Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet procedure in high-demand patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation without significant bone loss

2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
MohamedH Sobhy ◽  
AhmedH Khater ◽  
Yehia Haroon ◽  
AmrM Abdelhady
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
High Demand ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

scholarly journals Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair: a case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1921
Author(s):  
I. G. N. Wien Aryana ◽  
Rizki Zainuraditya
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Coracoid Process ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (ABR) provides acceptable results for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. However, recent studies have shown recurrent rates of 4-19% or even up to 35-40% in patients aged <25 years, and the results tend to get worse after long-term follow-up. The Latarjet procedure can improve anterior stability by multiple mechanisms, not only can the Bankart lesion be repaired and provide stability, but the transfer of the coracoid process extends the bony articular arc of the glenoid, and the addition of the conjoint tendon may provide dynamic stability as well. The Latarjet procedure for correcting recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation led to good and excellent results in 82.7% of the cases. The Latarjet procedure had the lowest re-dislocation rate, which was significantly lower than the arthroscopic Bankart repair. Latarjet procedure is effective in terms of restoring anteroinferior glenohumeral stability and good option for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair. Recurrence rates of instability are acceptable and re-operation rates were low.

Recurrence and Revision Rates With Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Compared With the Latarjet Procedure in Competitive Rugby Players With Glenohumeral Instability and a Glenoid Bone Loss <20%

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 866-872
Author(s):  
Luciano A. Rossi ◽  
Ignacio Tanoira ◽  
Tomás Gorodischer ◽  
Ignacio Pasqualini ◽  
Maximiliano Ranalletta
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Rugby Players

Background: There is a lack of evidence in the literature comparing outcomes between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Purpose: To compare return to sport, functional outcomes, and complications between the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure in competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between June 2010 and February 2018, 130 competitive rugby players with anterior shoulder instability were operated on in our institution. The first 80 patients were operated on with the arthroscopic Bankart procedure and the other 50 with the open Latarjet procedure. Return to sport, range of motion (ROM), the Rowe score, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System (ASOSS) were used to assess functional outcomes. Recurrences, reoperations, and complications were also evaluated. Results: In the total population, the mean follow-up was 40 months (range, 24-90 months) and the mean age was 24.2 years (range, 16-33 years). Ninety-two percent of patients were able to return to rugby, 88% at their preinjury level of play. Eighty-nine percent of patients in the Bankart group and 87% in the Latarjet group returned to compete at the same level ( P = .788). No significant difference in shoulder ROM was found between preoperative and postoperative results. The Rowe and ASOSS scores showed statistical improvement after operation ( P < .01). No significant difference in functional scores was found between the groups The Rowe score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean (± SD) of 41 ± 13 points to 89.7 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 42.5 ± 14 points to 88.4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). The ASOSS score in the Bankart group increased from a preoperative mean of 53.3 ± 3 points to 93.3 ± 6 points postoperatively, and in the Latarjet group, from a preoperative mean of 53.1 ± 3 points to 93.7 ± 4 points postoperatively ( P = .95). There were 18 recurrences (14%). The rate of recurrence was 20% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .01). There were 15 reoperations (12%). The rate of reoperation was 16% in the Bankart group and 4% in the Latarjet group ( P = .03). There were 6 complications (5%). The rate of complications was 4% in the Bankart group and 6% in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). The proportion of postoperative osteoarthritis was 10% in the Bankart group (8/80 patients) and 12% (6/50 patients) in the Latarjet group ( P = .55). Conclusion: In competitive rugby players with glenohumeral instability and a glenoid bone loss <20%, both the arthroscopic Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure produced excellent functional outcomes, with most athletes returning to sport at the same level they had before the injury. However, the Bankart procedure was associated with a significantly higher rate of recurrence (20% vs 4%) and reoperation (16% vs 4%) than the Latarjet procedure.

