scholarly journals A Prospective Comparative Study Correlating the Efficacy of Biodegradable versus Metallic Interference Screw for Tibial Sided Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Unicentre Pilot Study in Jaipur, Rajasthan

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (18) ◽  
pp. 1258-1263
Author(s):  
Vishal Singh ◽  
Alokeshwar Sharma ◽  
Avinash Gundavarapu ◽  
Tejas Patel ◽  
Santosh Kumar M
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Interference Screws ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Screw Group

BACKGROUND Traditionally, metallic interference screws were considered to have increased resistance to load than bio absorbable screws in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We did a comparative evaluation of biodegradable and metallic interference screws for tibial sided ACL reconstruction and also analysed complications, compared clinical outcome, did imaging study of ACL single bundle reconstruction by using titanium & newer poly–L-lactic acid (PLLA) bio absorbable screws to determine as to whether bio absorbable screw which costs double the metallic screw, is functionally better than standard metallic screws. METHODS This is a prospective comparative study conducted among 50 patients aged between 15 and 55 years with clinical and MRI confirmation of complete ACL tear, treated arthroscopically with ACL reconstruction with either bio absorbable (group 1) or metallic (group 2) interference screw and both the groups were compared on follow up for an average duration of 12 months. Lysholm and Gillquist Knee Scoring Scale were used and outcome scores were divided into excellent, good, fair and poor. RESULTS In our study 41 patients were males and 9 were females. Bio screw was used in 24 males and 6 female patients. Metallic screw was used in 17 males and 3 females. Outcome score was excellent in 26 (52 %) cases, good in 18 (36 %) cases, fair in 4 (8 %) cases, poor in 2 (4 %) cases. The mean Lysholm score in bio absorbable group was 93.13 and in metallic group was 89.70. Knee effusion was higher in bio screw group and infection rate was higher in metallic group. CONCLUSIONS In our study, the difference between bio absorbable screw group and metallic screw group was insignificant with regard to final patient outcome. Final osseointegration was better with bio absorbable screw, but increased cost of implant and almost same results compared to metallic screw does not make the bio absorbable screw superior to its counterpart. KEYWORDS ACL, Bio Absorbable Interference Screws, Metallic Interference Screws

scholarly journals Whether Sutures Reduce the Graft Laceration Caused by Interference Screw in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction a Biomechanical Study in Vitro

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanjun Teng ◽  
Lijun Da ◽  
Xiaohui Zhang ◽  
Hong Wang ◽  
Hua Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Protective Effects ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Interference Screws ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Background: Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction However, previous studies h a d reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration . The purpose of this study was to determine whether sutures reduce d the graft laceration from the insertion of interference screws in ACL reconstruction. Methods: Porcine tibias and bovine extensor tendons were used for establishing a knee model of ACL reconstruction in vitro . The ends of grafts were sutured using three different sutures, including the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures Poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) interference screw s w ere used fortibial fixation Biomechanical tests were performed to investigate the protective effects of different sutures on grafts Results : All prepared tendons and bone specimens showed similar characteristics (length, weight, and pre tension of the tendons, tibial bone mineral density) among all groups ( P 0.05). The biomechanical test s demonstrated that PEEK interference screw s significantly caused the graft laceration P 0.05). However, all sutures (the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not reduce the graft laceration in ACL reconstruction P 0.05). Conclusions : PEEK interference screw s significantly weakened the biomechanical properties of grafts during tibial fixation in ACL reconstruction. Absorbable Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures did not provide protective effects on grafts during ACL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Whether sutures reduce the graft laceration caused by interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A biomechanical study in vitro

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanjun Teng ◽  
Xiaohui Zhang ◽  
Lijun Da ◽  
Jie Hu ◽  
Hong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Interference Screws ◽  
Suture Group ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Biomechanical Tests ◽  
Single Insertion

