compared to Foley’s catheter but it needs constant supervision in view of hyperstimulation and tachysystole.

scholarly journals Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rawan A. Obeidat ◽  
Mahmoud Almaaitah ◽  
Abeer Ben-Sadon ◽  
Dina Istaiti ◽  
Hasan Rawashdeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Bishop Score ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Multiparous Women ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Induction of labour (IOL) is an important and common clinical procedure in obstetrics. In the current study, we evaluate predictors of vaginal delivery in both nulliparous and multiparous women in north Jordan who were induced with vaginal prostaglandins. Method A prospective study was conducted on 530 pregnant women at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) in north Jordan. All pregnant mothers with singleton live fetuses, who had induction of labour (IOL) between July 2017 and June 2019, were included in the study. Mode of delivery, whether vaginal or caesarean, was the primary outcome. Several maternal and fetal variables were investigated. The safety and benefit of repeated dosage of vaginal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) tablets, neonatal outcomes and factors that affect duration of labour were also evaluated. Pearson χ2 test was used to investigate the significance of association between categorical variables, while student’s t-test and ANOVA were applied to examine the mean differences between categorical and numerical variables. Linear regression analysis was utilized to study the relation between two continuous variables. A multivariate regression analysis was then performed. Significance level was considered at alpha less than 0.05. Results Nulliparous women (N = 254) had significantly higher cesarean delivery rate (58.7% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.001) and longer duration of labour (16.1 ± 0.74 h vs. 11.0 ± 0.43 h, p < 0.001) than multiparous women (N = 276). In nulliparous women, the rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in women with higher Bishop score; the mean Bishop score was 3.47 ± 0.12 in nulliparous women who had vaginal delivery vs. 3.06 ± 0.10 in women who had cesarean delivery (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.03–1.28, p = 0.03). In multiparous women, the rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in women with higher Bishop scores and lower in women with higher body mass index (BMI). The mean Bishop score was 3.97 ± 0.07 in multiparous women who had vaginal delivery vs. 3.56 ± 0.16 in women who had cesarean delivery (AOR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1–2.1, p = 0.01). The mean BMI was 30.24 ± 0.28 kg/m2 in multiparous women who had vaginal delivery vs. 32.36 ± 0.73 kg/m2 in women who had cesarean delivery (AOR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84–0.96, p = 0.005). 27% of nulliparous women who received more than two PGE2 tablets and 50% of multiparous women who received more than two PGE2 tablets had vaginal delivery with no significant increase in neonatal morbidity. Conclusion Parity and cervical status are the main predictors of successful labour induction. Further studies are required to investigate the benefit of the use of additional doses of vaginal PGE2 above the recommended dose for IOL.

scholarly journals Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour

1970 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Sultana ◽  
S Rouf ◽  
M Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Cervical Ripening ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Nulliparous Women ◽  
Unfavourable Cervix ◽  
Oral Group ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol

It is sometimes difficult to select the most effective, easy to use, safest, widely accepted and less expensive method for induction of labour and thereby spontaneous vaginal delivery. Prostaglandin E1 analogue ie misoprostol as a successful method both in oral and vaginal form has been used for induction of labour. The present study was conducted with an aim to compare the efficacy and safety of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol tablets for cervical ripening and induction of labour in pregnant women using similar dosing regimen in two groups of pregnant women. A prospective randomized trial was done on one hundred pregnant women for the purpose. They were between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation with singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation and unfavourable cervix (modified Bishops score of 4 or less) in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Dhaka Medical college Hospital during the period between February 2003 and March 2004. The mode of delivery did not vary significantly between the two groups. Mean induction delivery interval, mean doses of misoprostol, number of women delivered within 24 hours, oxytocin requirement and mean time to delivery were nearly similar in the two groups. Only nulliparous women in oral group took longer time to deliver than vaginal group though it was not statistically significant. The mode of delivery also did not differ significantly. The proportion of emergency caesarean section was high in vaginal group than oral group. Neonatal outcome was satisfactory and the results were comparable. (J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2006; 24: 44-49)

scholarly journals Effect of Antenatal Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise on Mode of Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 187-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fayiz F. El-Shamy ◽  
Eman Abd El Fatah
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Pelvic Floor ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Pelvic Floor Muscle ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Squeeze Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pfm Strength