LATARJET PROCEDURE FOR RECURRENT SHOULDER ANTERIOR INSTABILITY WITH LESS THAN 25% GLENOID BONE LOSS- ITS FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
pp. 62-65
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar KV ◽  
Arun Kumar C ◽  
Venkatachalam K ◽  
Gussain Rahul Vijay ◽  
Ashwin V Y ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Index Score ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Shoulder Score

Background: Latarjet procedure for a recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with more than 25% of bone loss is a standard treatment with good functional outcome. In glenoid bone loss < than25%, there is no concurrence in the surgery of choice between Bankart repair, Remplissage procedure and Latarjet procedure. This study is aimed to study the functional outcome following Latarjet procedure in recurrent shoulder instability in patients with < than 25% glenoid bone loss and also to assess the instability symptoms and complications following this procedure. Methods: It is a Clinical, Prospective and Observational study on thirty patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder, with less than 25% glenoid bone loss treated with Open Latarjet Procedure, at Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, done between Jan 2017 to Dec 2020, with a minimum follow-up of atleast 1year duration. Patients were post-operatively assessed functionally using Constant shoulder score, Rowe scoring system and the Walch- Duplay index score. Clinical instability was also assessed using the Anterior Apprehension and Anterior Drawer Test. Results: In our study with thirty patients, who underwent Latarjet procedure, Functional outcome of the patients were assessed using the Constant shoulder score, Rowe scoring system and the Walch- Duplay index score. The combined average percentage of Score of Scores of the three scoring systems were 74.46% had Excellent results, 14.42% had Good and 11.12% of patients had Average or Fair results. None of the patients had any instability symptoms post-operatively at the 1year post-op follow-up. Four patients had supercial Surgical Site Infections and 2 patients had developed mild to moderate shoulder stiffness. Conclusion: The Latarjet gives conrmationally Excellent to Good functional outcome and aid in the early return to activities of daily living and a fewer failure rate. In patients with Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocation, with even less than 25% Glenoid bone loss, it may be pertinent to primarily consider the osseous option of a coracoid transfer (Latarjet) rather than opt for simpler Open Bankart, Arthroscopic Bankart or an Arthroscopic Remplissage procedure alone. Thus, as a yardstick the bone loss concept, either on the Glenoidal or on the Humeral aspect, alone, need to be the deciding factor. The fact remains that in the athletic or otherwise Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Dislocators, there is also a concomitant humeral component, apart from the apparent and demonstrable Glenoid defect with the “Circle concept”.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Immobilization for First Episode of Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Before the Age of 25: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199638
Author(s):  
Cécile Pougès ◽  
Alexandre Hardy ◽  
Thomas Vervoort ◽  
Thomas Amouyel ◽  
Pauline Duriez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Nonoperative Group

Background: The risk of recurrence after the first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation is high with nonoperative treatment in younger patients. Purpose/Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and nonoperative treatment for shoulder dislocation in patients younger than 25 years, with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The hypothesis was that surgery would decrease the risk of recurrence. Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: We included patients aged between 18 and 25 years after a first episode of anterior shoulder dislocation and divided them into 2 groups. The first group was treated surgically with an arthroscopic Bankart repair within 2 weeks after the dislocation; the second group was treated nonoperatively. Both groups were immobilized for 3 weeks in internal rotation and followed the same physical therapy protocol. Standard radiography and computed tomography were performed immediately after reduction of the dislocation, and follow-up was performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome measure was instability recurrence, defined as another anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction by another person (the patient was unable to reduce the dislocated joint themselves), a subluxation, or a positive apprehension test. Secondary outcome measures included range of motion, return to sport, and functional scores such as the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score the Walch-Duplay score, and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Results: A total of 20 patients were included in each group. The mean ± SD age was 21 ± 1.8 years, and there were 33 men (82.5%) and 7 women (17.5%) in the total sample. Recurrence of instability was significantly decreased in the surgical treatment group compared with the nonoperative group (2 [10%] vs 14 [70%], respectively; P = .0001). Fewer patients in the surgical treatment group versus the nonoperative group had another episode of dislocation (0 vs 6 [30%], respectively), subluxation (2 [10%] vs 13 [65%], respectively; P = .003), or a positive apprehension test (1 [5%] vs 11 [58%], respectively; P = .0005). The Walch-Duplay score (88.4 vs 70.3 points; P = .046) and WOSI (11.5 vs 17.7 points; P = .035) were significantly better in the surgical group versus the nonoperative group after a 2-year follow-up. Level of sport was the same or better in 89% of the surgical treatment group vs 53% of the nonoperative treatment group ( P = .012). No surgical complication was recorded. We did not find any significant difference in range of motion. Conclusion: In patients with first-time shoulder dislocations, arthroscopic labral repair (Bankart procedure) reduced the risk of secondary shoulder dislocation and improved functional outcome versus nonoperative treatment after a 2-year follow-up. Surgical treatment after a first episode of shoulder dislocation could be offered as a primary treatment option in a younger population if these results are confirmed by larger studies with a longer follow-up. Registration: NCT03315819 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier)

