Outcomes of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Arterial Thrombotic Limb Ischemia: A Prospective Interventional Case Series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Salimi ◽  
Ehsan Rahimpour ◽  
Hossein Zabihi Mahmoudabadi ◽  
Pezhman Farshidmehr
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Pulmonary Hemorrhage ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Acute limb ischemia is a critical medical condition that can quickly become a life threat. Therapeutic modalities such as catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) have demonstrated various levels of efficacy in previous studies. Objective: This study presents the descriptive findings of a series of cases who presented with acute arterial thrombotic limb ischemia and underwent CDT. Methods: This was a cross-sectional single-hospital-based case series, in which all patients who were diagnosed with acute arterial thrombotic limb ischemia, and consequently underwent CDT during the oneyear study period were included. Detailed baseline characteristics and clinical findings of the studied patients on presentation, after intervention and at one-year follow-up are presented. Results: A total of 21 patients with a mean age of 60.7±15.2 years, including 16 males (76.2%) were included. The initial technical and treatment success rates were 20 (95.2%) and 14 (66.7%), respectively. The amputation-free and the overall survival rates after the one-year follow-up were 15 (71.4%) and 17 (81%), respectively. Four patients (19%) developed complications, two (9.5%) of which were significant (pulmonary hemorrhage and intraventricular hemorrhage). Amputation was performed in 6 (28.6%) cases. Conclusion: In this study, the treatment success rate and the technical success rate were satisfactory.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Accelerated Versus Multi-Hole Infusion Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Limb Ischemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 558-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Chait ◽  
Afsha Aurshina ◽  
Natalie Marks ◽  
Anil Hingorani ◽  
Enrico Ascher
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Loss ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Infusion Catheter ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
The Mean

Objective: Thrombolytic therapy is widely used in the treatment of arterial occlusions causing acute limb ischemia (ALI); however, knowledge regarding the efficacy of the different catheter systems available is scarce. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 catheter-directed infusion systems for intra-arterial thrombolysis in the setting of ALI. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to study all catheter-directed thrombolysis procedures performed over 32 months in patients diagnosed with ALI. Patients with thrombosis in both native arteries and bypass grafts were included. Patients with contraindications to thrombolysis, or those receiving thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis, were excluded. The duration of thrombolysis, amount of thrombolytic agent, and technical success rate were recorded. Technical success was defined as complete or near-complete resolution of thrombus burden, allowing for further intervention. Data were stratified to include location of thrombus, procedural complications, mortality, and rates of limb loss. Results: Ninety-one patients met inclusion criteria. Among them, Uni-Fuse and EKOS catheters were used in 69 and 22 patients, respectively. The mean age of the population was 71 (standard deviation [SD]: ±1.5) for patients treated with the EKOS catheter and 70 years (SD: ±2.6) for patients receiving thrombolysis with Uni-Fuse. There was no significant difference in the mean infusion duration (1.65 vs 1.9 days), volume of tissue plasminogen activator (44.6 vs 48.2 mg), or technical success rate (72% vs 86%) between the Uni-Fuse and EKOS cohorts ( P > .3). Furthermore, there was no difference in major limb loss or compartment syndrome between each group ( P > .4). The overall complication rate was 14% in both groups, with a 30-day mortality rate of 4% when treated with either catheter system. Conclusion: This study suggests that a standard multi-hole infusion catheter demonstrates similar clinical safety and efficacy as the ultrasound-accelerated EKOS system in the treatment of ALI.

scholarly journals Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide-Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Antoun ◽  
Pierre Cherfane ◽  
Bouchra Sojod
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Wide Diameter ◽  
Bone Level ◽  
One Year ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
Single Crowns

Introduction. To evaluate outcomes of wide-diameter (6 mm) implants immediately provisionalized with cement-retained single crowns in posterior molar sites.Materials and Methods. Forty-eight consecutive patients received a total of 53 moderately rough-surface, 6 mm diameter implants in healed sites. All implants were immediately provisionalized with a cement-retained provisional crown. Final prosthesis with cement-retained porcelain fused to metal crowns was delivered 3–6 months later. Patients were followed up for 1 year. Outcome measures were implant failures and success rate, complications, marginal bone levels, bone level changes, papilla index, bleeding on probing, and inflammation.Results. One patient was lost to follow-up. At one year, the implant survival and success rate were 98.1%. The mean marginal bone loss after 1 year was −0.17±1.84 mm. Ideal papilla score was recorded at 83.8% of the sites. More than 95.6% of the sites showed no bleeding or inflammation. No procedure-related or device-related adverse events were reported.Conclusion. Wide-diameter (6 mm) implants can safely and successfully replace single posterior molars. Longer follow-up studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term success of these implants.