Abstract Background Interference screw is commonly used for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, previous studies had reported that the insertion of interference screws significantly caused graft laceration. The purposes of this study were to (1) quantitatively evaluate the graft laceration from one single insertion of PEEK interference screws; and (2) determine whether different types of sutures reduced the graft laceration after one single insertion of interference screws in ACL reconstruction. Methods The in-vitro ACL reconstruction model was created using porcine tibias and bovine extensor digitorum tendons of bovine hind limbs. The ends of grafts were sutured using three different sutures, including the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) sutures. Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) interference screws were used for tibial fixation. This study was divided into five groups (n = 10 in each group): the non-fixed group, the non-sutured group, the absorbable suture group, the Ethibond suture group and the UHMWPE suture group. Biomechanical tests were performed using the mode of pull-to-failure loading tests at 10 mm/min. Tensile stiffness (newtons per millimeter), energy absorbed to failure (in joules) and ultimate load (newtons) were recorded for analysis. Results All prepared tendons and bone specimens showed similar characteristics (length, weight, and pre-tension of the tendons, tibial bone mineral density) among all groups (P > 0.05). The biomechanical tests demonstrated that PEEK interference screws significantly caused the graft laceration (P < 0.05). However, all sutures (the bioabsorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not reduce the graft laceration in ACL reconstruction (P > 0.05). Conclusions Our biomechanical study suggested that the ultimate failure load of grafts was reduced of approximately 25 % after one single insertion of a PEEK interference screw in ACL reconstruction. Suturing the ends of the grafts using different sutures (absorbable, Ethibond and UHMWPE sutures) did not decrease the graft laceration caused by interference screws.

Miniplate Suture Button Augmentation for Soft Tissue Graft Tibial Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-285
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Tibial Fixation ◽  
Suture Button ◽  
Soft Tissue Graft ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Supplemental Fixation

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires reliable and rigid graft fixation. Tibial-sided fixation is frequently cited as the “weak point” of the femur-graft-tibia construct. Some authors have recommended supplemental fixation with a staple or screw suture to post improve the strength and stiffness of the fixation. However, with these fixations, there is a risk for symptomatic hardware. Miniplate is flatter than screw or staple and does not penetrate the bone when attached. It is used as a button for suspensory fixation to enhance interference screw tibial fixation. Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the miniplate suture button for supplemental soft tissue graft tibial fixation in ACL reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was carried out between August 2016 and December 2019. A total of 40 patients had undergone primary ACL reconstruction, performed with hamstring tendon grafts that were secured using a miniplate suture button for supplemental interference screw tibial fixation. A total of 18 patients were excluded, leaving 22 patients at 1-year follow-up. Results: At least 1-year follow-up, the remaining 22 patients had significant difference between preoperative and postoperative outcome of anterior drawer test, Lachman test and pivot shift test (p<0.05). Lysholm knee scores improved significantly from 54.0±12.53 to 90.04±5.38. However, 3 patients (13.6%) experienced symptomatic hardware pain and 3 patients (13.6%) tendered around the miniplate site. There were no radiographic changes in miniplate displacement, deformed or broken plate, and bony reaction around miniplate. Conclusion: The use of a miniplate suture button as a supplemental fixation showed adequate fixation strength and showed good results in postoperative manual ligament laxity test and functional scores at minimum 1-year follow-up. However, there is still symptomatic pain at the hardware site. Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Supplemental fixation, Suture button

The Contribution of Partial Meniscectomy to Preoperative Laxity and Laxity After Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: In Vivo Kinematics With Navigation

