scholarly journals Comparative randomized controlled clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in midline laparotomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Bhavin P. Vadodariya ◽  
Nimish J. Shah ◽  
Mrudul Patel
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparotomy incisions have traditionally been made using a scalpel. Diathermy, a latest technique, is thought to increase the risk of infection, impair healing and decrease cosmesis. Recent studies suggest that diathermy may offer likely advantages with respect to blood loss, incision time and postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of surgical diathermy incisions versus conventional scalpel incisions for midline laparotomy in our hospital with an aim to evaluate diathermy as an operational alternative to scalpel incision.Methods: This was a prospective randomized clinical study which was conducted in the surgical wards of Medical College & SSG hospital, Vadodara, between December 2013 and December 2014.  Patients were randomly assigned to two groups i.e. Group A (scalpel group) and Group B (diathermy group).Results: A total of 148 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, 74 patients were randomized to Group A (scalpel group) and 74 patients to Group B (diathermy group). The two groups did not vary significantly in relation to age and sex (p>0.001). Laparotomy skin incisions using diathermy were significantly quicker than scalpel incisions (p=0.624). There was significantly less blood loss in the diathermy group compared with the scalpel group (P=0.15). The mean visual analogue scale was significantly reduced more in the diathermy group than in scalpel group patients on postoperative day 1 (p=0.81), day 3 (p=0.71) and day 5 (p=0.79) respectively. Postoperative complication rates did not differ significantly between the scalpel and diathermy groups (p=0.624).Conclusions: We concluded that diathermy incision in midline laparotomy has significant advantages compared with the scalpel because of reduced incision time, less blood loss, reduced early postoperative pain and postoperative wound infection.

scholarly journals ELECTIVE MIDLINE LAPAROTOMY

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 106-111
Author(s):  
ARSALAN SIRAJ ◽  
ATHAR ABBAS SHAH GILANI ◽  
MUHAMMAD FAROOQ DAR ◽  
Sohail Raziq
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
P Value ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Group A ◽  
Insignificant Difference ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare the diathermy incision with scalpel incision in patients undergoing midline elective laparotomy. Design of Study: A prospective, experimental comparative study. Place and Duration: Department of surgery, PNS Shifa Karachi, from March 2007 to June 2008. Patients and Methods: A total of 100 patients were included in the study, and equally divided into 2 groups. Group A received scalpel incision while in group B diathermy was employed to incise all layers. Peroperative parameters including, incision time and blood loss were calculated. Postoperatively, pain was assessed by visual analogue score and wound infection documented. Results: Both groups included fifty patients each out of the total 44 females and 56 were males, with similar gender preposition in both the groups. Mean age of patients in scalpel group was 48.78 (±14.47) while it was 44.92 (±15.87) in diathermy group. The mean incision related blood loss in Scalpel group was 1.53 (±0.20) ml/cm2 and in Diathermy group was 1.43 (±0.20) ml/cm2, showing significantly less bleeding in diathermy group (p-value= 0.014). Diathermy group, with incision related time of 6.20 sec/cm2 (±0.97 sec/cm2), was significantly quicker (p-value= 0.003) than scalpel incision, with incision time of 6.76 sec/cm2 (±0.84 sec/cm2). Postoperative pain scores, recorded daily over five days, showed insignificant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: Diathermy, employed for midline laparotomy, is quicker and hemostatic, compared to the scalpel. The two are, however, similar in terms of wound infection and postoperative pain.

Age related volume of cadaver-prostates in Bangladesh

1970 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
Rukshana Ahmed ◽  
Shamim Ara
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Gland ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Group A ◽  
Key Words Prostate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Pathological changes in the prostate gland occur commonly with advancing age including inflammation, atrophy, hyperplasia and carcinoma and a change in volume is also evident. Estimation of volume of prostate may be useful in a variety of clinical settings. A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed to see the changes in volume of the prostate with advancing age and done in the Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka from August 2006 to June 2007. The study was performed on 70 post-mortem human prostates collected from the unclaimed dead bodies that were under examination in the Department of Forensic Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. The samples were divided into three age groups; group A (10-20 years), group B (21-40 years) and group C (41-70 years). Volume of the sample was measured by using the ellipsoid formula. The mean ± SD volume of prostate was 7.68 ± 3.64 cm3 in group A, 10.61 ± 3.99 cm3 in group B and 15.40 ± 6.31 cm3 in group C. Mean difference in volume between group A and group C, group B and group C were statistically significant (p<0.001). Statistically significant positive correlation was found between age and volume of prostate (r = + 0.579, p < 0.001). Key Words: Prostate; volume; Bangladeshi. DOI: 10.3329/imcj.v4i2.6501Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2010; 4(2): 74-77

scholarly journals Monopolar Diathermy Tonsillectomy Versus Dissection Method Tonsillectomy