scholarly journals Endovascular Revascularization Strategies Using Catheter-Based Thrombectomy Versus Conventional Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Limb Ischemia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maofeng Gong ◽  
Xu He ◽  
Boxiang Zhao ◽  
Jie Kong ◽  
Jianping Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Event ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis

Abstract Background Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is an important clinical event threatening both life and the affected limbs, but the optimal treatment for ALI remains undefined. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of thrombectomy approaches via either catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Methods A total of 98 patients (mean age 69.7 years, 60 male) who underwent endovascular intervention for ALI from January 2015 to August 2018 were included. Of these, 57 were treated with primary CBT via a large-bore catheter, an AngioJet catheter or Rotarex catheter, and/or underwent low-dose CDT, and 41 were treated with primary CDT. The safety and effectiveness of CBT compared to conventional CDT and other various endovascular techniques were evaluated. Results More Rutherford IIb patients were treated with primary CBT (68.4%) than CDT (26.8%; P < .001). Patients who underwent primary CBT achieved a higher technical success rate than those who underwent primary CDT in a shorter procedure time (P < .001), whereas 42.1% of patients who underwent CBT did not need adjunctive CDT. The duration and dosage of adjunctive CDT in the CBT group were significantly decreased compared with those in the primary CDT group (both P < .001), and the CBT group achieved a shorter in-hospital length of stay (P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients treated with AngioJet and Rotarex catheters achieved slightly lower dosages, shorter CDT durations and shorter in-hospital stay lengths than those treated with large-bore catheters (P > .05). Clinical success was estimated to be achieved in 98.2% of patients who underwent CBT, which is similar to the 97.6% estimated in those who underwent primary CDT (P = 1.000), and this finding was similar among the CBT subgroups. Patients who underwent primary CBT had slightly fewer complications than those who underwent primary CDT (P = .059), especially minor complications (P = .036). The freedom from amputation at 6 and 12 months for CBT and CDT was assessed (93.0% vs 90.2% respectively, P = .625; 89.5% vs 82.5%, respectively, P = .34,). Comparable limb salvage was found for different techniques of large bore catheters, AngioJet catheters and Rotarex catheters. The Kaplan-Meier table analysis also showed similar limb salvage rates between groups. Conclusions Endovascular treatment of ALI with the use of catheter-based therapies is a safe and effective modality with similar safety and clinical outcome to conventional CDT alone, and this treatment modality overcomes the common shortcomings of CDT alone. Different CBT techniques have comparable efficacy but different adverse event profiles.

One-year outcomes of radiofrequency ablation of incompetent perforator veins using the radiofrequency stylet device: Cohort study from East Asia

2020 ◽  
pp. 026835552097348
Author(s):  
Chang-Ming Wang ◽  
Shi-Lu Zhao ◽  
Qi-Chen Feng ◽  
Shuo Gai ◽  
Xuan Li
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Sonographic Evaluation ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
One Year

Objectives The present study was designed to assess outcomes of patients undergone radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for their incompetent perforator veins (IPVs) with ClosureFast stylets. Methods Data of 165 IPVs in 138 limbs of 117 consecutive patients between July 2017 to Nov. 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary endpoints (technical success rate, complications) and secondary endpoints (VCSS) were analyzed. Results The immediate technical success rate was 100%. There were no major complications. The rate of ecchymosis and induration was 5.8%. 129/165 IPVs in 79.5% (93/117) patients had achieved sonographic evaluation at 1 year followed-up, in which 3 perforators were recanalized. VCSS scores at pre-operation and 1-year follow-up were 5.77 ± 1.88 and 2.70 ± 1.39, respectively ( t= 29.644, P= .000). Conclusions In conclusion, RFA is safe and effective for the treatment of IPVs. At the 1-year follow-up, the RFA of IPVs showed a low recanalization rate and had a satisfactory improvement on VCSS.

scholarly journals Endovascular revascularization strategies using catheter-based thrombectomy versus conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maofeng Gong ◽  
Xu He ◽  
Boxiang Zhao ◽  
Jie Kong ◽  
Jianping Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limb Salvage ◽  
Economic Cost ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Event ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Similar Clinical Outcome ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis