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (13) ◽  
pp. 3203-3211
Author(s):  
Alberto Grassi ◽  
Stefano Di Paolo ◽  
Gian Andrea Lucidi ◽  
Luca Macchiarola ◽  
Federico Raggi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Anatomic Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Medial Meniscectomy ◽  
Lateral Meniscectomy ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: Limited in vivo kinematic information exists on the effect of clinical-based partial medial and lateral meniscectomy in the context of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypothesis: In patients with ACL deficiency, partial medial meniscus removal increases the anteroposterior (AP) laxity with compared with those with intact menisci, while partial lateral meniscus removal increases dynamic laxity. In addition, greater postoperative laxity would be identified in patients with partial medial meniscectomy. Study design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 164 patients with ACL tears were included in the present study and divided into 4 groups according to the meniscus treatment they underwent: patients with partial lateral meniscectomy (LM group), patients with partial medial meniscectomy (MM group), patients with partial medial and lateral meniscectomy (MLM group), and patients with intact menisci who did not undergo any meniscus treatment (IM group). A further division in 2 new homogeneous groups was made based on the surgical technique: 46 had an isolated single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction (ACL group), while 13 underwent a combined single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction and partial medial meniscectomy (MM-ACL group). Standard clinical laxities (AP translation at 30° of knee flexion, AP translation at 90° of knee flexion) and pivot-shift (PS) tests were quantified before and after surgery by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment. The PS test was quantified through 3 different parameters: the anterior displacement of the lateral tibial compartment (lateral AP); the posterior acceleration of the lateral AP during tibial reduction (posterior acceleration); and finally, the area included by the lateral AP translation with respect to the flexion/extension angle (area). Results: In the ACL-deficient status, the MM group showed a significantly greater tibial translation compared with the IM group ( P < .0001 for AP displacement at 30° [AP30] and 90° [AP90] of flexion) and the LM group ( P = .002 for AP30 and P < .0001 for AP90). In the PS test, the area of LM group was significantly larger (57%; P = .0175) than the one of the IM group. After ACL reconstruction, AP translation at 30° was restored, while the AP90 remained significantly greater at 1.3 mm ( P = .0262) in the MM-ACL group compared with those with intact menisci. Conclusion: Before ACL reconstruction, partial medial meniscectomy increased AP laxity at 30° and 90° and lateral meniscectomy increased dynamic PS laxity with respect to intact menisci. Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction decreased laxities, but a residual anterior translation of 1.3 mm at 90° remained in patients with partial medial meniscectomy, with respect to those with intact menisci.

scholarly journals A comparative study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double, single, or selective bundle techniques

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949901877312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Yang Chia ◽  
Jade N Chee ◽  
Hamid Rahmatullah Bin-Abd-Razak ◽  
Denny TT Lie ◽  
Paul CC Chang
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Rotational Stability ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Stress Tests ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Purpose: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most frequently performed reconstructive surgery in the knee. Biomechanical studies have shown that double bundle (DB) reconstruction is better than single bundle (SB) reconstruction with regard to rotational stability. It is postulated that resection of ACL fibres that remain in continuity may be counterproductive for the knee as these fibres have the capacity to produce collagen. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy among selective bundle, DB and SB ACL reconstructions over a 2-year post-operative follow-up period. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted for comparison between selective bundle, DB and SB reconstructions. Between 2012 and 2014, 291 ACL reconstructions were performed. Of these, 68 patients had selective ACL reconstructions (group SLB), 147 had DB ACL reconstructions (group DB) and 76 had SB ACL reconstructions (group SB). Institutional Review Board approval was obtained, and all patients provided informed consent. Clinical results were assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm and Tegner scores. Stability was measured using Lachman, pivot shift and anterior drawer stress tests using the KT1000 at 30° of knee flexion. Results: There was no significant difference in ligament grade, function grade, IKDC grade, as well as Tegner and Lysholm means among all three groups after a 2-year follow-up period. Conclusion: Selective bundle reconstruction provides comparable results to DB and SB reconstruction techniques. It is a viable alternative for patients with partial tears.

scholarly journals Higher Rate of Patellofemoral Problems After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Hamstring Autograft

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 811-815
Author(s):  
Krisna Yuarno Phatama ◽  
Romy Darmawansa ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Arga Aldrian Oktafandi ◽  
Felix Cendikiawan ◽  
Alva Pribadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Hamstring Autograft ◽  
Peroneus Longus Tendon ◽  
Peroneus Longus ◽  
Kujala Score ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tendon Autograft

Background: Patellofemoral problems are not uncommon among post-anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction patients. Hamstring autograft harvesting-related factor is one of the suspected causes. A lack of tibiofemoral internal rotation force due to strength deficit causes the patella tends to shift laterally. Purposes: Peroneus longus tendon has been proposed as an alternative graft source due to its adequate tensile strength and minimal donor site morbidity to the knee biomechanics, including the patellofemoral joint. This tendon does not cross the knee joint and thus does not affect patellofemoral alignment and biomechanics. This study aims to compare patellofemoral problems between hamstring and peroneus longus autograft harvested-patients following ACL reconstruction. Material and methods: Thirty-one subjects who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction between September 2018 and September 2019 and met the inclusion criteria were grouped into the hamstring group (n=16) and peroneus longus group (n=15). Both groups were evaluated retrospectively. The follow-up assessment was conducted on the phase II rehabilitation program. The assessed variables were pain, crepitus, and the Indonesian-validated Kujala score. Results: No significant differences in pain and crepitus were found between both groups. There were significant differences in the Kujala score between both groups (P < .001). The peroneus longus group reported an averagely higher score than the hamstring group. Conclusion: Single bundle ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon autograft produces less patellofemoral symptoms and functional limitation than using hamstring tendon autograft.