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Md Abdus Salam ◽  
Md Mahbub Alam ◽  
Rezwan Ahmed ◽  
Md Sultan Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Throat Pain ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Case Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dissection Method

Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide by otorhinolaryngologists for different indications. Tonsillectomy is often performed as day-case surgery, which increases the demands of a satisfactory postoperative pain control and a low risk of early postoperative bleeding. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the Monopolar diathermy and Dissection methods of tonsillectomy and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages during surgery, convalescence. Materials and Methods: Two hundred children were recruited for this study during the period of five years from January, 2014 to December, 2018 at Otolaryngology department of Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital (KYAMCH). Subjects between the age of 5 and 25 years listed for tonsillectomy were included. Subjects were recommended not to have aspirin within the 2 weeks before surgery. Results: The mean duration of operation was found 10.6±0.4 minutes in group A and 17.0±0.7 minutes in group B. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. At 1st day, 11(11.0%) patients had throat pain in group A and 23(23.0%) in group B. At 2nd day, 14(14.0%) patients had throat pain in group A and 25(25.0%) in group B. Which were statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. Conclusion: The monopolar diathermy tonsillectomy appears to cause less bleeding, postoperative pain and less time consuming in compare with the dissection tonsillectomy although patients experience slightly more pain than dissection Method. KYAMC Journal Vol. 10, No.-1, April 2019, Page 21-24

scholarly journals Fetal and maternal outcome following expectant management of severe pre-eclampsia remote from term

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 5420
Author(s):  
Deepak A. V. ◽  
Reena R. P. ◽  
Deepa Anirudhan
Keyword(s):  
Expectant Management ◽  
Severe Preeclampsia ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Antenatal Corticosteroids ◽  
Maternal Complications ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Difficult Decision ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Expectant management of severe preeclampsia, remote from term is often a difficult decision. Maternal and foetal complications may occur while trying to achieve a more favourable perinatal outcome. We wanted to find out the foetal and maternal outcomes of expectant management in these women.Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted at Government Medical College, Thrissur, India between May 2013 and April 2015. Women with severe preeclampsia remote from term, who were admitted, managed expectantly and delivered in our hospital during the study period, were recruited. The study subjects were grouped into: Group A (between 28 weeks and 31 weeks 6 days) and Group B (between 32 weeks and 33 weeks 6 days). A structured proforma was used to collect demographic and clinical details. The maternal and foetal outcomes were noted.Results: There were 4786 deliveries during the study period. Among them 76 (1.58% of total deliveries) women with severe preeclampsia between 28 weeks and 33-week 6 days gestation on expectant management were included in the study. The mean duration of expectant management was 7.92 days in group A (27 women) and 6.67 days in group B (49 women). Most women required termination of pregnancy for foetal distress (36.8%). HELLP syndrome and imminent eclampsia were the maternal complications that occurred. Perinatal loss was significantly more in Group A when compared to Group B.Conclusions: Expectant management of women with severe preeclampsia remote from term, especially between 32weeks and 33weeks 6 days, with antenatal corticosteroids and close monitoring, seems a reasonable option in developing countries.

scholarly journals Surgery for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis a multicentre, retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Zeng ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Jiulin Tan ◽  
Zhilin Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Thoracolumbar Junction ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Purpose A multicentre, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different surgical techniques for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis. Methods The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 257) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. A total of 45 patients were operated on by an anterior approach (Group A), 52 by a combined anterior and posterior approach (Group B) and 160 by a posterior approach (Group C). Anti-tuberculosis therapy was performed both before and after surgery. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological results of the three groups were compared. Results All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion, pain relief and neurological recovery. The mean loss of correction in group A at last follow-up was higher than in groups B and C (P < 0.05), and the difference between groups B and C was not significant (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss in group B were greater than in groups A and C. Conclusions For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only approach is superior to the anterior-only approach in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only approach is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as the anterior-only or combined approach but with shorter operation times, less trauma and less blood loss. Keywords Spinal tuberculosis; Thoracolumbar junction; Three approaches.