Abstract Background Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is an important clinical event threatening both life and the affected limbs, but the optimal treatment for ALI remains undefined. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of thrombectomy approaches via either catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT). Methods A total of 98 patients (mean age 69.7 years, 60 male) who underwent endovascular intervention for ALI from January 2015 to July 2019 were included. Of these, 57 were treated with primary CBT via a large-bore catheter, an AngioJet catheter or Rotarex catheter, and/or underwent low-dose CDT, and 41 were treated with primary CDT. The safety and effectiveness of CBT compared to conventional CDT and other various endovascular techniques were evaluated. Results More Rutherford IIb patients were treated with primary CBT (68.4%) than CDT (26.8%; P < .001). Patients who underwent primary CDT achieved a higher technical success rate than those who underwent primary CBT in a shorter procedure time (P < .001), whereas 42.1% of patients who underwent CBT did not need adjunctive CDT. The duration and dosage of adjunctive CDT in the CBT group were significantly decreased compared with those in the primary CDT group (both P < .001), and the CBT group achieved a shorter in-hospital length of stay (P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients treated with AngioJet and Rotarex catheters achieved slightly lower dosages, shorter CDT durations and shorter in-hospital stay lengths than those treated with large-bore catheters (P > .05). Clinical success was estimated to be achieved in 98.2% of patients who underwent CBT, which is similar to the 97.6% estimated in those who underwent primary CDT (P = 1.000), and this finding was similar among the CBT subgroups. Patients who underwent CBT had a higher procedure-related distal embolization rate and economic cost than those who underwent primary CDT (P < .05), but it had slightly fewer complications than those who underwent primary CDT (P = .059), especially minor complications (P = .036). The freedom from amputation at 6 and 12 months for CBT and CDT was assessed (93.0% vs 90.2% respectively, P = .625; 89.5% vs 82.9%, respectively, P = .34,). Comparable limb salvage was found for different techniques of large bore catheters, AngioJet catheters and Rotarex catheters. The Kaplan-Meier table analysis also showed similar limb salvage rates between groups. Conclusions Endovascular treatment of ALI with the use of catheter-based therapies is an effective modality that can reduce the requirement for thrombolysis, with expected reductions in hemorrhagic complications, but at the risk of remediable distal emboli and increased economic cost. It has a similar clinical outcome to conventional CDT alone. Different CBT techniques have comparable efficacy but different adverse event profiles.

Solitaire stents for the treatment of complex symptomatic intracranial stenosis after antithrombotic failure: safety and efficacy evaluation

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 680-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoli Duan ◽  
Zhengzhe Feng ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Balloon Angioplasty ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Intracranial Stenosis ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Case Series Study

ObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of Solitaire stent placement after balloon angioplasty for the treatment of complex symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data from 44 patients who underwent Solitaire stent placement for complex symptomatic ICAS at our department between November 2010 and March 2014, with focus on the clinical factors, lesion characteristics, treatment results, and periprocedural complications. We also summarized the early outcomes and imaging findings during the follow-up period.ResultsOverall, the technical success rate was 100% (44/44). Post-stenting residual stenosis ranged from 0% to 40% (mean 15.00±12.94%). The overall 30-day rate of procedure-related complications was 9.09% (4/44). The incidence of recurrent ischemic events related to the territory artery was 4.55% during a mean clinical follow-up period of 25.5 months. Five patients (11.36%) developed in-stent restenosis during a mean angiographic follow-up period of 9.3 months.ConclusionsThis is the first case series study of ICAS treated by Solitaire stent placement. Deployment of a Solitaire stent with balloon angioplasty in the treatment of complex severe intracranial stenosis appears safe and effective, with a high technical success rate, relatively low periprocedural complication rate, and favorable outcome during follow-up.

scholarly journals Frequency of success and complications of primary endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants with obstructive hydrocephalous

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seema Sharafat ◽  
Zahid Khan ◽  
Farooq Azam ◽  
Mumtaz Ali
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Third Ventriculostomy ◽  
Creative Commons ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
One Year ◽  
Open Access Article

Objectives: To determine the success rate and complications of primary endoscopic third ventri-culostomy (ETV) in infants with obstructive hydrocephalous. Methods: This case series was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, Medical and Teaching Institute, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar from July 2016 to June 2018. All consecutive patients with age less than one year who underwent ETV for primary obstructive hydrocephalous, of both gender, were included in the study. The patients were followed up to six months after surgery. The data was entered in a specially designed Performa. Patients’ data was analyzed using SPSS version 21.0. Results: We had total 21 patients with age less than one year during the study period. Male patients were 11 (52.4%). Success rate of ETV at six months of follow up was 12 (57.1%). Post-op complications observed were in 9.52% (2/21) cases. One patient had cerebrospinal fluid CSF) leak and the other had significant bleed. Conclusion: ETV is successful in 57.1% of infants with obstructive type of hydrocephalous. The post op complications in case of ETV are lower than Ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Therefore, ETV can be offered to infants having obstructive hydrocephalous. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4097 How to cite this:Sharafat S, Khan Z, Azam F, Ali M. Frequency of success and complications of primary endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants with obstructive hydrocephalous. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(1):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4097 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Highly selective diversion with proactive leakage management after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Talboom ◽  
I Vogel ◽  
R D Blok ◽  
S X Roodbeen ◽  
C Y Ponsioen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Fecal Diversion ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Diverting Stoma ◽  
Faecal Diversion ◽  
One Year ◽  
Diversion Rate

