A Comparative Study on the Causal Relationships between Final Output(ō) and Final Output(ο) - Based on the Output-Output(OO) and Final Demand-Final Output(FF) Models -

From general advertising tasks and strategies three hypotheses about connectivity in advertisement texts were derived: 1. In advertisements the number of connectors will be comparatively high. 2. The number of subordinating connectors, however, will be low. 3. Connectors which semantically possess an argumentative or rhetoric quality will play a dominant role. These hypotheses were tested in a comparative study of written advertising language and other kinds of written texts. Hypothesis 1 and 2 were supported. In testing the third hypothesis it was found that the connectors of addition and of causation are more frequent in advertising than in other written language, but that adversatives are not. In a qualitative analysis the role of causal relationships was worked out. It was found that their functions fitted the tasks of advertising texts from which the hypotheses originated very well. At least five functions have been found: 1. Causal connectors often relate two different product qualities to each other. 2. They do this by putting these qualities in an argumentative structure of the following form: Product quality (P) conclusion> General positive quality (C) or: Ρ explanation 3. When the generalizing difference between (P) and (C) is not very strong, the structure becomes one of tautological repetition. In this way a product quality may be accentuated.

Download Full-text

A Study on the Final Demand-Final Output Model and the Economically Induced Effect

Korean Journal of Social Science ◽

10.18284/jss.2010.06.29.1.151 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 29 (1) ◽

pp. 151

Author(s):

Ho Un Gim

Keyword(s):

Final Demand ◽

Final Output

Download Full-text

A Study on the Characteristic Searching between Output-Output Balance and Final Demand-Final Output Balance Equations

Korean Journal of Social Science ◽

10.18284/jss.2021.04.40.1.151 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 40 (1) ◽

pp. 151-189

Author(s):

Ho Un Gim

Keyword(s):

Final Demand ◽

Balance Equations ◽

Final Output

Download Full-text

A Study on the Developing a New “Output Requirements Model” in Interindustry Analysis: Based on the Circulation System of Production between Final Demand, Total Output, and Final Output

The Korea Spatial Planning Review ◽

10.15793/kspr.2008.57..001 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 57 (null) ◽

pp. 3-18

Author(s):

Ho Un Gim

Keyword(s):

Final Demand ◽

Total Output ◽

Circulation System ◽

Final Output ◽

Interindustry Analysis

Download Full-text

Relações lógico-inferenciais no uso dos conectivos porque e já que: um estudo comparativo entre Ensino Fundamental e Ensino Superior

Ilha do Desterro A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies ◽

10.5007/2175-8026.2019v72n3p123 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 72 (3) ◽

pp. 123-138

Author(s):

Sabrina Lopes Dos Santos ◽

Daniela Garcia ◽

Marcus Maia

Keyword(s):

Elementary School ◽

Comparative Study ◽

Undergraduate Education ◽

Logical Reasoning ◽

Forced Choice ◽

Causal Relationships ◽

Causal Relations ◽

The Relationship ◽

The Way

This paper presents a comparative study between Elementary School and Undergraduate Education investigating the use of connectives já que and porque in sentences with inferential causal relations established through inductive and deductive logical reasoning. As the acquisition of some connectives is related to schooling and consequent exposure to the written modality, this work can contribute to raising questions about the relationship between the acquisition of this modality and its influence on the way we interpret logical-inferential relations. In this paper, we present a forced-choice judgment test in which participants should choose between the connectives já que and porque when they are exposed to sentences with direct and indirect causal relationships. Our hypothesis was that, in indirect cause relationships, individuals with more experience in reading would choose já que, but individuals with little experience should choose mainly porque in both cases.

Download Full-text