scholarly journals Comparison between scalpel incision and electrocautery incision in midline abdominal surgery: a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507
Author(s):  
Amit Yadav ◽  
Lakshman Agarwal ◽  
Sumit A. Jain ◽  
Sanjay Kumawat ◽  
Sandeep Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
P Value ◽  
Wound Area ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Fear of poor wound healing have curtailed the use of diathermy for making skin incision. Scalpel produces little damage to surrounding tissue but causing more blood loss. Our aim of study was to compare electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in terms of incision time, blood loss, postoperative pain and wound infection.Methods: Total of 104 patients were included in the study undergoing midline abdominal surgery. Patients were randomized into electrocautery (group A) and scalpel (group B). The incision dimension, incision time and blood loss were noted intraoperatively. Postoperative pain was noted on postoperative day 2 using visual analog scale. Wound complications were recorded on every postoperative day till the patient was discharged.Results: 52 patients in each of the two groups were analyzed. There was significant difference found between group A and group B in terms of mean incision time per unit wound area, 8.16±1.59 s\cm2 and 11.02±1.72 s\cm2 respectively (p value=0.0001). The mean blood loss per unit wound area was found to be significantly lower in group A (0.31±0.04 ml\cm2) as compared to group B (1.21±0.21), p value=0.0001. There was no significant difference noted in terms of postoperative pain and wound infection between both groups.Conclusions: Electrocautery can be considered safe in making skin incision in midline laparotomy compared to scalpel incision with comparable postoperative pain and wound infection with less intraoperative blood loss and less time consuming.

“A PROSPECTIVE STUDY: ROLE OF TRACTION ON FOLEY’S CATHETER IN TURP PATIENTS”

2021 ◽  
pp. 27-29
Author(s):  
Prashant Lavania ◽  
Ankush Gupta ◽  
Rahul Chaudhary
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Common Condition ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Group A ◽  
Foley’S Catheter ◽  
Group B ◽  
A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common condition affecting men those are 50 years of age and above.TURP is still the widely used technique for management of BPH. TURPwith advent of newer technologies in diathermy and visual scope, has turned into a relatively safe one. AIM:To study role of catheter traction on blood loss and complications in patients with TURP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was done among patients of BPH admitted in the Department of Surgery at S.N. Medical College, Agra during the period from January 2019 to February 2020. Total 60 cases were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups. Group A(30 patients) with traction on catheter after TURPand Group B(30 patients) without traction on catheter. DISCUSSION: Blood loss and irrigation uid was signicantly less in the group with traction on foley's catheter. Duration of hospital stay and complications were also lesser in group with traction. CONCLUSION: Traction on foley's catheter post TURP is effective in managing BPH with the merits of higher safety due to less blood loss and early discharge.

scholarly journals Postoperative analgesia after lumbar disc surgery: A comparison between ketorolac and opioid

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-61
Author(s):  
Md Mustafa Kamal ◽  
Abdullah Al Maruf ◽  
Sabina Yeasmeen ◽  
Abdul Hye
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Surgical Closure ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Post Operative Nausea