scholarly journals Early outcomes of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure in a series of 37 patients with shoulder instability

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Zeng ◽  
Chuan Liu ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Yan Huang
Keyword(s):  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Glenoid Bone Loss ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Latarjet Procedure ◽  
Capsular Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Latarjet ◽  
Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure

Abstract Background Anterior shoulder dislocation remains a clinical challenge. This study aimed to assess the graft position and clinical outcomes of the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and capsular repair for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with significant glenoid bone loss in 37 patients. Methods Between 2017 and 2017, 37 patients underwent arthroscopic Latarjet plus capsular repair procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation combined with significant glenoid bone loss. In follow-up examinations, Walch-Duplay scores, subjective shoulder value (SSV) scores, Rowe scores, and active range of motion (AROM) were assessed. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate coracoid graft position and bone resorption. A new method of evaluating the position of the coracoid bone block after Latarjet (H-Z method) was developed. Results Thirty-seven patients were included in this study. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months postoperatively (with an average of 13 months). No recurrent dislocation occurred at the final follow-up, and there was no significant effect on the AROM (all p > 0.05). Rowe (from 42.2 ± 5.6 to 91.1 ± 3.3), Walch-Duplay (from 31.5 ± 8.0 to 92.6 ± 3.7), and SSV (from 63.9 ± 6.1 to 79.3% ± 5.0%) scores were improved significantly after surgery (all p < 0.001). CT showed that the 29 patients had varying degrees of bone resorption, and 23 recovered to the preinjury level of motional function within 6–12 months after surgery. Conclusions In active patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations and significant glenoid bone loss, the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure plus capsular repair could restore shoulder stability satisfactory.

scholarly journals Evaluation of arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent shoulder dislocation

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 675
Author(s):  
R. G. Asutosh Mohapatra ◽  
Jitendra Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Recurrent Dislocation ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
The Mean

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Our aim was to study the surgical and functional outcome and postoperative shoulder motion following, arthroscopic repair of the Bankart lesion of the shoulder with suture anchors.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a study of arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with suture anchors in 20 patients. Most of patients had symptoms for a period ranging from 1 to 2 years and 1- 4 recurrent dislocation episodes preoperatively. Necessary radiological and haematological investigations were done. The post-operative x-rays were evaluated and the post-operative rehabilitation evaluation done at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 1 year, for any recurrence of symptoms.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> In our study of 20 patients, with the mean follow up period of 12 months, the mean Rowe score post-operatively improved to 94 from a pre-operative mean score of 56.25. Out of 20 patients none had episodes of recurrent dislocation. In 15 patients 3 suture anchors were used and in 5 patients 2 suture anchors used intra operatively. The range of movement – external rotation in 90º of abduction improved in 17 patients (85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We concluded that arthroscopic Bankart repair in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with suture anchors is effective in providing better shoulder function with range of movement and lower rate of recurrence.</p>

Quantitative Assessment of Glenohumeral Translation after Anterior Shoulder Dislocation and Subsequent Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1756-1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Marquardt ◽  
Christof Hurschler ◽  
Johannes Schneppendahl ◽  
Kai-Axel Witt ◽  
Wolfgang Pötzl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Quantitative Assessment ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

The surgical outcome of immediate arthroscopic Bankart repair for first time anterior shoulder dislocation in young active patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billy Kan-Yip Law ◽  
Patrick Shu-Hang Yung ◽  
Eric Po-Yan Ho ◽  
Joseph Jeremy Hsi-Tse Chang ◽  
Kai-Ming Chan
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Dislocation ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
First Time ◽  
Active Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document