scholarly journals Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1921
Author(s):  
I. G. N. Wien Aryana ◽  
Rizki Zainuraditya
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Coracoid Process ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (ABR) provides acceptable results for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. However, recent studies have shown recurrent rates of 4-19% or even up to 35-40% in patients aged <25 years, and the results tend to get worse after long-term follow-up. The Latarjet procedure can improve anterior stability by multiple mechanisms, not only can the Bankart lesion be repaired and provide stability, but the transfer of the coracoid process extends the bony articular arc of the glenoid, and the addition of the conjoint tendon may provide dynamic stability as well. The Latarjet procedure for correcting recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation led to good and excellent results in 82.7% of the cases. The Latarjet procedure had the lowest re-dislocation rate, which was significantly lower than the arthroscopic Bankart repair. Latarjet procedure is effective in terms of restoring anteroinferior glenohumeral stability and good option for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair. Recurrence rates of instability are acceptable and re-operation rates were low.

Long-term Follow-up of Acute Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Initial Anterior Shoulder Dislocations in Young Athletes

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett D. Owens ◽  
Thomas M. DeBerardino ◽  
Bradley J. Nelson ◽  
John Thurman ◽  
Kenneth L. Cameron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Young Athletes ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Immobilization for First Episode of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Before the Age of 25: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199638
Author(s):  
Cécile Pougès ◽  
Alexandre Hardy ◽  
Thomas Vervoort ◽  
Thomas Amouyel ◽  
Pauline Duriez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Nonoperative Group

Background: The risk of recurrence after the first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation is high with nonoperative treatment in younger patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and nonoperative treatment for shoulder dislocation in patients younger than 25 years, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The hypothesis was that surgery would decrease the risk of recurrence. Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: We included patients aged between 18 and 25 years after a first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation and divided them into 2 groups. The first group was treated surgically with an arthroscopic Bankart repair within 2 weeks after the dislocation; the second group was treated nonoperatively. Both groups were immobilized for 3 weeks in internal rotation and followed the same physical therapy protocol. Standard radiography and computed tomography were performed immediately after reduction of the dislocation, and follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was instability recurrence, defined as another anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction by another person (the patient was unable to reduce the dislocated joint themselves), a subluxation, or a positive apprehension test. Secondary outcome measures included range of motion, return to sport, and functional scores such as the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score the Walch-Duplay score, and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Results: A total of 20 patients were included in each group. The mean ± SD age was 21 ± 1.8 years, and there were 33 men (82.5%) and 7 women (17.5%) in the total sample. Recurrence of instability was significantly decreased in the surgical treatment group compared with the nonoperative group (2 [10%] vs 14 [70%], respectively; P = .0001). Fewer patients in the surgical treatment group versus the nonoperative group had another episode of dislocation (0 vs 6 [30%], respectively), subluxation (2 [10%] vs 13 [65%], respectively; P = .003), or a positive apprehension test (1 [5%] vs 11 [58%], respectively; P = .0005). The Walch-Duplay score (88.4 vs 70.3 points; P = .046) and WOSI (11.5 vs 17.7 points; P = .035) were significantly better in the surgical group versus the nonoperative group after a 2-year follow-up. Level of sport was the same or better in 89% of the surgical treatment group vs 53% of the nonoperative treatment group ( P = .012). No surgical complication was recorded. We did not find any significant difference in range of motion. Conclusion: In patients with first-time shoulder dislocations, arthroscopic labral repair (Bankart procedure) reduced the risk of secondary shoulder dislocation and improved functional outcome versus nonoperative treatment after a 2-year follow-up. Surgical treatment after a first episode of shoulder dislocation could be offered as a primary treatment option in a younger population if these results are confirmed by larger studies with a longer follow-up. Registration: NCT03315819 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for First-Time Dislocators in Athletes

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596712110238
Author(s):  
Eoghan T. Hurley ◽  
Martin S. Davey ◽  
Connor Montgomery ◽  
Ross O’Doherty ◽  
Mohamed Gaafar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
First Time

Background: In athletes with a first-time shoulder dislocation, arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) and the open Latarjet procedure (OL) are the most commonly utilized surgical procedures to restore stability and allow them to return to play (RTP). Purpose: To compare the outcomes of ABR and OL in athletes with a first-time shoulder dislocation. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with first-time shoulder dislocation who underwent primary ABR and OL and had a minimum 24-month follow-up. Indications for OL over ABR in this population were those considered at high risk for recurrence, including patients with glenohumeral bone loss. Patients who underwent ABR were pair-matched in a 2:1 ratio with patients who underwent OL by age, sex, sport, and level of preoperative play. The rate, level, and timing of RTP, as well as the Shoulder Instability–Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) score were evaluated. Additionally, we compared recurrence, visual analog scale pain score, Subjective Shoulder Value, Rowe score, satisfaction, and whether patients would undergo the surgery again. Results: Overall, 80 athletes who underwent ABR and 40 who underwent OL were included, with a mean follow-up of 50.3 months. There was no significant difference between ABR and OL in rate of RTP, return to preinjury level, time to return, or recurrent dislocation rate. There were also no differences between ABR and OL in patient-reported outcome scores or patient satisfaction. When collision athletes were compared between ABR and OL, there were no differences in RTP, SIRSI score, or redislocation rate. Conclusion: ABR and OL resulted in excellent clinical outcomes, with high rates of RTP and low recurrence rates. Additionally, there were no differences between the procedures in athletes participating in collision sports.