Background Most spinal surgery is painful and good postoperative analgesia is important. Opioids are the traditional first-line treatment. Ketorolac has been used for postoperative pain relief. However, there is no data available about controlling postoperative pain with ketorolac after open lumbar discectomy or laminectomy in Bangladesah. Objective To compare the efficacy of a Parentral ketorolac with conventional opioid for management of postoperative pain after lumbar disectomy or laminectomy. Methods Sixty patients who underwent lumbar disectomy or laminectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A (n = 30) patients received 30 mg intramuscular ketorolac upon surgical closure and every 6 hours for 24 hours and intramuscular pethidine 1.5 mg/kg/b.w. as needed (PRN). Group B (n = 30) patients received only intramuscular pethidine 1.5 mgkg-1/b.w. every 6 hours for 24 hours and as needed (PRN). Postoperative analgesia was assessed in both groups by Visual Analogue Scale at arrival in postoperative ward and at 6, 12 and 24 hours for 24 hours. Total postoperative narcotic consumption and side effects like post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), dizziness, urinary retention and pruritus were also recorded. Results Baseline data were comparable between the two groups. The mean VAS almost similar and less than 3 at different reading in both groups which indicate adequate postoperative analgesia and the differences were statistically not significant. The mean total cumulative amount of pethidine administered over 24 hrs period was less in group A it was 64.31+19.13 mg where as in group B was 161.23+21.25 mg. and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). Incidences of side effects like PONV, urinary retention and pruritus were more in group B than group A and differences were statistically significant (p<0.01). Conclusion For postoperative pain management after lumbar spine surgery both ketorolac and traditional parental opioid found effective. Total opioid consumption is significantly less with ketorolac and side effects like PONV, dizziness, urinary retention and pruritus were more with opioid alone. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v23i2.18175 Journal of BSA, 2009; 23(2): 56-61

scholarly journals Comparison of Preemptive Analgesic Effects of Intravenous Ketorolac and Oral Pregabalin in Patients Undergoing Mandibular Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-57
Author(s):  
Javad Yazdani ◽  
Saeed Nezafati ◽  
Ali Mortazavi ◽  
Farrokh Farhadi ◽  
Milad Ghanizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
Mandibular Fractures ◽  
Analgesic Effects ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intravenous Ketorolac

Background: Preemptive analgesia is one of the techniques to manage postoperative pain, which increases patient satisfaction and decreases the duration of hospitalization. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the pain relief achieved by preoperative intravenous ketorolac and oral pregabalin in patients undergoing surgery for mandibular fractures. Methods: In the present clinical trial, 60 patients with unilateral fractures of the mandible were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A, intravenous injections of ketorolac 30 mg and in group B, pregabalin 150 mg capsules were administrated one hour preoperatively. The severity of pain was determined using a visual analog scale (VAS) up to 24 hours postoperatively. Finally, the total doses of an opioid analgesic (pethidine) prescribed for each patient in mg during the first 24 hours and the time for the request of the first analgesic dose in minutes were recorded for each patient. Then, their means were compared between the two groups. Results: Maximum pain severity was experienced immediately after surgery, which decreased gradually during the 24-hour postoperative period (P < 0.0001). The mean severity of pain immediately after regaining consciousness and the mean pain score during the 24-hour postoperative period were lower in the pregabalin group than in the ketorolac group (P < 0.0001). In the ketorolac group, a slightly higher dose of the opioid was administered; however, the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The oral administration of pregabalin 150 mg one hour preoperatively was more effective than the intravenous administration of ketorolac 30 mg in relieving postoperative pain.

scholarly journals Conventional treatment versus vacuum therapy for diabetic foot ulcers treatment

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vigna Sai Potula
Keyword(s):  
Therapy Group ◽  
Vacuum Therapy ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trail ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: This study compares the efficacy of vacuum therapy against conventional iodine povidone dressing with respect to area and time of ulcer.Methods: This study is a randomized controlled trail which was conducted in Meenakshi Medical College hospital and research institute Enathur Kanchipuram. The number of patients selected were 50, which were divided into 2 groups, Group A which consisted of 25 and received vacuum therapy, Group B which consisted of 25 and received povidone-iodine solution.Results: This study was a 16 days study, mean area of ulcer on day 0 was 11.25 cm2 in group B, 10.89 cm2 in group A. On day 6, mean area of ulcer was 10.44 cm2 in group B, 8.98 cm2 in group A. Mean area of ulcer was 10.39 cm2 in group B, 7.66 cm2 in group A on the end of the day 16. The results show that both the groups showed decrease in the area of ulcers, but patients in group A who underwent vacuum therapy have shown greater decrease in the mean area of ulcer. The decrease in surface area of ulcer was statistically significant i.e. p=0.025. There was a greater decrease in infection in group A on 16th day compared to group A on 16th day. On day 0, 48% and 60% growth of microorganisms was observed in patients of group B and group A respectively (p=0.428). On day 16, 28% and 8% growth of microorganisms was observed in patients of group B and group A respectively (p=0.034).Conclusions: Vacuum therapy was more effective compared to conventional method of povidone-iodone solution dressing in rate of healing and time of healing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document