Abstract In this single center case series with nine percent primary diversion, 86 of 94 patients alive and with complete follow-up at one year had a functioning anastomosis. Seventy-five of the initial 99 patients never had a stoma. Meaning: Highly selective fecal diversion in combination with proactive leakage management, low anastomoses can be preserved safely, and the majority of patients will be spared all disadvantages of a diverting stoma. In this single-centre case series, with a primary diversion rate of 9 per cent, 86 of 94 patients who were alive and had complete follow-up at 1 year had a functioning anastomosis. Seventy-five of the initial 99 patients never had a stoma. The results indicate that, with highly selective faecal diversion in combination with proactive leakage management, low anastomoses can be preserved safely, and the majority of patients will be spared the disadvantages of a diverting stoma.

scholarly journals One-year outcomes of microhook trabeculotomy versus suture trabeculotomy ab interno

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Yokoyama ◽  
Masashi Takata ◽  
Fumi Gomi
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Glaucoma Surgery ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ab Interno

Abstract Purpose To compare clinical success rates and reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP-lowering medication use following suture trabeculotomy ab interno (S group) or microhook trabeculotomy (μ group). Methods This retrospective review collected data from S (n = 104, 122 eyes) and μ (n = 42, 47 eyes) groups who underwent treatment between June 1, 2016, and October 31, 2019, and had 12-month follow-up data including IOP, glaucoma medications, complications, and additional IOP-lowering procedures. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate treatment success rates defined as normal IOP (> 5 to ≤ 18 mm Hg), ≥ 20% reduction of IOP from baseline at two consecutive visits, and no further glaucoma surgery. Results Schlemm’s canal opening was longer in the S group than in the μ group (P < 0.0001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of all eyes showed cumulative clinical success rates in S and µ groups were 71.1% and 61.7% (P = 0.230). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of eyes with preoperative IOP ≥ 21 mmHg showed cumulative clinical success rates in S and μ groups were 80.4% and 60.0% (P = 0.0192). There were no significant differences in postoperative IOP at 1, 3, and 6 months (S group, 14.9 ± 5.6, 14.6 ± 4.5, 14.6 ± 3.9 mmHg; μ group, 15.8 ± 5.9, 15.2 ± 4.4, 14.7 ± 3.7 mmHg; P = 0.364, 0.443, 0.823), but postoperative IOP was significantly lower in the S group at 12 months (S group, 14.1 ± 3.1 mmHg; μ group, 15.6 ± 4.1 mmHg; P = 0.0361). There were no significant differences in postoperative numbers of glaucoma medications at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (S group, 1.8 ± 1.6, 1.8 ± 1.5, 2.0 ± 1.6, 1.8 ± 1.5; μ group, 2.0 ± 1.6, 2.0 ± 1.6, 2.1 ± 1.6, 2.2 ± 1.7; P = 0.699, 0.420, 0.737, 0.198). Conclusion S and µ group eyes achieved IOP reduction, but μ group eyes had lower clinical success rates among patients with high preoperative IOP at 12 months.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of surgical embolectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia: a nationwide cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Kai Yang ◽  
Chien-Chou Su ◽  
Chih-Hsin Hsu
Keyword(s):  
Rate Ratio ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Acute Limb Ischemia ◽  
Antithrombotic Agent ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgical Embolectomy ◽  
Adjusted Rate ◽  
Adjusted Rate Ratio

AbstractIn Taiwan, the outcomes of acute limb ischemia have yet to be investigated in a standardized manner. In this study, we compared the safety, feasibility and outcomes of acute limb ischemia after surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed therapy in Taiwan. This study used data collected from the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Database (NHID) and Cause of Death Data between the years 2000 and 2015. The rate ratio of all-cause in-hospital mortality and risk of amputation during the same period of hospital stay were estimated using Generalized linear models (GLM). There was no significant difference in mortality risk between CDT and surgical intervention (9.5% vs. 10.68%, adjusted rate ratio (95% CI): regression 1.0 [0.79–1.27], PS matching 0.92 [0.69–1.23]). The risk of amputation was also comparable between the two groups. (13.59% vs. 14.81%, adjusted rate ratio (95% CI): regression 0.84 [0.68–1.02], PS matching 0.92 [0.72–1.17]). Age (p < 0.001) and liver disease (p = 0.01) were associated with higher mortality risks. Heart failure (p = 0.03) and chronic or end-stage renal disease (p = 0.03) were associated with higher amputation risks. Prior antithrombotic agent use (p = 0.03) was associated with a reduced risk of amputation. Both surgical intervention and CDT are effective and feasible procedures for patients with ALI in Taiwan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document