Radiological Long-Term Follow-up After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: Results on Prevalence and Risk Factors of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis at a Minimum of 10 Years Follow Up

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. e43-e44
Author(s):  
Johannes E. Plath ◽  
Mohamed Aboalata ◽  
Julia Juretzko ◽  
Simone Waldt ◽  
Stephan Vogt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Arthrosis of glenohumeral joint after arthroscopic Bankart repair: a long-term follow-up of 13 years

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauri Kavaja ◽  
Jarkko Pajarinen ◽  
Ilkka Sinisaari ◽  
Vesa Savolainen ◽  
Jan-Magnus Björkenheim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glenohumeral Joint ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Dislocation arthropathy and drill hole appearance in a mid- to long-term follow-up study after arthroscopic Bankart repair

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 2156-2162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ostberg Elmlund ◽  
Lars Ejerhed ◽  
Ninni Sernert ◽  
Lars Christensen Rostgård ◽  
Jüri Kartus
Keyword(s):  
Drill Hole ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Dislocation Arthropathy ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

scholarly journals Ten-year follow-up of acute arthroscopic Bankart repair for initial anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (8) ◽  
pp. 889-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Chapus ◽  
G. Rochcongar ◽  
V. Pineau ◽  
É. Salle de Chou ◽  
C. Hulet
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

scholarly journals Long-term follow-up after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in 182 cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. E258-E262
Author(s):  
Christian Suchy ◽  
Moritz Berger ◽  
Ingo Steinbrück ◽  
Tsuneo Oyama ◽  
Naohisa Yahagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Background and study aims We previously reported a case series of our first 182 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESDs). In the initial series, 155 ESDs had been technically feasible, with 137 en bloc resections and 97 en bloc resections with free margins (R0). Here, we present long-term follow-up data, with particular emphasis on cases where either en bloc resection was not achieved or en bloc resection resulted in positive margins (R1). Patients and methods Between September 2012 and October 2015, we performed 182 consecutive ESD procedures in 178 patients (median size 41.0 ± 17.4 mm; localization rectum vs. proximal rectum 63 vs. 119). Data on follow-up were obtained from our endoscopy database and from referring physicians. Results Of the initial cohort, 11 patients underwent surgery; follow-up data were available for 141 of the remaining 171 cases (82,5 %) with a median follow-up of 2.43 years (range 0.15–6.53). Recurrent adenoma was observed in 8 patients (n = 2 after margin positive en bloc ESD; n = 6 after fragmented resection). Recurrence rates were lower after en bloc resection, irrespective of involved margins (1.8 vs. 18,2 %; P < 0.01). All recurrences were low-grade adenomas and could be managed endoscopically. Conclusions The rate of recurrence is low after en bloc ESD, in particular if a one-piece resection can be achieved. Recurrence after fragmented resection is comparable to published data on piecemeal mucosal resection.

scholarly journals Balloon-expandable stents for treatment of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis: Clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 666-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Hyun Baik ◽  
Hyo Sung Kwak ◽  
Gyung Ho Chung ◽  
Seung Bae Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Middle Cerebral Artery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cerebral Artery ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Ischemic Events

Background Insertion of a balloon-expandable stent (BES) in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis is a treatment option for reperfusion therapy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up after insertion of balloon-expandable stents in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis. Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for retrospective review of patient data. Thirty-four patients (15 men, 19 women; median age, 67.5 years) with symptomatic MCA stenosis underwent balloon-expandable stent insertion between June 2008 and December 2010. Patient records were reviewed for angiographic findings and clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up. Results Of these patients, 22 presented with acute ischemic stroke with underlying MCA atherosclerosis and had good clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score (mRS): 0–2) after reperfusion therapy. Indications for stenting for the remaining 12 patients were recurrent transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) refractory to medical therapy and MCA stenosis greater than 70%. During the poststenting follow-up period, which ranged from 61 to 108 months (median, 67.5 months), a TIA occurred in five patients. Of these five patients, one experienced a complete reocclusion of the MCA stent, and three had symptomatic restenosis. The remaining 29 patients did not experience any further ischemic events or restenosis during the follow-up period. Conclusions In our study, treatment with balloon-expandable stents in patients with symptomatic MCA stenosis resulted in low recurrence rates for both ischemic events and restenosis during long-term follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document