Background: Vaginal delivery is the best end of the pregnancy for the mother and the newborn. Aim: To evaluate the impacts of short-term antenatal pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercises on a woman’s mode of delivery. Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial that recruited 20 healthy pregnant women aged between 20 and 25 years and able to contract the PFMs. The participants were included in the study at 20 weeks of gestation (WG) and were randomly allocated to one of two groups: the intervention group (n = 10) or the control group (n = 10). PFM strength was measured by vaginal squeeze pressure at 20 and 36 WG, and delivery outcomes were evaluated by a blinded searcher from the birth registry after labor. Results: There were no statistically significant changes between both groups at baseline regarding gestational age, type of labor, previous pregnancy complications, and PFM strength (p > 0.05). There was a significant change between both groups in mean PFM strength at 36 WG (p < 0.05). A significant correlation was observed between PFM strength at 36 WG and mode of delivery (vaginal delivery: r = 0.58, p < 0.05; caesarean delivery: r = –0.49, p < 0.05). Conclusions: PFM exercise is recommended for healthy pregnant women as a safe and inexpensive strategy for increasing the vaginal delivery rate.

scholarly journals Use of Misoprostol in Term pregnant women for Good Delivery Outcome: Experience at a tertiary care Hospital in Dhaka

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-26
Author(s):  
Aftabun Nahar ◽  
Rifat Sultana ◽  
Fatema Mahbooba Akter ◽  
Munira Ferdausi ◽  
Md Abdullah Yusuf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Term Pregnancy ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
Delivery Outcome ◽  
Unfavourable Cervix ◽  
Study Population

Background: Use of misoprostol in term pregnancy is very useful for the better outcome during delivery. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to see the delivery outcome among the term pregnant women. Methodology: This cohort study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Sir Salimullah Medical College and Mitford Hospital during the period from 1 st September 2005 to 28th February 2006. Primi or second gravida patients with the gestational age between 37 weeks to 42 weeks in singleton pregnancy with cephalic presentation and not in labour who came for delivery purposes during the study period at any age were selected as study population. After proper selection of the cases, induction of labour (IOL) was done by applying Tab Misoprostol 50mcg in the posterior vaginal fornix. Purpose of induction of labour was successful when vaginal delivery occurred without any untoward side effects and without any surgical interference. Result: Out of 60 pregnant women 21 (35%) patients had unfavourable Bishops' score with 3-5 and 39 (65%) patients had favorable Bishops' score with 6-10. 39 patients had favourable pre- induction cervical score, among them 79% had delivered vaginally and 21% had undergone LUCS. 21 patients had unfavourable cervix, among them 57% experienced vaginal delivery and 43% experienced LUCS. Out of all study population 60% of study population who were primigravide had vaginal delivery in 67% cases and caesarean section in 33% cases and among 40% 2nd gravida cases vaginal delivery was 79% and caesarean delivery was 21%. Conclusion: In conclusion the use of misoprostol during term pregnancy is significantly related with the normal delivery.Journal of Science Foundation 2014;12(2):22-26DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jsf.v12i2.27733

scholarly journals Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasreen Noor ◽  
Mehkat Ansari ◽  
S. Manazir Ali ◽  
Shazia Parveen
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Labour Induction ◽  
Sterile Saline ◽  
Group I ◽  
Catheter Group ◽  
Uterine Hyperstimulation ◽  
Spss Software ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Foley’S Catheter

Objectives. To compare the efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol with transcervical Foley catheter for labour induction.Material and Methods. One hundred and four women with term gestation, with Bishop score < 4, and with various indications for labour induction were randomly divided into two groups. In Group I, 25 μg of misoprostol tablet was placed intravaginally, 4 hourly up to maximum 6 doses. In Group II, Foley catheter 16F was placed through the internal os of the cervix under aseptic condition and then inflated with 50 cc of sterile saline. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software.Results. The induction to delivery interval was 14.03 ± 7.61 hours versus 18.40 ± 8.02 hours (p<0.01). The rate of vaginal delivery was 76.7% versus 56.8% in misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter group, respectively. Uterine hyperstimulation was more common with misoprostol. Neonatal outcome was similar in both the groups.Conclusion. Intravaginal misoprostol is associated with a shorter induction to delivery interval as compared to Foley’s catheter and it increases the rate of vaginal delivery in cases of unripe cervix at term. Transcervical Foley catheter is associated with a lower incidence of uterine hyperstimulation during labour.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document