scholarly journals In Vitro Testing of 2 Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Systems Versus Interference Screw for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 232596712110316
Author(s):  
Gerardo L. Garcés ◽  
Oscar Martel ◽  
Alejandro Yánez ◽  
Ignacio Manchado-Herrera ◽  
Luci M. Motta
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Interference Screw ◽  
Yield Load ◽  
Ultimate Failure Load ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ultimate Failure ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Background: It is not clear whether the mechanical strength of adjustable-loop suspension devices (ALDs) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is device dependent and if these constructs are different from those of an interference screw. Purpose: To compare the biomechanical differences of 2 types of ALDs versus an interference screw. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: ACL reconstruction was performed on porcine femurs and bovine extensor tendons with 3 types of fixation devices: interference screw, UltraButton (UB) ALD, and TightRope (TR) ALD (n = 10 for each). In addition to specimen testing, isolated testing of the 2 ALDs was performed. The loading protocol consisted of 3 stages: preload (static 150 N load for 5 minutes), cyclic load (50-250 N at 1 Hz for 1000 cycles), and load to failure (crosshead speed 50 mm/min). Displacement at different cycles, ultimate failure load, yield load, stiffness, and failure mode were recorded. Results: In specimen testing, displacement of the ALDs at the 1000th cycle was similar (3.42 ± 1.34 mm for TR and 3.39 ± 0.92 mm for UB), but both were significantly lower than that of the interference screw (7.54 ± 3.18 mm) ( P < .001 for both). The yield load of the UB (547 ± 173 N) was higher than that of the TR (420 ± 72 N) ( P = .033) or the interference screw (386 ± 51 N; P = .013), with no significant difference between the latter 2. In isolated device testing, the ultimate failure load of the TR (862 ± 64 N) was significantly lower than that of the UB (1879 ± 126 N) ( P < .001). Conclusion: Both ALDs showed significantly less displacement in cyclic loading at ultimate failure than the interference screw. The yield load of the UB was significantly higher than that of the other 2. The ultimate failure occurred at a significantly higher load for UB than it did for TR in isolated device testing. Clinical Relevance: Both UB and TR provided stronger fixation than an interference screw. Although difficult to assess, intrinsic differences in the mechanical properties of these ALDs may affect clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals The Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant on Postoperative Clinical Results in Patients with Remnant Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 624-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Goce Andonovski ◽  
Sonja Topuzovska ◽  
Milan Samardziski ◽  
Zoran Bozinovski ◽  
Biljana Andonovska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Bundle ◽  
Knee Stability ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Proprioceptive Function

BACKGROUND: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) remnants have important biomechanical, vascular and proprioceptive function.AIM: To determine the influence of the ACL residual remnants after partial and complete ACL ruptures on postoperative clinical results in patients with remnant preserving ACL reconstruction.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 66 patients divided into two groups. In patients from the investigation group remnant preserving ACL reconstruction was performed, in patients from the control group single bundle ACL reconstruction was performed. The results were assessed by Rolimeter measurements, Lysholm and Tegner scores and proprioception evaluation.RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference of anterior tibia displacement (mm) was improved from 4.4 ± 1.06 to 0.4 ± 0.7 in the investigation group, and from 4.6 ± 0.68 to 1.9 ± 0.64 in the control group (p < 0.001). Difference in the angles in which the knee was placed by the device and the patient has improved from 1.5 ± 0.96° to 0.5 ± 0.53° in the investigation group and from 1.8 ± 0.78° to 1.3 ± 0.97° in the control group (p < 0.05).  Tegner and Lysholm scores showed no difference between the groups.CONCLUSION: Preservation of the ACL residual bundle provides a better knee stability and proprioceptive function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document